Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight)
Reload this Page >

Annoyed with other pax attitudes... Nimes to Luton & back again

Wikiposts
Search
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

Annoyed with other pax attitudes... Nimes to Luton & back again

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Jun 2007, 19:52
  #41 (permalink)  
SXB
Riding the Euro Gravy Plane
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Strasbourg
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FHA
Maybe you should read F3Gs comments again, he was simply illustrating how easy it can be to jump to, incorrect, assumptions. Which is exactly what you've just done, again.....
SXB is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2007, 20:28
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Age: 65
Posts: 3,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Please excuse the interruption, but... off the personal please FHA
TightSlot is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2007, 20:36
  #43 (permalink)  
FHA
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: E/E Bay
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OK boss: Forum rules now re-read. Suggest you read them too F3G.
FHA is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2007, 23:39
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North East
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just thought I'd add my experiences to this one.
I have flown Ryanair on several occassions now and never had a problem with them, you just have to obey their rules, its not hard. Also regarding boarding Ryan air have when I have flown with them always anounced boarding of priority boarders and people with young children first. So in Ryanairs defence the family with the child should of been ready for boarding at the gate near the front of the queue, I'm not suggesting the women who finally moved was in the right, just trying to defend Ryanair.

With regard to other pax being annoying on flights I encountered it myself on a recent longhaul trip returning to the UK. The first one was a pax who moved from his own seat, about 3 hours into a 10 hour flight, into a free seat in front of me. This wasn't a problem, he the preceded to recline his seat fully, this again wasn't a problem. The problem arose while and after having an inflight meal about 4 hours out. This bloke, and he wasn't British, didn't return his seat to the upright position while he ate although he sat upright the whole time, this meant for me to eat I either had to sit upright cramped up or reclined and uncomfortable to eat. After the meal he sat back but the proceded to figit the whole way while I was trying to watch the in flight entertainment in the back of his seat. Around this point he also for some reseaon tried to recline the empty seat next to him, in front of my girl friend, at which the two of use lent forward onto it to stop him.
On the same flight we had someone sat next to the window over the wing then 3 spare seats and then me and my girlfriend. This bloke had a fasination with opening the blinds (on the left hand side on a transatlantic flight) and looking out of the window. This caused us to be blinded by sunlight bouncing off the wing and entering the cabin. We asked cabin crew if they could ask him to stop which they did. This unfortunatley just turned this middle aged bloke into a naughty school kid. For the last hour or so he kept snatching cheeky looks out the window or partly opening the blind, thus blinding us every time.
To cap the trip off for our connecting flight I was assinged a window seat having put up with aisle seats on 5 previous sector on the trip I was looking forward to a bit of a change only to board the plane to find some bloke sat in it. I ended up sitting on the aisle again and my girlfriend sat in the middle next to this bloke. He was sat as wide legged as possible taking up room where my girlfriends legs were meant to be and proceded to fall asleep!
Being fairly reserved as we are the two of us complained only once about the whole episode and that only seemed to bring out the naughty boy in a middle aged man.
At the end of the day the nightmare pax are out there you just have to deal with them. We took 6 flights and only encountered problems on 2.
Anyway at the end of the day what point is there getting worked up about it these pains in the neck are only in our lives for a short space of time. Plus it gives me at least something to talk about on here
onion is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2007, 01:31
  #45 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: London UK & Uzes France
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have flown Ryanair on several occassions now and never had a problem with them, you just have to obey their rules, its not hard.
Agreed. However, my point is that there are so many people out there who feel that the rules don't - or shouldn't - apply to them. I am not even talking about "pond scum" here - there are plenty of intelligent, educated people with a superiority complex. These are the kind of arrogant sh*ts that visit places like Uzes and Nimes - people who honestly should know better.

I speak from experience with this one - my Stepdad - normally a lovely wonderful man - gets on an aircraft and becomes Mr. Hyde. He almost had an EZY flight to Nice turn back to Luton about 5 mins after takeoff over going to the toilet before the seatbelt signs were turned off...

