Oz and US Free Trade agreemant
Props are for boats!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: An Asian Hub
Age: 56
Posts: 994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oz and US Free Trade agreemant
Anyone know what this Free Trade Agreement thats being negoitiated between Australia and the US is all about?
Will it make Aircraft and Parts Cheaper?
Sheep
p. hey Im bored
Will it make Aircraft and Parts Cheaper?
Sheep
p. hey Im bored
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: South of zero
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It would be the same as the one that NZ is getting................oops sorry that dosen't exsist
As far as I understand it will not really effect the exchange rate in the long run.........BUT short term could strengthen, it's a bloody good deal for importers and ewxporters and your defence force. Very very cheap gear
As far as I understand it will not really effect the exchange rate in the long run.........BUT short term could strengthen, it's a bloody good deal for importers and ewxporters and your defence force. Very very cheap gear
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
it means, put simply, gives the USA full, free & unfettered access to your markets. In return, well, they'll take full, free & unfettered access to your markets. Did I mention that the US will get full, free....................................
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Under the Equator
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SeldomFixit;
Australia has much more to gain.
Australia actually punches well above it's weight in the USA.
Australia is the 8th largest investor in the USA (thanks to Messers Lowy, Pratt & others) with US$70BN of investment over there and Australian companies employ over 80,000 Americans.
The USA has investments of about US$130BN in Australia and employs over 300,000 Australians.
I see a free trade agreement as more advantageous to Australia than the USA.
Australia has much more to gain.
Australia actually punches well above it's weight in the USA.
Australia is the 8th largest investor in the USA (thanks to Messers Lowy, Pratt & others) with US$70BN of investment over there and Australian companies employ over 80,000 Americans.
The USA has investments of about US$130BN in Australia and employs over 300,000 Australians.
I see a free trade agreement as more advantageous to Australia than the USA.
PPRuNeaholic
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Cairns FNQ
Posts: 3,255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maybe Dubya had a pang of conscience about the way he in which he shamelessly ripped the heart out of our once thriving sheep and lamb export market in Iraq... 
There are many other instances where the US has shafted us too. Don't forget that US farmers still receive government subsidies.
If this FTA leads to a level playing field, I'm all for it... but I don't believe in the tooth fairy either.
There are many other instances where the US has shafted us too. Don't forget that US farmers still receive government subsidies.If this FTA leads to a level playing field, I'm all for it... but I don't believe in the tooth fairy either.
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mmm...sounds like you might be french. The US has gotten rid of one of the worst dictators in the world has just signed a new deal to send 87B in aid to Iraq, prevented countless other acts of genocide/murder and all you can think about is the lost sheep trade.
Mmmm... the US was trying the same isolationist policy in 1939, but changed it's mind thank goodness or we'd be using the yen in oz, and deutchmark in france.
Mmmm... the US was trying the same isolationist policy in 1939, but changed it's mind thank goodness or we'd be using the yen in oz, and deutchmark in france.
PPRuNeaholic
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Cairns FNQ
Posts: 3,255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the US was trying the same isolationist policy in 1939, but changed it's mind
How times change eh? In 1917 (a bare 3 years after the start of WW 1), it only took the sinking of ONE ship to change American minds about that war. In 1941, it took the sinking of almost the whole US Pacific Fleet to achieve the said change of mind.Uncle Sam is getting an awful lot of trade business for its money and efforts. And I promise to forget that the whole premise for the invasion of Iraq was the supposed existence of WMD. They still seem to be somewhat elsuive, don't they?
The very fact that the spin doctors have come up with all that bs about liberating the people of Iraq is proof, to me, that even dear old Uncle Sam wants everyone to forget about WMD. How can we ever forget, or forgive, such a massive lie?
As for me being French...
PPRuNe Co-Pilot
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Sky
Posts: 931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OzExpat a French
Yes i'd like to know where those WMD are
No dought America has gotten rid of a dictactor, but anything that America get's it's hands on there is always trouble...
