Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

WAR ROLE FOR REDS?

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

WAR ROLE FOR REDS?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th March 2026 | 19:35
  #21 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 212
Likes: 36
From: UK
Whilst I realise the OP is somewhat tongue in cheek, perhaps it’s time we start to think a bit more outside the box.
We currently have F35s and Typhoons on CAP shooting ASRAAM at $20k drones.
When we buy a turboprop trainer like the Texan ( or rent them) maybe we should spend the extra and get the more upmarket version or an alternative that can be armed. Good slow speed performance, but easily fast enough to catch a small drone and the cost of the upgrade from Texan would be covered with the first few FJ CAPs saved and ASRAAMs unfired?

Last edited by ASRAAMTOO; 6th March 2026 at 20:09.
ASRAAMTOO is offline  
Reply
Old 6th March 2026 | 21:13
  #22 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 12,446
Likes: 367
From: Wildest Surrey
Originally Posted by langleybaston
I believe that the Gnats or early Hawks had a war role. ISTR it was in the plans I had to read and sign at Bawtry 1984 [not that 1 Group had such aircraft].
What it was to do with Met. I know not. Very few of my clearances passed my 'need to know' test.
Weren't they called 'shadow' squadrons; training units were assigned a 'shadow' squadron number and equipped with a pair of Sidewinders.
chevvron is offline  
Reply
Old 6th March 2026 | 22:13
  #23 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Aviation Qualifications: LAME
Posts: 803
Likes: 642
From: Cumbria
Originally Posted by ASRAAMTOO
Whilst I realise the OP is somewhat tongue in cheek, perhaps it’s time we start to think a bit more outside the box.
We currently have F35s and Typhoons on CAP shooting ASRAAM at $20k drones.
When we buy a turboprop trainer like the Texan ( or rent them) maybe we should spend the extra and get the more upmarket version or an alternative that can be armed. Good slow speed performance, but easily fast enough to catch a small drone and the cost of the upgrade from Texan would be covered with the first few FJ CAPs saved and ASRAAMs unfired?
Can I suggest "War Role for BBMF" might have more mileage than RAFAT? Four Hispanoes should mess up a Shahed.
DuncanDoenitz is offline  
Reply
Old 6th March 2026 | 22:17
  #24 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Oct 2018
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 12,213
Likes: 1,649
From: Ferrara
And they can drop 10 ton bombs......................
Asturias56 is offline  
Reply
Old 7th March 2026 | 18:22
  #25 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 708
Likes: 117
From: the far south
Originally Posted by OvertHawk
I've got a war role for The Reds.

Send them all to the training system to try and reduce the monumental, embarrassing, delays in training RAF Pilots or send them back to the front line.

Ten plus qualified Military instructors flying aerobatics whilst we pay other countries to train our pilots during a time of global war.

Dozens (hundreds?) of technical and support staff.

We can't afford them.

I wish we could - really i do.

But we can't.

We're already well into a major global conflict on several fronts and UK PLC needs to get it's sh!£ together and focus on what is going to protect this country.

It''s not going to be Red White and Blue smoke!
This! With bells on!
typerated is offline  
Reply
Old 7th March 2026 | 20:59
  #26 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 536
Likes: 71
From: Overseas
Regardless of your views on the Reds and their worth, they are not the root cause of the abject failures in the RAF training system. Having another 9-10 pilots available, not all of whom are instructors, would make no difference.
LateArmLive is offline  
Reply
Old 8th March 2026 | 11:26
  #27 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 142
From: Around
Originally Posted by LateArmLive
Regardless of your views on the Reds and their worth, they are not the root cause of the abject failures in the RAF training system. Having another 9-10 pilots available, not all of whom are instructors, would make no difference.
Quite, 40 odd techies won't make a difference either.
downsizer is offline  
Reply
Old 8th March 2026 | 19:15
  #28 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 708
Likes: 117
From: the far south
Originally Posted by downsizer
Quite, 40 odd techies won't make a difference either.
But sending them back to operational units would make everyone's quality of life better. Less over worked, probably less time deployed. And then retention might improve too.
typerated is offline  
Reply
Old 8th March 2026 | 19:23
  #29 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 708
Likes: 117
From: the far south
Originally Posted by LateArmLive
Regardless of your views on the Reds and their worth, they are not the root cause of the abject failures in the RAF training system. Having another 9-10 pilots available, not all of whom are instructors, would make no difference.
What if the T1s and instructors were sent to Valley to cover the initial part of the Hawk syllabus. The T2s then used for what used to be the TWU part.
Just pro tem till they can buy an advanced trainer.
typerated is offline  
Reply
Old 8th March 2026 | 21:02
  #30 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Aviation Qualifications: Military (Retired)
Posts: 2,688
Likes: 1,522
From: Near the coast
TR

Great idea but that ship has sailed. From flash to bang to get a syllabus DSAT compliant and CFS accredited would be more trouble than it’s worth.

I know that everyone loves to spitball and think they can solve the problem but the reality is that the RAF currently has Hawk T2 and that’s it. We have outsourced to various other locations for various stages of training but the Hawk T1 is no longer a solution.

BV
Bob Viking is offline  
Reply
Old 9th March 2026 | 21:39
  #31 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 5,099
Likes: 321
From: east ESSEX
Maybe the MOD/Govmnt should strike a Turkish deal,as they want Typhoos.Buy some of their Hurjets,like the Spanish are doing..
sycamore is online now  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.