![]() |
Originally Posted by Herc15
(Post 12051464)
Are you suggesting Bibi lost a finger recently? Im counting 4 fingers 1 thumb on each hand. Look up compression artifacts
|
I dont think the track of any aircraft just after take off- Fairford to Frome is probably about ten mins flying time gives any indication of destination so I dont think anyone is giving any info away and its all over local neighbourhood chat sites because they are so bloody noisy. in fact speaking to some neighbours it makes them reflect about the whole thing , which have ranged from if they had the resources would it be Ok for the Venezuelan airforce to kill Trump or what figures do we have for civilians.
Personally I am in favour of regime change in Iran having friends and acquaintances from Iran and their treatment particularly of women is appalling, A more open Iran would be an asset to the world an not just because they have oil they are a nation with history and culture and with 92 million people would be a strong moderating influence in the region which it badly needs . Another tragedy |
fdr and sycamore nope that is Dart's Sky Cannon
https://scontent.flba1-1.fna.fbcdn.n...9A&oe=69B9D5DA cheers |
Originally Posted by RAFEngO74to09
(Post 12051613)
Pentagon Brief - 13 Mar 26
(8) Fox News on X: "WATCH LIVE: Pentagon officials hold press briefing on Iran conflict https://t.co/m1zjm3cvHw" / Twitter |
Originally Posted by mahogany bob
(Post 12051439)
America - finish the job - get rid of the Mullahs whilst you have the chance .
no other option UK and Europe = give all the help you can .
The consensus building of a united NATO, united allied forces across the Atlantic have been memorable, amply aided by the fairly continuous stream of enthusiastic support for these at 2:00AM on Twitter/X, used to be Twitter/Truth Social. I guess that invective, like beauty, is in the text of the authors. The underlying problem is, nature abhors vacuums. This might result in the curious rush of air to the head of our politicians, but it also means that without a filler, there will be a fill, just not of choice medium. Iran would do well with a new government, one for the people, by the people etc, but that seems to not always work out as advertised either. They, the Iranians need to make the choice, having one forced upon them has a vanishingly small Pk of success, but does wonders for the need for homeland security. I would think that the adults in the room might wish to determine first up what the reason for the current "excursion" is, then determine what the necessary outcome has to look like to resolve the reasons for whatever this is, and then to determine how that can be achieved, if that is possible at all. Glad that the A-team is right on top of that... and not F-troop. Nukes are bad, but there are a number of vectors by which that can arise, and increasing the justification for every country to have nukes as we move sadly by choice to a multipolar world strongly suggests that we are only at the start of this debacle. Wait until Maldives, Heard Island, Liechtenstein etc decide that they cannot rely on the status quo for defence of their interests, they need an independent WMD for their own survival. In all truth, the N of NBC is just one of 3 letters of options that exist to any nation on the planet. Of these, the B makes the N and the C pale into insignificance, but it tends to be rather indiscriminate. |
Originally Posted by fdr
(Post 12051713)
Wait until Maldives, Heard Island, Liechtenstein etc decide that they cannot rely on the status quo for defence of their interests, they need an independent WMD for their own survival.
|
So the US is considering sending a Marine unit (up to 5000 personnel) and associated warships. This could start to get very hot indeed. It may get pretty hot back in the US for the Donald if this strategy backfires
|
Originally Posted by Canary Boy
(Post 12051898)
So the US is considering sending a Marine unit (up to 5000 personnel) and associated warships. This could start to get very hot indeed. It may get pretty hot back in the US for the Donald if this strategy backfires
Could this indicate an interest in taking over Qeshm Island on the northern side of the Straits of Hormuz? Control of this island, with its long runway would give US a commanding position? |
Originally Posted by Canary Boy
(Post 12051898)
So the US is considering sending a Marine unit (up to 5000 personnel) and associated warships. This could start to get very hot indeed. It may get pretty hot back in the US for the Donald if this strategy backfires
|
|
Originally Posted by DogTailRed2
(Post 12051906)
Can 5000 do the job? [OK I know it's the Marines but ..... ] |
Originally Posted by fdr
(Post 12051713)
Wait until Maldives, Heard Island, Liechtenstein etc decide that they cannot rely on the status quo for defence of their interests, they need an independent WMD for their own survival. In all truth, the N of NBC is just one of 3 letters of options that exist to any nation on the planet. Of these, the B makes the N and the C pale into insignificance, but it tends to be rather indiscriminate.
