Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Family building own airport in QLD

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Family building own airport in QLD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Mar 2013, 21:45
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"At least someone is doing something about that disaster area at Brisbane airport and surrounds. Let's hope they don't use the same mob for the roads and car parks"

Must be the same people they use at Sydney and Melbourne ?
500N is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2013, 22:23
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 89 Likes on 32 Posts
I think we are seeing the start of something that will replicate itslef all over Australia.

Contrary to received wisdom, not all brillance and money must necessarily flow from Canberra, Brisbane, Sydney, Melbourne and Perth.

Technologies now facilitate decentralisation. "The Bush" is not short of money and ideas either.

The benfits of doing it yourself include the ability to tell Canberra or Spring Street to go **** themselves.

To the posters who say "great this is going to fic Brisbanes problems and we need a high speed rail link" I say, really? Think the Wagners did this to fix Brisbanes problems? It may be that they intend to bypass Brisbane entirely.

Similar stuff is going on in Victoria. Regions are asking for at least $4.4 bn in infrastructure according to reports - and if the regions keep getting the short end of the stik when it comes to infrastructure they will start being creative exactly like the Wagners.

The capital cities are a mess - stuck in gridlock and smarter people are getting out.

CASA would be "courageaous" not to support and facilitate this development.
Sunfish is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2013, 22:27
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in the classroom of life
Age: 55
Posts: 6,864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
emergov

I think you forget that the taxes paid by people DOING stuff is where the priority lies. YBOK should be sold to Wagners for a cheap price and they expand it into a decent airport.

The Army base should be relocated somewhere else, where some employment and growth would be appreciated.

Solves two things at once!

And before you get started, I am 100% about looking after the ADF, in my opinion they are under resourced. I was and should have joined in 85, for some reason I did engineering instead. Fortunately engineering has done well for me and I now pay several times the average wage in taxes each year, and I am annoyed more of it does not go to the ADF. Ohh and Jnr Jaba is part the way there, so I am not about harming the ADF at gain of private industry.
Jabawocky is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2013, 23:05
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The regions might be asking for 4.4Bn but whether they get it is
a different matter entirely.

Look at Tulla - how many years has it been since a rail link
was first looked at ? And why hasn't a link been built ?
Not sure how true it is but I gather half the reason is the airport
doesn't want a rail link because car parking fees are so lucrative.
500N is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2013, 23:09
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jabbawocky,

I appreciate your position, and in fact I think the Wagner's are on to a good concept here, he certainly has the support of the community, which is convinced it needs a new airport.

But I'm told hundreds of million dollars have been spent on Oakey over the years and that Oakey airspace is unique in Australia - optimised for helo training. We are now cheerfully suggesting government spends that money again because a private company bought some land 10km away from the base and might pay some taxes on future profit.

Good luck to Wagner's, but if CASA kills their proposal, perhaps we could blame a lack of aeronautical chart reading skill rather than blaming Defence for owning an airfield since 1942 and operating the airspace around it for decades.
emergov is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2013, 23:52
  #26 (permalink)  
601
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Brisbane, Qld, Australia
Age: 78
Posts: 1,478
Received 19 Likes on 14 Posts
If you really think that in this day and age anybody builds an IFR airport (in the western world) capable of handling 747's without considering ALL of those things very carefully you are of very simple mind..
Yes - Brisbane is one example. What combination does Brisbane have during the worst weather for its location.

Rain, low cloud and SE wind.

Sure the majority of wind is NE/SW. But this occurs mainly during benign weather.

Which way is the main runway aligned.

NE/SW

It is fun breaking out at mimina and looking out of the the other side of the cockpit for the runway.

But when it was built by a Department not versed in aviation, you get what you pay for.

As for Okay, the Army took over a civilian airport and moved everyone else out. Maybe they could have another move.
601 is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2013, 00:12
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Speaking of Brisbane: whatever happened to that private GA airport project to compete with / replace Archerfield that was in the news a year or so ago?
baswell is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2013, 00:27
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Australia
Age: 66
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
bas

Lockyer Valley Airport (see ad on P38 of this month's Aviation Trader)... again another airport that infringes military airspace.

As for Wellcamp the Wagner's need to be commended for their vision and balls to build this. Sure their grandkids might make some money, but the real winner will be the Toowoomba City and surrounding people/businesses that now get a decent airport.

