PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions (https://www.pprune.org/pacific-general-aviation-questions-91/)
-   -   RAAF pilots leaving (https://www.pprune.org/pacific-general-aviation-questions/278647-raaf-pilots-leaving.html)

junior.VH-LFA 25th Feb 2016 11:02

Zanthrus,

Maybe they get their training paid for because they volunteer to deploy and potentially die for you? What a bitter outburst.

Just a thought.

Slezy9 25th Feb 2016 12:04


Originally Posted by zanthrus (Post 9281491)
Tell the RAAFies to F off! They do not meet Civvie standards.

Karma? Good enough for them to be picky why can't we return the favour?
PAY FOR THERE TRAINING like the rest of us had to?

Haha! I needed a good laugh!

Also, you might want to head back and complete year 12 English before you apply... There, their and they're are easy to confuse!

allthecoolnamesarego 25th Feb 2016 12:42

I think they tripped over the civvie standards on the way into the RAAF.:}

dartman2 26th Feb 2016 05:15

Zanthrus you are a clown. Clearly you have never been in the ADF so you are not qualified to comment (or spell either by the look of it).

There are many GA Pilots that have gone to fly in the ADF and also many ADF Pilots that have gone to fly in GA after their ROSO is up. They have done both and can hold whatever opinion they like.

dr dre 26th Feb 2016 08:51

Unlike Zanthrus (although I suspect that post was a wind up), no issue here with some RAAF pilots joining airlines, but please when you get there don't complain about how you find airline flying boring and you're only "taking" the job for the money and the lifestyle, there's plenty of guys and gals slogging it out in GA and cadetships who would crawl over broken glass to get a major airline gig, it'd be their career dream. And yes these pilots from a purely "civvie" background (who'd comprise at least 90% of your new work colleagues) can fly planes, and fly them well, and have had varied backgrounds and experiences, just like you.
Otherwise welcome aboard


Originally Posted by allthecoolnamesarego (Post 9281597)
I think they tripped over the civvie standards on the way into the RAAF.:}

I'm not going to have a go at standards required or probably more accurately the personalities wanted in the military vs the airlines, but I will say there have been former military pilots who have failed selection processes at airlines and who have failed training courses at airlines, success at one doesn't guarantee success at another.

josephfeatherweight 23rd Oct 2016 09:25

Thread revival - how many have their apps in with Qantas?

rodney rude 27th Oct 2016 07:37

323. I just checked

j3pipercub 27th Oct 2016 11:57

I'd heard 327...

Falling Leaf 27th Oct 2016 20:20

...which would be the total number of pilot's in the RAAF? :O

Ascend Charlie 27th Oct 2016 21:06

There are a lot of good opportunities for a smart pilot to gain early captaincy on B737 and A330 and C-17, multi-engine overseas airways time. Then when their return of service is up, they naturally will hop to the airlines.

In the Bad Old Days only the Herc, Orion and the VIP pilots had an easy path.

Slezy9 28th Oct 2016 08:12

The word is that very few RAAFies got a call up to the second stage with Qantas...

Shagpile 28th Mar 2017 17:22

Surely this thread needs a refresher...I hear the exodus has begun.

Chronic Snoozer 28th Mar 2017 17:45

Shades of 87/88?

Bleve 29th Mar 2017 00:36

A hint to anyone wanting to fly for Qantas. HR pretty much runs all recruitment now. So no need to bone up on anything technical (eg engine types, destinations etc). It's all touchy-feely stuff. 'When was the time you helped someone in need?' 'How did feel when ....?' 'How do actively promote diversity?' etc Wearing a rainbow lapel pin will probably get you fast tracked to CP.

junior.VH-LFA 29th Mar 2017 06:10

Not that I was around for it, but from what I've read historically this seems similar to 87/88.


The exodus is definitely underway.

gerry111 29th Mar 2017 09:32

Aren't they hanging around to fly those wonderful, shiny new F-35's, junior?

junior.VH-LFA 29th Mar 2017 15:08


Originally Posted by gerry111 (Post 9722667)
Aren't they hanging around to fly those wonderful, shiny new F-35's, junior?

It's not the tech that'causing people to want out...

