Wikiposts
Search
Private Flying LAA/BMAA/BGA/BPA The sheer pleasure of flight.

Yokes v Sticks

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Jan 2006, 22:49
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: SELondon
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yokes v Sticks

I've discovered I have a pathological dislike of control yokes in light aircraft.
I learnt in the good old Cessna 150 and didnt know any different, before having a quick spell in a Supercub for a tailwheel sign-off.......(I didnt fully appreciate the Cub's stick at the time because I was learning the importance of rudders in a tailwheeler)
Then it was back to the Cessna before discovering the delightful Robin DR400 complete with joystick....I have flown them ever since, apart from a few aerobatic hours in the superb stick equipped Bulldog.
Recently curiosity led me to get a check out in a PA28.....sorry, but I didnt enjoy it, and found the yoke unwieldy and I couldnt believe I flew the Cessna so long, I don't think my opinion was clouded by the fact that I flew like a 1 hour struggling student who has just had weeks of weather cancellations.
I don't reckon I would have got my tailwheel or aero's sign-off if the plane hadnt been stick equipped.......and thats no yoke........sorry

I know tail-wheel oldtimers favour the traditional stick, but just wondered what other peoples opinions were on the subject?
Alvin Steele is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2006, 23:30
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hellfire Corner
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Having discussed this on occasion with others, I think that one tends to relate most easily to what one first encountered.
I'm a Sticker, having started my flying in gliders. Although I am very fond of the trusty C-150, I could (and can) only fly one by holding the yoke in the centre. This doesn't work as well in other aircraft of the same family controlled rather more - er - ponderously, but is still more effective than trying to do, badly, what the yoke designers intended.

I think I should be very embarrassed by this, but I don't often need to demonstrate, thank goodness

A good job I'm not ChiefChump...
ChampChump is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2006, 01:43
  #3 (permalink)  

 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: 75N 16E
Age: 54
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I always flew aeroplanes with yokes......And I bought one with a stick. I would never go back willingly, the stick is much nicer to fly, more comfortable (two fingers resting your hands in your lap). Trouble is there is no where to clip my yoke-mounted-stop-watch-bulldog-clip-approach-plate-holder.....
englishal is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2006, 06:24
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Sydney NSW Australia
Posts: 3,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
agreed, having speant my learning years in piper Archers and Arrows, i thought the Yoke was great, then i discovered the Jabiru, KR2 , Once youv'e had stick, you'll never go back!

even though i still fly the Arrow occasionally to take PAX etc, i find myself wishing for a stick very soon.
Ultralights is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2006, 06:57
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK,Twighlight Zone
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I learnt in sticks and own 3 yoke aircraft! I fail to see what the drama is about really. I switch backwards and forwards between stick and yoke all the time as I do between training wheel and tail wheel.

For IFR flight I much prefer a yoke. But at the end of the day I question the adaptability of any pilot who can manage something as simple as the controls.......

S-Works is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2006, 06:58
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: SX in SX in UK
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I too learnt in a C150, with yoke, then moved into a Koliber with a stick, which was far, far better.

But its probably worth remembering that the stick was connected to the ailerons via rods, there were no cables and pulleys, so there was very little backlash in the system.
Kolibear is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2006, 08:28
  #7 (permalink)  
High Wing Drifter
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I don't really think there is much between them in the kind of A to B flying that I do. My limited time on the Vagabond judges that the stick is more intuitive but can actually quite cumbersome because the stick comes back quite far and so I found it very difficult to finish off a wing down landing. The thought also occured to me with the Supercub that wing down approaches would be easier with a yoke but I have no comparable experience. However, the stick is more fun!

But somehow an Arrow or Seneca with a stick...hmmm. Nah
 
Old 31st Jan 2006, 08:48
  #8 (permalink)  

Why do it if it's not fun?
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 4,779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bose-X is the only one so far to mention the purpose of the flight.

For aerobatics, definitely a stick. For IFR flight, definitely a yoke. For anything in between, it's not quite so clear cut.

Alvin - I noticed that you learnt on a Cessna, but it was only on flying the PA28 that you realised you don't like yokes? The PA28 yoke is much bigger than the Cessna's, and although I learnt to fly on a PA28 and thought the yoke was absolutely fine then, now that I regularly swap between Cessnas and Pipers I prefer the Cessna yoke over the Piper's any day.

FFF
-------------
FlyingForFun is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2006, 09:00
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've been in, but never flown, a plane with a stick.

The feedback from pilots who have done both concurs with FFF. Cirrus pilots appear to spend most of their time on autopilot, because it's reportedly difficult to fly with the spring-loaded stick for very long.

