PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   Platinum Jubilee Fly Past (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/647033-platinum-jubilee-fly-past.html)

Timelord 4th Jun 2022 13:00

On a slightly drifting note, during one of the “fill in” bits on TV with Ms Wark, Sir Stu Peach referred to HM as Commander in Chief of the armed forces. Is that right? Is that new? Is that wrong? I have only ever heard her described as “head” which is subtly different.

ShyTorque 4th Jun 2022 14:37


Originally Posted by goldox (Post 11239648)
According to Sky, the 70 symbol was made by the Red Arrows.
:ugh:


Of course… we should have realised…all fifteen of them :ugh:

H Peacock 4th Jun 2022 20:16


Good to see that the Reds came up with 9 aircraft, bearing in mind recent events.....
Well it’s not airframes they are short of, although another birdstrike just after the event in the Midlands.

Glad to see Monty hasn't lost it; references nailed even though he’s on a ground tour!

RomeoTangoFoxtrotMike 5th Jun 2022 13:13


Originally Posted by DaveReidUK (Post 11240214)
My take on it is that the formation flew parallel to, but very slightly north of, the Mall and overflew the wing of the Palace closest to Constitution Hill.

If you look at the two Voyagers' tracks on FR24, from Colchester onwards the inbound track was 236°T to match the orientation of the Mall, so I don't see any evidence of a 3° divergence.

I've noticed that, at a couple of TTC flypasts that I've attended previously. There is a very obvious explantion of why this is deliberate, which I'm not going to describe here.

RomeoTangoFoxtrotMike 5th Jun 2022 13:17


Originally Posted by Fortissimo (Post 11240512)
Or higher drag so higher thrust for same IAS, which would put the engine rpm into a more responsive range so more precise forward movement. Higher drag would also help with quicker rearward movement.

I've heard that same explanation given previously.

Dan Winterland 5th Jun 2022 15:04


Arrows airbrake use: isn't it to push up the RPM to improve throttle response?
Higher thrust = more smoke in the Red's case.

Bob Viking 5th Jun 2022 15:14

Airbrake out
 
I’m sure I recall someone telling me that the disturbed airflow behind the airbrake also helps to make the smoke trail bloom more. Not sure if that’s a genuine reason or not but it seems feasible to me.

BV

CARR30 6th Jun 2022 06:15


Originally Posted by rcsa (Post 11239981)
Seriously, chaps - HE was sitting in a windowless room, with a list of aircraft provided by the RAF and filtered by a producer, with monitors showing five or six different camera angles, while a director made independent decisions on which camera view to broadcast, and echelons of aircraft came overhead at 200 knots. He possibly had no idea what the broadcast output was showing at that moment. And he's a TV personality, not ex-aircrew or a spotter. He'd been live for over two hours, on what may well be the biggest show of the year, with a guest in the studio to engage with.

It's probably not as tough as flying an inverted Buccaneer at 20 ft around the Glens, as you gents have all done, but it's not easy; and using this error to slag off the BBC tells more about your own political agenda than it does about HE's ability.

The commentator's job is to comment on what viewers are seeing adding context and information.

Anyone can read a script out of sync with the video. What's actually required for the job is someone who watches the broadcast stream and knows their stuff. That someone was not Huw Edwards.

WHBM 6th Jun 2022 16:09


Originally Posted by rcsa (Post 11239981)
It's probably not as tough as flying an inverted Buccaneer at 20 ft around the Glens, as you gents have all done, .

He appears to be paid a sight more, though; we wonder why ...

charliegolf 6th Jun 2022 16:53


Originally Posted by WHBM (Post 11241778)
He appears to be paid a sight more, though; we wonder why ...

Had he done it for free, would the whining be less, then?

CG

OvertHawk 7th Jun 2022 14:51


Originally Posted by charliegolf (Post 11241803)
Had he done it for free, would the whining wold be less, then?

CG

Nooooooooo.

It would have been more because he would have been deriving someone who knew how to do it of paid work!!

(And then someone else would have complained about you saying "for free" instead of "free" or "for nothing"! :ok:)

fallmonk 7th Jun 2022 17:07

Excuse my ignorance, but has any aircraft from the commonwealth air forces ever taken part in one the flypast to celebrate in one of the Queens anniversary's?

Wokkafans 7th Jun 2022 17:53


Originally Posted by fallmonk (Post 11242314)
Excuse my ignorance, but has any aircraft from the commonwealth air forces ever taken part in one the flypast to celebrate in one of the Queens anniversary's?


Canadian Sabres and Australian Vampires were part of the fly past for the 1953 RAF Coronation Review. The static display also included Australian Meteors and a New Zealand Bristol Freighter,

A list of participants is here: https://www.hampshireairfields.co.uk/nos10.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=haEe5KfxvUg

charliegolf 7th Jun 2022 18:16


Originally Posted by OvertHawk (Post 11242260)

(And then someone else would have complained about you saying "for free" instead of "free" or "for nothing"! :ok:)

On,' watching it back'*, I see I butchered the entire post!

CG
*one that really grips my whatsit!

MPN11 7th Jun 2022 18:19

… amd whimper!

Did the Kiwi Bristol Frightener fly to UK? Or walk? 🤠

Pearly White 8th Jun 2022 07:32


Originally Posted by wondering (Post 11240074)
The left Typhoon is clearly too far ahead. Or the other two Typhoon next to it too far behind.

I think the typographical term for what you're seeing there is a "serif".

Asturias56 8th Jun 2022 07:33

there were some great pictures of the 1953 parade in History & nostalgia a month or so back

https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....7fa0999635.jpg

mickjoebill 8th Jun 2022 10:54

https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....2457ba7272.png
Jolly good show.

Null Orifice 8th Jun 2022 10:56

Nice picture! Makes me feel really ancient, having worked on at least four of the types depicted - but wasn't in the RAF at that time.

Pearly White 8th Jun 2022 11:00


Originally Posted by Asturias56 (Post 11242571)
there were some great pictures of the 1953 parade in History & nostalgia a month or so back

https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....7fa0999635.jpg

This must have been very nearly the entire RAF fleet. What are the four-engined taildraggers in the left foreground, please?


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:07.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.