Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

New 145’s rumoured to replace Puma in Cyprus and Brunei.

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

New 145’s rumoured to replace Puma in Cyprus and Brunei.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Nov 2023, 16:18
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: cyprus
Posts: 53
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Lucifer,

Living the high life in Canadaland has fogged your memory somewhat. The last flight of an 84 Sqn Wessex in Cyprus was flown on 31 Jan 03 with a 3 ship led by me followed by a singleton flypast with ensign flown by OC 84. The following day they were packed up and flown to Brize Norton in an AN 124. The very last 84 Sqn flight by an 84 Sqn pilot in a Wessex was on 20 Feb 03 when I landed as number 4 of a 4 ship at Shawbury. The Seakings had already taken over the standby in Jan 03 having been flown out of the port and landed at Akrotiri on 31 Dec 02 so you most definitely did not do the last shift in Mar 03 which is when the Griffin arrived!

Enough of the history lesson and thread drift, as someone who has flown the Griffin in Cyprus and the Jupiter in the maritime role I would say that it is suitable for the task which 84 Sqn fulfils. Lack of DAS is a red herring, it is not required for the role and none of the previous aircraft have had it. A major advantage the Jupiter/H145 has is training mode. If there is a doubt over SE performance use it during a dummy winch and you will soon know what the aircraft thinks. Stretcher winching was not carried out at 202 Sqn as it was not a customer requirement but buy the right stretcher and I'm sure there are enough people around who could resurrect the skill. Heat exhaustion could be an issue as the 145 has a lot of glass and the cockpit gets really warm in the UK never mind a Med summer.
I think the biggest limitation will not be the aircraft but who owns the risk and how much they will accept. Military flying is a risky endeavour but I think a lot of people higher up the chain have forgotten this and their appetite for owning it has wained.

Myra Leese is online now  
Old 13th Nov 2023, 18:56
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 516 Likes on 215 Posts
I also recall when a Bell 412 from Air Log was doing the Cyrus/Lebanon Embassy thing....before it was rebranded by its owners and sent off to to Nigeria.

Crewed by civilians and somehow got the job done without any problems. I was to do the Ferry Flight but that got changed to where I picked it up on Accra then on to Lagos.

At times I do wonder how the RAF has managed following some turnover in staff.
SASless is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2023, 08:18
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: uk
Age: 43
Posts: 61
Received 99 Likes on 38 Posts
At times I do wonder how the RAF has managed following some turnover in staff.
There is a random statement - care to explain what it actually means?
Lala Steady is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2023, 08:19
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: uk
Age: 43
Posts: 61
Received 99 Likes on 38 Posts
Myra, does the 145 have a night overwater capability? I.e. autohover and transitions modes?
Lala Steady is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2023, 09:16
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2023
Location: California
Posts: 46
Received 46 Likes on 18 Posts
Originally Posted by Lala Steady
Myra, does the 145 have a night overwater capability? I.e. autohover and transitions modes?
Autohover yes. It has a GTC (H) function that allows the pilot to either set a ground vector or ‘double tap’ for a hover. As for auto transition, no it does not, at least the RAF Jupiter does not - maybe it is an option?
Lucifer Morningstar is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2023, 09:30
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2023
Location: California
Posts: 46
Received 46 Likes on 18 Posts
Originally Posted by Myra Leese
Lucifer,

Living the high life in Canadaland has fogged your memory somewhat. The last flight of an 84 Sqn Wessex in Cyprus was flown on 31 Jan 03 with a 3 ship led by me followed by a singleton flypast with ensign flown by OC 84. The following day they were packed up and flown to Brize Norton in an AN 124. The very last 84 Sqn flight by an 84 Sqn pilot in a Wessex was on 20 Feb 03 when I landed as number 4 of a 4 ship at Shawbury. The Seakings had already taken over the standby in Jan 03 having been flown out of the port and landed at Akrotiri on 31 Dec 02 so you most definitely did not do the last shift in Mar 03 which is when the Griffin arrived!

