Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Non-Airline Forums > Private Flying
Reload this Page >

Aerobatic training

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Private Flying The forum for discussion and questions about any form of flying where you are doing it for the sheer pleasure of flight, rather than being paid!

Aerobatic training

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th July 2005 | 02:03
  #21 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 56
From: Melbourne, Australia
Luke - an interesting website, thanks. Things have certainly changed at Cambridge since I flew Tigers there back in the mid-70's.
djpil is offline  
Old 14th July 2005 | 10:38
  #22 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
From: S089
NSF Sibson, EGSP

www.nsof.co.uk
hekokimushi is offline  
Old 14th July 2005 | 12:51
  #23 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: Horsham
Again thanks all for your replies, lots of good interesting options and info coming in!

Pitts I am going to finish the AOPA as I only have 2 1/2 hours to go. I think I may have been confused by the aerobatic checks listed on www.tigerclub.co.uk, thinking they were some form of signing off, or rating.

I did plan to go and fly with the tigerclub for tailwheel and aerobatics towards the end of the year, has anyone flown there, the website makes it look like a really interesting airfield with alot of events.

Thanks again.
cosworth211 is offline  
Old 14th July 2005 | 18:47
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts Bay Colony
Cos,
Sounds like a good plan if you're that close to finishing the course.

I've flown into Headcorn a couple of times. Very aerobatic-friendly airport and the people I met at the Tigerclub were superb and very welcoming. I'd highy recommend spending a bit of time there and getting to know them and see if you fit in.

Good luck and if you're ever at Popham, come looking for The Magnolia Pitts and I'll buy you a cup of coffee.

Good luck!

Pitts2112
Pitts2112 is offline  
Old 15th July 2005 | 02:26
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,085
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Grrr

VP prop is nothing to worry about
Agreed.

no aerobatic aircraft should be without one!
I take it that you have no experience with glider aerobatics.

teach you 'proper' aeros
As opposed to?
MLS-12D is offline  
Old 15th July 2005 | 07:36
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: Kent
Tiger Club

An interesting and different experience, particularly if you come to it from a Spam Can oriented training environment. You will be flying with "check pilots" rather than instructors, but don't worry about that, as they typically have gazillions of hours, so you really are in competent hands.

You can do tailwheel training on the Cub for about £85 per engine hour.

The check pilot approach does mean that you can get very different views on how to fly, but I believe you come out of the experience a much more flexible, knowledgeable pilot.

As said before, the vast majority of the club are friendly and welcoming, and it has more than it's fair share of interesting oddballs, though one or two were clearly badly beaten in their childhood .

As an added bonus, there's nothing to beat Headcorn on a hot summers weekend for sheer buzz and interest.
KCDW is offline  
Old 15th July 2005 | 09:13
  #27 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
From: across the border....
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
no aerobatic aircraft should be without one!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MLS-12D
"I take it that you have no experience with glider aerobatics"



OK, no powered aerobatic aircraft should be without one!

re. the glider aerobatics, I have actually (including a Fox).

7700
squawking 7700 is offline  
Old 15th July 2005 | 10:32
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
From: The Heart
MLS,
Yes, 'proper' aeros.
Manouvres conducted with the emphasis on accuracy of line, precision and symmetry. Positioning and presentation of manouvres to the judges and exchange of energy for the flow of the sequence.
Competition aeros by their very nature require discipline. Much as a nose wheel aircraft can be landed within a range of attitudes but a tailwheel aircraft can only be three-pointed in one.

Thus 'proper' aeros rather than just the safe completion of aerobatic manouvres.

Cosworth,
I admit to being a member. There is nowhere in the world which can compete with the atmosphere, variety and experience of people and flying at the club.
The Garden Party (8-9 september) may give you an entertaining introduction if you'd care to drop by.
Miserlou is offline  
Old 15th July 2005 | 15:57
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,085
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Thumbs up

7770,

Good for you.

The Fox is a superb aircraft, isn't it? My only complaint is that the cockpits are cramped ... but I can always undergo decapitation or some other surgery to shorten myself.

Cheers,

MLS
MLS-12D is offline  
Old 15th July 2005 | 18:23
  #30 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: Horsham
Pitts I will definately pop over and say hi, I am a big fan of the Pitts Special, one of my fave aircraft, love to see what it can do. Did you read the article on the pitts day out to toulouse recently in Pilot?

I'd love to go to the tiger clubs party but I will be at EFT in the states at that point, though upon my return in Dec I will definately be heading over!

I've heard of the "check" pilot scenario at Tiger and it sounds like a mutually beneficial way of flying for check pilot and student alike, while saving instructor fee's! More FTO's should adopt it!
cosworth211 is offline  
Old 15th July 2005 | 21:02
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts Bay Colony
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you read the article on the pitts day out to toulouse recently in Pilot?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Read it? I bloody wrote it!!

We're doing it again in about 2 weeks going to another chateau! We didn't get as far as Toulouse, though. More like Abbeville for a night over in Roune. Great time was had by all, I can assure you, and expectations for the next one are high as well!

The Pitts can do more than I'll ever ask it to. If you get a chance, get some time in one sometime. It'll spoil you forever!

Pitts2112
Pitts2112 is offline  
Old 16th July 2005 | 07:00
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
From: Norfolk
??

Read it? I bloody wrote it!!


And what a superb piece it was - we are really looking forward to drinking all the beer that your fee for the article will provide in 3 weeks in Dijon.

