Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight)
Reload this Page >

Things I always wanted to know as a PILOT

Wikiposts
Search
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

Things I always wanted to know as a PILOT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Nov 2007, 23:36
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: A Paddy in Paris
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'Cos I've seen the content (which doesn't change) 100 times before
Ah well, if you're THAT experienced, without having to look it up, you should be able to tell us... if you sit in seat 6E, which is your nearest exit...

on a 737-800?
Airbus A320?
Airbus A321?

If you can't answer those question, I don't want to have to climb over to you from 6F if the **** does hit the fan. I've flown more than 500 times, I can't answer those questions, and I always pay attention. Sometimes I even read the safety card too.

Please pay attention, it's not done simply for insurance purposes and it is aircraft specific. The life you save might not just be your own, it might be mine.
DrKev is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2007, 05:31
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Londonish
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Try quoting the whole sentence:
'Cos I've seen the content (which doesn't change) 100 times before. In my case, I already looked on the way in where the exits were, and had a quick think where I'm going if, and usually count seat backs to the exit. I don't need to be told how to put on a lifejacket, or use the oxygen mask (again).
Sitting at my desk - no idea (approximately, 6 is about mid way, from memory the overwings are around row 14, and fronts row 1 (obviously) in pretty much all those aircraft). By the time I'm strapped into seat 6E I would know. I also pay attention to the door operation (do you?) and if I can spot it, where the portable oxygen is (just in case).

Anyway, the 'safety brief' doesn't tell me what you ask. What it does tell me, at least on those aircraft is that: there are 2 exits at the front, 2 overwing, and 2 at the back, how to use the oxygen mask (pull down sharply), where to find the lifejacket (under the seat), the brace position, to remove my high heels before using the exit slide, wear my safety belt at all times, follow the strip lighting on the floor, listen to the cabin crew instructions, turn off my mobile phone, and any other electronic equipment as it may interfere with the aircraft navigation systems, usually the names of the cabin crew, captain and first officer. Did I miss anything? Oh yes, there's a whistle and a light on the lifejacket, I pull the tags to inflate (NOT inside the aircraft), and blow into the mouthpiece to top up.

I guess my point is that just because I don't hang on every word of the show, doesn't mean I'm not thinking about it - I'm well aware that those with a plan tend to be the ones that live.
Mark1234 is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2007, 07:51
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: london
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tightslot,

I know about the evacuation in 90 seconds and so on. But, me memeory serves me very well. Several years ago, before EZY et.al., airlines like BA did NOT have a row of seats over the wing exits at all. Due, I guess to increased cost pressures, seats were added in, and so now there are rows of seats at over wing exits on most airlines.

In fact, the history was, I think like this, the British airtours Manchester runway disaster highlighted the difficulties of escape from wing exits, and this then lead to overwing exit rows being removed completely. Following on from this over several years, airlines gradually decided those rows should really still be there (for financial reasons), and put them back in, with a marginally bigger gap between the rows.

Nobody will ever convince me that putting a row of seats adjacent to an overwing exit is a good idea.

Until it changes, i will be re-assured to know that pax safety is NOT the main concern of any airline. Making a profit is.
10secondsurvey is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2007, 08:51
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Age: 64
Posts: 3,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
10SS

The Cranfield (and other) research found that evac flow rate at the overwing exits was actually speeded up in some cases when seats were present in the exit row, as opposed to when removed partially or fully - I know, this sounds bizarre.

The Cabin Layout is approved by the CAA - airlines don't have an option to just insert seats anywhere at will

Safety is in my opinion the primary concern of airlines because a failure to operate safely will put you out of business (and possibly in court on charges of corp. manslaughter) faster than you can imagine.

I'm quite happy that we should agree to disagree on these points if you prefer. I don't wish to make a case that airlines are the white knights of ethical business practices - clearly they are not angels in any sense. However, I do feel that in this instance, your lack of trust is mis-placed. It is quite possible thaat my appreciation of the Cranfield results is faulty, in which case I'm sure that somebody will advise.
TightSlot is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2007, 21:59
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The bar of the Frog and Peach
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tightslot
It seems counter-intuitive but a similar effect is seen in corridors and door ways. Placing an obstacle upstream of the opening or some railings along the middle of the corridor speeds up the flow, something to do with reducing the tendency of people to jam themselves together.
As for the briefing, experience has shown me two advantages.
1, Airline equipment differs, e.g does the life jacket have one red toggle or two. tapes to tie or a Fastex buckle?
2, Cabin crew remember you taking notice of their briefing when you need to ask a favour later in the flight.
Question for frequent fliers: What has changed in BA's briefing recently?
Carry0nLuggage is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2007, 23:17
  #26 (permalink)  
25F
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
1. They can't figure out the lock?

2. Lots of reasons, mostly already covered. I can well believe that some people have enough problems flying without listening intently to "what to do when we crash". Since starting to read Pprune I've started paying more attention - as a courtesy to the crew, mostly. And in the hope that it will encourage others to do likewise.

3. Cos we would pay 10% more to have 10% more legroom?

4. "Do cheap airfares override survival instincts?" Even an airline with a bad safety record is probably still safer than driving to the airport.

5. "Why the rush to disembark?" Beats me. I stand up when the people in the aisle nearby start moving.

9. Greasers - some people really do think that you "slam it down" because you want to.
25F is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2007, 23:23
  #27 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,150
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
Don't forget that, whilst some pax blame the FC for 'slamming it down just for fun'. If it is a greaser - they presume that auto-land did it.
PAXboy is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2007, 03:00
  #28 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 1998
Location: Formerly of Nam
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for your answers so far - Im learnin a lot!