The prospect of the 'Big Big B' (the use of which the famous Captain Corquoran sought to deny ;-) ) being deployed has haunted me since long before a Chinese lab, allegedly affiliated with the PLA and the recipient of some US funding, engineered a deadly hybrid pathogen which escaped and went on to torment the world. The doctrine of MAD worked - given a couple of close shaves - because both sides knew there would be nothing left to 'win' in the end. Conversely, a suitable pathogen enables the destruction of the adversary population whilst keeping its infrastructure and resources intact, and ripe for the picking - and does not require fancy air assets or expensive rocketry for delivery. (We were somewhat lucky - the biography of the Soviet bugmaster, who defected west with the impending collapse of the USSR, makes horrifying reading). Consider the scenario: - bad guys have developed very deadly and very transmissible bug. - bad guys have kept that secret whilst producing ample stocks of an effective vaccine. - bad guys deliver their 'surrender-or-die' ultimatum - "Nuke us, and destroy the only vaccine stocks?" => Checkmate? What makes the B option so scary now is that we have seen - perhaps belatedly - that custom lethal bugs can be produced in very modest facilities - no need for an aviation industry, or vast stocks of munitions, and such facilities could very easily be hidden underground if not even within an apartment block. This makes the B option potentially available on the cheap not only to rogue nations but even to well-funded smaller entities (the nutcases who dispensed nerve agents on the Tokyo metro were subsequently found to be extremely well-funded). So, I do hope that the B option is not amongst the 'surprises' with which the IRGC seeks to threaten the world. (and I'm no longer sure that B-weapons are going to remain 'indescriminate' for long, given the diabolical emergent biotechnology which may enable specific genetic groupings to be targeted). ... and apart from that, Mrs. Lincoln ... happy Easter |
dogle, you do realize that Mrs Lincoln was insane, right? :confused:
Originally Posted by Canary Boy
(Post 12051898)
So the US is considering sending a Marine unit (up to 5000 personnel) and associated warships. This could start to get very hot indeed. It may get pretty hot back in the US for the Donald if this strategy backfires
Originally Posted by TCAS FAN
(Post 12051902)
Could this indicate an interest in taking over Qeshm Island on the northern side of the Straits of Hormuz? Control of this island, with its long runway would give US a commanding position?
Originally Posted by Steepclimb
(Post 12051943)
The irony is that in neutralising the Iranian regime he might neutralise himself to his loyalists. The Americans who don't want their American kids dying in pointless wars.
I am not sure that DJT has a grasp of how fickle the electorate can be. If only I could be one of the voices in his head, I'd drop a bit of advice, but his listening skills are sub optimal. *Win the war* is not a guarantee of ballot box victory...Winston Churchill could share a few lessons learned on that one. |
Originally Posted by Steepclimb
(Post 12051943)
I don't know what happened but it's a bad accident. Doesn't bear thinking about.
But it's war, accidents happen. Easy to say that. But a consequence of war, sadly. If there's a good thing about this war, it's possibly the downfall of the Mullahs and of the clown prince circus of the Trump regime, who leapt into this war thinking it would end overnight. The irony is that in neutralising the Iranian regime he might neutralise himself to his loyalists. The Americans who don't want their American kids dying in pointless wars. I'm not American but I have two military age boys. If I was American I'd be worried. Trump himself, in a lucid moment counseled that this wasn’t an overnight operation. I didn’t want this war, but it’s here and has to be prosecuted to the fullest. That will take time, there will be more US KIA I imagine, but it must be completed, the media and the US bashers aside |
I don't think you can take out 93 million people in 640,000 square miles with any finite amount of ordnance.
|
Originally Posted by West Coast
(Post 12051993)
so it’ll never be as fast as the attention span of many pprune readers.
|
Roughly two weeks into this with a foe that has many advantages. Their navy is gone. Their Air Force is missing in action. Targets have been struck ahead of the Pentagon’s initial schedule. This isn’t a Nintendo shoot em up war game that lasts an hour, so it’ll never be as fast as the attention span of many pprune readers. And, as with Ukraine, this is showing that the future of warfare is drone warfare, both offensive and defensive, on the battlefield. And Iran appears to have a very large supply of drones. A urgent question being do they have the buried factories to keep producing them or is it a finite supply? Threr has been the suggestion that one option for the USA is to seize all the Iranian islands in the Gulf, including Kharg and Qeshm as part of a shield and to stop their oil exports Pending a final deal when they recommence under US control as with Venezuela). The question being do they have the C-UAS to hold them without heavy casualties from sustained Iranian drone attacks? Ukraine might have the answer to that. |
Originally Posted by ORAC
(Post 12050915)
One to fill the other to full at some point and RTB, the other to accompany and refuel the E-7 to it’s destination?
Presumably also carrying ground crew and equipment to support the detachment. Edit - A39-005 is now on it way home as well https://globe.adsbexchange.com/?icao=7cf868 |
What is going to happen when the 5000 marines start taking casualties?
Will Congress and the Senate finally grow a pair and stop this lunacy before it becomes another forever war? You can’t defeat an ideology with bombs. How much ordanance has Bibi spaffed yet Hamas still exists. |
US tankers hit in Saudi
|
If I had Marines ready to go near Iran, plus somebody inside the regime is clearly tipping the Americans/Israelis off as to where top people are, I'd be looking to do a smash and grab on their nuclear material. Wouldn't be easy, but if that was removed from the country it would change the dynamics totally. Or let the Israelis do it, even better..
|
Are semi-circulars out of fashion?
|
Originally Posted by arf23
(Post 12052101)
If I had Marines ready to go near Iran, plus somebody inside the regime is clearly tipping the Americans/Israelis off as to where top people are, I'd be looking to do a smash and grab on their nuclear material. Wouldn't be easy, but if that was removed from the country it would change the dynamics totally. Or let the Israelis do it, even better..
