Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Are they doing this on purpose?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st Jan 2011, 03:38
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Sydney
Posts: 817
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are they doing this on purpose?

I have heard recently of a SECOND pilot who left a certain operator whilst still bonded, and agreed to pay his bond. The operator then cuts off all lines of communication with the ex pilot, never reply to emails , won't take your phone call or even reply when you have left several messages.
The pilots then pay back MOST of their bond.... in a payment schedule process. The pilot, as I have said before HAS agreed to pay the full amount of the bond owing, and is in the process of doing so.
In the meantime, the company has started debt recovery procedures against the pilot, and does not inform the pilot of this. The company gives the debt collection agency wrong details (twice now!!!) and the first thing the pilot knows of it all is when the debt recovery agency hits them with an extra $3000 or so of fees, because the pilot failed to show up to court and/or respond to the debt collection agencies letters.
In BOTH cases, the company sent legal stuff to addresses which were old before the pilot even left the company. in BOTH cases, the pilot HAD updated his contact details with the company when he was still there,and BOTH pilots had received other correspondence from the company at the correct details when they worked for the company.

it is just ANOTHER pain in the neck that pilots who are paying their bonds back have to deal with. and it would seem that the company are doing this on PURPOSE to make a point.

I would say to ANY pilot who leaves a company where they are bonded.... KEEP A RECORD OF ALL CORRESPONDENCE! even if it is phone call, a christmas card(hahaha) or a legal letter. keep the envelopes too!!!!!
apache is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2011, 05:26
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Sydney
Age: 44
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am not sure - don't put to malice what you can put to incompetence.

I had a similar issue with a car lease when I switched jobs (not aviation related). The lease company organised the finance and did the paperwork, and in the duration of the lease I moved. The lease company got the details from my employer automatically, updated their info and everything happened as normal. When I switched companies the lease terminated and the finance became my responsibility directly. A month later I got a call informing me my car was going to be repossessed and would I like to catch up on two payments. Seems the lease company never changed my address on the finance and I did not get their paperwork and late notices. The date the lease terminated was one day before the normal finance payment, so I was unknowingly two payments in the whole instead of the one I knew I was, which triggered their debt recovery actions.

I would not be surprised if it was a similar setup - the bond is held with some old details and no-one was proactive enough to ensure they were correct before beginning action.
SgtBundy is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2011, 05:31
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 3,889
Likes: 0
Received 250 Likes on 108 Posts
Anytime you deal with your employer about something as serious as this, even leave etc PUT IT IN WRITING. Email is great because it is time stamped, however a sent email does not mean it was received.

the debt recovery agency hits them with an extra $3000 or so of fees, because the pilot failed to show up to court and/or respond to the debt collection agencies letters.
If you have not been SERVED with a letter of demand then you cannot be "fined" an extra $3000. Just because a company sends you an invoice does not mean you are legally required to pay it.

The debt collection company cannot add money to a debt because you did not show up in court, the court could impose the penalty but only if you had been summonsed to appear.

Spend $200 and get some legal advice.

I know of one MFO who told his own bonded pilots not to worry when they left as the bond was legally unenforceable!

Come up with a payment plan, how about $20 a month for the next X years?
Icarus2001 is online now  
Old 31st Jan 2011, 06:12
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Unless the law has been changed recently, there is no obligation on a debtor to pay any collection fees demanded by a debt collector.

In other words, you are only liable for the original debt with the original party. Debt collectors will demand you pay their fees, but tell them where to stick it. After all, you have no commercial deal or contract whatsoever with the debt collector, who is hired by the creditor, and is paid by them.
Back Pressure is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2011, 06:18
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Brisvegas
Posts: 3,889
Likes: 0
Received 250 Likes on 108 Posts
The ACCC guide to debt collection. Section 12 is useful and so is section 19.

