students useing GPS
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: australia
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
students useing GPS
Just wondering how many people think that students should be useing GPS when doing navs.I think maybe they shouldnt be able to use them until they have a PPL.That way they have had some chance in developing map reading skillsWhich you still need when it all turns too crap.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Agree absolutely. Learn the basics of DR and the rules of thumb for drift correction and eta calculation and diversions too. Then later after PPL use GPS to enhance situational awareness without compromising basic skills. You can still use them to check the GPS and be confident of its use.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Undershoot of YPJT RWY24R
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I for one flies around without a GPS.call me a vintage or conservative pilot or shall i say frankly i cant afford one 
Ive seen some frens of mine flying using GPS for their navs pre PPL which I believe is totally absurd & too much of technology reliance.
What if one day their GPS knocks out on them? n since theyve been doing nav pre PPL till god knows whenever/wherever they may go n land up to; I don't think they'd be able to navigate visually without any help or cause any inconvenience to others or ATC.
in my opinion,which i maybe wrong;These are pilots who will never learn the basics of & mastering basic navigation.
No harm carrying a GPS i guess but be sure to learn the basic fundamentals of nav at the early stages.If one is post PPL & other higher lvl of licences then its a luxury to use them since
these experience pilots already have the backups of basic handson nav in case the techno gadgets kills itself.
*one of my fren got lost once in the outback after too much reliance on the GPS n unfortunately the GPS kills itself on one of his "perfect" flight.He was totally frightened to his wits knowing that he gotta b back to basics which he admits at that point of time he's so hopeless of it.
Ive seen some frens of mine flying using GPS for their navs pre PPL which I believe is totally absurd & too much of technology reliance.
What if one day their GPS knocks out on them? n since theyve been doing nav pre PPL till god knows whenever/wherever they may go n land up to; I don't think they'd be able to navigate visually without any help or cause any inconvenience to others or ATC.
in my opinion,which i maybe wrong;These are pilots who will never learn the basics of & mastering basic navigation.
No harm carrying a GPS i guess but be sure to learn the basic fundamentals of nav at the early stages.If one is post PPL & other higher lvl of licences then its a luxury to use them since
these experience pilots already have the backups of basic handson nav in case the techno gadgets kills itself.
*one of my fren got lost once in the outback after too much reliance on the GPS n unfortunately the GPS kills itself on one of his "perfect" flight.He was totally frightened to his wits knowing that he gotta b back to basics which he admits at that point of time he's so hopeless of it.
Yep, turn it off.
I wonder though if one day in the unfortunate event of a hapless student getting lost on a solo nav and forced landing somewhere if the insurance would pay if the instructor had forbidden the student to take a GPS with him/her.....
Might be a consideration for the companies to write it in their ops manuals etc.
CS
I wonder though if one day in the unfortunate event of a hapless student getting lost on a solo nav and forced landing somewhere if the insurance would pay if the instructor had forbidden the student to take a GPS with him/her.....
Might be a consideration for the companies to write it in their ops manuals etc.
CS
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Sydney
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
incorporate GPS into the lesson, and let the instructor use it to see how accurate the student is with traditional navigation techniques. It will help the student see improvments first hand, but always encourage the use of a GPS as a backup too only(VFR). Its amazing to see that the majoritoty of PPLs that have a VCA always try to get out of it saying that they had a GPS and could accuratly navigate to within meters of CTA, and they do it all the time. The safe and legal use of GPS needs to be stipulated at the early stages of training
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: cloud9
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
HAVE ONLY JUST STARED USING GPS. A FEW MONTHS AGO WAS DOING A VERY LONG X COUNTRY USING THE GPS TO LOCATIONS I HAD NEVER BEEN BEFORE. FOUND IT TO AN AWSOME TOOL THAT WAS UNTILL IT SHAT ITSELF HALF WAY THROUGH THE LEG. LUCKLY I HAD PLANED AND WAS FOLLOWING THE FLIGHT THE OLD FASSIONED WAY AS WELL. SAVED MYSELF AN EMBARASSING RADIO CALL FOR HELP.
ALL STUDENTS, EAVEN UP TO CPL SHOULD STRICTLY USE THE OLD FASSION WAY.
ALL STUDENTS, EAVEN UP TO CPL SHOULD STRICTLY USE THE OLD FASSION WAY.
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As for shunning the use of GPS during basic nav training (in order to develop map-reading and DR skills), I totally agree.
But when moving beyond PPL, and certainly for those who are hitting CPL training, they should be comfortable making use of all the available resources onboard their aircraft. In fact I would say it is encumbent on them to do so, if they want to call themselves professional pilots. Unfortunately there is this persisting "old school" mentality amongst instructors that the student should have his hand slapped if it goes anywhere near that GPS. I find this way of thinking to be totally out of step with modern aviation, because the technology is firmly in place and it's not going away anytime soon. Yes, there are equipment and user limitations to be aware of, and the instructor should ensure that the student uses the technology in moderation (so as not to become too dependent on it) - but what message does it convey when we have a large number of "professional" pilots out there who don't know how to use the equipment themselves? I fly not only with students, but fellow work colleagues who don't know how to use the NAV mode on their autopilot, or that a HSI is always in the command sense, and heaven forbid we should actually turn the GPS on! In short, the current (and upcoming) generation of instructors are perpetuating this technological ignorance because no-one ever fully explained it to them, so they think their own students should be kept in the dark also.
