Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

710m TODA - Enough for a Baron 58?

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

710m TODA - Enough for a Baron 58?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Sep 2009, 13:09
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Qld troppo
Posts: 3,498
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I regularly take the Bonanza in and out of 600 m - it does that comfortably in most conditions.

This relates to a Beechcraft Baron how?
Cause a Baron is just two Bonanzas flying in formation!

Dr
ForkTailedDrKiller is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2009, 20:25
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: South Pacific
Posts: 862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nah.. A BARON is a Commercial Pilots Sports Car, A Bonanza (as much as I luv em) is a Private Pilots Limo.
frigatebird is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2009, 00:05
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,604
Likes: 0
Received 74 Likes on 29 Posts
I regularly take my 206 into a 15 m strip.
Dick Smith is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2009, 00:14
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: On the equator
Posts: 1,291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dick Smith
I regularly take my 206 into a 15 m strip.
Bell 206, I take it? lol
training wheels is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2009, 00:36
  #45 (permalink)  

Grandpa Aerotart
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: SWP
Posts: 4,583
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
My god he is capable of humorous flippancy too
Chimbu chuckles is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2009, 00:39
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Under the wing, asleep.
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From reading this thread I'm getting the feeling that it's probably not the greatest idea to take a B-58 into 710m. It seems that one day you're going to get stung, badly. Unless of course the thread starter is confident that they will be on the ball every time.

So what, if any, aircraft are out there that can do the job? I.E. 6 bums (at a pinch - more like 4) out of 700m for a good distance @ 170+kts? All for Baron money.

Does it have to be a twin?

C210 with some go fast gear?

FTDK?
Wanderin_dave is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2009, 00:56
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Qld troppo
Posts: 3,498
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
So what, if any, aircraft are out there that can do the job? I.E. 6 bums (at a pinch - more like 4) out of 700m for a good distance @ 170+kts? All for Baron money
Turbo-normalised, IO550 engined Bonanza B36TC. (Note "B36" not "A36"!)

My current dream machine!

Dr
ForkTailedDrKiller is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2009, 02:13
  #48 (permalink)  

Grandpa Aerotart
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: SWP
Posts: 4,583
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From reading this thread I'm getting the feeling that it's probably not the greatest idea to take a B-58 into 710m. It seems that one day you're going to get stung, badly. Unless of course the thread starter is confident that they will be on the ball every time.
Perfection 100% of the time is not required just an ability to recognise when a GA is required and do it. Its not a one way strip in PNG where you can't do a GA from a mile or two out - THAT requires 100% perfection.

I find it interesting that people would find it more acceptable to operate, say, an A36 Bonanza off the same strip but get very worked up about a B58.

A B58 MAUW is 53% heavier than an A36 yet it has 100% more power/thrust - a B58 is off the ground quicker and going like a dog shot up the ar$e. Landing the B58 might be 50% heavier/about 10kts faster and uses exactly the same wheels/brakes so takes longer to stop but still with 50% factoring in this case.

Lose an engine at 50' in a single and you're going down - lose one in a Baron at 50' you will (with appropriate initial/recurrent training) climb at 300+'/min. Lose an engine just before airborne in either aircraft and you're in just as much pooh - you'll probably stop if you haven't wasted too much strip getting to speed - if not pull the wheels up and slide off the end and you'll likely go off slow enough that injuries will be nil/minimal.

Strip length is not the issue here - its purely a financial issue - is the thread starter prepared to spend the money required to maintain the strip/aircraft/skills/discipline required to fly a Baron the way it was designed to be flown?

If not it wouldn't matter much if the strip was 1000m long.
Chimbu chuckles is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2009, 02:58
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: YMML
Posts: 2,564
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
I regularly take my 206 into a 15 m strip.
bobomptissshhh!

