Wikiposts
Search
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

London _washington

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Jul 2007, 08:59
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: West of LAM.
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
London _washington

Time for Holidays again....

320 mrs 320 320 junior and 320 junior MK2 will be going to DC in Sept..


My question is LHR-IAD with United
LHR-IAD with BA

or LHR-BWi with BA


BWI is better for my onward journey but with a 3 year old PTV's are important and from what i can find LHR-BALTIMORE is a 767 which does'nt appear to have PTV's. They are all similar prices...

as usual any tip offs would be appreciated.

ta

320
320JI is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2007, 15:48
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Yorks
Age: 64
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Take a look at Maxjet ex STN.
tezzer is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2007, 06:01
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,222
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
I thought the BA 767s had been "Dusked" which meant they had the lie flat beds in Club, WTP and individual screens throughout the aircraft,
Hartington is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2007, 11:20
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: LGW
Age: 75
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
United operate 767 LHR - IAD, and have PTV's through out. 12 diferent channels and 6 childrens channels. Very good service too. Not sure about BA tho

Don't even consider Maxjet, they dont accept young children as they are a business airline only, and certainately NOT kitted out for kids. especially the food, as its all ala cart.
GEAR_DOWN is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2007, 00:24
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: somewhere near LTN
Age: 50
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

How on earth did the infant & kids get on my LAS flights then?
FormerFlyer is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2007, 09:00
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Dublin
Posts: 1,806
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All BA767s not only have PTVs but are all kitted out with the AVOD system so even better to keep the kids mute for a few hours. Also BWI is a much smaller and easier airport to navigate then IAD and generally the BA plane is the only one arriving and departing from the international terminal at any one time meaning less congestion and easier to keep an eye on the kids!
apaddyinuk is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2007, 12:24
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: 39N 77W
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I live in the DC area and, give the choice, I'd pick BWI over IAD any day. IAD may be a petty airport, but it is inefficient. Many millions have been spent on Bandaid fixes for the worst design errors.

IAD has only about 75% as many airline operations a day as BWI, but traffic is rather peaky and IAD is limited to one runway if the wind exceeds the crosswind limits on the N-S parallel runways. Substantial delays occur in that case.

At IAD you'd have to take the people-mover to the main terminal for customs / immigration. And then you'd use the people-mover back to the midfield terminal for your onward flight. If your onward flights were from BWI, it's a long, slow and probably expensive way to get there from IAD. IAD is a "slow" airport, especially on late-afternoon departures.

The international part of the terminal at BWI is rather new, though I haven't used it. If you are continuing on Southwest, be advised that they have a number of restaurants and shops after security in their new 24-gate part of the terminal. Both A or B security lead into the Southwest terminal, use whichever seems shorter.
seacue is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2007, 16:01
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: West of LAM.
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thanks BWI it is!

thankyou all..
i'm staying in maryland for the two weeks as we have family there and have just booked the BA flights to BWI as they released a load of much cheaper fares.
The whole party 2 adults 1 child one infant £960 which i thaught was pretty good.
Nice idea re the max jet but at £2100 i think i'll slum it in world traveller
re assured about the PTV's that will defo keep him quiet for while!
just one question it will not let me book the seats for the outbound leg. I've done the inbound no problem but the outbound just returns a message saying it is not possible at this time try later...obviously a bassinet position is quite important so any ideas??
Is it possible they are waiting for an aircraft allocation?
now then..........car hire
thanks
320JI is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2007, 01:28
  #9 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,152
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
320JI not sure if you asking for car hire info? If not, then ignore this!

I do not know Washington but work on the following principle: If I do not know the area and do not have anyone local = use a mainstream brand. If I have local people = ask them to book a local company that they know. They will probably not have an on-airport garage but they will be cheaper.

The mainstream car hire groups are expensive but you know what you are getting and can usually get good support if the car breaks down. Actually, they tend to specialise in having modern fleets that are reliable - that is what you pay for. So I just pocket the frequent flyer miles and enjoy the service.

On a recent trip to Cape Town (which I know well and have local contacts) I found that the local car hire companies charged a big premium for international credit cards and some wanted cash deposits ...

Now back to hairyplanes.
PAXboy is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2007, 16:29
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smart move, avoiding IAD (I Am Disgusting -- the aiport, not me).
I've not done immigration/customs through BWI, but it has to be better than Dull-ass.
Middle Seat is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2007, 06:52
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: 39N 77W
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I often use A***o for car rental. They are cheaper than most other major brands. I've never had a dud car from them. They and N******l are co-owned and share the same cars in some locations. I've never used them at BWI since I live in the area. The major car rental companies at BWI are located in a new facility a considerable distance from the terminal. There is a shared shuttle from the terminal.
http://www.bwiairport.com/ground_tra...n/car_rentals/
seacue is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2007, 14:22
  #12 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: West of LAM.
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thanks for all the responses.

still unable to book the seats on the outbound.....has anyone got any clues
320JI is offline  
Old 12th Jul 2007, 16:39
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: 39N 77W
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One might guess that your outbound is oversold. They are banking on cancellations or no-shows. Sorry to be in my wet-blanket mode.

I hope it's really a less-negative reason.
seacue is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.