Enough of the history lesson and thread drift, as someone who has flown the Griffin in Cyprus and the Jupiter in the maritime role I would say that it is suitable for the task which 84 Sqn fulfils. Lack of DAS is a red herring, it is not required for the role and none of the previous aircraft have had it. A major advantage the Jupiter/H145 has is training mode. If there is a doubt over SE performance use it during a dummy winch and you will soon know what the aircraft thinks. Stretcher winching was not carried out at 202 Sqn as it was not a customer requirement but buy the right stretcher and I'm sure there are enough people around who could resurrect the skill. Heat exhaustion could be an issue as the 145 has a lot of glass and the cockpit gets really warm in the UK never mind a Med summer.
I think the biggest limitation will not be the aircraft but who owns the risk and how much they will accept. Military flying is a risky endeavour but I think a lot of people higher up the chain have forgotten this and their appetite for owning it has wained.
The 3 ship was followed by a role demo, I guess you forgot. When OC 84 shutdown on the last day, the aircraft were transferred at that moment to RAF disposals. You could not have flown an 84 Sqn Wessex into Shawbury, because it didn’t have any as they had already been removed from the Sqn inventory. Sorry to be pedantic but you seem a stickler for the facts.
Lucifer Morningstar is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2023, 09:38
  #27 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,264
Received 180 Likes on 106 Posts
Originally Posted by Lucifer Morningstar
The 3 ship was followed by a role demo, I guess you forgot. When OC 84 shutdown on the last day, the aircraft were transferred at that moment to RAF disposals. You could not have flown an 84 Sqn Wessex into Shawbury, because it didn’t have any as they had already been removed from the Sqn inventory. Sorry to be pedantic but you seem a stickler for the facts.

​​​​​​Folks,

Can I recommend that we take that conversation offline and maybe stick to the topic at hand? Appreciate it's personal for both of you....
PPRuNeUser0211 is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2023, 15:38
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,331
Received 623 Likes on 271 Posts
Autohover yes. It has a GTC (H) function that allows the pilot to either set a ground vector or ‘double tap’ for a hover. As for auto transition, no it does not, at least the RAF Jupiter does not - maybe it is an option?
So it would seem that the Jupiter is hardly more capable than the Wessex or the 412 that preceded it, SAR modes on the AFCS were what was lacking on both aircraft and for £145 million I'd expect an aircraft that has SAR as part of its role there to have that fitted.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2023, 16:17
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: cyprus
Posts: 53
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Crab,

The Sqn's role has been considerably diluted from what you remember. Night decks had already been withdrawn by the time I left in 05 and I never got to hover the Griffin once over water at night, we were barely allowed to fly a night sit on the Southern cliffs. Ironically, the 412 EP delivered by Bell was originally a full glass 4 axis digital aircraft with transition and auto hover but the RAF didn't want such a jump in capability and so asked FBH to remove it and turn it back to clockwork! As you well know typical Cyprus weather is fairly benign so an all weather aircraft with auto transition and hover would be overkill and too expensive. Sometimes the simple solution really can be the best.
Myra Leese is online now  
The following users liked this post:
Old 15th Nov 2023, 08:33
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,331
Received 623 Likes on 271 Posts
Myra, but that is a bloody expensive simple solution!

I know that the Cypriots have their own capable SAR aircraft so the number of jobs that 84 would be called out on is greatly limited - but what about military ejections? Would they leave that to Cyprus SAR?

Whatever the likelihood of using SAR modes on an aircraft is, they will be based on an island in the Med so why not have them as standard?
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2023, 09:28
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Alles Über
Posts: 377
Received 42 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by [email protected]
Myra, but that is a bloody expensive simple solution!

I know that the Cypriots have their own capable SAR aircraft so the number of jobs that 84 would be called out on is greatly limited - but what about military ejections? Would they leave that to Cyprus SAR?