I recently taught a GPS course to some aviation diploma students, and made the remark that by the end of training they were probably more familiar with how to operate a GPS than 90 per cent of the Instructors responsible for the delivery of their training. Of course, this is not to take away in the slightest from the importance of continuing to promote the art of stick-&-rudder and DR - but it would make for a worthwhile and long-overdue change to see some more instructors out there stop being so anal about modern technology in the cockpit.
But when moving beyond PPL, and certainly for those who are hitting CPL training, they should be comfortable making use of all the available resources onboard their aircraft. In fact I would say it is encumbent on them to do so, if they want to call themselves professional pilots. Unfortunately there is this persisting "old school" mentality amongst instructors that the student should have his hand slapped if it goes anywhere near that GPS. I find this way of thinking to be totally out of step with modern aviation, because the technology is firmly in place and it's not going away anytime soon. Yes, there are equipment and user limitations to be aware of, and the instructor should ensure that the student uses the technology in moderation (so as not to become too dependent on it) - but what message does it convey when we have a large number of "professional" pilots out there who don't know how to use the equipment themselves? I fly not only with students, but fellow work colleagues who don't know how to use the NAV mode on their autopilot, or that a HSI is always in the command sense, and heaven forbid we should actually turn the GPS on! In short, the current (and upcoming) generation of instructors are perpetuating this technological ignorance because no-one ever fully explained it to them, so they think their own students should be kept in the dark also.
I recently taught a GPS course to some aviation diploma students, and made the remark that by the end of training they were probably more familiar with how to operate a GPS than 90 per cent of the Instructors responsible for the delivery of their training. Of course, this is not to take away in the slightest from the importance of continuing to promote the art of stick-&-rudder and DR - but it would make for a worthwhile and long-overdue change to see some more instructors out there stop being so anal about modern technology in the cockpit.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: australia
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hope im not as old as i sound but when I learnt to fly GPSs were just being talked about.Everyone couldnt wait.I have been lost ,very lost,I in the end remembered some words from a great mate,He said If you ever get lost land as soon as possible,shut down,get out and have a walk around,then start the flight again.chuck the old wac on the tail and get out the ruler and work something out without having too worry about where you are and wasting fuel as you do soo.This worked for me.Its amazing how much clearer you think when u get some pressure off your self.I was made too fly without captain Garmin when getting checked out on mail runs,didnt have a problem with that,But now im checking guys out and I say go for it use the Gps but also have your head outside and seeying what is actually on track soo if you one day have flat baterys you know that dam with a airstrip is dead on track!!
Join Date: May 2003
Location: PH 298/7.4DME
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yep, for sure.
My instructors encouraged me to have the GPS on, as it's another pilot aid there in case I need it, etc. I always found a better sense of achievement by not using it though and actually seeing my destination on top of the nose cowling 25 mins out.
That said, none of the aircraft I fly with the company I'm with now have GPS in them anyway, so there's little choice.
520.
My instructors encouraged me to have the GPS on, as it's another pilot aid there in case I need it, etc. I always found a better sense of achievement by not using it though and actually seeing my destination on top of the nose cowling 25 mins out.
That said, none of the aircraft I fly with the company I'm with now have GPS in them anyway, so there's little choice.
520.
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: australia
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Only ever used a GPS once when a mate decided to bring one on a reasonably long trip (in over ten years of flying). Nice to have but I'd hazard the suggestion that by the time an individual has a PPL they should have no probs getting from A to B with DR techniques.
Remember....anything with batteries is bound to stop eventually.................Oh dear....I couldn't resist could I?.......nurse!!!!!?????!
Remember....anything with batteries is bound to stop eventually.................Oh dear....I couldn't resist could I?.......nurse!!!!!?????!
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Crookwell
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If GPS is there to use then use it because it's just another tool for navigation, but sole reliance not only encourages laziness but is just asking for trouble. GPS is subject to interference, incorrect entry and misinterpretation just as other navaids. I have been taught that all information should always be cross-checked vigilantly.
At our school we are reminded of the clown that set a direct GPS track from Archerfield to Cairns and flew it, incurring numerous airspace violations needless to say!
I agree students should learn all traditional nav techniques and if GPS is there to be used, then it should be taught too. If we are taught to be sceptical of the GPS just as we are radionavaids then there shouldnt be a problem.
At our school we are reminded of the clown that set a direct GPS track from Archerfield to Cairns and flew it, incurring numerous airspace violations needless to say!