Flossie sends love from here in deepest Ireland!!


Stik
stiknruda is offline  
Old 16th July 2005 | 16:01
  #33 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: Horsham
I popped into to see the tiger club today at Headcorn, they were a very friendly bunch, and a good vibe across the whole airfield. Their cap10 is a lovely looking aircraft and seems to be in very good condition.

Pitts I enjoyed that article, especially the story of your run and break at Lydd!
cosworth211 is offline  
Old 17th July 2005 | 09:57
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts Bay Colony
Thanks, Cos and Stik. The article wouldn't have been half of what it was if Stik hadn't been with us and when I say "I wrote" really it was a collaborative effort of everyone who went - which is part of the reason it appeared in the magazine in May when we did the trip the previous September.

Yeah, the run and break at Lydd seems to have stuck in people's minds for some reason. I'm not sure which was more fun, doing the run and break or watching our intrepid leader contend with the bollocking from the tower.

Stik, is the fee from the article going to be used for drinks in August or for bail this weekend? Let me know if any of you need a character witness!

Pitts2112
Pitts2112 is offline  
Old 18th July 2005 | 11:59
  #35 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 27,401
Likes: 857
From: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
"I've heard of the "check" pilot scenario at Tiger and it sounds like a mutually beneficial way of flying for check pilot and student alike, while saving instructor fee's! More FTO's should adopt it!"

But is it legal? Unless holding at least a CRI Rating, there is no legal way for such instruction to be given unless someone very brave at the CAA has issued some form of exemption. And you should certainly NOT be charged for any such 'check' by a non-CPL holding non-FI/CRI!

To my mind, anyone giving aerobatic instruction to a licence holding pilot must be AT LEAST a CRI(A) - and if charging for such, must of course hold a Professional Licence.
BEagle is offline  
Old 18th July 2005 | 12:19
  #36 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 3,077
Likes: 1
From: Oop North, UK
You also need an instructors rating to sign off on differences training for taiwheel so how do they get round that
foxmoth is offline  
Old 18th July 2005 | 12:50
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: Kent
BEagle, Foxmoth,

Probably need someone in the know from the club to comment.

However, note I didn't say they were not FIs, they may well be - its just that they don't call themselves that. The key difference (and main benefit) is that they don't charge .
KCDW is offline  
Old 18th July 2005 | 15:48
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,085
Likes: 0
From: Canada
But is it legal? Unless holding at least a CRI Rating, there is no legal way for such instruction to be given unless someone very brave at the CAA has issued some form of exemption.
One way to get around this legal hurdle is for the 'student' to log all time as the PIC, while the check pilot is officially a mere passenger. This is not a perfect solution, but workable.

To my mind, anyone giving aerobatic instruction to a licence holding pilot must be AT LEAST a CRI(A) - and if charging for such, must of course hold a Professional Licence.
Well, you are entitled to your opinion. Personally, I'm inclined to think that the only real criteria are experience and competence. I know several high-time pilots, mostly ex-military, who have no civilian instructor qualifications but are more than capable of serving as checkpilots. And I know some civilian instructors who have lots of paper qualifications but not the matching skills.

IIRC, Duane Cole lost his medical about ten years before his death, but continued to give informal aerobatic instruction ... and his services were sought-after by those in a position to know.
MLS-12D is offline  
Old 18th July 2005 | 21:18
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
From: The Heart
BEagle,

If I may address your last post, what a load of twoddle!!!

I believe the check pilots, quite coincidentally, do hold instructors ratings or higher. The system has been in place for, oh, nearly fifty years and has worked well, the Tiger Club having been a breeding ground for aerobatic, racing and display pilots for most of this time. You'll want to check your history books to see the role of the Tiger Club in UK GA.

The Club has a system which imposes a higher standard than the law requires.

Type specific training, aerobatics and formation flying require no special qualification of the teacher, there being no specific qualification to receive. You 'could' teach yourself.

Whilst the check pilots hold professional licences none of them charge for their time or experience. Put rather romantically you could say that they are 'giving' back to a club which has been so generous to give them those skills in the first place.
Perhaps, in this cynical world, it is hard to believe that there are people who just love flying old aeroplanes.

As for "To my mind, anyone giving aerobatic instruction to a licence holding pilot must be AT LEAST a CRI(A)"...I nearly fell of my chair at such blind nonsense!

Instructors building hours to get their careers started seems to me like the one-eyed man in the land of the blind.
Miserlou is offline  
Old 18th July 2005 | 21:31
  #40 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 27,401
Likes: 857
From: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Miserlou, firstly there is no need to be so rude.

Since the advent of JAR-FCL, any instruction, of whatever kind, has to be given (at SEP Class SPA level) by either a FI(A) (for ab-initio) or by FI(A)/CRI(A) (for licence holders).

So the statement made by one poster "You will be flying with "check pilots" rather than instructors, but don't worry about that" cannot be legally correct. There is nothing to prevent suitably qualified people, including well-qualified aerobatic pilots, from becoming bona fide CRI(A)s (as all PFA coaches now are) in order to conduct properly regulated training.

Requirements for CRI(A) Ratings and their revalidation and/or renewal are far simpler than for FI(A) Ratings.

As for "Type specific training, aerobatics and formation flying require no special qualification of the teacher, there being no specific qualification to receive. You 'could' teach yourself."; that my friend is truly 'twaddle'.

Last edited by BEagle; 19th July 2005 at 05:53.
BEagle is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.