Wikiposts
Search
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

Jet2 - G-lsac - Man-ssh

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Aug 2009, 20:23
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Glenrothes, Fife
Age: 38
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jet2 - G-lsac - Man-ssh

Hi Guys.

Not a pilot (unless flight sim counts!), but looking for some reassurance here!

Flying Jet2 on 30th Aug on LS757 and returning on 6th Sept on LS758 from MAN-SSH-MAN.

I understand this route is always operated by one of Jet2's 757's with winglets. The thing thats making me nervous is that G-LSAC has been the most frequently used aircraft on this route, and just over one week ago this plane was involved in a pressurisation issue - resulting in a dive from FL350 to FL080.

A: What caused this, and is it likely to happen again?
B: Any professional point of view on Jet2's 757's and if it will be G-LSAC or G-LSAB??

Any reassurance would be appreciated.

Cheers

Nick
DJNICKSMITH is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2009, 20:37
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Bradford
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The route has mainly been operated by a wingletted 757 but LSAA has done it aswell. There is 1 752W at LBA, and one at MAN. These rotate frequently, with AC currently been at LBA and AB at MAN.

I really wouldn't be worried about the problem involving AC last week, it was back flying that day and has been doing 4 sectors a day since. There is nothing wrong with it, nothing wrong with any of the others to mention it. Is it likely to happen again? No.

From a personal point of view AC is the nicest one inside as it has the new slimline seats which give an extra couple of inches of legroom. Should you get chance I strongly reccomend you upgrade to an extra legroom seat, rows 2-7, 8ABC, row 12 and row 33. SSH is a long flight even for the new seats its well worth the £25.

Have a great holiday!
righthandrule is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2009, 20:40
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The glasshouse, a stone's throw from you
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You'll be right mate!

Seriously all modern jets are very safe and are getting safer.

Why, because ANY incident whether it is fatal, non-fatal, near miss down to the "No immediate effect" type of incident are recorded, and lessons are promulgated for everyone to learn from. Aircraft are thoroughly checked over and I do not mean just kicking the tyres, I'm not an Aircraft engineer but they are complicated machines with a lot of Built in Test Equipment etc which alert the Pilot if there is a problem.

And if there is a problem, procedures are in place for the Pilot/Controller to follow to allow a safe conclusion to the flight.

I myself work in the ground environment and the amount of hoops we have to go through to prove that a system is safe is extremely thorough. So I could only imagine that aircraft are the same if not more so.

Hope I've helped.
PT
pottwiddler is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2009, 09:49
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flight sim DOES NOT count!!
Fuel Crossfeed is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2009, 11:33
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: England
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd better cancel my last 8 LPC's then!
tonker is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2009, 14:03
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: london
Age: 59
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why the hell should the fact the aircraft is being used as its meant be used a issue? further why should the problem that caused the rapid decent return? jet 2 employ clever sods called licensed engineers to sort problems out, ive no doubt they did just that, or do think some gash sod just penned the defect off? get real for gods sake
simonchowder is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2009, 19:42
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
simonchowder..

Calm Down!!! It was just reassurance being asked for!
ROSSKi MYT is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.