I'll respond in detail to your replys soon. I did think though
that pax were more savvyer with regards to flyin with
highly-publicised dangerus outfits.

PS Reds to answer your question the airboos sucks!
Slasher is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2007, 03:18
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Australia
Age: 52
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RevMan2

Oh, hahahahaha!! My thoughts too!

(I learnt to count from the Hosties. "Hmmm, let me see... I've done 1, 2, 3, no hang on - FOUR of them..." )
kiwi chick is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2007, 04:37
  #30 (permalink)  
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Derbyshire, England.
Posts: 4,091
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
10SecondSurvey - When and which aircraft did BA NOT have a row of seats by the emergency exit?
I ask as I often flew as a pax on the 707, VC10, Trident and Vanguard and I'm fairly sure they all had seats in the emergency exit rows, on the Standard VC10 it was something like row 9.
parabellum is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2007, 05:23
  #31 (permalink)  
Final 3 Greens
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Parabellum

I can't remember which airline (and it would have been any, some or all of BA, AF, AZ, KL, LH probably), but I do recall when I started paxing in the late 70s that the overwing exits didn't have seats next to them.

But its a long time ago
 
Old 15th Nov 2007, 14:36
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Looking for a green tree
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thousands of miles but I still pull out the briefing card and listen to the brief...................I live in fear that the CC might tell me off for not paying attention
Always lock the toilet door.............but have been on flights where people didn't even know how to get in let alone lock it and get out again when finished!!!
I try and fly with the 'legacy' carriers - because I trust their maintenance - I assume that the majority of pilots they have employed are able to fly the aircraft!
I have no idea why the rush to disembark - and I have in fact told people standing before the aircraft has reached the gate to "sit down" in no uncertain terms-they affect my safety if they are standing beside me
I don't care what sort of landing it is - as long as I get on the ground safely!
Re the late boarding passengers - could be totally eliminated if the gate was closed prior to boarding - any body coming later.............tough, unless it is from a delayed flight from the same carrier.
Monkeytoo is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2007, 17:18
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: south of Cirencester, north of Lyneham
Age: 76
Posts: 1,267
Received 20 Likes on 9 Posts
The BA safety briefing said (last time I flew a month or so ago) that 'The captain and crew are here for your safety'. Now I always thought that the Captain's job was mainly to fly (or when the PF is the F/O, do the second pilot's job) the aircraft. After all, if the aircraft doesn't leave the gate, it's much less likely that there will be any safety problems.....
radeng is online now  
Old 15th Nov 2007, 22:53
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Ruritania
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My similar question:- why can't people walk on the plane, shove their luggage in the locker and sit down, allowing the plane to board and be off in 10 mins flat? - instead of parading their asses around and sizing everyone else up, until finally, in a deft coup de grace when everybody's sitting down at last, get up again to steal a march on the competition with some final rummaging in the briefcase for the umpteenth time. Eventually it will be only the A1 alpha male left standing, he who will lead us into the New Age of Enlightenment onboard the plane for the course of the 90 mins of the flight ... until the seatbelt signs go off and The Pack makes a rush for the toilets ...
BaronChotzinoff is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2007, 21:59
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: if only I knew...
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LOL!

...until the seatbelt signs go off and The Pack makes a rush for the toilets...
That for me is one of the last great mysteries. No matter how much time people have spent in the terminal building/lounges with plenty of access to bathrooms, once the seat belt signs go, there is always a handful of passengers dashing for the toilets immediately...

Another thing. Arriving at the gate 15 minutes late only having to further delay departure because there are still people showing up at the last minute, usually with two duty free bags plus the odd coffee/big mac in their hands is usually quite annoying. I has always amazed me that in the case of a delayed inbound aircraft, still the odd passenger on the next flight almost manages (and often does manage) to miss it, even though you would expect them to be standing ready to board at once by that time...

PleaseSayAgain is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2007, 16:07
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: uk
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Q2. I'm with Mark1234 on this - do my own cks on way in. But always look at the CC while they do their thing - it's a courtesy thing and I know how I would feel talking to a load of tops of heads.

Q9. Can't remember the last time I did a greaser, but then I fly freight and the parcels neither care nor complain.
deltahotel is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2007, 01:20
  #37 (permalink)  
25F
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
I remember a BAC 1-11 in the seventies which had a backwards-facing row of seats at the over-wing exit(s), so there was a clear access. These seats were very popular with families as it allowed parents and kids to sit facing each other.
25F is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2007, 01:56
  #38 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,150
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
Angel

I recall travelling on a Trident LHR~HAM in December 1975 that had an experiment with a few rows of rear facing seats at the front of the Y cabin. At check-in, I was asked if I would sit there and fill in the questionnaire. Naturally I did and it was all very comfortable.

My guess as to why they have never made them standard around the world is that, they would have to tell folks that it is safer that way in an emergency stop or incident. THEN they would have to explain to folks why they had not reversed the seating years ago!
PAXboy is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2007, 07:42
  #39 (permalink)  
JFW
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: London
Age: 69
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm sure that I remember taking a charter flight in (I think) a 1-11, in the late '70's. The front half of the cabin had rear facing seats, the back half frontward facing. Not sure if this was a common configuration though, it was incredibly cramped, so I suppose it could have been just for the charter market.
JFW is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2007, 09:14
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Yorkshire, England
Age: 57
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Me too, I think Dan Air may have had the rear-facing 1-11 seats.

Also I am sure I didn't dream it, but the meal was locked inside the seat in a little integral 'larder' just above the tray table. Dread to think what Health and Safety would make of that today. Or maybe it was a dream.

Paxboy, the Trident at MAN viewing park has this config if you want t nosey. Gorgeous restoration. Sorry for thread drift.
MrSoft is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.