Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Skytrans not happy about the competition

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Skytrans not happy about the competition

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Jul 2023, 07:50
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Australia
Posts: 555
Received 79 Likes on 38 Posts
So could it be that cameras were installed to use in a campaign against a competitor rather than to check if the runway is wet? Pretty average behaviour if so.
Cloudee is offline  
Old 14th Jul 2023, 09:27
  #22 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 73
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Cloudee
So could it be that cameras were installed to use in a campaign against a competitor rather than to check if the runway is wet? Pretty average behaviour if so.
Maybe hinterland should request access to the footage. That way they know if their boys are doing as they should and touching down on the piano keys. Might even get some good footage of a skytrans machine overrunning after one of their high approaches.😂

Last edited by CAVOK92; 14th Jul 2023 at 09:39.
CAVOK92 is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 15th Jul 2023, 01:38
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Melbourne, Aus
Age: 29
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dry_Twotter
Hinterland GM and HOFO are brave boys thinking that their piece of paper gets them around the P135 and the C208 POH.

Probably something that you’d want to run by the punters in the back, wouldn’t you say?

cabzjet is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2023, 07:32
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Brisbane, Qld
Posts: 1,370
Received 29 Likes on 15 Posts
Yes, a Test Pilot does it and then those figures are adjusted for an average Pilot because of course they don't expect you to fly it like a Test Pilot. If you want to go landing on an Airstrip prior to the numbers on a section of ground that isn't part of the regular inspections required to approve that Airstrip, you go right ahead, but when you hit a hole that no one knew about don't be surprised when you're the one responsible.
Ixixly is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2023, 08:24
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 576
Received 314 Likes on 110 Posts
Originally Posted by Ixixly
Yes, a Test Pilot does it and then those figures are adjusted for an average Pilot because of course they don't expect you to fly it like a Test Pilot. If you want to go landing on an Airstrip prior to the numbers on a section of ground that isn't part of the regular inspections required to approve that Airstrip, you go right ahead, but when you hit a hole that no one knew about don't be surprised when you're the one responsible.
Must be hard for you to land on a dirt strip in the Kimberley or Territory champ.
aussieflyboy is offline  
The following 3 users liked this post by aussieflyboy:
Old 15th Jul 2023, 10:21
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: All at sea
Posts: 2,194
Received 155 Likes on 103 Posts
Originally Posted by Ixixly
Yes, a Test Pilot does it and then those figures are adjusted for an average Pilot because of course they don't expect you to fly it like a Test Pilot. If you want to go landing on an Airstrip prior to the numbers on a section of ground that isn't part of the regular inspections required to approve that Airstrip, you go right ahead, but when you hit a hole that no one knew about don't be surprised when you're the one responsible.
Did someone suggest landing "on a section of ground" that presumably is off the airstrip?
No, what is suggested is that, on a really short strip, no bush pilot who wants to maximise the margins is going to waste valuable stopping distance by flying large air transport 50 ft heights at the threshold, then relying on maximum braking to compensate for being only average and maybe landing a bit longer than the test pilot did.
50 ft looks bloody high when you have only a few hundred metres to get down and stopped.
If we were to scale things down according to aircraft size and responsiveness, 15ft would probably feel right for most pilots and provide adequate clearance 'over the fence', but no, in aviation we often use arbitrary numbers because it's easier for the rule makers. The rule makers are not out there doing it in the weeds.
Mach E Avelli is offline  
The following 4 users liked this post by Mach E Avelli:
Old 16th Jul 2023, 05:01
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: PNG
Posts: 42
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The ignorance shown in this thread astounding. It certainly puts the Hinterland HOFO in the unenviable position of having to support his ill-advised GM [CAVOK92 + burners] who’s gone rouge on a pilot rumour network.

Some advice: you are attempting to push your way into the Torres Strait; a high skill, high intensity environment with several very experienced operators who, despite the local challenges, manage to keep the good people of the TS safe on a daily basis.

Rather than coming on here and telling us all we have no idea what we’re doing, perhaps a good place to start would be:
  • take a closer look at the Cessna Caravan POH and Part 135 to realise the legal risk you actually have chosen to adopt,
  • talk to some people who know something about short runways,
  • get some organic, ticket-based runs on the board, and;
  • Stop inventing rumours, avoid the temptation of congratulating yourself from your own account and adopt some humility.

