Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Flying School Owner makes AFR rich list

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Flying School Owner makes AFR rich list

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Feb 2020, 08:58
  #181 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,880
Received 193 Likes on 100 Posts
Originally Posted by Clare Prop
Has it worked though?
The whole RAAus thing shouldn't have been on the same playing field in the first place.
From what I've observed in the last 20 years or so, most LSAs just aren't tough enough for flying training and have sent some good operators to the wall.
I heard from a LAME that a certain Aquila, by the time it was imported and on the VH register, cost half a million bucks. Could have got 8 reliable second hand Cessnas or Pipers for that price, had a decent range and a sturdy reliable aeroplane with a steady resale value. I guess that's why some of us are still flying the dinosaurs.
That Aquila was a failure from the start. It joins a list of many before it and most likely many after.

Squawk7700 is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2020, 09:55
  #182 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 58
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Squawk7700
That Aquila was a failure from the start. It joins a list of many before it and most likely many after.
Aquila has CASA Type Acceptance of an EASA TC. It is not a LSA.
Ndegi is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2020, 11:13
  #183 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,880
Received 193 Likes on 100 Posts
Originally Posted by Ndegi
Aquila has CASA Type Acceptance of an EASA TC. It is not a LSA.
I didn't say it was an LSA.

It's too heavy for a 100hp Rotax for starters.
Squawk7700 is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2020, 01:53
  #184 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,315
Received 229 Likes on 105 Posts
Rich Lister resigns from embattled Soar Aviation


https://www.afr.com/companies/transp...0200302-p5464d


Clare Prop is online now  
Old 7th Mar 2020, 18:59
  #185 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 89 Likes on 32 Posts
He is pulling up the drawbridge.
Sunfish is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2020, 20:41
  #186 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,880
Received 193 Likes on 100 Posts
“Unrelated health issues”

Gee, that’s a new one!
Squawk7700 is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2020, 21:06
  #187 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 89 Likes on 32 Posts
My guess is that he and his money will vanish into Asia rather quickly, never to be seen again.
Sunfish is offline  
Old 7th Mar 2020, 21:29
  #188 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 551
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Squawk7700
“Unrelated health issues”!
Allergic to going to jail
Kiwiconehead is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2020, 00:21
  #189 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,315
Received 229 Likes on 105 Posts
Isn't there a review of their RTO that is about to be completed about now?
Clare Prop is online now  
Old 8th Mar 2020, 05:57
  #190 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: space
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Lies lies lies. About the only thing Neel did honest was his gym workouts ( possibly the odd steroid too but no idea). He has now had ample time to extract maximum cash from the business and shuffle it all overseas.

Shortly I reckon you won’t see him for dust!
Pity no one from whom he has stolen money will get a penny back, but good riddance you dodgy C#NT!
zanthrus is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2020, 07:27
  #191 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,315
Received 229 Likes on 105 Posts
Originally Posted by Squawk7700
“Unrelated health issues”

Gee, that’s a new one!
Christopher Skase comes to mind
Clare Prop is online now  
Old 8th Mar 2020, 08:31
  #192 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,880
Received 193 Likes on 100 Posts
Originally Posted by Clare Prop
Christopher Skase comes to mind
I was being sarcastic :-)

There are a string of others. Gobbo and Overland come to mind.
Squawk7700 is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2020, 21:40
  #193 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Rockhampton
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 2 Posts
The interesting part about 'Gobbo' is the way the media handle all her articles.
Normally the media is quick to relate all of ones sins and give a complete running commentary

Except for Gobbo! she or her father seem to be receiving special treatment.

Why does the media not mention her famous father, former Chief Justice in every article. makes for good drama,
Office Update is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2020, 22:32
  #194 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 89 Likes on 32 Posts
The Gobbo matter is the subject of a royal commission that’s why. In addition she can sue.
Sunfish is offline  
Old 18th Mar 2020, 05:03
  #195 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: MELBOURNE
Age: 70
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SOAR has certainly been a cash cow for a smart operator in so called training, there have been lots of them, ripping off both the students and taxpayers.
But as far as getting a PPL, CPL, MECIR etc, never ever pay up front. You don’t need to. Pay as you go.
Also, you do not need to pay for ground courses, buy Tait’s books, particularly for the CPL and Instrument Rating.
You just study each book, do the questions, then do the exam, 7 in total or it was in 2002/2003 for the CPL.
Same for the IFR written. Just buy the book and study it .
There are great small schools around, if you do not get on with the instructor , say so and change. You are the consumer.
If they are not organised, do not do good pre and post briefs, do not keep your documentation up to date, are gruff,appear disinterested, mention it to the chi and change instructors. Even good schools get dud instructors.
Study the texts as if your life depends on it and enjoy your flying and stay away from the glossy schools.
Biggles081053 is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2020, 01:56
  #196 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: MELBOURNE
Age: 70
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As a CPL with a MECIR and Instructor rating, I gasp at the idea of $75,000 being a reasonable amount of money to pay for a CPL.
200 hours of flying is the min number of hours for the non integrated course pathway.

Many of those hours are solo, most probably.