http://www.accc.gov.au/content/item....int%202010.pdf

The operator then cuts off all lines of communication with the ex pilot, never reply to emails , won't take your phone call or even reply when you have left several messages.
The solution to that is a registered letter addressed to the CEO of the organisation or failing that the CFO.
Icarus2001 is online now  
Old 31st Jan 2011, 08:57
  #6 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 1996
Location: Utopia
Posts: 7,445
Received 230 Likes on 122 Posts
"The company gives the debt collection agency wrong details (twice now!!!) and the first thing the pilot knows of it all is when the debt recovery agency hits them with an extra $3000 or so of fees, because the pilot failed to show up to court and/or respond to the debt collection agencies letters.
In BOTH cases, the company sent legal stuff to addresses which were old before the pilot even left the company. in BOTH cases, the pilot HAD updated his contact details with the company when he was still there,and BOTH pilots had received other correspondence from the company at the correct details when they worked for the company."
apache. That makes no sense. No Court will entertain or pass judgement on a claim if there is no Affidavit of Service and the Respondent is absent.

Either your friend was Served and failed to attend at Court, or you have the story very wrong.

No additional fees or charges are payable unless included in a Court Judgement. If the matter was heard in a Small Claims Tribunal (in most states) the fees and charges a Complainant may claim are minimal.

"The operator then cuts off all lines of communication with the ex pilot, never reply to emails , won't take your phone call or even reply when you have left several messages."
Keep a diary, phone bills, emails etc. The Court would be very interested in a Complainant endeavouring to frustrate settlement of a debt!

I suggest you go check the story as your post is incorrect.
tail wheel is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2011, 09:05
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Sydney
Posts: 817
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
tailwheel...
they were named in a class action as a number of pilots had left, and they were grouped in with the others.
The court found in favour of the company, and the first that these two knew of it was when they were ruled guilty in absentia, and the agency, amazingly, tracked them down.

the second guy I have heard of, took it back to court and the judge ordered them to mediation... the company would NOT negotiate - judge not impressed.

I haven't heard the final outcome.
apache is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2011, 09:17
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: I prefer to remain north of a direct line BNE-ADL
Age: 49
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 10 Posts
Bonds may be a contract but just leave when you want to, in general your going to go overseas anyway so tell them to shove it! I left one about 9 years ago and told them to shove it saved 10k. If companies are starting to really try and get these bonds back I would like to hear which ones, you can P.M me if you like my brother is a lawyer that would love to know, he reckons the companies dont have a leg to stand on!
Angle of Attack is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2011, 09:17
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Since this is a professional pilots rumour network. Could someone maybe hint at which company would be so low as to cause employees/ex employees so much grief. I have heard of bullying in stingy GA jobs but not at the bond for endo stage of jobs.

I am interested because I have been shafted with prickly pineapples all the way through GA and wish not to give service to bollicks companies such as this.

What absolute bastardry.
Zoomy is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2011, 09:38
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The Shire
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Bonds may be a contract but just leave when you want to, in general your going to go overseas anyway so tell them to shove it! I left one about 9 years ago and told them to shove it saved 10k. If companies are starting to really try and get these bonds back I would like to hear which ones, you can P.M me if you like my brother is a lawyer that would love to know, he reckons the companies dont have a leg to stand on!
You're a real moron.

I hope no-one here takes your advice.

I fully support bonding, and I fully support paying it back. It's give and take between Pilots and the companies.

If more people like you told the few operators who are still prepared to endorse their Pilots to shove it when they leave, then the next minute we would all be paying for every rating from your first twin to an airliner.

A bond is a gentleman's agreement. As professional aviators, it is up to us to act like professionals in everything we do.

If I find out who you are, I'll blacklist you with as many aviators as I can.

GG
The Green Goblin is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2011, 09:51
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cairns
Age: 50
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Disclaimer: this is just what I've experienced using the WA system, good luck.

I do not know or care which company you are referring to here, but debt recovery is something I've been learning about for the past two or so years.

State to state things are a little different.

In short, I rented a house to some scumbags, they trashed my house and stopped paying rent, i.e. breached the contract.

Took them to court, they did not turn up, had my case heard, by presenting my evidence ( contract, photos and condition reports ), and the Magistrate ruled in my favour and awarded an amount.

