King Air down at Essendon?
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,692
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Akro - it didn't climb because he stopped piloting.
Leady, slip and skid occur during a turn, when the turn is not perfectly coordinated.
Sideslip is when the aircraft is going through the air "somewhat sideways". It can have a significant sideslip angle but still be travelling in a straight line - with zero yaw and all forces in equilibrium!
Sideslip is when the aircraft is going through the air "somewhat sideways". It can have a significant sideslip angle but still be travelling in a straight line - with zero yaw and all forces in equilibrium!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,692
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
aviate, navigate,communicate?
If I had a low level incident that had me worried, I'd be thinking about getting the services out early, which would prompt you to make a mayday call. Plus, the Mojave incident has burned in my mind that you need to make the mayday call to prevent AsA & ATSB from attacking you later.
Akro - you need to get past this idea that his experience equated to competence. I have a vast training background and I have been with 15,000 hour pilots that I wouldn't piss on and I have been with 1500 hour pilots that fly like eagles. EXPERIENCE DOES NOT NECESSARILY EQUAL COMPETENCE.. I have seen it so many times.
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Look closely at the pixel method.
There is no basis to suggest that he stopped flying.
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
King Air Down at Essendon
It may help to understand this crash by describing a crash of a Bonanza I witnessed at Archerfield some time ago.
A fully loaded Bonanza took off on 28.
At the time, I was working from building just to the south of the terminal building.
What drew our attention, was the Bonanza being airborne well before you’d expect to see it off the ground. The climb levelled out, then started again, then levelled out then went into a vertical climb ending in a stall turn and descent into the ground.
(it landed in the creek actually just near the 10 threshold).
Alarming to watch I can tell you.
It did this out of control manoeuvring because it was trimmed full nose up on the elevators.
It had returned to AF just prior to loading and the attempted departure of the crashed flight.
The aircraft was trimmed nose up from the previous landing when it attempted the takeoff.
So, during the Bonanza’s departure, the controls were just doing what the aerodynamics wanted them to do and simply overpowered the pilot.
Slow speed, the pilot could handle it but as the speed increased the trim position forced the elevators to full nose up and the pilot simply could not stop it doing so.
Now think of this B200.
It accelerates and starts veering left as the aerodynamics are forcing the rudder to yaw hard nose left.
I can only speculate of the pilot’s reaction but it must have been startling to him and he never gets his head around the problem and the solution.
The yaw continues, it gets airborne, secondary effect of yaw comes into play, and …
If the Bonanza pilot had recognised why the pilot was pushing so hard on the elevators, it should have followed that trim follows the control pressure.
Ditto with the B200 pilot.
And the other solution was in both cases, get off the power.
A fully loaded Bonanza took off on 28.
At the time, I was working from building just to the south of the terminal building.
What drew our attention, was the Bonanza being airborne well before you’d expect to see it off the ground. The climb levelled out, then started again, then levelled out then went into a vertical climb ending in a stall turn and descent into the ground.
(it landed in the creek actually just near the 10 threshold).
Alarming to watch I can tell you.
It did this out of control manoeuvring because it was trimmed full nose up on the elevators.
It had returned to AF just prior to loading and the attempted departure of the crashed flight.
The aircraft was trimmed nose up from the previous landing when it attempted the takeoff.
So, during the Bonanza’s departure, the controls were just doing what the aerodynamics wanted them to do and simply overpowered the pilot.
Slow speed, the pilot could handle it but as the speed increased the trim position forced the elevators to full nose up and the pilot simply could not stop it doing so.
Now think of this B200.
It accelerates and starts veering left as the aerodynamics are forcing the rudder to yaw hard nose left.
I can only speculate of the pilot’s reaction but it must have been startling to him and he never gets his head around the problem and the solution.
The yaw continues, it gets airborne, secondary effect of yaw comes into play, and …
If the Bonanza pilot had recognised why the pilot was pushing so hard on the elevators, it should have followed that trim follows the control pressure.
Ditto with the B200 pilot.
And the other solution was in both cases, get off the power.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,692
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Akro - you need to get past this idea that his experience equated to competence.
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
XYGT is correct - one Jan Kennedy. I saw this accident too like I witnessed the fatal C206 accident at CAB that killed five souls. My statement to the coroner was that it appeared to me that the trim might have been left set for landing as the aircraft had no rapid pitch change that might have been associated with a seat rollback.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,692
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Forget the pixel method, Old Akro, I suggest it would be too erroneous. Just look at the impact marks diagram and associated analysis.
Secondly, I'm not completely won over by the roof marks because a) from the time any part f the aircraft touched the roof, the path of the aircraft would have become violent and not fully predictable. The first part of the aircraft contacting would create yaw in itself. b) the propellor marks aren't fully consistent with the aircraft position they have outlined. I think the slash marks look like they are made with less aircraft yaw.
I think the work they did here was interesting, its just not intellectually rigorous enough to base their conclusion upon.
Regarding the pilots "leg giving out" you and I are just going to disagree. My reading is that the SIM pilot said that the rudder force was manageable at the airspeeds that the accident aircraft was flying. The sadness is that the ATSB didn't undertake the SIM exercise diligently. It should have replicated the incident aircraft's flight condition. In which case we wouldn't be debating the implications of comma's.
Drain Bamaged
Aircraft doing what it was doing and not thinking once about rudder trimming your aircraft for a little help!?
Really?
The maydays were broadcast in the last 3 seconds before impact
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,692
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I understand that the B200 is certified under FAR 23. Paraphrasing FAR 23.677 it says essentially that the aircraft should have enough control authority to land in any trim position. The wording suggests they are primarily referring to elevator trim. Does anyone know if this is tested for rudder trim?
In a similar vein, I note that the ATSB report indicates did not consult Raytheon. If the ATSB is asserting that the B200 cannot be flown with full rudder trim, wouldn't it be worth an email to the manufacturer to see if they flight tested this condition????
In a similar vein, I note that the ATSB report indicates did not consult Raytheon. If the ATSB is asserting that the B200 cannot be flown with full rudder trim, wouldn't it be worth an email to the manufacturer to see if they flight tested this condition????
