Wikiposts
Search

Notices
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Chopper reported missing, NSW

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th November 2023 | 21:25
  #41 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 880
Likes: 225
From: Australia
Originally Posted by Squawk7700
Second hand story. 200+ metres is still high when you’re flying at 500ft...
I was in agreement with the observations you shared. Air flow over a 218m (715 ft) peak could surely still influence a helo flying at say 900ft noting there are further (lower) peaks in that area. Unless other factors become obvious, ATSB would presumably consider this.
helispotter is offline  
Reply
Old 6th November 2023 | 00:25
  #42 (permalink)  
Moderator
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,379
Likes: 490
From: Melbourne
Spot on, apologies if I gave the wrong impression.
Squawk7700 is offline  
Reply
Old 12th July 2024 | 21:52
  #43 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 880
Likes: 225
From: Australia
The ATSB preliminary report into the loss of this Robinson R66, VH-KFT, hadn't been linked in this thread when it was released, so here it is:

https://www.atsb.gov.au/publications...rt/ao-2023-051

ATSB report they recovered an in-flight video camera as one of several components for more detailed examination. Based on the discussions in this thread, I was anticipating this accident may have been another mast bumping due to low-g in turbulence or control inputs case as ATSB attributed to the loss of the R44 VH-HGU:

https://www.atsb.gov.au/publications...ir/ao-2020-061

There is a prospect that any available video might support that. But in the case of VH-KFT, the preliminary report states: "...the ATSB has determined there to be a reasonable likelihood of limitations in risk controls and organisational factors relevant to the occurrence...". That is sufficiently vague that the final report will need to be awaited, but it sounds like there might be more to it than the likely cause as reported in the case of VH-HGU.

The ASN Wikibase has the accident listed at:

https://asn.flightsafety.org/wikibase/347293

The pilot was travelling with his dog.
helispotter is offline  
Reply
Old 12th July 2024 | 22:19
  #44 (permalink)  
Moderator
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,379
Likes: 490
From: Melbourne
The KFT report has many references to weather, which aligns with your comments re risk controls.

It’s pretty clear they aren’t blaming the R66. What they haven’t said unless I missed it is anything about cloud other than 8/8, however from what I was advised by a pilot involved in search, was that significant turbulence existed at the firm and the report does mention gusts of 23 knots and if you refer to my post above it mentions local conditions that can cause turbulence.
Squawk7700 is offline  
Reply
Old 30th June 2025 | 01:48
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 431
From: Cab of a Freight Train
Final report is out. In short, operating in turbulence above Va, encountered low-G, didn't apply aft cyclic to reload the rotor prior to countering an uncommanded rapid right roll and broke up less than 4 seconds after encountering the low-G condition.

The ATSB looks to be quite happy about the factory-fitted camera & data recorder though. Gives them a birds-eye view of exactly what happened, though it'd be sobering viewing for the investigators.
KRviator is offline  
Reply
Old 30th June 2025 | 02:59
  #46 (permalink)  
Moderator
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,379
Likes: 490
From: Melbourne

The fitment of the camera in this case may have long lasting benefits for owners and operators of these machines.
Squawk7700 is offline  
Reply
Old 30th June 2025 | 05:39
  #47 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 132
Likes: 6
From: N/A
A lot of focus is on the horizontal stabilizer and it's apparent tendency to be the primary cause of the rolling moment. Is anyone aware of any actual data to support this, or is this spin from Robinson's new private equity owners to try and rebrand the type as less susceptible to mast bumping?
Sir HC is offline  
Reply
Old 30th June 2025 | 09:59
  #48 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 880
Likes: 225
From: Australia
Originally Posted by Sir HC
A lot of focus is on the horizontal stabilizer and it's apparent tendency to be the primary cause of the rolling moment. Is anyone aware of any actual data to support this, or is this spin from Robinson's new private equity owners to try and rebrand the type as less susceptible to mast bumping?
The asymmetric horizontal stabiliser and retrofit of symmetric version has been the subject of some discussion a in the R66 thread at Rotorheads:

Robinson R66 (merged threads)

See from post 425 onwards.

I don't see it as spin, after all, it is effectively Robinson saying the original configuration wasn't ideal and the new configuration is an improvement.

Last edited by helispotter; 30th June 2025 at 10:15.
helispotter is offline  
Reply
Old 1st July 2025 | 01:49
  #49 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,688
Likes: 254
From: Australia
Looks if the $1 billion the industry has saved since mandatory full position reporting for VFR because of the duplicated ATC/FIS system being abolished when I was chairman of CAA was worthwhile!
Dick Smith is offline  
Reply
Old 1st July 2025 | 03:23
  #50 (permalink)  
Moderator
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,379
Likes: 490
From: Melbourne
Originally Posted by Sir HC
A lot of focus is on the horizontal stabilizer and it's apparent tendency to be the primary cause of the rolling moment. Is anyone aware of any actual data to support this, or is this spin from Robinson's new private equity owners to try and rebrand the type as less susceptible to mast bumping?
I read somewhere that Bell fitted a similar one to their latest creation, then after testing they fitted a full width stabilizer. Seems amazing that it's gone on for so long before the change.
Squawk7700 is offline  
Reply
Old 1st July 2025 | 06:32
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2024
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 101
Likes: 95
From: Maskot
Originally Posted by Squawk7700
ATSB YouTube link

The fitment of the camera in this case may have long lasting benefits for owners and operators of these machines.
100%. A picture and especially their YouTube sure speaks a thousand words. How innocent munching on his sandwich, forthcoming cat's paws (never heard of that before but understand the sentiment). RIP that man.
Zumba in the street is offline  
Reply
Old 1st July 2025 | 09:29
  #52 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 880
Likes: 225
From: Australia
Originally Posted by Squawk7700
I read somewhere that Bell fitted a similar one to their latest creation, then after testing they fitted a full width stabilizer. Seems amazing that it's gone on for so long before the change.
See my comments re the changes made to the Bell 505 at post #426 in "Robinson R66 (merged threads)". David Smith (formerly at Bell) explains the background for the evolution of the stabiliser on the 505 in post #430 of that thread and it differs to reasoning for change on the R66.

helispotter is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd July 2025 | 14:25
  #53 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,863
Likes: 444
From: QLD - where drivers are yet to realise that the left lane goes to their destination too.
Originally Posted by Dick Smith
Looks if the $1 billion the industry has saved since mandatory full position reporting for VFR because of the duplicated ATC/FIS system being abolished when I was chairman of CAA was worthwhile!
Out of context Dick. Also inappropriate. The guy's dead whether that Billion was spent or not. Saving it certainly didn't save him.
Traffic_Is_Er_Was is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.