Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

Glou idiot !

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th July 2006 | 15:11
  #101 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: Surrey, UK.
Originally Posted by IO540
Almost nobody (outside those who spend their lives on these internet forums) had heard of it back then.
I know Shoreham is a bit backward, what with its quaint buildings and stuff, but surely they had a computer in the clubhouse?

Everyone I spoke to knew about it -- and none of them post(ed <= 2002) here or on FLYER.

Are you sure you're not generalising just a smidgen?
rustle is offline  
Old 4th July 2006 | 15:40
  #102 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
From: Dorset
Agree....

No-one taught me how to use the AIS site..... Seriously, probably best to let a teenage son work it out then show you how to use it
Pudnucker is offline  
Old 4th July 2006 | 17:09
  #103 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
From: EuroGA.org
I know Shoreham is a bit backward, what with its quaint buildings and stuff, but surely they had a computer in the clubhouse

Did I mention Shoreham, Rustle? My recollection of my training (the location is irrelevant) is that notams were not taught at all, internet was not available (except in one school which folded shortly afterwards and where any aircraft owner was banned from using the facilities), and the tower briefing terminal was a PC hacked to work only for MET and flight plan filing.

Talking of Shoreham, my (vague) recollection of the pilot briefing room there is that internet is not available and this is true for most UK GA airfields. That's why I nowadays never bother with what they call "pilot briefing facilities" at any airport - a laptop with GPRS is a far better way to do it.

Yes of course I am generalising. I am using plenty of words like "almost", "nearly", etc. You are just taking it literally/personally. But this is the problem: the general situation is that a lot of pilots out there don't know they should collect their preflight briefings in this way, but the "establishment" assumes that everybody knows about it. As indeed do all the righteous people on here (and flyer.co.uk, and elsewhere) who immediately have a go at somebody, automatically assuming he is an idiot.

My experience from training, and from meeting other pilots, is that while some are right clowns (and will probably end up in the side of a hill) most are completely normal and far from stupid. Their "fault" is that they were trained in another age, and their contact with these new fangled developments is very minimal.

As regards who has or has not posted on flyer.co.uk, this means nothing because most people use nicknames, and far more people read those forums than ever write anything.
IO540 is offline  
Old 4th July 2006 | 17:37
  #104 (permalink)  

 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
From: 75N 16E
My recollection of my training (the location is irrelevant) is that notams were not taught at all, internet was not available
You should have done it in America In 2000, we had DUATs internet access and weather plots, and 1800WXBrief to give us weather briefs and notams before every single flight......

But then again, we are inferior pilots
englishal is offline  
Old 4th July 2006 | 20:54
  #105 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 4,631
Likes: 0
From: UK
"Everyone I spoke to knew about it"

Everyone I spoke to agreed the world is flat. So true if your sample was drawn from the flat world society .

Unfortunately not the most scientific way of reaching a conclusion other than the one you would prefer.
Fuji Abound is offline  
Old 4th July 2006 | 20:56
  #106 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: Surrey, UK.
Originally Posted by Fuji Abound
"Everyone I spoke to knew about it"

Everyone I spoke to agreed the world is flat. So true if your sample was drawn from the flat world society .

Unfortunately not the most scientific way of reaching a conclusion other than the one you would prefer.
About as scientific as
Originally Posted by IO540
Almost nobody (outside those who spend their lives on these internet forums) had heard of it back then.
rustle is offline  
Old 4th July 2006 | 21:09
  #107 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 4,631
Likes: 0
From: UK
The answer surely is if everybody hadnt assumed nobody knew then more people would have known .
Fuji Abound is offline  
Old 4th July 2006 | 21:38
  #108 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: Surrey, UK.
Originally Posted by Fuji Abound
The answer surely is if everybody hadnt assumed nobody knew then more people would have known .
WTF?
rustle is offline  
Old 5th July 2006 | 11:09
  #109 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,540
Likes: 3
From: UK
precisely correct Fuji
surely not is offline  
Old 5th July 2006 | 14:42
  #110 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 4,631
Likes: 0
From: UK
Surely - glad you liked it!
Fuji Abound is offline  
Old 5th July 2006 | 14:54
  #111 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
From: England
excellent highjacking of a thread !
tangovictor is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.