Sunfish 30th Mar 2017 09:49

my guess: some HR pr1ck saying that a 'new generation pilot" is needed for the F35 and by definition anyone with significant F18 experience is a "legacy pilot". that is how one avoids critics of the new model of anything.....

junior.VH-LFA 30th Mar 2017 16:42


Originally Posted by Sunfish (Post 9723903)
my guess: some HR pr1ck saying that a 'new generation pilot" is needed for the F35 and by definition anyone with significant F18 experience is a "legacy pilot". that is how one avoids critics of the new model of anything.....

Well that would be totally incorrect.

Chronic Snoozer 30th Mar 2017 17:18


Originally Posted by Sunfish (Post 9723903)
my guess: some HR pr1ck saying that a 'new generation pilot" is needed for the F35 and by definition anyone with significant F18 experience is a "legacy pilot". that is how one avoids critics of the new model of anything.....

Nothing like a bit of burley in the water.....

Old Fella 31st Mar 2017 05:41

I hope the current "King Pins" of the RAAF have a better understanding of what the role of their crews are and what the crew requirements are to operate their aircraft. I recall around 1980 when a lot of Flight Engineers were leaving the RAAF a high ranking Officer stated, "Let them leave, we will operate the aircraft without them" when told a particular Squadron looked like not being able to meet their operational tasking requirements if they could not stem the tide of F/E's going to civilian operators. I also remember one CAF labeling those pilots leaving as "most being malcontents with little prospect of promotion", or very similar comment when asked if he was concerned at the exodus of the time. That was mid to late 1980's. Many of those "malcontents" had very successful civilian careers.

Teamaker 31st Mar 2017 07:50

Emirates are telling new recruits and potential applicants that they are hoping to open a base in Australia. Whether or not they can pull it off is another question but they do need to do something drastic to stem the exodus and prepare for their huge aircraft orders.

That might cause a raaf exodus.

Arm out the window 31st Mar 2017 08:41

That's right, malcontents and deadwood was the term, S.D.Evans the utterer I think?

Captain Dart 31st Mar 2017 09:47

Anyone joining Emirates directly onto a base would need a food taster when in DXB. I would suggest bases would be awarded in seniority order. Also, tomorrow is April 1st.

I was one of Evans' 'malcontents'; I only left because of the looming desk job. As it happened, I did well after leaving the RAAF, and am still flying at nearly 60.

Old Fella 31st Mar 2017 10:35

Malcontents
 

Originally Posted by Arm out the window (Post 9725047)
That's right, malcontents and deadwood was the term, S.D.Evans the utterer I think?

You are spot-on AOTW. The article was in Australian Aviation and I responded to it, something which I know was appreciated by some at the time. The same individual sometime later sought a political seat and decried the loss of crews and the lack of anything being done to arrest the exodus.

Joker89 31st Mar 2017 10:40


Originally Posted by Old Fella (Post 9724860)
I hope the current "King Pins" of the RAAF have a better understanding of what the role of their crews are and what the crew requirements are to operate their aircraft. I recall around 1980 when a lot of Flight Engineers were leaving the RAAF a high ranking Officer stated, "Let them leave, we will operate the aircraft without them" when told a particular Squadron looked like not being able to meet their operational tasking requirements if they could not stem the tide of F/E's going to civilian operators. I also remember one CAF labeling those pilots leaving as "most being malcontents with little prospect of promotion", or very similar comment when asked if he was concerned at the exodus of the time. That was mid to late 1980's. Many of those "malcontents" had very successful civilian careers.

I don't think anything has changed.

Old Fella 31st Mar 2017 10:48

The more things change the more they stay the same
 
I have been out of the RAAF since early 1981 Joker, but I think you are more than likely correct.

gerry111 31st Mar 2017 11:13

I was a troop in the RAAF during Air Marshal S. Evans' time as CAS Apr 82- May 85. He was poorly regarded by many of us as simply an aloof mouthpiece for the Defence Minister and Federal government. Fortunately, his replacement was the extremely well respected 'Jake' Newham. I remember meeting Air Marshal Newham in late 1985 at RAAF Richmond. That was after work, in the Airmen's Club over a few beers with quite a few other troops. He was very down to earth and a true leader.

josephfeatherweight 31st Mar 2017 11:26

The issue is self perpetuating - generally speaking, the "good" ones get out and the "bad" ones (with some exceptions) stay in and wonder why any of the "malcontents" wanna leave!