Humour? Dick???
OZBUSDRIVER is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2009, 03:40
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: South Pacific
Posts: 862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Used to land Islanders on 15 metre strips too, .. and sometimes even narrower when the incoming tide was surging well up the beach.. Just had to time it right between the surges.. and again for the takeoff.. or the patient would have had a bumpy road ride out overnight.
frigatebird is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2009, 04:37
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The 'Bat Cave' @ HLP in the Big Durian Indo
Age: 62
Posts: 781
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts


Go for a Silver Eagle turbine 210

Good short field (advertised ground run 170m) and 210kts with an Allison 250

Price is around US$750,000 for an already converted one

Welcome to the Home of the Silver Eagle

Last edited by aseanaero; 30th Sep 2009 at 04:59.
aseanaero is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2009, 04:59
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: YMML
Posts: 2,564
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Found just the aircraft for the new aerodrome...mind you...some teething problems to iron out on the landing sequence...



If this thing doesn't work then try-
Operation Creditable Sport
OZBUSDRIVER is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2009, 05:14
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 946
Received 37 Likes on 12 Posts
How about a Bou?
A little birdy told me the market will be flooded with them soon!
710m would be an international strip for the old girl.
ozbiggles is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2009, 06:40
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Under the wing, asleep.
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fair point Chimbu.

I just think that the strip/aircraft/skills/discipline equation can be moved more in the piots favour by using an aircraft with more fat in the charts. I don't have any time in the Baron and was going off purely what i was reading. Just looking at it from a different angle.

I don't know the pilot here, he may well fly like Bob Hoover and be comfortable with your scenario. If so, or if he does commit as you say then all good. But by getting some more space he may not need to.
Wanderin_dave is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2009, 07:12
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: South Pacific
Posts: 862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mate of mine on a farm outside Port Lincoln years ago, used to have a 210 with a turbine in the nose. A Walther. Couldn't use full power on T.O., but it used to get off short. Cruise over the National Park was really smooth but only on half power or it would go through the Vne. Better than putting a 210 H.P. Continental in a 172..
Love the vid of the retro rockets firing and the Herc falling on in a heap. Saw a Yank Herc. land (fall) on with a full load of relief supplies once, and later heard when he got back to Guam he wouldn't be coming back on a second trip as the wing had cracks in it. Have had people come back into Beta before the wheels touch. No brownie points for that..

Last edited by frigatebird; 30th Sep 2009 at 07:25.
frigatebird is offline  
Old 8th Nov 2009, 21:58
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Iloilo, Philippines
Age: 54
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hi mates been taking an A36 into a 950m strip and doing it half d length. Currently the strip is restricted to one way in and out so been landing with mostly 10 to 15k tw. still stopping at lass than 700m .... Will be using a BE-58 anytime with this condition and will get back to this thread.....Im in the tropics......
icefire1142 is offline  
Old 9th Nov 2009, 08:07
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Godzone
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cessna 206 will solve all your problems. Closely followed by the 210T
toolowtoofast is offline  
Old 9th Nov 2009, 10:53
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The B58 for the job is under development

http://www.rocketengineering.com/doc...ss_Release.pdf

500 horses per side and 4500 fpm roc ... Nice

if you have to settle for one engine give this one a go

http://www.turbinebonanza.com/images/flight4.jpg
Aerodynamisist is offline  
Old 9th Nov 2009, 12:26
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Back to the original thread . . . I chose not to respond earlier when all the technical information was being bandied around by those who know a lot of things. They could well be right.

But for me it is remarkably similar to a question I have faced a few times in my corporate career. If I am prompted to ask is “is this company solvent” the answer is always no - unless there is a compelling and overriding reason to the contrary.

Similarly, if the voice in my head asks “is this strip long enough” – the answer is always no!

Just my thoughts . . . and I too am Baron endorsed and can read the POH.

Cheers

Pedota
Pedota is offline  
Old 9th Nov 2009, 21:21
  #60 (permalink)  
Sprucegoose
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hughes Point, where life is great! Was also resident on page 13, but now I'm lost in Cyberspace....
Age: 59
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
This is what you need!



TODR 300M, LDR less than 300M!
9 minutes to FL250 and 290+ knots TAS!
Howard Hughes is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.