I wonder what the DA40 (centre stick) is like to fly IFR, manually.
IO540 is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2006, 09:11
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 3,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The stick is the ideal control for an aeroplane. Compared to a yoke one can input a control movement more quickly and more accurately, especially if it's a combination of pitch and roll.

Also, the stick allows for a simpler and more direct connection by pushrods to the ailerons in particular, and so has the potential (if well engineered) for a nicer 'feel'.

If the aeroplane has no pretensions to 'good handling', then this probably doesn't matter. But I could never understand why dH fitted some Mosquitos with yokes while others had sticks.

SSD
Shaggy Sheep Driver is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2006, 09:19
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EuroGA.org
Posts: 13,787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You can have a yoke with rod (not cable) linkages. The TB20 has rods; very firm and precise, no backlash. Only the elevator trim uses a cable.
IO540 is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2006, 10:46
  #12 (permalink)  

Why do it if it's not fun?
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 4,779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IO540,

Have only ever flown a Cirrus once, but from that brief flight my opinion was that any issues with the controls would be due to the trim system, not due to the stick itself. In fact, I got to quite like it after 20 minutes or so.

FFF
-------------
FlyingForFun is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2006, 10:56
  #13 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: SELondon
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FFF, learning on the 150 the yoke was all I knew,I had no comparison at that time, but when it came to a DR400 check-out, I was pleasantly surprised to find my flying more accurate and it felt more intuiative (sp)? with the stick.
If I'm honest, I wasnt keen on the PA28 at all (but thats a debate for another day).....apologies to any PA28 fans/owners.
Alvin Steele is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2006, 10:56
  #14 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,224
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
Horses for courses!

I own one of each (stick, yoke, bar) and have done for a reasonable number of years.

For a small, light manoeuverable aeroplane a stick generally gives the best control and feedback. For long cruises, or an aeroplane with very high forces, a yoke is more comfortable and allows better mechanical advantage. For the combination of (often) high forces combined with (sometimes) rapid inputs needed, I'd go for the bar on my flexwing.


Mind you, if I had to pick just one, it'd be a stick! For a 3-axis aeroplane anyhow.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2006, 11:14
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Milton Keynes
Age: 39
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I prefer the yoke, however the planes that i've trained on so far (C152, C172 and PA-38 Tomahawk) all have yokes. I did have abit of a go of a Europa last year which has a stick, it wasnt as bad as I thought it would be but I just prefer the yoke.
captain_flynn is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2006, 12:10
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: The Beautiful South
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Devil

Simple.......... DRIVE with a wheel (yoke )
FLY with a stick !!!

cirrus01 is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2006, 15:28
  #17 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: SELondon
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Despite the above, we all want sticks so we can pretend to be jet jockies!


I do feel more like a real pilot with one, in the PA28 I may as well have been downwind in a Ford Focus.
Alvin Steele is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2006, 16:40
  #18 (permalink)  
Final 3 Greens
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I wonder if there is a degree of snobbery here?

I'd bet a fiver that most people haven't flown a PA28 or C150 to the edge of the envelope (I know that I haven't), but they still like to sneer how car like it is.

Well, I've flown sticks and yokes and ram's heads and....

The PA28/32 yoke was sometimes a little awkward to get fully back in the flare

The PA23 yoke was fluid and a delight to use

The 150 yoke was little

Sticks are less convenient for plates etc, but are lovely to use otherwise

Rams heads are very easy for cross wind landings from either side, no sprained wrists

As Bose X says, there are things that should worry most of us more.

Perhaps the people who specifically need a yoke or a stick also need a special pair of flying shoes too.....
 
Old 31st Jan 2006, 16:45
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Kent
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Final 3 Greens
I wonder if there is a degree of snobbery here?

I'd bet a fiver that most people haven't flown a PA28 or C150 to the edge of the envelope (I know that I haven't), but they still like to sneer how car like it is.

Well, I've flown sticks and yokes and ram's heads and....

The PA28/32 yoke was sometimes a little awkward to get fully back in the flare

The PA23 yoke was fluid and a delight to use

The 150 yoke was little

Sticks are less convenient for plates etc, but are lovely to use otherwise

Rams heads are very easy for cross wind landings from either side, no sprained wrists

As Bose X says, there are things that should worry most of us more.

Perhaps the people who specifically need a yoke or a stick also need a special pair of flying shoes too.....

Showing total ignorance here, but do many a/c other than Concorde have ram heads?

tKF
TheKentishFledgling is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2006, 16:51
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 3,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TheKentishFledgling
Showing total ignorance here, but do many a/c other than Concorde have ram heads?
tKF

Tridents did - except the ones delivered to China, who specified standard yokes.

SSD
Shaggy Sheep Driver is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.