Whatever the likelihood of using SAR modes on an aircraft is, they will be based on an island in the Med so why not have them as standard?
Possibly an MoU? There was one in Brunei between RBAF, BSP and BFB from memory which covered a few scenarios, downbird, single aircraft ops etc.
trim it out is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2023, 09:43
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,262
Received 334 Likes on 186 Posts
Originally Posted by trim it out
Possibly an MoU? There was one in Brunei between RBAF, BSP and BFB from memory which covered a few scenarios, downbird, single aircraft ops etc.
Must have been a long time ago - BSP hasn't had any winching capability since around 1999!
212man is online now  
Old 15th Nov 2023, 10:26
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Alles Über
Posts: 377
Received 42 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by 212man
Must have been a long time ago - BSP hasn't had any winching capability since around 1999!
Are you sure?

https://www.bsp.com.bn/main/media-centre/view-all/23
trim it out is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2023, 16:12
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,262
Received 334 Likes on 186 Posts
Originally Posted by trim it out
my apologies - total brain fart! I was even instrumental in the selection of the project manager. Yes, the SAR capability started in 2013 just after I left. Prior to around 1999 there was a lim-SAR capability with the 61s
212man is online now  
The following users liked this post:
Old 16th Nov 2023, 11:59
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: SW England
Age: 69
Posts: 1,497
Received 89 Likes on 35 Posts
Having been the Loan Service SAR examiner with RBrAF/ATUDB at the tail-end of the last century, I can certainly remember there being a dire need for some kind of credible heli SAR system in-country. On one occasion an AAC crew from Seria took a cross-border task near KK to find/pick up missing walkers, on at least one other they did a deck-winching task. I was the standby SAR Capt for both, and in each case the Brunei RCC turned the task down without even consulting the "op" part of the Air Force (I only heard about them when arriving at work the following day(s)). I use the term "op" in its loosest sense; ATUDB were fine for birthday flypasts and OK-ish for jungle resupp but you wouldn't want've had to rely on them for anything serious. Very frustrating for the 2, Hawk-trained, supremely competent operators they had on strength, one of whom wasn't even allowed to retire at the end of his engagement(!) - he had planned to join RBA but was told if he left the Air Force he would never work anywhere again. You couldn't make it up.

I believe someone who used to post on here as "Rottweiler" went out to run the BSP SAR flight.
Thud_and_Blunder is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 18th Apr 2024, 20:00
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Alps
Posts: 3,155
Received 101 Likes on 54 Posts
122m contract awarded

https://des.mod.uk/122m-contract-see...735%2C69%2C734

'Defence Equipment & Support has awarded a £122m contract for six Airbus H145 helicopters to provide aviation support for UK troops in Brunei and the island of Cyprus.

In November 2023 the MOD announced its intention to procure the Airbus H145s through the release of a Voluntary Transparency Notification.

The Airbus H145 is familiar to Defence as it is already used as part of the UK Military Flying Training System to train helicopter aircrew in maritime, mountain and search and rescue techniques.

The additional helicopters will be used to support UK troops conducting jungle training in Brunei, including essential medical evacuation. The aircraft based in the Sovereign Base Areas (SBAs) on Cyprus will support UK training and military exercises (including joint UK/Republic of Cyprus activities) along with emergency response and aerial firefighting duties.
cheers
chopper2004 is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2024, 11:00
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: GMT
Age: 53
Posts: 2,070
Received 186 Likes on 70 Posts
Another AH buy, no tender. Easy bucks!!!!

Or is this a sop because the 149 was selected as NMH before the requirements were written?
minigundiplomat is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2024, 10:40
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The 24th & a Half Century
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by minigundiplomat
Another AH buy, no tender. Easy bucks!!!!

Or is this a sop because the 149 was selected as NMH before the requirements were written?
I’d say this is a sign and portent. Given the NMH budget has been reduced significantly to only 9 figures, along with the scoring associated with number of airframes offered, I suspect even Leonardo may struggle. So, my forecast, assuming Labour don’t defer a decision or delete the programme is it’ll be another £950M+ to Airbus for a 145/175 combo.
DuckDodgers is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.