The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

RAAF Dassault Falcon 7X

Old 1st Apr 2019, 11:16
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: The wrong time zone...
Posts: 657
Originally Posted by junior.VH-LFA View Post
The G550 is an entirely different purpose specific platform, which will not share crew or facilities. The idea that somehow it would be a level of commonality is a myth.
Junior, I reckon the sharing of crew could occur with a bit of planning and forethought - and would benefit all.
The training facilities (simulator) could definitely be shared, again with planning and forethought.
Parts/maintenance sharing would potentially be problematic as I understand the Surveillance aircraft vs VIP aircraft would be on different airworthiness/maintenance regimes - but that could have been resolved/worked around with some effort also.


josephfeatherweight is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2019, 11:50
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1998
Location: Mesopotamos
Posts: 1,269
Has the location of the aerial refuelling probe been finalised on the W-2085? Knowing how deep IAI go with repurposing existing frames I'm having trouble accepting the W-2085 shares much commonality with the corporate version other than the basics. Considering the high sticker price of this package deal I wouldn't be surprised if they came with a huge number of caveats on the what/when/how that can be done to them including swapping bits with more mortal G550's.
cattletruck is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2019, 12:00
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 428
change of mind

Last edited by ftrplt; 1st Apr 2019 at 12:51.
ftrplt is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2019, 12:11
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Equatorial
Age: 46
Posts: 515
Is there a difference in the flight deck between the surveillance mode and standard?

I was told the RSAF guys use a corporate 550 for training.

With that in mind why could one not fly both?
Global Aviator is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2019, 12:19
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 428
change of mind

Last edited by ftrplt; 1st Apr 2019 at 12:51.
ftrplt is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2019, 12:31
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Aus
Age: 27
Posts: 345
Originally Posted by josephfeatherweight View Post

Junior, I reckon the sharing of crew could occur with a bit of planning and forethought - and would benefit all.
The training facilities (simulator) could definitely be shared, again with planning and forethought.
Parts/maintenance sharing would potentially be problematic as I understand the Surveillance aircraft vs VIP aircraft would be on different airworthiness/maintenance regimes - but that could have been resolved/worked around with some effort also.


There could be one way crew swaps. The time required to get appropriate security requirements and doctrinal stuff sorted the other way would be problematic at best.

Sim is probably the biggest aspect, to my knowledge neither A/C is getting one.

The thing with this, like everything in defence related acquisition is those that know know and won’t say a word, and those who don’t usually don’t have the information to arrive at the “right” decision.

Either way, it sure does look like a nice jet!
junior.VH-LFA is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2019, 10:49
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Galapagos of the aviation's world
Age: 54
Posts: 9
Could be a little French gift after the purchase of a bunch of submarines....
Just to give a taste and open the door to more falcon sales....
Just a thought.....happened in the past....
pelosh is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2019, 20:38
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: The wrong time zone...
Posts: 657
Originally Posted by pelosh View Post
Could be a little French gift after the purchase of a bunch of submarines....
Just to give a taste and open the door to more falcon sales....
Just a thought.....happened in the past....
Actually, you might be on the money there - I did hear the 7Xs (well, the lease anyway...) came pretty cheap.
josephfeatherweight is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2019, 23:15
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: act
Posts: 142
VIP fleet has been leased since the 80’s, an entirely different acquisition program to purchasing a platform outright. Gunnedah, Halls Creek, Hamilton VIC, some of the short strips used by 34. Another advantage of the Falcons are higher MLW vs BOW, means you can carry more fuel, payload into tight strips, especially where there is no Jet A1 available. PCN? If the government wants to come into a regional town to spend cash, do you think the council won’t issue a concession??
Vref+5 is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2019, 06:05
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 20
Originally Posted by chimbu warrior View Post
4 x G550's for 2.5 billion; some middleman has seen Australia coming and done nicely out of this.
The 'middleman' as you put it is the US Government FMS program and US contractors behind the design/integration of the capability on behalf of the US Government.
A30_737_AEWC is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2019, 04:27
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,942
Originally Posted by josephfeatherweight View Post

Actually, you might be on the money there - I did hear the 7Xs (well, the lease anyway...) came pretty cheap.
Folks,
Without "the facts", who knows.
But one thing is certain, from the pilot or engineering point of view, the 7X is an outstanding aircraft, as are its predecessors and Dassault contemporaries.
And the Dassault company is, itself, quite a fascinating story, a living testimony to its founder-- how, with brains and determination, a small independent company can survive and prosper in an era of "Big Government" and nationalisation.
Tootle pip!!
LeadSled is offline  
Old 7th Apr 2019, 05:25
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 186
When was the tender to establish best value for money or aircraft suitability?
Rudder is offline  
Old 7th Apr 2019, 08:57
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Aus
Age: 27
Posts: 345
Originally Posted by Rudder View Post
When was the tender to establish best value for money or aircraft suitability?
https://australianaviation.com.au/20...ntractor-role/

Stop clutching at straws.
junior.VH-LFA is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2019, 11:35
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NSW
Posts: 241
Its official: Three Falcon 7X to replace the CL604's third quarter on 2019 to coincide with end of CL604 leases. Good choice.
TBM-Legend is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2019, 07:03
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 20
Do we know under what contract the Falcon 7Xs services are being acquired/provided ? Is it under the existing arrangement with NG ? Or is there a new contractor on the block ? Apparently Dassault offered the Falcon 7X to both contractors who were shortlisted for the ongoing/future provision of SPA/VIP aircraft services.

https://australianaviation.com.au/20...aaf-vip-fleet/

What I'm really asking is who was the preferred contractor for the award of this contract:

Replacement Special Purpose Aircraft (SPA) Transport Service - Managing Contractor
https://www.tenders.gov.au/?event=pu...A84007338AE512
A30_737_AEWC is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2019, 11:49
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia
Age: 60
Posts: 5
My understanding is the two shortlisted Managing Contractors both backed away from the contract.
MustangRG is online now  
Old 2nd Jun 2019, 05:00
  #37 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nth Queensland
Posts: 102
A56-002

The second RAAF Falcon 7X left France yesterday and currently overnight in India. A56-002
Petropavlovsk is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2019, 01:39
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Dunda
Posts: 91
Is the falcon already up and at work? Saw CNS-SYD REGENT92 then to CBR as REGENT94 this morning.

Thought I read Q3 2019 it would be operational? Seems remarkably quick for a new type.
patty50 is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2019, 02:53
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 118
No tender process for selection of aircraft. No best value for money process for competing aircraft. Just how it works now.
d_concord is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2019, 03:53
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NSW
Posts: 241
No tender process for selection of aircraft. No best value for money process for competing aircraft. Just how it works now.
Not so. There was a tender which included aircraft and support. The aircraft, like the Challengers and BBJ are leased. Northrop Grumman won...
TBM-Legend is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.