US Carrier Announces Ab Initio Program
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Escaped the sandpit 53° 32′ 9.19″ N, 9° 50′ 13.29″ E
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1. Because AF447
2. Because many pilots feel that they had to work their way up to the mainline and LCC jobs, so why should someone else get a shortcut if there are plenty of pilots who are already qualified to do the job.
^ like the guy above said!
Modern day scabs. Underpaid, even after they're "qualified." Dragging the industry as a whole down with them.
Modern day scabs. Underpaid, even after they're "qualified." Dragging the industry as a whole down with them.
Edit: This press release should worry the Unions: http://boeing.mediaroom.com/2015-10-...-9-Dreamliners
Last edited by ExDubai; 22nd Oct 2015 at 07:42.
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Or-E-Gun, USA
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Very Interesting, But...
A Very Interesting program and I wish JB every success. However, with the exception of some variations in the course work and FF simulators used, I cannot imagine any huge differences between their G7 program and the traditional academic degrees offered in the field by several established universities. Both are expensive and both take about four years. For the longer term, a 'real' degree is probably of more value; the G7 closer to a comprehensive meal ticket.
That mouthful said, JB may believe that they have no other choice, given the 1500 hour requirements. JB may be first to play around with this, but where is their guarantee that they will complete even one full (4-year) cycle? Other U.S. carriers may try similar programs. My suggestion would be that they keep extremely high standards, fill their classes with pilots who are already graduates of the existing programs (but with the 'wrong' kinds of hours), pay them a small stipend and convert these already well educated pilots into JB pilots. It would be much faster, probably produce far better rounded pilots and avoid the stigma of "Trade Schools Selling Jobs." Ask yourself this: "How many U.S. pilots already have a 4-year degree, between 1000 and 1500 hours, but the 'wrong kind' of hours? I'd guess a LOT! That is the pilot pool that JB should be targeting. Again, I have to wonder how long JB can (or will) sustain this program. Total cost is relevant. Employment upon successful completion is relevant. The carriers need pilots and the pilots need jobs, but the ATP/hour rules interject a major disconnect. The 'suitable' pilot-candidates do not need four more years. Twelve or perhaps 18 months of additional work should produce a qualified FO. (Far better than some Asian programs that convert novices to Jet Transport Pilots with 251 hours, the ones that I call Shake & Bake Pilots. How often do we see S&B pilots mentioned in accident reports?)
As before, retired and not my axe to grind. Still, I'm interested in your thoughts.
That mouthful said, JB may believe that they have no other choice, given the 1500 hour requirements. JB may be first to play around with this, but where is their guarantee that they will complete even one full (4-year) cycle? Other U.S. carriers may try similar programs. My suggestion would be that they keep extremely high standards, fill their classes with pilots who are already graduates of the existing programs (but with the 'wrong' kinds of hours), pay them a small stipend and convert these already well educated pilots into JB pilots. It would be much faster, probably produce far better rounded pilots and avoid the stigma of "Trade Schools Selling Jobs." Ask yourself this: "How many U.S. pilots already have a 4-year degree, between 1000 and 1500 hours, but the 'wrong kind' of hours? I'd guess a LOT! That is the pilot pool that JB should be targeting. Again, I have to wonder how long JB can (or will) sustain this program. Total cost is relevant. Employment upon successful completion is relevant. The carriers need pilots and the pilots need jobs, but the ATP/hour rules interject a major disconnect. The 'suitable' pilot-candidates do not need four more years. Twelve or perhaps 18 months of additional work should produce a qualified FO. (Far better than some Asian programs that convert novices to Jet Transport Pilots with 251 hours, the ones that I call Shake & Bake Pilots. How often do we see S&B pilots mentioned in accident reports?)
As before, retired and not my axe to grind. Still, I'm interested in your thoughts.
Thread Starter
NFZ,
JB already has something akin to what you describe involving universities and Cape Air:
Fly. Auburn. - jetBlue Announces 2014 Gateway Class
JetBlue, Cape Air partner with BSU - Lifestyle - The Herald News, Fall River, MA - Fall River, MA
And this deal with Expressjet. But these folks would already be flying CRJ/ERJ stuff. I've only heard one passing local comment about it from an Xjet pilot and it was negative. I didn't really understand why:
JetBlue, ExpressJet partner to offer students and current pilots career pathway - eTurboNews.com
JB already has something akin to what you describe involving universities and Cape Air:
Fly. Auburn. - jetBlue Announces 2014 Gateway Class
JetBlue, Cape Air partner with BSU - Lifestyle - The Herald News, Fall River, MA - Fall River, MA
And this deal with Expressjet. But these folks would already be flying CRJ/ERJ stuff. I've only heard one passing local comment about it from an Xjet pilot and it was negative. I didn't really understand why:
JetBlue, ExpressJet partner to offer students and current pilots career pathway - eTurboNews.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
LH offers this program since decades with two options of a combined program with aviation major or just flight training program, and as I know, their program is based on MPL, not ATPL. However, they are right now changing the whole concept of the program, the boldest one being it will not be financially sponsored by LH anymore. As I know, they have currently dozens of cadets finished training but still waiting for a job from LH and again dozens of candidates who have succeeded the assesment and ready to start training. Some of the cadets finished training have been transitioned to Germanwings.
KLM, British and Air France have their own ab-initio programs as well as I know.
Turkish hires more cadets every year, recently they bought a whole airport in Southwest Turkey and asked flight training department of Florida Institute of Technology to set the place up. They are still sending some of the cadets to FIT and some other schools in Europe. The program is completely sponsored by the airline including the accommodation and cadets receive a small scholarship-kind salary during the training.
The case of Turkish seems to be a dream for a US airline, however I don't see any reason it would not succeed. Turkish is relatively new in this game, (around 10 years) but LH has been doing this for decades.
KLM, British and Air France have their own ab-initio programs as well as I know.
Turkish hires more cadets every year, recently they bought a whole airport in Southwest Turkey and asked flight training department of Florida Institute of Technology to set the place up. They are still sending some of the cadets to FIT and some other schools in Europe. The program is completely sponsored by the airline including the accommodation and cadets receive a small scholarship-kind salary during the training.
The case of Turkish seems to be a dream for a US airline, however I don't see any reason it would not succeed. Turkish is relatively new in this game, (around 10 years) but LH has been doing this for decades.
Thread Starter
JetBlue opens the window for next ab initio intake:
JetBlue | JetBlue Begins Accepting Applications for Second Cycle of its ?Gateway Select? Pilot Training Program
JetBlue | JetBlue Begins Accepting Applications for Second Cycle of its ?Gateway Select? Pilot Training Program
Thread Starter
JB's whole attitude toward this ab initio thing is puzzling; it just isn't necessary. There's no lack of qualified people who'd jump at the chance to fly for them. Perhaps JB should avail themselves of the eager supply without resorting to some process tantamount to phrenology.
The stories I hear from really good candidates turned away by these career-destination carriers leave me speechless.
The stories I hear from really good candidates turned away by these career-destination carriers leave me speechless.