He is the kind of pax I despise

As an aside - I remember when I was in the "sky café" or whatever it is called at CDG, a prattish Brit businessman was in front of me. The poor girl behind the counter could not understand his *awful* attempt at ordering a croissant in French, and he eventually got so annoyed he resorted to calling her a "bloody frog".

And this was no doubt a pillar of our community in England...

Also regarding boarding Ryan air have when I have flown with them always anounced boarding of priority boarders and people with young children first. So in Ryanairs defence the family with the child should of been ready for boarding at the gate near the front of the queue, I'm not suggesting the women who finally moved was in the right, just trying to defend Ryanair.
I was under that impression too. However the past 2 flights have not called that - instead it is "priority boarding and web check in" followed by "everyone else". I guess that they want you to pay if you need to get on first. A little sick perhaps...

Onion - I sympathise with you. I doubt I would have been able to hold my tongue

Curiously enough, that is more or less exactly what the Duke of Wellington said when the first passenger trains were introduced in the 19th century.

He was quoted as being against them on the grounds that the common people would want to travel, and that might lead to revolution. Substitute "pond scum" for "the common people" and it all begins to sound very familiar!
Union Jack - at the risk of sounding horribly pompous, I think you can widen the net to include all forms of public transport - humanity en masse is generally a horrible experience!

Cheers!

Martin
FirmamentFX is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2007, 13:11
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Limbricht
Posts: 2,196
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Window Shades

Aah Onion, the window blind thing! Don't take my comments as being aimed at you personally because I don't know if you were on an overnight flight or not. As for lowering the window blinds, personally I have a little problem with that depending on the time of day. If I'm travelling say AMS-JFK westbound during the middle of the day I don't particularly want to be in near total darkness. It's daytime and I'd like my daylight please. To save making a fuss I tend to abide however I get a bit grumpy about it. Eastbound is another matter. I recently flew overnight from Vancouver to Amsterdam. At this time of the year on such northerly tracks it's daylight all the way. Whether I wish to sleep or not, it's technically night time and I'll lower the window shade no problem. There are posters who would say that it is inconsiderate to others not wanting to lower the blind (on a daytime westbound flight). My contention is that it is just as inconsiderate wanting to force daylight away from those who may prefer to be in daylight during daytime. I'm not looking for confrontation but just pointing out that there are two sides to this problem.
Avman is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2007, 15:46
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,565
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
FirmamentFX

Spot on.

My "local" route is not popular with Lager Louts, Club 18 - 30 types or Hen Parties ( shame). More likely the clientel are city/legal/lovie types visiting their second/third homes. Nevertheless put them within 50 metres of the gate for the free seating flight and young children are at risk of being trampled underfoot....and don't get me started at the nonsense that goes on during boarding itself.

And why do they insist on doing the same when flying with the alternative, full service, pre-allocated seat outfit?
wiggy is online now  
Old 17th Jun 2007, 20:38
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North East
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Avman the flight in question was a eastbound from the west coast of the states. So the blind situation was annoying. I agree on westbound flights its slightly different. What annoyed me most about the situation was the way the middle aged bloke became a naughty little boy stealing peeks out the window after he had been asked to close it. That was more irritating than having the sun on us before he was asked to close it.
onion is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2007, 20:50
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: here.....there.......
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking of pre-boarding for children....which this touches on, asked at Gatwick recently if pre-boarding was available as we were travelling with an infant (Monarch to Cuba). Answer - 'No, if we let you, everyone with infants will want to pre-board'. Erm, yeah, that's the idea - doh!
h73kr is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2007, 21:50
  #50 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: London UK & Uzes France
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking of pre-boarding for children....which this touches on, asked at Gatwick recently if pre-boarding was available as we were travelling with an infant (Monarch to Cuba). Answer - 'No, if we let you, everyone with infants will want to pre-board'. Erm, yeah, that's the idea - doh!
Haha! Fantastic.
FirmamentFX is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.