PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   USMC Mid-Air - F-35/KC-130 (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/635797-usmc-mid-air-f-35-kc-130-a.html)

VX275 13th Oct 2020 07:26

The front door can be jettisoned for use as an emergency parachute exit (just don't jump up as you leave).

NutLoose 13th Oct 2020 17:52

Considering they were in an emergency descent one would think the fwd exit was the last place you wanted to be stepping out of. Thanks for extending my knowledge of the Herc :)

sycamore 13th Oct 2020 19:07

Like all `news`items ,it`s a bit like `Send 3 and 4 pence,we`re going to a dance`.....none of the Marine Corps statements mention that any of the Herk crew jumped at all.....

WIDN62 13th Oct 2020 21:23

I don't think the crew door is designed to be jettisoned in flight. It is designed for use on the ground if the fuselage is distorted and it can't be opened normally. It is impossible to believe that if it were jettisoned in flight it would miss No 2 prop. This is why the Crew Door light on the classic C130 or the Crew Door Warning on the C130J is treated so seriously.

heights good 14th Oct 2020 03:09


Originally Posted by West Coast (Post 10897003)
Screaming holy **** I had a midair would also get everyone’s attention.

Feel free to dissect what many of the pedants here believe is a systemic training issue of declaring emergency vs mayday/pan, however on that day, the phraseology that was most common to both the flight crew and the controller was “declaring an emergency”

the issue comes when callsigns subsequently join the frequency and just hear a callsign being mentioned i.e. RAIDER50 vs MAYDAY RAIDER50.

It is the normal procedure for ATC and crews to append their callsign with mayday so that EVERYONE knows what is happening and can then minimise transmissions.

Either way, the crew got ATCs attention and walked away to tell the tale, that's the main point.

Just This Once... 14th Oct 2020 10:10


Originally Posted by WIDN62 (Post 10903942)
I don't think the crew door is designed to be jettisoned in flight. It is designed for use on the ground if the fuselage is distorted and it can't be opened normally. It is impossible to believe that if it were jettisoned in flight it would miss No 2 prop. This is why the Crew Door light on the classic C130 or the Crew Door Warning on the C130J is treated so seriously.

It is.


____

ancientaviator62 15th Oct 2020 10:14

IIRC we had lots of crew door warning light problems when we first got the 'K'. Eventually the 'solution' was to remove the 'door closed' microswitch and just have the 'door locked' system in operation. The meant that in theory you could turn the handle to the locked position but still have the crew door open. This would still put out the master warning light !
As for carriage of parachutes they were worn by the loadmaster on certain airdrops (back type) and carried on the tanker (clip on WW2 fashion). I have no recollection of crew parachute carrying in any other role on the 'K'.

tdracer 15th Oct 2020 18:01

Do we know with any certainty that part of the C130J crew bailed out rather than ride the aircraft down?

NutLoose 15th Oct 2020 18:14

Nope, we only have your press reports saying they did and if they’re anything like ours then I would take it all with a pinch of salt.

ancientaviator62 16th Oct 2020 07:51

Just curious how many crew members the USMC C130 tanker would carry on a tanking sortie. As for baling out if anyone did, then my door of choice in the circumstances would be the port para door. This is based on the pics of the damage over on the starboard side. You would not know if bits were still flying past on that side. I am assuming that if the ramp and door are useable in the air in their tanker C130 (not an option on the RAF C130 tanker !) the descent speed may have precluded its use. But they would have still had to be slow enough and high enough to get a para door open and the jumpers out safely. Just my thoughts of course.

ORAC 16th Oct 2020 08:33

https://nbcpalmsprings.com/2020/10/1...ng-in-thermal/



The C-130 Military cargo plane has been moved to the Jacqueline Cochran Airport in Thermal. NBC Palm Springs viewer Steve Randall shared these photos with us.


https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....99a80ccfc0.jpg



https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....bf48088eb5.jpg



https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....d1cbf55aff.jpg


https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....37239c51df.jpg

Pugilistic Animus 26th Oct 2020 23:00


Originally Posted by heights good (Post 10904027)
the issue comes when callsigns subsequently join the frequency and just hear a callsign being mentioned i.e. RAIDER50 vs MAYDAY RAIDER50.

It is the normal procedure for ATC and crews to append their callsign with mayday so that EVERYONE knows what is happening and can then minimise transmissions.

Either way, the crew got ATCs attention and walked away to tell the tale, that's the main point.

:}

NutLoose 28th Oct 2020 15:54

More images, you can see the creasing of the front fuselage by the door and it looks like the prop warning markings are a couple of foot aft of the impact points.

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zon...ern-california

ancientaviator62 29th Oct 2020 08:32

NutLoose,
thanks for the link. I had not realised that the USMC tankers dispensed fuel with the ramp open ! I wonder what speed they operate at.

Tashengurt 29th Oct 2020 09:22


Originally Posted by NutLoose (Post 10913589)
More images, you can see the creasing of the front fuselage by the door and it looks like the prop warning markings are a couple of foot aft of the impact points.

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zon...ern-california

Interesting 'tide line' on the fuselage, could be soot but I'm sure could equally be from foam or an irrigation sprinkler in the field.

