Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Steam Gauges Are Safer..?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Feb 2016, 19:50
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,041
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Never mind what you think I will say. If you know the answer to my question then please enlighten us all. Why do airlines and manufacturers not choose the steam gauge format?
PENKO is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2016, 21:54
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Have helped design elements of the A330 and A340 cockpit when seconded to Airbus at Toulouse back in the mid 90s I could tell you why and I could tell you what the process is but you would not believe it except to say that no line pilot, trainer or examiner had a say in it
Would find that interesting GBS so please go ahead
mcgrath50 is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2016, 12:38
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why do airlines and manufacturers not choose the steam gauge format?
For the same reason that the manufacturers of glass cockpit avionics continue to produce tape displays - they believe that the tape displays are "industry standard".

Many years ago I did some work with Boeing when they were evaluating PFD displays during the design stage for the 747-400. We had to fly several complicated procedures using various displays - some with tapes and some with round dials. Provided the scaling was right they were all flyable but I much preferred the old round dials, particularly for airspeed.
Thanks Bergerie1. Do you have any recollection of how the senior flight people at Boeing regarded the PFDs? I read somewhere that, following the evaluation (involving you, it seems) of the glass cockpit displays, some of the senior flight people were against proceeding with them, but were overruled by a management that was swayed more by the economic benefits of the displays.

I sure would not like to give up my airspeed trend arrow.
Yes, a wonderful thing, but only necessary with tape displays - which tells you something about the intrinsic inadequacy of tape displays.
FGD135 is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2016, 22:50
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Folks,
Go back and read the original report, sadly, in this thread, the "headline" has been beaten to death, the real content of the reports has been completely missed.
Colgan Air, AF447 etc. were not caused by "steam gauges" versus "glass".
Tootle pip!!
LeadSled is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2016, 07:17
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,041
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
The original article basically states (as far is I can discern) that the systems behind electronic instruments are more complex and that general aviation pilots do not understand them, nor have the appropriate mental models ready to tackle any failures. Sounds like a training issue to me.

General Aviation pilots have higher accident rates in technically advanced aircraft whilst the advent of the magenta line has led a dramatic reduction of crashes in professional aviation. Again, it sounds like a training issue to me.

With regard to the off topic ( ) digital vs. analog discussion:
My car has both an analog and a digital speed indication. I refer to both, but in different circumstances. When accuracy is required due to speed limits, cruise control operation and for general speed information, I refer to the digital readout. However when I brake suddenly because of a speed camera, I prefer the angular indication of the analog speed needle. So far I agree with those that state that steam driven round dials have an advantage, however only in certain dynamic circumstances. Life in a modern airline cockpit mostly calls for great accuracy and at other times for instant recognition. A modern PFD is a good compromise between digital and analog representation. It might not be suitable for private pilots who fly once a month though..
PENKO is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2016, 07:36
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: A place in the sun
Age: 82
Posts: 1,269
Received 48 Likes on 19 Posts
FGD135,

Unfortunately I can't answer your question as I do not know how the final decision was made. However, the best instrument for me was the pointer and drum - the pointer for the quick glance out of the corner of the eye and the numerals on the drum for an exact figure when I needed it.
Bergerie1 is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2016, 07:43
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ijatta
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe it's just me, but when the winds are gusty on final approach, the speed tape's bouncing around made it difficult for me to ascertain my airspeed because the digits just became a blur.

This is on the 777 and I'm old, so that may explain it.
wanabee777 is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2016, 07:48
  #48 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,576
Received 426 Likes on 225 Posts
However when I brake suddenly because of a speed camera
You're joking, I hope....
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2016, 08:06
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,041
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
You know, around where I live the police have been cautioned by the authorities (!) that they have to suspend their speed camera operation if they notice a traffic jam forming in front of their camera.


Maybe it's just me, but when the winds are gusty on final approach, the speed tape's bouncing around made it difficult for me to ascertain my airspeed because the digits just became a blur.

This is on the 777 and I'm old, so that may explain it.
Maybe it helps not to focus on the digits but on the analog display of the speedbug. The same speedbug that we have been flying around with on non-EFIS aircraft. It's interesting to note that Airbus aircraft do not have this 'nervous' readout of digital airspeed on the PFD.
PENKO is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2016, 08:32
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Here and there
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 15 Posts
Steam Gauges

PENKO hit the nail on the head when he commented that pilots who fly once a month, be they private pilots or low time commercial pilots, will probably find it harder to stay current on glass.
Aero clubs and hire aircraft will probably get business if they hold older models of aircraft for hire that have round instruments.
On another drift pilots who train on glass and then go into the general aviation work area, not airlines, may have to go back to flight school to get some experience with round gauges because that is what the older aircraft are still using.
runway16 is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2016, 09:46
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,559
Received 76 Likes on 44 Posts
I had a laugh when I did my glass-panel wonder-jet CBT: "the flight instruments are arranged in the classic T pattern" the nice man said. My @rse!
Capn Bloggs is online now  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.