The average PPL takes say 65 hours, of that maybe 40 are dual.
Then the pilot flys lots of hours for pleasure solo or maybe sharing costs at $250 per hour wet, max a 172 or equivalent.
Builds hours, simultaneously goes off and buys Tait’s CPL series of books. Studies book of a night, weekends and sits each exam.
There is no need to go and pay for a class, pointless!
PPL then finds a local flying school, which does not require PPL to wear a uniform, which is the most ridiculous thing I see at some airports and undertakes the flying training required to reach CPL level.
This will involve some dual, but mostly solo at $250 max for solo, max $320 for dual.
Then when the CFI believes the PPL is ready and the 7 exams are all passed, a test flight is booked with the CASA delegate.

cost? Ppl...... 25 hrs x 320 =. 8000
40 hrs x 250 = 10000
Total max for PPL. = $18,000. Absolute max....

cost for pleasure hours.... 100hrs x $250. = $25,000

cost of dual for CPL. 25 hrs x $320 = $8000
cost of solo for CPL. 15 hrs x $250 = $3750

total hrs = 200. Total cost. $54,750 absolute max.....

So, I am not sure why $75,000 is a reasonable cost for a CPL.
Biggles081053 is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2020, 03:32
  #197 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Hobart
Posts: 51
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well go start your own school then and destroy the opposition by your amazing ground breaking prices

Originally Posted by Biggles081053
As a CPL with a MECIR and Instructor rating, I gasp at the idea of $75,000 being a reasonable amount of money to pay for a CPL.
200 hours of flying is the min number of hours for the non integrated course pathway.

Many of those hours are solo, most probably.

The average PPL takes say 65 hours, of that maybe 40 are dual.
Then the pilot flys lots of hours for pleasure solo or maybe sharing costs at $250 per hour wet, max a 172 or equivalent.
Builds hours, simultaneously goes off and buys Tait’s CPL series of books. Studies book of a night, weekends and sits each exam.
There is no need to go and pay for a class, pointless!
PPL then finds a local flying school, which does not require PPL to wear a uniform, which is the most ridiculous thing I see at some airports and undertakes the flying training required to reach CPL level.
This will involve some dual, but mostly solo at $250 max for solo, max $320 for dual.
Then when the CFI believes the PPL is ready and the 7 exams are all passed, a test flight is booked with the CASA delegate.

cost? Ppl...... 25 hrs x 320 =. 8000
40 hrs x 250 = 10000
Total max for PPL. = $18,000. Absolute max....

cost for pleasure hours.... 100hrs x $250. = $25,000

cost of dual for CPL. 25 hrs x $320 = $8000
cost of solo for CPL. 15 hrs x $250 = $3750

total hrs = 200. Total cost. $54,750 absolute max.....

So, I am not sure why $75,000 is a reasonable cost for a CPL.
swells is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2020, 03:37
  #198 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NSW Australia
Posts: 2,455
Received 33 Likes on 15 Posts
Biggles,
your maths is OK but some of your underlying assumptions are a bit out of date. People want a "product" handed to them on a plate. A program of training. The vast majority of CPL trainees are school leavers who need to be spoon-fed, and very few people train through the old "hour building" pathway of which you speak.

That is a pity, because it is often these guys who are the best/most practical GA pilots.

Your numbers also assume no IFR or Multi or night, but a bare Day VFR CPL.

I wish it worked the way you have painted it above!

We find that no matter how low-cost we make the training, punters can't afford $55,000-75,000.... or, more accurately, are not willing to do the hard yards involved at that price when they can get it "for free" through Vet Student Loans.
... I know, I know it's not "Free", but it's a gummint loan and that's the next best thing.


Cheers

Last edited by Horatio Leafblower; 19th Mar 2020 at 04:10.
Horatio Leafblower is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2020, 03:48
  #199 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: MELBOURNE
Age: 70
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The LSA is not as heavy and maybe not as robust as the old 152, 172 and Piper equivalent, but the LSA market offered 2 seater modern aircraft with EFIS at an affordable cost.
For example the Bristell with A twin Dyson EFIS, a Garmin 650, auto pilot and even a BRS will cost maybe $250 k new. Use half the fuel per hour , more space for pilot and instructor compared to a new 172 which you will not get any change from $600,000 . Also the Bristell will get along at 120 knots plus.

I look at most of the aircraft in schools around south east Oz and they are 1970,1960 vintage, with steam gauge technology. Not that I believe that should be an issue at PPL level.

RAAus schools have been flying 600 kg max aircraft with students for some time.

We would all like to be flying Cirrus 22 Turbos but at 1.2 million a pop, it is just a dream.
I notice in the US at one establishment old 172s are being retrofitted with modern avionics. But the cost in the end is not affordable for most schools unless the students are willing to pay $400/ hr rental.

Many of the lighter aircraft are set up for night, have VH reg, eg, Bristell.
In fact in the US one can fly IFR in a Bristell. There really is no reason why they could not be, an aeroplane is an aeroplane. Icing condition naturally cannot be flown in nor can other larger IFR aircraft.
I wonder whether CASA would allow suitably equiped LSA aircraft to fly IFR in IMC if they were Experimental?

Having both a CPL, MECIR and 22 years of flying experience in all sorts of piston aircraft and an RAAus certificate I find that it the much lower inertia of the
RAAus aircraft requires greater skill to land well.

A new
Biggles081053 is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2020, 04:15
  #200 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: MELBOURNE
Age: 70
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes Horatio, One spends big money when one starts multi-engine training.
There were lots of training Beechcraft Duchesses , Piper Seminole around in my time, they are all rusted away and in grim condition now. Not too many Partenavias either.
A few Senecas about, all 1970 or early 80’s. But one needs to experience asymmetric flight and have the hell scared out of them when the instructor de powers an engine when there is not enough runway to drop back onto.
A quick look at a Moorabbin provider and the Seminole is $639/$733 flights with per hour, wet I assume.

That $20,000 grand I just saved would be quickly gobbled up by that for sure.
Biggles081053 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.