Yes i'd like to know where those WMD are
No dought America has gotten rid of a dictactor, but anything that America get's it's hands on there is always trouble...
Last edited by AIRWAY; 24th Oct 2003 at 22:12.
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As to trade received for invading iraq...mmm. not sure..I'm not privy to such information, I find it hard to believe it would amount to the 87B that they're putting into country not to mention what they've already spent. ...as for the WMD, ok you may have a valid point, time will tell...as for getting rid of a dictator, I fly with pilots who spent time in Afghanistan and Iraq and they tell me how much the people there appreciated them.
and airway....anything america gets its hands on...really now, would that include the truman plan and rebuilding Japan and Korea?
and airway....anything america gets its hands on...really now, would that include the truman plan and rebuilding Japan and Korea?
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Druglord - keep it coming - you're a crackup mate. I just hope that whilst so much of "HIS" time is devoted to "God save America", there's a bit left over to save the rest of us FROM America.
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Sydney
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes, Dubya is my hero too, not to mention that lying little peice of dog sh!t in Canberra, Johhny.
Apparently, Johhny has to write his name on the soles of his shoes these days as his head is so far up Dubya's clacker, people can't find him.
And where are those WMD?
Fact: The chemicals that the Americans claim Sadam had tons and tons of have a shelf life of generally 1-4 years. The inspection teams believed they may not have got all the chemicals but they were sure they destroyed all the machinery possible for making the chemicals. That was in the early/mid 90's. An imminent threat in early 2003 - I don't think so.
Fact: If I were to enrichen uranium in my back yard, or indeed in a tunnel under my house, the Americans have been able to detect that by space for about 10 years. So the old story about cannisters being smuggled into Iraq was nothing but a scare campaign as "The Co-ilition of the Killing" were starting to run out of bullsh!t.
Fact: Dick Cheney and Dubya have both worked in the oil industry. Donald Rumsfield has a back ground in selling weaponry. I can not remember the exact details (some ppruner must know the details) but he was in the news a few months ago as he was the chairmen of a company that had sold equipment to North Korea to aid them in developing nuclear power stations/weapons. Prime examples above of how black a human soul can be!
Quote:
"Sadam could launch missiles within 45mins". Tony Blair, late 2002
I found it interesting when Colin Powell presented his case for murder last year. He held up pictures of warehouses, trucks moving around factories etc. etc. At the time there were about 200 hundred inspectors on the ground in Iraq. Now, I am not a smart bloke but can someone please explain this. Why didn't Powell pick up a phone, you know those things, they have been around only for about 100 years, and ring the bl00dy inspectors and get them to turn up for a surprise visit. And maybe he did. But as we heard no more about it, I can only guess of 2 things. Either the whole story was crap OR the inspectors dropped in the day the photo's were shown (if they were really smart, the day before) found nothing, but OUR world leaders accidentally forgot to tell us.
Q: Why does God allow war to happen?
A: So American's can learn geography!
If our world leaders spent as much money and effort on famine and the envirament, then we ALL would have something to fight for!
It's not about interest rates and home improvement TV shows.
Mmmm, ..... Iraq has the world's second largest oil reserve. I don't have a recent figure but 6 months ago the estimated cost of the war + first 6 months was $US180 billion. And Dubya did ALL this just because he is bl00dy good bloke.
Yep, he's my hero.
"All we are saying ..... is give peace a chance". J Lennon, 1969
Apparently, Johhny has to write his name on the soles of his shoes these days as his head is so far up Dubya's clacker, people can't find him.
And where are those WMD?
Fact: The chemicals that the Americans claim Sadam had tons and tons of have a shelf life of generally 1-4 years. The inspection teams believed they may not have got all the chemicals but they were sure they destroyed all the machinery possible for making the chemicals. That was in the early/mid 90's. An imminent threat in early 2003 - I don't think so.
Fact: If I were to enrichen uranium in my back yard, or indeed in a tunnel under my house, the Americans have been able to detect that by space for about 10 years. So the old story about cannisters being smuggled into Iraq was nothing but a scare campaign as "The Co-ilition of the Killing" were starting to run out of bullsh!t.
