Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight)
Reload this Page >

TSA screeners allow fed agent with fake bomb to pass through security at Newark

Wikiposts
Search
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

TSA screeners allow fed agent with fake bomb to pass through security at Newark

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Mar 2013, 16:20
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,852
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TSA screeners allow fed agent with fake bomb to pass through security at Newark

EXCLUSIVE: TSA screeners allow fed agent with fake bomb to pass through security at Newark Airport - NYPOST.com
rotornut is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2013, 18:05
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: UK
Age: 83
Posts: 3,788
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Is anyone even the slightest bit surprised?

I have to tell you that I have a disabled son who uses a wheelchair. Every time we go through security in the UK or (more especially) in the USA, things become quite difficult.

I think our worst experience was the TSA at Miami outbound to the UK.

My son was taken away from us in his wheelchair and was not treated well.

However, I was able to reassure him afterwards that he still had a high degree of intelligence which far exceeded the hopeful expectations of the "highly trained" staff who had spent 15 minutes making themseves feel inportant.
JW411 is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2013, 18:58
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 224
Received 186 Likes on 72 Posts
Look at the war on terror's worldwide success at protecting us though. A fake bomb gets through, just thank your lucky stars no water gets through. They must intercept thousands of litres every single day. Sleep assured.
bugged on the right is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2013, 21:02
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
No safety action is 100% and the terrorists also consider the odds.

Fortunately the exact data, failures vs sucesses is not published keeping the bad guys guessing.
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2013, 21:30
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: UK/OZ
Posts: 1,888
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Look at the war on terror's worldwide success at protecting us though. A fake bomb gets through, just thank your lucky stars no water gets through. They must intercept thousands of litres every single day. Sleep assured.

By banning liquids they are stopping home made liquid bombs from being mixed on board.
mickjoebill is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2013, 21:41
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: .
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fortunately the exact data, failures vs sucesses is not published keeping the bad guys guessing.
I suspect that if they failed to stop a bomb getting through then the results would be noticeable quite soon afterwards.
Nemrytter is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2013, 21:48
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Great White North eh!
Age: 84
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angry MIA ???

JW411

Why would anyone in their right mind book through MIA??
aspinwing is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2013, 21:51
  #8 (permalink)  

Dog Tired
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 1,688
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I think our worst experience was the TSA at Miami outbound to the UK.
How many 'worst experiences' would you like me to tell you about?

The excellent man in charge at SFB (some many years ago) should have been sent to all the other places to teach manners.
fantom is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2013, 21:53
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,041
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
No pilot ever crashes in a sim?
PENKO is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2013, 22:01
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: gashbag
Age: 53
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes they do. Usually when certain scenarios are pushed to extremes as a training aid. We don't crash for real. Your point is?
PURPLE PITOT is offline  
Old 17th Mar 2013, 21:53
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Location, Location
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
By banning liquids they are stopping home made liquid bombs from being mixed on board.
Just in case you weren't joking, mickjoebill:

There are no innocuous, water-like fluids that could be mixed in flight to produce a bomb. Binary high explosives exist, but the individual chemicals are quite nasty in their own right, and you need the facilities of a chemical lab to mix them without a premature 'fizzle'.

And if such chemicals did exist, the current policy of confiscating water bottles would be unable to prevent their use. The searches are (inevitably) much less than 100% effective, and there's no penalty for detection other than the confiscation of the liquid. So a determined terrorist could simply carry on trying until they succeeded. As the IRA used to say: "You have to be lucky every time. We only need to be lucky once."

Last edited by Pax Vobiscum; 17th Mar 2013 at 21:53.
Pax Vobiscum is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.