A debt recovery agent basically tries to bully and scare you into coughing up cash, if you (the debtor) are stupid enough to pay up to their conditions, plus interest and their self imposed fee's, your mistake.

Nothing is set in stone until the Magistrate rules as such, i.e. MR Smith, you are hereby ordered to pay ABC $XXXXX.

If you have been making regular payments to the creditor ( or trying too ), the Magistrate is unlikely to be too harsh on you.

Often the Creditor will request a payment schedule, which is the Magistrate ordering you to pay under certain conditions, i.e. $xxx per week, this amount is decided at a "means enquiry", you will need to take pay slips etc etc.

If you default on the installment order, the creditor will then seek a "Garnish" or "Earnings Appropriation Order", which is effectively the court ordering your employer to pay the creditor.

One nasty curve ball that can be thrown in after defaulting on a installment order is the "Seizure and Sale" or "Seizure and Deliver", the bailiff will turn up on your door and take goods to the vales of the outstanding amount, this is not a good situation, a $1200 TV, when seized and sold is worth about $300, my previous tennants found that little gem out the hard way ( that is how the idiots spent their cash splash money, I mean stimulas package).

With this order, there are items that are exempt from the bailiff taking, each state is different ( fridge, work clothes etc etc ). My advice is not to let it get this bad, you do not need your kids to see this.

From what I've seen. Debt recovery agents are used when there is a fair chance of recovering the cash, they are expensive and as others have said, you are under not obligation to pay them squat, unless the Magistrate orders you too.

If you are summonsed to Court, you will be served this notice by hand by either the creditor, debt recovery agent or the bailiff.

If you are summonsed to Court, be it the small claim or the Magistrates, and do not attend, perhaps not immediately, a bench warrant for your arrest will be issued.

The advice above by other posters is sound, get legal advice, if you are the debtor, just about every state has a free service to give you advice, if you are the creditor, you'll have to pay for advice.

Unions, they can offer very good advice and support.

Interest and fees can only be added by the Magistrate.

Everytime you go to court, the creditor has to pay application fees, the debtor will eventually have to pay all of these.

Mediation is often the first step in the process, the two parties enter a short attempt at negotiation:

The Creditor goes into this looking to gain as much of the money as quickly as possible, for example if the debtor owes the creditor $10,000.

The debtor can offer say $5,000 cash, the creditor may take that, so it is done and dusted on the spot. ( the creditor knows it will take atleast 12 months and 4-5 court visits to get the whole amount, and may cost them $6-7,000, [most of which is cost they can not pass on] to recovery the extra $5,000, so they often cut their losses and take the $5,000)

If an agreement is reached at mediation, the court registrar will issue an order detailing the term of the agreement.

To recover a debt entirely will take many visits to court and quite a lot in terms of time and money ( usually 12-18 months, and there is no certainty they will get the money ), application fees will be charged to the debtor, but the creditors time generally is not.
Josh Cox is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2011, 09:51
  #12 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Sydney
Posts: 817
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I fully support bonding, and I fully support paying it back. It's give and take between Pilots and the companies.
and it is THIS sort of attitude which is WHY pilots are now bonded!
20 years ago, there was no such thing.

In years gone by, pilots, especially in regionals, were getting a lesser salary for the first three years, then in the 4th year, jumped by quite a margin. THIS is how the return of service worked.

Nowadays, companies STILL pay less in the first three years... AND either bond you, or make you pay up front. WE have given, and THEY have taken.

Maybe if these companies addressed the REAL issue, ie "WHY are all our pilots so quick to leave?" ... then this wouldn't be an issue.

pesonally, GG, I think that that is a ridiculous statement you make.

If I find out who you are, I'll blacklist you with as many aviators as I can.
are you in management? I just can't get over this statement.
apache is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2011, 09:58
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The Shire
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
pesonally, GG, I think that that is a ridiculous statement you make.

Quote:
If I find out who you are, I'll blacklist you with as many aviators as I can.
are you in management? I just can't get over this statement.
Of course not.