At the end of the day this “opposition” you speak of may well be the people you’ll be thanking later for spotting you in the ocean.

Last edited by Dry_Twotter; 16th Jul 2023 at 08:09.
Dry_Twotter is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 16th Jul 2023, 08:17
  #28 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 73
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Iv never had someone try and name me on a forum before. Is that even in the rules?
Be rest assured that I am not associated with the blue shed, infact the only people I know around Cairns work in the red shed. Never the less I am just someone that is out of GA who is taking pleasure in listening to the scuttlebutt that is being thrown between an organisation that appears to have a full understanding of the new regulation and one that didn’t bother to read them, and when they (he) did still can’t see where they went wrong.

Last edited by CAVOK92; 16th Jul 2023 at 08:32.
CAVOK92 is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2023, 08:22
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: PNG
Posts: 42
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Dry_Twotter
The ignorance shown in this thread astounding. It certainly puts the Hinterland HOFO in the unenviable position of having to support his ill-advised GM [CAVOK92 + burners] who’s gone rouge on a pilot rumour network.

Some advice: you are attempting to push your way into the Torres Strait; a high skill, high intensity environment with several very experienced operators who, despite the local challenges, manage to keep the good people of the TS safe on a daily basis.

Rather than coming on here and telling us all we have no idea what we’re doing, perhaps a good place to start would be:
  • take a closer look at the Cessna Caravan POH and Part 135 to realise the legal risk you actually have chosen to adopt,
  • talk to some people who know something about short runways,
  • get some organic, ticket-based runs on the board, and;
  • Stop inventing rumours, avoid the temptation of congratulating yourself from your own account and adopt some humility.

At the end of the day this “opposition” you speak of may well be the people you’ll be thanking later for spotting you in the ocean.
Read again.
Dry_Twotter is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2023, 08:50
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Aus
Posts: 2,789
Received 415 Likes on 229 Posts

I don't see what all the fuss is about, you just roll to a stop.

PS I don't think they crossed the threshold at 50ft, and that didn't look like touching down 300m into the runway. I also reckon that approach was a tad steeper than 3 degrees.
43Inches is offline  
The following 3 users liked this post by 43Inches:
Old 16th Jul 2023, 09:38
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: All at sea
Posts: 2,194
Received 155 Likes on 103 Posts
Originally Posted by 43Inches
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ojt-zS5IaQ

I don't see what all the fuss is about, you just roll to a stop.

PS I don't think they crossed the threshold at 50ft, and that didn't look like touching down 300m into the runway. I also reckon that approach was a tad steeper than 3 degrees.
Very nice; touched down on the numbers just beyond the piano keys. Slightly steep (about 4.5 degrees) approach works much better on short fields than the flat drag-it-in technique sometimes seen. Pilots confusing precautionary landings taught in some flight schools with serious short field techniques perhaps?
Oh and while I am on my soapbox, forget all about the Jacobsen flare and other theory like looking down the runway during the flare, particularly when you need to get it on early. Pick your touchdown spot and look at it. You go where you look. Of course look up during the rollout, but doing so too early always seems to prolong the touchdown.




Last edited by Mach E Avelli; 16th Jul 2023 at 10:30.
Mach E Avelli is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 16th Jul 2023, 11:09
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: All at sea
Posts: 2,194
Received 155 Likes on 103 Posts
Originally Posted by Cloudee
So could it be that cameras were installed to use in a campaign against a competitor rather than to check if the runway is wet? Pretty average behaviour if so.
How clever are these cameras? Can they differentiate between dry, damp and wet? Are they an approved method for determining runway condition?
Just asking.

