Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions
Reload this Page >

Engine quit late downwind at Bankstown 6/6/09

Wikiposts
Search
The Pacific: General Aviation & Questions The place for students, instructors and charter guys in Oz, NZ and the rest of Oceania.

Engine quit late downwind at Bankstown 6/6/09

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Jun 2009, 02:54
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Remoak is a stirrer. Leave him alone.

My 2c worth -
Better that the pilot potentially crash and burn on the airfield at Bankstown (or surrounding open space) than into someone's house in Condell Park.

The areas north and east of bankstown a/p are quite hilly and developed. No chances there.
nick2007 is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2009, 03:07
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The Shire
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Just revising for my CPL aerodynamics exam on Thursday, so this is applied theory at its best
The blind leading the blind

Honestly, I'm not trying to put you down or anything, but there's clearly a deficiency in your training somewhere, and it'll bit you in the @ss sooner or later if you don't address it!
How can you point out deficiencies in another pilots training when you are yet to finish your own? Not only that but a CPL is a licence to get out there and learn, so a bare CPL does not mean you are a commercial pilot by any stretch of the imagination.

If you bank an aeroplane that steeply without power so close to the ground, you're tempting fate.

Unnecessarily too, because without that last bank (starting 1:21), he would have been over more or less level ground and could have washed off any remaining energy in a flare and landed the thing in control.
Yep would have been nice to land the thing under control straight into a fence.........

..and to some of the others here -- you know who you are -- if people are supposed to learn from this (and it's clear from the responses there's a need for it!), stop w@nking on about how to best analyse an incident and actually start doing it
From someone who has yet to demonstrate a PFL for the issue of a CPL and who will probably need a second shot too.

It might look like a dramatic display of a forced landing and hell I would not want to be in the same situation myself, but sometimes you must play the hand you've been dealt and make the best of a bad situation.

GG

Last edited by The Green Goblin; 23rd Jun 2009 at 03:29.
The Green Goblin is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2009, 03:20
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: australia
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One of the easiest things in the world is an unqualified opinion on an aviation incident after the fact.

We can all learn from every incident, often as not the gritty bits are difficult to deal with because the incident claims victims and we all have emotion to cope with on top of the lessons that arise.

In this case we are at least not faced with ruling out difficult emotion, everyone involved is still with us.

The PIC was faced with a classic dilemma, where do I go???, and a very small time frame in which to perform the analysis.

So did he make errors of judgement ?? in fine detail analysis no doubt he did, in the big picture where everyone walked away from the incident No he didn't, and no one on the ground was involved.

There are real positive lessons in this, probably the most profound is the PIC has walked up to look disaster in the face and come away with a good result, he will carry that lesson for all his aviation career and be better for it.
Joker 10 is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2009, 04:02
  #64 (permalink)  
PlankBlender
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hey Goblin, you know nothing about me, so keep the accusations down I might 'only' hold a PPL but happen to have a multiple of the aeronautical experience necessary for CPL issue, not everyone needs or aspires for the next license with minimum hours

desmotronic purpotes to be an ATPL in his profile and if he can't tell a stall when it hits him in the face he does indeed require some training, give me an ATO that disagrees with that and I'll think about it again, otherwise crawl back to wherever you came from ! Proficiency in recognising a stall is prerequisite for issue of a PPL, so I think I'm in the green saying there's a deficiency in his training!!! Let me make it more precise for you, there's a deficiency in his basic training!!

How can you point out deficiencies in another pilots training when you are yet to finish your own?
There there, and here I was under the impression that learning as a pilot never stopped? Where would you in your apparent infinite wisdom put the 'end' of the training of a pilot? ATPL? ATPL with 10,000 hours of experience? ATPL and competitive aerobatics champion?

Yep would have been nice to land the thing under control straight into a fence.........
Look at the video properly before you shoot your mouth off again, when he increased the bank he had level ground ahead of him, he was trying to turn for some strange reason, a hugely dangerous thing to do!

 
Old 23rd Jun 2009, 04:05
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: planet earth
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
PB,
settle petal.

Fact is hes not even 15 ft off the ground when he enters the frame at 1.20, touch down is 1.23, sure it stalls in the flare at about 2 feet. If he'd got some flap out it would have been a greaser.

good luck with the cpl and thanks for yr expert opinion.
desmotronic is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2009, 05:21
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The Shire
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Hey Goblin, you know nothing about me, so keep the accusations down I might 'only' hold a PPL but happen to have a multiple of the aeronautical experience necessary for CPL issue
Yet you still don't have one

Look at the video properly before you shoot your mouth off again, when he increased the bank he had level ground ahead of him, he was trying to turn for some strange reason, a hugely dangerous thing to do!
You'd also remember from your lessons on slow flight that the controls are less responsive with reduced airflow. From my armchair it looks like he rolled a little more than he anticipated due to the lag in control responsiveness. You will also know that if you raise the nose you will increase the drag decrease the airspeed and indirectly increase the ROD (The lighties still teach power for ROD and Attitude for AS) I'm sure you would have had a few heavy landings in your training doing exactly what the fella in this clip did. Combine that with soft wet grass and instead of bouncing, it absorbed the impact and nosed over. If this were on the runway (assuming a normal powered approach) the aircraft would have bounced requiring full power immediately and a go around, else it would have been a prop strike and bent fire wall. If you watch circuits or instruct you will see far worse than this every hour.