I agree students should learn all traditional nav techniques and if GPS is there to be used, then it should be taught too. If we are taught to be sceptical of the GPS just as we are radionavaids then there shouldnt be a problem.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Anywhere they want !
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You gotta walk before you can run. Basics first, then once mastered, progress to tech.
I've seen one bloke come unstuck due to bad inputs into a GPS and not wanting to believe it could be wrong.
GIGO. Garbage in garbage out!
I've seen one bloke come unstuck due to bad inputs into a GPS and not wanting to believe it could be wrong.
GIGO. Garbage in garbage out!
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I say get used to using a GPS particularly for IFR ops
One day I see all NDBs being decommissioned and GPS NPA being the norm. Take a look at the NAS reform being introduced and oz GA becoming more and more like US GA procedures. I think you will struggle to find a NDB/ADF approach at many UA airports, its either VOR or GPS NPA....
What are everyones thoughts on the use of GPS NPA replacing NDB approaches...??
Ang
One day I see all NDBs being decommissioned and GPS NPA being the norm. Take a look at the NAS reform being introduced and oz GA becoming more and more like US GA procedures. I think you will struggle to find a NDB/ADF approach at many UA airports, its either VOR or GPS NPA....
What are everyones thoughts on the use of GPS NPA replacing NDB approaches...??
Ang
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Amy Johnson managed to come from UK with just a School Atlas and a compass. So why did they ever bother to invent GPS? Chuck all of your expensive ASA charts away and get a good Atlas. Gregory's is fine for flying around Sydney.
Seriously though - some need to come into the 21st Century. The challenge is teaching PROPER use of GPS and in particular, understanding its limitations. Any student who is using it as sole means on a Nav test is not likely to get very far - because the GPS will definitely fail! It is also true that a few aerodromes have already switched off their NDB's relying on GPS NPA instead. That is the way of the future - especially when WAAS gets going.
The danger is the nice new licence that gets a flash hand held, battery powered, sticker ariel Garmin for Christmas - and then ventures off into the outback without so much as a briefing on its power, traps and limitations.
Seriously though - some need to come into the 21st Century. The challenge is teaching PROPER use of GPS and in particular, understanding its limitations. Any student who is using it as sole means on a Nav test is not likely to get very far - because the GPS will definitely fail! It is also true that a few aerodromes have already switched off their NDB's relying on GPS NPA instead. That is the way of the future - especially when WAAS gets going.
The danger is the nice new licence that gets a flash hand held, battery powered, sticker ariel Garmin for Christmas - and then ventures off into the outback without so much as a briefing on its power, traps and limitations.
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah I agree - lets get it going asap - beats all of the needle chasing for sure!
But wrt to on-route and NPA, there is a catch. The cost of the average database, updated monthly is about $1200 per year. This will inevitably increase the cost beyond what it was with NDB's, VOR's and DME's - and guess who that gets passed on to.
Now that we can use GPS instead of DME, even on ILS/DME, I hope we are all checking our databases. You know how mean some of these owners can be skimping on updates!
But wrt to on-route and NPA, there is a catch. The cost of the average database, updated monthly is about $1200 per year. This will inevitably increase the cost beyond what it was with NDB's, VOR's and DME's - and guess who that gets passed on to.
Now that we can use GPS instead of DME, even on ILS/DME, I hope we are all checking our databases. You know how mean some of these owners can be skimping on updates!
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Interesting
My understanding is that if a student is heading for a licence test, PPL, CPL he/she will need to demonstrate an understanding of instruments at there desposal, i.e navigation instruments installed in the aircraft not hand held GPS, if GPS is one of those instruments so be it, to assist in there navigation. 
Its up to the instructor or examiner to make sure that the student is not using only one form of instrumentation, i.e GPS, ADF, VOR or just plain old DR for navigation but a complement of techniques to assist them.
So there is nothing wrong with GPS
unless the student becomes to depandant on it then you just turn it off so they start using other techniques. 
chucky
Its up to the instructor or examiner to make sure that the student is not using only one form of instrumentation, i.e GPS, ADF, VOR or just plain old DR for navigation but a complement of techniques to assist them.
So there is nothing wrong with GPS
unless the student becomes to depandant on it then you just turn it off so they start using other techniques. chucky
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Still in Paradise
Age: 60
Posts: 861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's just another tool, like a compass, VOR, ADF, Autopilot. Anyone flying a specific aircraft should be thoroughly familiar with and competent in the use of all the bits in it - including all the above. Instructor-induced failures of any / all of these aids is a useful training technique.
Many of the GPA NPAs in USA are actually overlays of previous or existing NDB & VOR Navaid NPAs. There are not that many of the dedicated GPS waypoint-type approaches such as we have designed here. NDBs are programed for phase-out in 2006 (again).
Many of the GPA NPAs in USA are actually overlays of previous or existing NDB & VOR Navaid NPAs. There are not that many of the dedicated GPS waypoint-type approaches such as we have designed here. NDBs are programed for phase-out in 2006 (again).