Send Hegseth in, the gung ho fool. |
This thread "Iran" has to a large extent been taken over by the mid air collision in Iraq, which is already being covered in the Accidents and Close Calls forum. Can we get back to events in Iran please.
|
Originally Posted by arf23
(Post 12052101)
If I had Marines ready to go near Iran, plus somebody inside the regime is clearly tipping the Americans/Israelis off as to where top people are, I'd be looking to do a smash and grab on their nuclear material. Wouldn't be easy, but if that was removed from the country it would change the dynamics totally. Or let the Israelis do it, even better..
|
Originally Posted by wondering
(Post 12051364)
I reckon, the military doesn´t have to earn money like airlines? Or even has an incentive to save money? Figuring in all the infrastructure required to operate them, the costs per flight hour must be horrendous. In all fairness, so are F-35 costs.
And I can´t see any B-52 flying over countries which have a reasonable working air defence system. Seems like only countries which are second or third tier opponents get it. |
Another 3 Buffs arrived at RAF Fairford yesterday, bringing the total B1/B52 count to 18.
AFAIK they’ve only flown two mission from the base so far, both involving B1s. Does this suggest that we've reached the 'bouncing rubble' stage of the conflict, or are recent AAR mishaps/travails restricting activity? |
https://www.reuters.com/world/irans-...ys-2026-03-13/
Originally Posted by Mr. Hegseth, 2026
"We will keep pressing, keep pushing, keep advancing. No quarter, no mercy for our enemy."
Originally Posted by Wilhelm II, Emperor of Germany, 1900
"If you come before the enemy, he will be defeated! No quarter will be given! Prisoners will not be taken!"
|
Originally Posted by arf23
(Post 12052101)
If I had Marines ready to go near Iran, plus somebody inside the regime is clearly tipping the Americans/Israelis off as to where top people are, I'd be looking to do a smash and grab on their nuclear material. Wouldn't be easy, but if that was removed from the country it would change the dynamics totally. Or let the Israelis do it, even better..
|
Originally Posted by sfm818
(Post 12052157)
I believe this is about Israel.
Netanyahu addressed Congress several times to build a case for US support to attack Iran. A process started (Under the direction of Olmert/Livni) in the closing month of the Bush W administration. America has been played. |
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
(Post 12052182)
There's even more evidence to discount that scenario now that it appears that no receive-capable aircraft was involved.
|
Satellite images show one of Iran’s three Russian-made Kilo class diesel-electric submarines sunk at Bandar Abbas. In a world’s first ,the submarine was sunk by a US Army ATACMS surface to surface missile..... |
The U.S. Army has sent 10,000 Merops AI-enabled interceptor drones developedby the California-based defense venture Project Eagle to the Middle East, as it looks to repel Iranian one-way drone attacks without using up high-cost missile defense systems, according to a statement Friday by U.S. Army Secretary Dan Driscoll.
Wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merops_(weapon) https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....18bd0cb3ad.png |
Reading and hearing Hegseth's somewhat enthusiastic comments during his press conferences, it is hard to reconcile them as coming from a person who has actually served in a combat zone. More than once, I believe. It's not an attitude you normally hear from combat veterans.
|
Originally Posted by ORAC
(Post 12052270)
The U.S. Army has sent 10,000 Merops AI-enabled interceptor drones developedby the California-based defense venture Project Eagle to the Middle East, as it looks to repel Iranian one-way drone attacks without using up high-cost missile defense systems, according to a statement Friday by U.S. Army Secretary Dan Driscoll.
Wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merops_(weapon) |
Originally Posted by dead_pan
(Post 12052287)
Wow that fella on the left is tiny!
|
Originally Posted by Bob Viking
(Post 12052070)
I thought you were a sensible and considerate person. Please consider if your beloved grand daughter had been on the KC135 and tell us if it would still be a case of ‘sh1t happens’.
It’s not that you’re wrong it’s that your statement was not something I’d expect to come from you. BV |
Confused
Over here in US.
Just heard that POTUS says they have destroyed 100% of Iran's military capability.....but they will still use their drones, missiles and mines to try and close the Strait. Is it me? |
BBC online: Trump demands UK send ships to Strait of Hormuz.
Could hardly have come at a worse time. We have a conjunction of rudderless government, a very attenuated RN and a difficult geopolitical situation. Plus Trump. Time to start cancelling exercises and scrape something together, or lose all military and political credibility. |
Originally Posted by Martin the Martian
(Post 12052285)
Reading and hearing Hegseth's somewhat enthusiastic comments during his press conferences, it is hard to reconcile them as coming from a person who has actually served in a combat zone. More than once, I believe. It's not an attitude you normally hear from combat veterans.
I think it is fortunate that Hegseth is standing behind a podium as he exults in death and destruction. I surmise he experiences a rush of blood to his pelvic area. The troops in the field should start painting bombs Blue in his honour. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 09:36. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.