Fact: Dick Cheney and Dubya have both worked in the oil industry. Donald Rumsfield has a back ground in selling weaponry. I can not remember the exact details (some ppruner must know the details) but he was in the news a few months ago as he was the chairmen of a company that had sold equipment to North Korea to aid them in developing nuclear power stations/weapons. Prime examples above of how black a human soul can be!
Quote:
"Sadam could launch missiles within 45mins". Tony Blair, late 2002
I found it interesting when Colin Powell presented his case for murder last year. He held up pictures of warehouses, trucks moving around factories etc. etc. At the time there were about 200 hundred inspectors on the ground in Iraq. Now, I am not a smart bloke but can someone please explain this. Why didn't Powell pick up a phone, you know those things, they have been around only for about 100 years, and ring the bl00dy inspectors and get them to turn up for a surprise visit. And maybe he did. But as we heard no more about it, I can only guess of 2 things. Either the whole story was crap OR the inspectors dropped in the day the photo's were shown (if they were really smart, the day before) found nothing, but OUR world leaders accidentally forgot to tell us.
Q: Why does God allow war to happen?
A: So American's can learn geography!
If our world leaders spent as much money and effort on famine and the envirament, then we ALL would have something to fight for!
It's not about interest rates and home improvement TV shows.
Mmmm, ..... Iraq has the world's second largest oil reserve. I don't have a recent figure but 6 months ago the estimated cost of the war + first 6 months was $US180 billion. And Dubya did ALL this just because he is bl00dy good bloke.
Yep, he's my hero.
"All we are saying ..... is give peace a chance". J Lennon, 1969
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Cambodia
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
America never does anything unless it is purely in self interest, or in the best interest of US business.
NEVER.
Druglord, by the way, the Japanese were knocking on Australia's door BEFORE the US became involved. If the Japanese never attacked Pearl Harbour, the US would never have got involved in the Pacific, or Europe.
NEVER.
Druglord, by the way, the Japanese were knocking on Australia's door BEFORE the US became involved. If the Japanese never attacked Pearl Harbour, the US would never have got involved in the Pacific, or Europe.
druglord
I am sure no US pilot would just saunter around Baghdad and get a welcoming impression from the locals. Sounds like a tall story from weekenders trash hauling in the Guard.
Shock and Awe- The number of US state sponsored dictators post WW11.
I am sure no US pilot would just saunter around Baghdad and get a welcoming impression from the locals. Sounds like a tall story from weekenders trash hauling in the Guard.
Shock and Awe- The number of US state sponsored dictators post WW11.
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So I'm not quite sure what the arguement here is...that america is the only country that does things in it's own interest and every other country is altruistic...thus the enormous amounts of foreign aid provided by the rest of the free world...or that america shouldn't have gotten involved in WW2 if pearl harbour hadn't been invaded...or that there's a conspiracy theory with american oil companies and the commies...
what's next the CIA killed the loch ness monster?
If you're getting your news source from the BBC or CNN I'll listen to your arguements, if it's from channel 9 or the Australian...well I just not that naive
what's next the CIA killed the loch ness monster?
If you're getting your news source from the BBC or CNN I'll listen to your arguements, if it's from channel 9 or the Australian...well I just not that naive
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Sydney
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The saddest thing that we will probably lose in all this is our cultural independance.
As part of the FTA with the United States of Aggression, we will let a lot more American TV in to our living rooms. Unfortunately this may well mean that the Australian Film and Television Industry will suffer.
Do you really think the Americans are going to give anything away when their economy is going down the gurgler? Because Johnny does absolutely EVERYTHING that the Washington Baboon asks, without question, they probably think us Aussies are just a bunch of losers - a bunch of 'yes' men. They have no respect for us. Lets face it, they even sent us a bill for the bombs we used to murder Iraq's to further THEIR world domination and oil interests.