As for Oakey, they can quite easily co-exist and share the small amount of their airspace that Wellcamp needs.
hiwaytohell is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2013, 00:29
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mel-burn
Posts: 4,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This morning on Sunrise they showed a family member standing in front of a lot of construction equipment. It looked to be full steam ahead.
VH-XXX is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2013, 01:07
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Sydney NSW Australia
Posts: 3,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
finalyl the first piece of new infrastructure the country has seen thats actually needed!
Ultralights is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2013, 01:38
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 46
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes your right.. excellent example. They just built Brisbane airport and when they finished the project they were kicking themselves for not having thought about the wind and the weather first. They must have just completely forgotten about those things. Or maybe they were just inexperienced with airport building and no clever people (like you or Oakape) realised what they were doing until it was too late.
bodybag is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2013, 05:27
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SE Qld, Australia
Age: 77
Posts: 1,176
Received 39 Likes on 26 Posts
601:

As for Okay, the Army took over a civilian airport and moved everyone else out. Maybe they could have another move.
Err, Oakey was built for the RAAF in 1943, initially as a home for 6AD.
Dora-9 is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2013, 06:46
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: in the classroom of life
Age: 55
Posts: 6,864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I dont get what the big deal is....YBOK can keep their airspace. It is only restricted by name not nature.

I fly through there quite a lot, when active and when not.

emergov......its just not an issue.
Jabawocky is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2013, 06:50
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: somewhere in Oz
Age: 54
Posts: 913
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Canberra will have its work cut out ensuring this decentralisation thing doesn't get out of hand. It's dangerous stuff, you know!

Last edited by Andy_RR; 12th Mar 2013 at 06:51.
Andy_RR is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2013, 07:28
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I fly through there quite a lot, when active and when not.
It's one thing to plan through it on an IFR plan, quite another to need clearance any time you want to do a few circuits. Plus all RA-Aus pilots are not welcome as active restricted areas are to be treated as class C...

Not knowing the location, I can't tell, but of it is at the edge and doesn't infringe IFR approach paths, then I imagine they might be open to doing the same as we have here at Gawler, I nice cut-out with enough altitude to get out VFR without clearance.
baswell is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2013, 08:05
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Australia
Age: 66
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bas it (threshold of Wellcamp Rwy 13) will be about 9 nm bearing 160 from Oakey, and 6 nm west of TWB!

Last edited by hiwaytohell; 12th Mar 2013 at 08:08.
hiwaytohell is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2013, 10:48
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What about the good ole USA? Many towns / cities have numerous airports in very close poximity. What Emergov doesnt get is no one is asking Oakey to shut down and move. All it will take is some planning for turbines and jets (high altitude) to approach over rotary wing (low alt) aircraft. Chuck in weekends and public holidays and it may only be an issue for a very short time each week and when the wind is blowing the wrong way.

Groggie
Grogmonster is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2013, 11:58
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: QLD - where drivers are yet to realise that the left lane goes to their destination too.
Posts: 3,338
Received 182 Likes on 75 Posts
So after the 747 load of tourists exit the terminal, where do they go? Oh that's right, they wait for the line of buses to take them on the long trip to anywhere else. Or how about the FIFO guy who has to drive to/from TWB or catch the bus before/after catching his flight. Are they hoping they'll all live in Toowoomba instead? Can't see it working. Avalon is different. It's between Geelong and Melbourne, freeway & reasonable public transport in either direction, and is effectively suburban. And still only Jetstar go there. Sure this may capture some FIFO traffic, but Toowoomba is not a realistic alternative to Brisbane. Otherwise everyone would just be using the Gold or Sunny Coast airports now.
Traffic_Is_Er_Was is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2013, 14:19
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Australia
Age: 66
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think you are missing the point Traffic

Firstly Toowoomba is a city of over 130,000 people and the second largest inland city in Australia, that has outgrown its tiny airport (which is now surrounded by houses).

A decent airport will attract increased services to Sydney and eventually elsewhere.

In the longer term, like 25+ years, which is where the Wagners are looking there is a real possibility of freighters from Asia.

The planned new airport just happens to be adjacent to the proposed Toowoomba bypass, and once it and the alternate range crossing are built Wellcamp will be closer to Brisbane's western suburbs than the Gold Coast and similar in transit times than Brisbane Airport.

Wellcamp over time could also be a viable alternate for Ipswich.

Keep in mind a lot of agricultural produce is grown (or can be grown) in the area for high value export, including quite a deal for air freight, so as Brisbane continues to grow, particularly in the western and south western areas, Wellcamp will definitely be a viable alternative, particularly if there are cost advantages for distribution and warehousing due lower costs than in Brisbane, plus the prospects for agricultural/horticultural airfreight backloads.

Likewise in the 25 year timeframe the Melbourne - Brisbane inland rail line could well be a reality. http://www.nationbuildingprogram.gov...nd_Railway.pdf This project is far more than a pie in the sky idea. Take a look at the map in the link, it runs right past Wellcamp.

The Wagners are not looking 5 or even 10 years out. These guys are looking past their next generation. Very smart guys!
hiwaytohell is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2013, 21:26
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: YMML
Posts: 2,561
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Do not knock Wagners. They are a local company with international reach. If ever Queensland is going to grow away from the SE corner then infrastructure must be built in this region. Agriculture is but one industry. If the greenies are put in check then the basic ingredient for development....abundant cheap power and water....if you build it, they will come!
OZBUSDRIVER is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.