Old Fella 31st Mar 2017 11:53

Down to Earth
 

Originally Posted by gerry111 (Post 9725208)
I was a troop in the RAAF during Air Marshal S. Evans' time as CAS Apr 82- May 85. He was poorly regarded by many of us as simply an aloof mouthpiece for the Defence Minister and Federal government. Fortunately, his replacement was the extremely well respected 'Jake' Newham. I remember meeting Air Marshal Newham in late 1985 at RAAF Richmond. That was after work, in the Airmen's Club over a few beers with quite a few other troops. He was very down to earth and a true leader.

Gerry, you and I both know that the majority of those with whom we flew or otherwise worked with were good blokes. (No female tech crew in my day) Some went on to the upper echelons and remained unchanged, others needed a much bigger hat size as they ascended the rank ladder. We were/are all smart enough to know the difference in personalities they each possessed. My experience during my 23 years left me with many more good memories than bad ones. The same can be said of my civil career experiences and those with whom I shared the flight deck. As in all areas of life we sometimes do not always enjoy the company of those around us or above us. Overall life has been great and I hope it stays that way for a while yet.

Ascend Charlie 31st Mar 2017 22:20

There are some good stories about Selwyn D Evans and his efforts to fly every aircraft on every base, from the Huey to the F-111 to the Orion, each of them ending with him committing some atrocity and (twice) damaging the aircraft, then refusing to accept responsibility for it.

In 1973 he also grounded every pilot at Amberley whose hair was longer than the Air Force Regulations, because "if you disobey RAAF Orders, then you probably disobey Flying Orders, so you are by definition DANGEROUS, so you are grounded until you get a haircut." Be nice if you could fix a dangerous pilot by giving him a haircut...

I think he even tried to be governor of SA.

Slezy9 12th May 2017 01:07

There are a few RAAF pilots that now have start dates but upon resignation they were surprised to find that their SPEC aircrew ROSO was to be enforced!! Apparently it's lawyers at 20 paces.

blumoon 12th May 2017 01:55

Why? were they expecting something different? Talk about cake and wanting to eat it too

Slezy9 12th May 2017 03:03

I've no sympathy... Spec Aircrew is the greatest deal for those chosen few who can actually get it. No ground job, pay rise every year and generally the best/most interesting flying.

donpizmeov 12th May 2017 09:12

Only the that are good looking and incredibly talented can get spec aircrew. Anyone thinking that ROSO will not be enforced is perhaps intellectually challenged.

Shagpile 12th May 2017 16:58


Anyone thinking that ROSO will not be enforced is perhaps intellectually challenged.
Can you provide an example of when and how a roso has been enforced?

The Banjo 12th May 2017 17:13

Was it Evans who ran unsuccessfully for the seat of Eden Monaro in the mid 80's??
There was suggestion at the time that his military success was in no small part due to old school connections with Jim Killen, defence minister 1977-82 ish.

Brakerider 12th May 2017 21:09

For the laymen, can someone explain 'spec crew' ?

Slezy9 12th May 2017 21:12


Originally Posted by Brakerider (Post 9769307)
For the laymen, can someone explain 'spec crew' ?

Basically...

Contract length of 3, 6 or 10 years (normally)

Guarenteed flying position and no change of location

$3000 pay rise a year

A return of service of 3 years for signing up (I think)

josephfeatherweight 13th May 2017 09:57

Also - the best bit - "Cannot be promoted whilst in position."
In fact, if you're above the rank of Flight Lieutenant, Spec Aircrew usually comes with a DEMOTION.
There's some VERY happy former Group Captains wearing Flight Lieutenant rank on their shoulders now...
Doesn't necessarily encourage the FLTLTs who wanted the Spec Aircrew position to stay, especially when they're the one's with the option to leave and take a job overseas - for perhaps DEC with some high paying Chinese airline on an A330...
IMO the RAAF don't run the whole Spec Aircrew thing all that well.


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:31.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.