When I started out in the middle of last decade, Pilots in regionals paid for endorsements.

If you wanted to work for Qlink, cough up a Dash 8 endorsement. Want to work for Skippers? Pay for a Metro endorsement etc.

It was only after the events of 2007/2008 that companies started bonding new employees en mass. There were a few that paid prior to that. However the vast majority did not.

We certainly don't want to go back to pay for endorsements in the regionals as well as the airlines. Where will it end?

Any aviator that has done a runner in the regionals I have been involved with has had their name run through the mud from that point on, with both management and with their peers. IMO too bloody right.

GG
The Green Goblin is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2011, 09:58
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cairns
Age: 50
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GG,

If I find out who you are, I'll blacklist you with as many aviators as I can.
I would have to agree with Apache, IMHO that statment presents a very poor image of you.
Josh Cox is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2011, 10:05
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The Shire
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Perhaps I was being a little harsh, but I believe it is up to us as Pilots to work with companies, to ensure both our needs and theirs are met.

We as Pilots, need to get experience to get another foot up the greasy pole and they need stability in their Pilot groups.

If they ask for 2 years, and you agree, then you should be held accountable to their cost of training you. If you leave prior to the agreed term - you should compensate them. If you are not prepared to do this, you should not accept the job and 'free' training the company will provide you. You should buy your own endorsement and be a free agent instead (and we all know how I feel about this).

GG
The Green Goblin is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2011, 10:17
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: south pacific vagrant
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For once I agree with GG

If you are man enough to sign an agreement, atleast be man enough to honour it.

If you dont like the terms, dont sign it.
waren9 is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2011, 10:24
  #17 (permalink)  
tmpffisch
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Funny the AFAP hasn't been mentioned here yet. I thought they've helped argue quite a few bond related complaints.

I agree, if you're man enough to sign it, live up to your side of the deal. If you don't like the deal you're getting, negotiate it! The company just wants to see value in their investment.
 
Old 31st Jan 2011, 10:34
  #18 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Sydney
Posts: 817
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you don't like the deal you're getting, negotiate it! The company just wants to see value in their investment.
never heard of a pilot telling the prospective employer that they dont like the deal, lets negotiate... AND get the job!
apache is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2011, 10:36
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NSW Australia
Posts: 2,455
Received 33 Likes on 15 Posts
Devil

In years gone by, pilots, especially in regionals, were getting a lesser salary for the first three years, then in the 4th year, jumped by quite a margin. THIS is how the return of service worked.
20 years ago, how many Jet jobs were about?

20 years ago, did we have QF+JQ+DJ+ umpteen o/s carriers with access to Australia?

No Apache, when you and I learnt to fly 20 years ago it was expected that you would spend average 5-10 years in GA and regional airlines before you got to look at a "major".

Then, as now, you would drop everything as soon as they called you - the difference is that to fuel their growth the 'majors' (as JQ and DJ are) are drawing guys out of the regionals much earlier than before.

The regionals are facing massive (and growing) regulatory costs, massive demand growth (and wages pressure) for LAMEs, and simultaneously a drop in (a) rural and regional economies and (b) customer pricing expectations.

I am not advocating a decrease in pilot wages but are regional airlines merely charitable organisations for the training of Jet Pilots? St Vincent de Rex? Pelican Brothers College of Christ?

A bond, as noted above, is an agreement for a return of service. 20 years ago you could take a man at his word - that is, sadly, less often the case today.

If you agree to 2 years of service, you do it.

If you agree to pay your pilots $5000 of deferred salary on their first anniversary, you do that too

The world has changed and we can either grow up and live with it, or die as bitter and twisted old men
Horatio Leafblower is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2011, 10:43
  #20 (permalink)  
tmpffisch
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
never heard of a pilot telling the prospective employer that they dont like the deal, lets negotiate... AND get the job!
I was thinking more of internal promotions rather than a new employee. Negotiating with a prospective employer would probably be a deal breaker in a lot of circumstances.
 


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.