Chinese spy balloon over US
https://www.yourbigsky.com/billings-...ing-statement/
Harking back to Japanese fire balloons in WWII?! Not the first time in recent years - and they don't want to take `kinetic action' (FFS, just say shoot it down) because of the danger of debris to those on the ground. |
Probably an Alibaba order gone astray.
|
Originally Posted by tartare
(Post 11378953)
https://www.yourbigsky.com/billings-...ing-statement/
Harking back to Japanese fire balloons in WWII?! Not the first time in recent years - and they don't want to take `kinetic action' (FFS, just say shoot it down) because of the danger of debris to those on the ground. https://twitter.com/wildweatherdan/s...052801/photo/1 https://www.news.com.au/technology/i...62bde74004dac5 also last year, sighting over Philippines https://www.scmp.com/news/china/dipl...outh-china-sea https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....c1428c02b.jpeg cheers |
Yes, we had a thread about this somewhere, the airfield and the giant hangar for it, and how it was based on a US military experiment; this was also seen observing Taiwan.
|
Only 98 more to go.
|
Balloon is over the Montana Minuteman III silo areas - now has 2 x F-22A + KC-10 tanker heading there
|
Would be interesting to get hands on the payload.
But I guess too high for any type of drone with scissors...! Wonder if it'll `drift' south-east over Whiteman...? |
|
Senior Defense Official Holds a Background Briefing on High-Altitude Surveillance BalloonKey points:
Very high confidence aircraft is PRC asset Aircraft is a surveillance asset Limited surveillance value relative to other PRC surveillance assets PRC officials have been engaged “with urgency” |
Question raised by that briefing: If they have taken steps against surveillance from the balloon, but LEO satellites provide similar or better coverage then doesn't that run a risk of creating an observable delta? OTOH, It can certainly be a good time for a solid misinformation plan. Are there any secret carrot farms now laid out in the area? Lots of radio chatter concerning Christopher Robin's woodland friend?
The AF is not saying the altitude, but a couple of people with theodolites or sextants could get some known separation to find that out, most easily around dawn or dusk. About 2 -5 miles ought to be enough for non-precision equipment to manage a +/-5% estimate (any school children in Montana looking for a project?) Decent astronomical telescopes should have sufficient precision to get better results. Don't forget to correct for curvature of the Earth! |
No nation has yet claimed ownership, therefore it must be a hazard to high altitude navigation and should be removed.:E
IG |
If a drone or balloon with a telescope was to hover over my garden I would shoot it down. :cool:
|
They always blame balloons..
...Its Aliens I tell you !!! |
Originally Posted by tartare
(Post 11378953)
https://www.yourbigsky.com/billings-...ing-statement/
Harking back to Japanese fire balloons in WWII?! Not the first time in recent years - and they don't want to take `kinetic action' (FFS, just say shoot it down) because of the danger of debris to those on the ground. https://twitter.com/wildweatherdan/s...052801/photo/1 https://worldpopulationreview.com/st...ana-population behind only Alaska and Wyoming in terms of least densley populated states in the US.... |
To be fair, at least the Chinese "weather balloons" actually look like weather balloons...
|
Originally Posted by Imagegear
(Post 11379043)
No nation has yet claimed ownership, therefore it must be a hazard to high altitude navigation and should be removed.:E
IG |
Wonder if its steerable? Photo on BBC seems to show solar type panels hanging below it. Any unusual movements from Chinese vessels in N Atlantic? Wot goes up, must come down.......
|
Originally Posted by ROC man
(Post 11379149)
Wonder if its steerable?
"Google's Project Loon uses controllable altitude superpressure balloons to achieve flights of over 300 days.[" Google Loon is now closed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loon_LLC https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superpressure_balloon https://www.flightradar24.com/blog/k...loon-balloons/ |
Very interesting JimJim. So it just needs the jetstream data nobbling before publication.......
|
Yeah, Montana being so densely populated......not. You could shoot the balloon down with minimal risk of hitting anyone! |
Originally Posted by India Four Two
(Post 11379224)
Yes, Montana is about 50% larger than the UK in area and has only 2% of the population - about one million. It's a big state - 550 miles east-west and 300 miles north south.
You could shoot the balloon down with minimal risk of hitting anyone! |
Looks more like a university or scientific instrument than a military asset...
|
How did it get this far before being noticed? Doesn't the US have an ADIZ? I would have thought a 3xbus sized floating o ject would have triggered something before it was over the top of mainland US, and been dealt with before that point.
|
BBC News reporting that it "flew over several sensitive military installations".
Presumably, being a balloon, then like any other balloon it just went where the wind took it? |
Originally Posted by rmcdonal
(Post 11379250)
How did it get this far before being noticed? Doesn't the US have an ADIZ? I would have thought a 3xbus sized floating o ject would have triggered something before it was over the top of mainland US, and been dealt with before that point.
|
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
(Post 11379252)
BBC News reporting that it "flew over several sensitive military installations".
:O |
Minuteman silos are easily spotted using Google earth - I doubt a balloon would add much info
|
|
Why bother? Its presence is known and knocking it down gives an indication of high altitude defence capability. |
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
(Post 11379252)
BBC News reporting that it "flew over several sensitive military installations".
Presumably, being a balloon, then like any other balloon it just went where the wind took it? |
Perhaps it is a stray weather balloon- but the PRC would say that, wouldn’t they? If it is actually spying then it might be more beneficial for the US to intercept its transmissions and decode what it is reporting than it would be to bring it down - if indeed they have the technology to bring down something flying at perhaps 80,000 feet. If they do have the technology they might not want to demonstrate it.
|
Originally Posted by Asturias56
(Post 11379277)
Minuteman silos are easily spotted using Google earth - I doubt a balloon would add much info
|
If you want to photograph an ICBM silo, go rent a C172 |
Spying Over Montana?
Looking at a map I've always got the feeling that Montana is an old man spying on Idaho. Sticking his nose right into Idaho's business https://media.officedepot.com/images...40_o01/8325540 You can't unsee that now "If you want to photograph an ICBM silo, go rent a C172 and snap away" - Not so easy to do in the US any more. Not if you're not a citizen at least |
Originally Posted by melmothtw
(Post 11379297)
True, but by the same token if it is feeding intelligence back in real time you don't want it staying aloft.
|
Originally Posted by Ninthace
(Post 11379330)
If you know it is there, you do not give it any intelligence to gather other than height, pressure, wind speed, temperature, humidity, atmospheric composition, presence of pollutants, incidence of cosmic rays, ozone levels and so on. :=
|
|
Originally Posted by melmothtw
(Post 11379334)
Lol, good luck getting any government/military organisation to move that quick.
|
Originally Posted by MechEngr
(Post 11379028)
Don't forget to correct for curvature of the Earth!
Nearly Legober ...... a bit early for that. Fanger trouble |
Originally Posted by Ninthace
(Post 11379231)
Why bother? Its presence is known and knocking it down gives an indication of high altitude defence capability.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 19:16. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.