RFDS Central Section EBA
It's been dragging on for almost a year now with no real end in sight.
30/31 votes were "no" on the first offer back in January.
Intervals between meetings have been much too long, and now they are trying to tell us that not having the agreement in place by the end of financial year means no back pay. Working for 2009 pay in 2011... Hmm
30/31 votes were "no" on the first offer back in January.
Intervals between meetings have been much too long, and now they are trying to tell us that not having the agreement in place by the end of financial year means no back pay. Working for 2009 pay in 2011... Hmm
Guest
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
glekichi
Ok thats obviously not good. But you know if you ALL stick together and be patient (very patient) you will get a good outcome. Get advice re the back pay (FWA), not sure they can get out of that. Remember its industry standard your after as far as pay is concerned.
SN
Ok thats obviously not good. But you know if you ALL stick together and be patient (very patient) you will get a good outcome. Get advice re the back pay (FWA), not sure they can get out of that. Remember its industry standard your after as far as pay is concerned.
SN
Sprucegoose
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hughes Point, where life is great! Was also resident on page 13, but now I'm lost in Cyberspace....
Age: 59
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I don't think they can do that Glekichi, the only way forward is to stick together!
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why can't we just have a national EBA for the pilot group? Rumours are that funding is to be removed from the section CEO's control and turned over to the national board why not do it with salaries as well. It would save having these bitter little wars in every section every couple of years that just seems to brew more resentment every time we go through it.
Guest
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
HC
I agree. We need a nation wide RFDS pilots EBA. We should also be able to transfer between sections without re-applying and "doing a deal" with our LSL and other entitlements.
SN
I agree. We need a nation wide RFDS pilots EBA. We should also be able to transfer between sections without re-applying and "doing a deal" with our LSL and other entitlements.
SN
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Still in Paradise
Age: 60
Posts: 861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey Harry, haven't you got more important (smaller things) to deal with just at the moment
glek, I have recently been part of an EBA that dragged out over two years, and went to arbitration. The backpay was to the end of the previous agreement, ie two years back. Maybe run that issue past your AFAP or FWA rep.
Mind you, the red woodpecker got most of it back in tax anyway....
Dunno why RFDS doesn't have a national system on all counts - one HR department rather than 4, one EBA for all pilots, one for all nurses, one standard for all issues...... would be logical, no?
glek, I have recently been part of an EBA that dragged out over two years, and went to arbitration. The backpay was to the end of the previous agreement, ie two years back. Maybe run that issue past your AFAP or FWA rep.
Mind you, the red woodpecker got most of it back in tax anyway....Dunno why RFDS doesn't have a national system on all counts - one HR department rather than 4, one EBA for all pilots, one for all nurses, one standard for all issues...... would be logical, no?
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Jamair - Totally agree
Only part of most RFDS sections that is rapidly expanding is HR and Admin.
No wonder it is getting harder to compete with Charter operators who want to pick up the State Govt Health contracts.
But - like the chance of getting rid of State Govts, not likely to happen.
Only part of most RFDS sections that is rapidly expanding is HR and Admin.
No wonder it is getting harder to compete with Charter operators who want to pick up the State Govt Health contracts.
But - like the chance of getting rid of State Govts, not likely to happen.
I feel for you guys/gals.The RFDS is the best job by far but don't forget it's entwined with commercial pressures, Govt contracts (where applicable) & therefore subject to all that goes with the commercial reality of it all, cost containment.
Fuel, maint & hardware are pretty much not negotiable but the human element is, that's the part that is negotiable hence the constant battle to get better wages for the pilots & reduce costs for the managers.
The original concept which Flynn dreamed up many years ago is still there but pretty much only in spirit these days, it's now a big business with all the business dramas attached. The recent loss of the Vic Air Ambo contract proved that, the RFDS was the only dedicated aero-medical provider in this country that I can think of (with no other interests elsewhere)& it was pushed out purely due commercial reasons,money!
Good luck to those that are still there living the dream & being part of a respected community as man can't live by respect alone
Wmk2
Fuel, maint & hardware are pretty much not negotiable but the human element is, that's the part that is negotiable hence the constant battle to get better wages for the pilots & reduce costs for the managers.
The original concept which Flynn dreamed up many years ago is still there but pretty much only in spirit these days, it's now a big business with all the business dramas attached. The recent loss of the Vic Air Ambo contract proved that, the RFDS was the only dedicated aero-medical provider in this country that I can think of (with no other interests elsewhere)& it was pushed out purely due commercial reasons,money!
Good luck to those that are still there living the dream & being part of a respected community as man can't live by respect alone
Wmk2
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Duck & Wally
Well said both - bloody shame but how true.
Would be interesting to see the list of respondants to contracts if they had to do clinics (inc providing the medical staff) & primary retrievals as well as the contract ambulance work.
Well said both - bloody shame but how true.
Would be interesting to see the list of respondants to contracts if they had to do clinics (inc providing the medical staff) & primary retrievals as well as the contract ambulance work.