My guess is Australia is about to get a right rogering from the Americans when it comes time to sign on the dotted line. Maybe in the spirit of free trade, Johnny could get an American company to produce the next round of fridge magnets?
Be alert and be very alarmed - these war mongers are still in power!
As part of the FTA with the United States of Aggression, we will let a lot more American TV in to our living rooms. Unfortunately this may well mean that the Australian Film and Television Industry will suffer.
Do you really think the Americans are going to give anything away when their economy is going down the gurgler? Because Johnny does absolutely EVERYTHING that the Washington Baboon asks, without question, they probably think us Aussies are just a bunch of losers - a bunch of 'yes' men. They have no respect for us. Lets face it, they even sent us a bill for the bombs we used to murder Iraq's to further THEIR world domination and oil interests.
My guess is Australia is about to get a right rogering from the Americans when it comes time to sign on the dotted line. Maybe in the spirit of free trade, Johnny could get an American company to produce the next round of fridge magnets?
Be alert and be very alarmed - these war mongers are still in power!
US FTA WON'T GIVE SAME BENEFITS AS A FULL MULTILATERAL TRADE AGREEMENT
The US is rushing the innocents in Canberra into this FTA because they,(the US), do not want to sign up for the full blown multilateral trade agreement which has been the long term aim of all nations in the World Trade Organisation.
The US operates on the 'united they stand - divided they fall' principle of business, and can gain far more advantageous terms via these FTA's than they will via a WTO agreement. That's why they currently have 17 of them in progress, and why they, along with the EU, have deliberately sabotaged the last 3 rounds of the WTO Trade meets.
The US is fearful of the influence of China, and these FTA's are one way of ensuring that the US has 'influence' over potential competitors for China's huge import market.
The history of FTA's is that generally the US has not delivered on it's side of the agreement The North American Free Trade Agreement promised Canada access to the US grain and meat markets over 5 years ago - they are still sitting on the 49th parallel....wishing they'd been less naive.
The US always has icluded very long term, vaguely worded terminology to cover agriculture in their FTA's, including such long 'phase-in' periods that most of our generation will be in nursing homes before it's applicable. And it does not affect subsidisation.
Given that they are spending US$19 billion on farm subsidies in the next 3 years, is it any wonder that the US wants us to sign off on an FTA which will have precedence-in-law over any future multi-lateral arrangements? It's not in the interests of US farmers to support the WTO trade talks - they will not lose a thing via a US-OZ FTA.
One of the other concerning aspects of an FTA is that it often gives companies much more power in respect of challenging decisions such as those relating to quarantine, and monopolistic trading. US companies have a nasty habit of litigating at the drop of a hat, and that's what's happened with the NAFTA agreement - 28 court actions were pending as of 15/10/03 - effectively blocking the intent of the FTA.
A strong agricultural sector has a huge multiplyer effect right through the economy. It means more aircraft sales, and more hours flown, whether private, charter, ag, or regional RPT.
Farmers are understandably worried that any FTA will involve a reduction in quarantine standards, the abolition of the single desk wheat marketing arrangements, and a loss of ability to import cheaper generic chemicals, fertilisers and pharmaceuticals due 'dumping' claims of the largely US owned multi-nationals. We are being told that our intent to keep Oz clean & green can't be justified - essentially because other countries have the problems, and greatly envy us our low disease and pest status. It's just plain sabotage for us to relax our barriers to facilitate a FTA. Especially when the US and EU clearly use non-tariff barriers such as bogus quarantine claims to keep our primary produce out.
In the longer term, any FTA will see more pests and diseases entering OZ, over and above the current alarming rate of quarantine incursions. Buy a Thrush or Airtractor now - while the A$ is up!! [just joking, of course]
Yes, there may be some increased opportunities for export to US markets, but we need to remember that the US farmer will be much more able to compete with us for existing markets elsewhere in the world. Our costs are likely to rise if our current ability to import generic chemical and fertiliser is challenged via the anti-dumping rules about to be changed by Customs. We'll be less able to compete with the US in many respects.