Last edited by Mach E Avelli; 16th Jul 2023 at 11:20.
Mach E Avelli is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 16th Jul 2023, 11:57
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: S16 47.2'
Posts: 180
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by CAVOK92
Only heard good things about working for PC and Hinterland.
Can’t comment about working for Skytrans but if they had their head in the sand about the new Part135 requirement I’m sure it says a lot about how it is being managed currently. Maybe the CP should keep his dress ups and take on being a tradie instead 😂.
You’ve not been around the right people I’d have to suggest, sure he has his fan club, but he’s as scummy as any of the operators I came across in GA.
Left 270 is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by Left 270:
Old 16th Jul 2023, 13:54
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: rookie land
Age: 31
Posts: 170
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Left 270
You’ve not been around the right people I’d have to suggest, sure he has his fan club, but he’s as scummy as any of the operators I came across in GA.
Getting your super paid is a privilege and not a right apparently
the_rookie is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2023, 22:12
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: All at sea
Posts: 2,194
Received 155 Likes on 103 Posts
Originally Posted by the_rookie
Getting your super paid is a privilege and not a right apparently
If so, here is a guaranteed way to get it up to date and not get sacked. Or if you do get sacked, have some fun with a wrongful dismissal case at no cost to you. If they claim redundancy is the reason, you can prevent them from subsequent hiring until you are reinstated.
First, if not already a member, join the AFAP. Yes, they are a bit weak in some areas, but they have excellent free legal help available for members.
Then put your employer on notice that they have 14 days to get your super up to date, or you will notify the ATO.
If they don’t pay on time send them a final warning.
If they cry poor or whatever, remind them that it’s your money and that you are not in the loans business. Tell them that you WILL be reporting them to the ATO.
Then DO IT, advising them that you have done so - this gives them one last opportunity to pay up and have you call off the wolves. It is important to be seen at every stage to have been transparent and reasonable. Of course some bosses will still brand you as Bolshevik, but they are just germs you sometimes find in this business.
Not only did this once work for me, I got the super plus interest, and ended up with a very compliant employer.
Pilots need to p!ss or get off the pot.

Last edited by Mach E Avelli; 16th Jul 2023 at 22:33.
Mach E Avelli is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 16th Jul 2023, 22:52
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Aus
Posts: 2,789
Received 415 Likes on 229 Posts
Originally Posted by Mach E Avelli
If so, here is a guaranteed way to get it up to date and not get sacked. Or if you do get sacked, have some fun with a wrongful dismissal case at no cost to you. If they claim redundancy is the reason, you can prevent them from subsequent hiring until you are reinstated.
First, if not already a member, join the AFAP. Yes, they are a bit weak in some areas, but they have excellent free legal help available for members.
Then put your employer on notice that they have 14 days to get your super up to date, or you will notify the ATO.
If they don’t pay on time send them a final warning.
If they cry poor or whatever, remind them that it’s your money and that you are not in the loans business. Tell them that you WILL be reporting them to the ATO.
Then DO IT, advising them that you have done so - this gives them one last opportunity to pay up and have you call off the wolves. It is important to be seen at every stage to have been transparent and reasonable. Of course some bosses will still brand you as Bolshevik, but they are just germs you sometimes find in this business.
Not only did this once work for me, I got the super plus interest, and ended up with a very compliant employer.
Pilots need to p!ss or get off the pot.
Мир, хлеб и земля, Comrade!
43Inches is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2023, 03:53
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: All at sea
Posts: 2,194
Received 155 Likes on 103 Posts
Originally Posted by 43Inches
Мир, хлеб и земля, Comrade!
Ah yes, the last two I have. As for the first, unlikely we will ever achieve that...But thanks anyway.
Mach E Avelli is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 17th Jul 2023, 08:19
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Australia/India
Posts: 5,287
Received 419 Likes on 209 Posts
A GM who's "gone rouge"? Once they start wearing make-up, it's a dead giveaway they've lost the plot.
Lead Balloon is offline  
The following 4 users liked this post by Lead Balloon:
Old 18th Jul 2023, 04:37
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Vic
Posts: 124
Received 16 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by Lead Balloon
A GM who's "gone rouge"? Once they start wearing make-up, it's a dead giveaway they've lost the plot.
Cedrik is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2023, 04:39
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Vic
Posts: 124
Received 16 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by Mach E Avelli
Very nice; touched down on the numbers just beyond the piano keys. Slightly steep (about 4.5 degrees) approach works much better on short fields than the flat drag-it-in technique sometimes seen. Pilots confusing precautionary landings taught in some flight schools with serious short field techniques perhaps?
Oh and while I am on my soapbox, forget all about the Jacobsen flare and other theory like looking down the runway during the flare, particularly when you need to get it on early. Pick your touchdown spot and look at it. You go where you look. Of course look up during the rollout, but doing so too early always seems to prolong the touchdown.
I find it best just to land the aircraft
Cedrik is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.