Guest
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wal
Thats not quite right mate. Fuel, aircraft and parts ARE negotiable and the RFDS would find that they would have good purchasing power if they worked together on things like a national fleet plan, fuel hedging, fuel supply contracts and parts stores, pilot training, recruiting and aircraft medical fitouts. Thats without even looking at the medical side of things. Mate if they just got together we could probaly knock 20% off the cost running an airframe over it's life. They are their own worst enemy on this. They operate the largest fleet of King Airs in the southern hemisphere and they could plan the replacement strategy over 50 years if they wanted!
SN
Thats not quite right mate. Fuel, aircraft and parts ARE negotiable and the RFDS would find that they would have good purchasing power if they worked together on things like a national fleet plan, fuel hedging, fuel supply contracts and parts stores, pilot training, recruiting and aircraft medical fitouts. Thats without even looking at the medical side of things. Mate if they just got together we could probaly knock 20% off the cost running an airframe over it's life. They are their own worst enemy on this. They operate the largest fleet of King Airs in the southern hemisphere and they could plan the replacement strategy over 50 years if they wanted!
SN
Okay 'SN' perhaps I'll re phrase y words for the likes of you.
Negotiating of the human element is personal effects us, where it hurts, the other is purely numbers on paper. I think most here get my point.
Wmk2
Negotiating of the human element is personal effects us, where it hurts, the other is purely numbers on paper. I think most here get my point.
Wmk2
Guest
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Apart from the Central Section who are well behind for some reason RFDS pilot's are remunerated fairly well. Although there is always room to improve. As far as losing contracts is concerned this will continue until the RFDS gets competitive. You just can't blow endless amounts of public money favouring one operator if they are hidiously expensive. On the other hand I would say that if the RFDS is within cooee of the cheapest tender they should get the work based on reputation and the fact the money stays in the country.
One way to help the RFDS be more competitive may be to consolidate and get an economy of scale advantage over the competition. Fight fire with fire!
SN
One way to help the RFDS be more competitive may be to consolidate and get an economy of scale advantage over the competition. Fight fire with fire!
SN
A national pilots eba would be a great thing. An "aircrew" eba including nurses would be another interestig option. Like the others here though, I can't see it happening - especially with the different roster system here.
The feeling I get is that the pilots are sticking together on this one, and with the company not looking like budging, pia seems inevitable.
The feeling I get is that the pilots are sticking together on this one, and with the company not looking like budging, pia seems inevitable.
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Dog House
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
National EBA
A national EBA for the RFDS has been mooted for quite a few years - It might be more likley if some of the old wood gets scraped away. Portability of T &C's with the ability to apply to Bases around Australia would make the job perfect!
Adding medical staff to an EBA would not be easy though.
Adding medical staff to an EBA would not be easy though.
Guest
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Interesting. So whats the advantage of bringing nurses in under a pilots eba?
Nationalisation would be great. Earn points for working remote areas for a transfer to your choice of location. Transfer between sections without having to apply for the job. Work your way up the ranks. What a great career path!
You know what? IT AIN'T GONNA HAPPEN! Too many big fish in little ponds etc.
Whats the latest offer central have put on the table?
SN
Nationalisation would be great. Earn points for working remote areas for a transfer to your choice of location. Transfer between sections without having to apply for the job. Work your way up the ranks. What a great career path!
You know what? IT AIN'T GONNA HAPPEN! Too many big fish in little ponds etc.
Whats the latest offer central have put on the table?
SN
Seeing that we work the same shifts and seem to be forever overtaking each other on the salary front, having the nurses under the same eba would make sense in terms of a united workforce. At the moment it seems like either one or the other is always in the middle of an eba, bringing with it all the usual unpleasantries.
Still, a nation wide pilot's eba is what we really need, and, as has been said, the ability to move between bases.
I still don't know how it would work with our differing rosters. We need some kind of equation that considers and puts different weights on standby time, actual duty time, time of day, and flight time to give an overall figure that is easy to compare. I'd imagine that would plug right into an FRMS algorithm too.
We have been told that our roster of five on, grey day, two off means we are less productive than qld thus the pay gap, but I don't see how that could be. We fly 550-600hrs a year as is, averaging around 45hrs a week of rostered standby of which around 35hrs become actual duty, plus the usual few hours of overtime outside of rostered standby times.
Plus, if ya ask Wally we need some danger money for flying the single too!
Still, a nation wide pilot's eba is what we really need, and, as has been said, the ability to move between bases.
I still don't know how it would work with our differing rosters. We need some kind of equation that considers and puts different weights on standby time, actual duty time, time of day, and flight time to give an overall figure that is easy to compare. I'd imagine that would plug right into an FRMS algorithm too.
We have been told that our roster of five on, grey day, two off means we are less productive than qld thus the pay gap, but I don't see how that could be. We fly 550-600hrs a year as is, averaging around 45hrs a week of rostered standby of which around 35hrs become actual duty, plus the usual few hours of overtime outside of rostered standby times.
Plus, if ya ask Wally we need some danger money for flying the single too!