I cannot see many benefits for Oz in any FTA, because our federal government is so clearly intent on appeasement of the US. They are lightweights fighting the Mike Tyson of world trade. There will be substantially more benefits from a WTO multilateral agreement, because Oz will be negotiating from a position of strength with the so-called 'Cairns' group of nations.
We need to say NO to big buddy and the FTA.
My interest in this arises from being an agricultural scientist and specialist crop protection consultant for over 40 years.
cheers,
The US is rushing the innocents in Canberra into this FTA because they,(the US), do not want to sign up for the full blown multilateral trade agreement which has been the long term aim of all nations in the World Trade Organisation.
The US operates on the 'united they stand - divided they fall' principle of business, and can gain far more advantageous terms via these FTA's than they will via a WTO agreement. That's why they currently have 17 of them in progress, and why they, along with the EU, have deliberately sabotaged the last 3 rounds of the WTO Trade meets.
The US is fearful of the influence of China, and these FTA's are one way of ensuring that the US has 'influence' over potential competitors for China's huge import market.
The history of FTA's is that generally the US has not delivered on it's side of the agreement The North American Free Trade Agreement promised Canada access to the US grain and meat markets over 5 years ago - they are still sitting on the 49th parallel....wishing they'd been less naive.
The US always has icluded very long term, vaguely worded terminology to cover agriculture in their FTA's, including such long 'phase-in' periods that most of our generation will be in nursing homes before it's applicable. And it does not affect subsidisation.
Given that they are spending US$19 billion on farm subsidies in the next 3 years, is it any wonder that the US wants us to sign off on an FTA which will have precedence-in-law over any future multi-lateral arrangements? It's not in the interests of US farmers to support the WTO trade talks - they will not lose a thing via a US-OZ FTA.
One of the other concerning aspects of an FTA is that it often gives companies much more power in respect of challenging decisions such as those relating to quarantine, and monopolistic trading. US companies have a nasty habit of litigating at the drop of a hat, and that's what's happened with the NAFTA agreement - 28 court actions were pending as of 15/10/03 - effectively blocking the intent of the FTA.
A strong agricultural sector has a huge multiplyer effect right through the economy. It means more aircraft sales, and more hours flown, whether private, charter, ag, or regional RPT.
Farmers are understandably worried that any FTA will involve a reduction in quarantine standards, the abolition of the single desk wheat marketing arrangements, and a loss of ability to import cheaper generic chemicals, fertilisers and pharmaceuticals due 'dumping' claims of the largely US owned multi-nationals. We are being told that our intent to keep Oz clean & green can't be justified - essentially because other countries have the problems, and greatly envy us our low disease and pest status. It's just plain sabotage for us to relax our barriers to facilitate a FTA. Especially when the US and EU clearly use non-tariff barriers such as bogus quarantine claims to keep our primary produce out.
In the longer term, any FTA will see more pests and diseases entering OZ, over and above the current alarming rate of quarantine incursions. Buy a Thrush or Airtractor now - while the A$ is up!! [just joking, of course]
Yes, there may be some increased opportunities for export to US markets, but we need to remember that the US farmer will be much more able to compete with us for existing markets elsewhere in the world. Our costs are likely to rise if our current ability to import generic chemical and fertiliser is challenged via the anti-dumping rules about to be changed by Customs. We'll be less able to compete with the US in many respects.
I cannot see many benefits for Oz in any FTA, because our federal government is so clearly intent on appeasement of the US. They are lightweights fighting the Mike Tyson of world trade. There will be substantially more benefits from a WTO multilateral agreement, because Oz will be negotiating from a position of strength with the so-called 'Cairns' group of nations.
We need to say NO to big buddy and the FTA.
My interest in this arises from being an agricultural scientist and specialist crop protection consultant for over 40 years.
cheers,
PPRuNeaholic
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Cairns FNQ
Posts: 3,255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks RV6-VNE, that seems to vindicate my suspicions. Maybe one day we'll have the sort of pollies that won't want to bend over and take it up the @rse from America.