If this was a stall it would have impacted the ground in a pitch down attitude and been a far worse outcome for the pilot involved.

Also another thing/factor to think about is the pilot neglecting to use flaps, resulting in a higher nose attitude for the approach vis able to us short final. Then when the pilot has gone for the touch down he has looked for the attitude he is used to with flap resulting in a 3 pointer.

desmotronic purpotes to be an ATPL in his profile and if he can't tell a stall when it hits him in the face he does indeed require some training, give me an ATO that disagrees with that and I'll think about it again, otherwise crawl back to wherever you came from
A typical Gen Y tantrum, I'm sure that desmotronic knows what a stall looks like, just not here and I tend to agree. 18 degrees is not the angle I taught for a stalling angle either but rather exceeding 15 (based on a 152)

Let me make it more precise for you, there's a deficiency in his basic training!!
Speaking of which how about you get back to yours
The Green Goblin is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2009, 05:25
  #67 (permalink)  
PlankBlender
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
desmotronic, you really don't know your stalls:

sure it stalls in the flare at about 2 feet.
The stall is fully developed by the time the wing starts to drop (early parts of 1:22), at which time he's more than a wing span away from the ground, a helluva lot more than 2 feet!!

The aircraft would have begun to stall as soon as he put it into the, again, very dangerous low steep bank (1:21), and the stall horn -- which in the Warrior is on the left wing which happens to be the high wing here in the right hand turn, with the greater AoA and therefore closer to the stall -- would have been blaring for several seconds before the wing drop.

Said stall warning should be an immediate cue in the absence of power to counteract the impending stall. The pilot in this case obviously didn't heed that warning or tried and failed to be effective again sluggish controls so close to the stall. It actually seems the aircraft pretty much lands itself because the timing of the stall, roll, and nose drop just happen to fit the height over the ground when it all happens so kudos to the Piper engineers for designing such a resilient and docile airframe!

Also, where do you see a flare? He banks, it stalls/rolls/drops, he's on the ground. No flare whatsoever.

Admittedly, the pilot didn't have a whole lot of time to play with here, but this discussion surely shows that the dissection of a mishap can teach a lot of things, including aerodynamical basics and what to do (and what not to do) if you find yourselves in a pickle!

Again, as an ATPL with (potential) responsibility for the travelling public, I urge you to revisit some of the basics! I just hope you never have to try to remember how to recognise a stall or incipient spin or the relevant recovery in a hurry, it might end in

I'll settle when you tell me you won't take unsuspecting passengers or try to teach others to fly until you know your basics
 
Old 23rd Jun 2009, 05:40
  #68 (permalink)  
PlankBlender
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Yet you still don't have one
And I haven't had the need for one and haven't sought one, and now that I do, I'll get it, we're not talking rocket surgery here . Not sure what you're insinuating, but I won't be drawn into a d!ck measuring contest

A typical Gen Y tantrum
Wrong generation, wrong assumptions!

what a stall looks like, just not here and I tend to agree.
Care to elaborate, we might learn something after all?! Where do you differ from my explanation of the stall and ensuing 'landing'?

If this was a stall it would have impacted the ground in a pitch down attitude
So you're implying since the aircraft isn't stalled he somehow managed to flick the left wing down at that roll rate at the last second despite reduced effectiveness of controls?

And the nose doing down before he touches the ground isn't pitch down enough for you?

18 degrees is not the angle I taught for a stalling angle either but rather exceeding 15 (based on a 152)
Mr. Tait actually stipulates 'just over 20 degrees' as stalling AoA for a C152, and uses 18 degrees continually as the representative stalling AoA for your typical lightie, of course noting that it specific to the airframe and a bit academic anyway as realistically, we're talking stall speeds for different configurations, weights, and load factors.

Good point on why the turn when entering the field of view might have been steeper than possibly planned, a potential explanation and something we all can learn from!

Speaking of which how about you get back to yours
Absolutely, this is just for some entertainment in the breaks

Last edited by PlankBlender; 23rd Jun 2009 at 05:55.
 