RAFEngO74to09 29th Oct 2020 13:08

The KC-130J air-to-air refueling speed range is 100 knots to 270 knots.

ancientaviator62 30th Oct 2020 08:16

A good speed range but IMHO the ramp and door would not be open at the upper limit. Perhaps the picture I saw was just a publicity shot without actual tanking taking place. If memory serves the RAF C130K tanker dispensed at 185 kts.

sycamore 30th Oct 2020 11:45

aa62, can`t find my little `blue-book` for tanking guidlines,but we`d always try to do it over 200 kts,assuming one was not too heavy...
Interesting to see that NP2000 props(8-bladed composites) are being retrofitted to other Herks in place of the metal paddles.
Interesting to read the investigation into the break-up of Bu.No 16500 over Mississippi,after a blade on #2 let go....!
Remind me of the `ramp and door `speed limits on our K` ,not tankers....another subject..

Just This Once... 30th Oct 2020 12:03


Originally Posted by ancientaviator62 (Post 10914868)
A good speed range but IMHO the ramp and door would not be open at the upper limit. Perhaps the picture I saw was just a publicity shot without actual tanking taking place. If memory serves the RAF C130K tanker dispensed at 185 kts.


Originally Posted by sycamore (Post 10915013)
Remind me of the `ramp and door `speed limits on our K` ,not tankers....another subject..

It's been a while and I have too many types in my head:

150kts ramp and door (no HSR / shutters on a K)
170kts door only (no HSD or uprated actuator on a K)

I think...

sycamore 30th Oct 2020 12:16

Thanks JTO,...clarify HSD/HSR please...?

Just This Once... 30th Oct 2020 12:31

High Speed Ramp (shuttering fixed to the sides of the ramp).
High Speed (cargo) Door (slightly different actuator(s)with or without fuselage rib/skin changes).

WIDN62 30th Oct 2020 13:53

C130K and J, 185 Kts for the door only.

NutLoose 30th Oct 2020 14:45

So what type of ramp is this :E


https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....125e658271.jpg

RAFEngO74to09 30th Oct 2020 16:21

250 knots ramp on the KC-130J - from the USMC Concepts & Programs website:

https://www.candp.marines.mil/Progra...ation/KC-130J/

sycamore 30th Oct 2020 19:33

Nutty,what,where,when?...Braking action -poor;grass is `damp....!!

JTO ,Thanks...

NutLoose 30th Oct 2020 22:45

Sycamore

Cameroon Air Force C-130H damaged after overshooting runway

ancientaviator62 31st Oct 2020 08:07

Thank you for the explanation of those abbreviations. No such 'go faster' devices on the 'K' during my time on the a/c. We even had to bunt the a/c slightly to get the cargo door into the uplock.
Interesting about the speed of the C130J. IIRC this could be north of the VNO of the 'K.'

SpazSinbad 22nd Jun 2022 16:31

Long article from the HERC crew about the collision by the F-35B. Appears the F-35B pilot closed TOO FAST but there could be other explanations but not in this good story from the SUPER J crew:

‘We're leaking fuel and we might be on fire’ How a Pair of KC-130J Pilots, Crew Saved Their Plane After a Collision with an F-35 - USNI News

...things quickly spiraled as the F-35B, call sign “Bolt 93,” collided with the tanker.... “It was a really violent collision,” recalled Wolff,..."


SpazSinbad 5th Dec 2022 05:00

Raider Five Zero on Fire: An Impossible Story of Survival 2 Miles High
Matt White 24 Nov 2022 Coffee or Die Magazine https://www.coffeeordie.com/raider-five-zero

"...The pilot of Bolt 93 replied, “Yeah, stand by.” He later told investigators he then went “heads down,” checking bingo math and distances on a kneeboard as the formation continued the slow turn back to the south.

But that turn was now complete. Just as the pilot of Bolt 93 went “heads down,” Jones began to roll Raider 50 onto a straight heading. There is no rule in Marine aviation that requires tanker pilots to announce turns. In combat, air refueling is often done with no radio chatter at all. As Raider 50 leveled out, Bolt 93 stayed in a 17-degree left turn — directly toward Raider 50.

A loadmaster called out on the tanker’s intercom: “Nine Three’s coming in fast!” He turned away to shelter from the impact when the jet was about 10 feet from his window.

The fighter tore into both of the tanker’s engines, shattering the propellers. The doomed jet twisted into the side of the tanker’s fuselage, tearing a gash through the plane’s landing gear compartment.

At 4:03 and 55 seconds, the pilot of Bolt 94 realized a disaster was unfolding with Bolt 93 in an “uncontrolled vector” toward the tanker. He called out helplessly, “Easy, easy, easy, PUSH OVER, PUSH OVER, PUSH OVER!” —an instruction equivalent to “Dive!”

Inside Raider 50, the loadmaster on the right side simply yelled into the intercom: “Oh ****, oh ****, oh ****!”

At 4:03:57, 13 seconds after Bolt 93’s pilot went “heads down,” the F-35’s nose slammed into the bottom of Raider 50’s right wing at 16,920 feet and 264 mph. The fighter tore into both of the tanker’s engines, shattering the propellers. It also ripped loose the hose pod, causing a torrent of fuel to begin spraying out. Finally, the doomed jet twisted into the side of the tanker’s fuselage, tearing a gash through the plane’s landing gear compartment.

In Bolt 94, the pilot watched a momentary fireball engulf the F-35 and most of Raider 50’s right wing. When it cleared, Bolt 93 was gone, tumbling away. In the next minute, the pilot of Bolt 94 called out three times for his wingman to eject. He got no response...."

Photo: "A Marine Corps KC-130J during an air-to-air refueling of two F-35B Lightning IIs. To receive fuel, the fighters connect to the hoses reeled out behind each wing. US Marine Corps photo by Lance Cpl. Olivia G. Ortiz." https://brcc.brightspotgocdn.com/dim...%2F1826193.jpg
https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....3c71bb2f79.jpg


All times are GMT. The time now is 19:40.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.