Old 23rd Jun 2009, 05:42
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: planet earth
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
like i said thanks for yr expert opinion.
desmotronic is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2009, 05:53
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The Shire
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Again, as an ATPL with (potential) responsibility for the travelling public, I urge you to revisit some of the basics! I just hope you never have to try to remember how to recognise a stall or incipient spin or the relevant recovery in a hurry, it might end in

I'll settle when you tell me you won't take unsuspecting passengers or try to teach others to fly until you know your basics
Someone needs to bend that plank over your bum mate
The Green Goblin is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2009, 05:57
  #71 (permalink)  
PlankBlender
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Running out of arguments here, chaps? Ah well, back to the book, more interesting anyway I think we might have exhausted this discussion
 
Old 23rd Jun 2009, 06:01
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The Shire
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
You have just become to laborious I'm afraid
The Green Goblin is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2009, 06:21
  #73 (permalink)  
PlankBlender
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
yup, I sometimes have that effect on people when I want to know stuff and figure out whether I'm right or wrong.. just disappointing that a lot of people rather tune out than have a lively discussion.. a feature of Gen Y I hear, also affects some ageing Baby Boomers
 
Old 23rd Jun 2009, 07:04
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Island
Age: 43
Posts: 553
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Back to your flock of sheep mate
How very mature of you GG.


We were all having a heated, yet civilised debate about the video until you came along.

You have added nothing to this discussion whatsoever, other than your childish bickering.
glekichi is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2009, 07:06
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Hiding..... in one hemisphere or another
Posts: 1,067
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Look you people....it's painfully simple.

Lose the donk in a single, put the fecker down as soon as possible in the LEAST worst place.

He chose the LEAST WORST PLACE, he put it down and he flew it all the way into the "crash".

Just land, don't bull****!

To borrow a BN CEN ATCO's phrase "NCD. Good outcome."
Atlas Shrugged is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2009, 07:13
  #76 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
plankbender - your comments in the analysis of the video have been most useful - thanks. It would have been a sad reflection on aviation in this country if the forced landing had gone uncritiqued.
BPH63 is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2009, 08:43
  #77 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The Shire
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
We were all having a heated, yet civilised debate about the video until you came along.
What? Implying you could have done a better job?

baaaaaaaaaaaaaa
The Green Goblin is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2009, 08:49
  #78 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The Shire
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
plankbender - your comments in the analysis of the video have been most useful - thanks. It would have been a sad reflection on aviation in this country if the forced landing had gone uncritiqued.
If you're going to log in with another user name plank bender at least be less obvious!

Being critiqued is something a flying instructor does with a student after a lesson along with positive comments on what the student is doing well. It is not something a Student Commercial Pilot does to another aviator who has successfully conducted a forced landing for real, and lived to tell the tale.

Congratulations Mr Cherokee!
The Green Goblin is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2009, 10:35
  #79 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: these mist covered mountains are a home now for me.
Posts: 1,785
Received 29 Likes on 12 Posts
Hey, a big thumbs up for the pilot who lived through this event, saving all on board. Please note that the following is NOT a criticism of your flying. I'm very happy for you.

Hopefully this amplifies a need for pilots to practise more PFL's. And after flying with a civilian pilot recently I was shocked by his lack of training and currency in stalls, steep turns, recovery from the resulting Unusual Attitudes, PFL's and the like, and my offer to get him up to speed was gratefully accepted. And I'm not criticising him, but the system in general that accepts this. During the resulting flights, he constantly advised me that he had 'never seen' this or that, only did 'one of those' about two years earlier, and wasn't sure if 'this' was even allowed. He even clarified with the CFI before we went flying, who confirmed that there was no reason we should even attempt stalling during a gliding turn. I mean, crikey - THAT's when it's most likely to bite ya! Consequently, said pilot's skills improved drastically in only a few short hours, with some new skills to boot.

If you suspect that you are also skills deficit, then please go out, find an instructor with some hands and feet skills, and brush up on these aspects. It might not only save your bacon, but also your pax's, and those on the ground underneath your flight path...
Runaway Gun is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2009, 11:09
  #80 (permalink)  
PlankBlender
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Well, Martin, thanks for your positive post, it's always a pleasure to see balanced analysis and wisdom from senior members of the industry -- surely they're lining up to call your good self their mentor!

Anyway, I won't be drawn into a seniority p!ssing match, I've proved in my first career and certainly don't need to justify to you that I can hold my own when it comes to analysis of facts and theories, so I'll just keep stating my opinion as is my want here and exchanging with people who actually have something to contribute to the discussion more than a pathetic attempt to pull rank

One thing you might consider in your world of hours and bigger better kero burning toys is that not everyone is in this game to progress as fast as possible to the business end of a widebody to be stuck in jet leg land for the next thirty years, there are those of us who have travelled the world in a former life and are very content with flying hands-on, not always over the weather, and within a few time zones so we can enjoy life and our later years without bodies shot from abuse......

GG, I can assure you I only maintain one user name here.
 


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.