Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

New RAF Uniforms

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

New RAF Uniforms

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Jun 2022, 08:13
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: England
Posts: 1,930
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Bob Viking
Is that meant as a negative? Sartorially speaking I’d rather look French than follow current British trends.

BV
As I currently work with the French Air and Space Force, I think I am qualified to say that their uniform is no different from our current No 2 uniform, but with different colours and better fit.
Roland Pulfrew is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2022, 08:19
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: England
Posts: 1,930
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Bob Viking
A few caveats before I pass judgment.

1. I spend 99.99% of my time at work in a flying suit.

I hate our current scratchy trousers and cheap shirts. None of it fits properly and it looks bargain basement.

BV
As you spend 99.9% of your time in flying kit, I am guessing that you also haven’t bought any blues in a long time. The newer (issue) kit is better than it used to be. Decent quality blues have always been available, you just have to pay for it.
Roland Pulfrew is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2022, 08:28
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Near the coast
Posts: 2,366
Received 548 Likes on 149 Posts
Roland

In 23 years I have never paid for any blue uniform (apart from a new hat). I’ve also not had anything since my initial issue (which still fits) and the updated bits as they have been released.

Aside from Number 1s and 5s I probably haven’t worn blues for over ten years. And I haven’t worn either of those at all for at least five.

BV
Bob Viking is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2022, 09:06
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: England
Posts: 1,930
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Talking

Originally Posted by Bob Viking
In 23 years I have never paid for any blue uniform (apart from a new hat). I’ve also not had anything since my initial issue (which still fits) and the updated bits as they have been released.

Aside from Number 1s and 5s I probably haven’t worn blues for over ten years. And I haven’t worn either of those at all for at least five.

BV
So you are complaining about kit issued 23 years ago and you’ve never needed (or bothered) to buy any better quality uniform?
Roland Pulfrew is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2022, 09:23
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Near the coast
Posts: 2,366
Received 548 Likes on 149 Posts
Roland

Why would anyone in their right mind pay to buy uniform that their employer mandates they should wear? If the RAF couldn’t give me blue uniform that fits and is comfortable to wear that’s bad right? I’m not going to pay to get them off the hook.

The images look like a uniform that would probably be more comfortable and accommodating.

None of this changes the fact that I think we should just wear MTP day to day with RAF flashes.

BV
Bob Viking is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2022, 09:35
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Where the heart belongs
Age: 55
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Cat Techie
....What is a Mod 90 some will say??
Is that a bit like a 1250 but really poor quality!!
Sideshow Bob is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2022, 09:41
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: east ESSEX
Posts: 4,662
Received 70 Likes on 45 Posts
Bob,for those of us who`ve been out longer than you`ve been `in`,wossa MTP?
I was one once,but things `change`....
sycamore is online now  
Old 15th Jun 2022, 09:42
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,914
Received 2,836 Likes on 1,211 Posts
The 1250 credit card format used to self destruct , and the laminated jobby before that used to delaminate, so its obviously up there with the quality standard, what you want is it laser etched into a metal blank.
NutLoose is online now  
Old 15th Jun 2022, 09:44
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,914
Received 2,836 Likes on 1,211 Posts
Originally Posted by sycamore
Bob,for those of us who`ve been out longer than you`ve been `in`,wossa MTP?
I was one once,but things `change`....
Multi Terrain Pattern as in what was DPM, ie cabbage kit.
NutLoose is online now  
Old 15th Jun 2022, 10:04
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: England
Posts: 1,930
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Bob Viking
Why would anyone in their right mind pay to buy uniform that their employer mandates they should wear? If the RAF couldn’t give me blue uniform that fits and is comfortable to wear that’s bad right? I’m not going to pay to get them off the hook.

The images look like a uniform that would probably be more comfortable and accommodating.

None of this changes the fact that I think we should just wear MTP day to day with RAF flashes.

BV
It’s a fair point BV and I have never understood why RAF officers have to pay for a uniform we are mandated to wear, except for tradition, and the fact that for all of those 23 years you have been receiving a benefit from the tax man to help pay for that uniform. As I said, colleagues I’ve spoken to, who have used the new ordering system, have said that the newer uniform is better quality and fits better.
Roland Pulfrew is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2022, 11:00
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: UK
Age: 42
Posts: 654
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
I'd agree with MTP with RAF flash for day to day work. My other thought was a lighter variant of the new RN working uniform. There will be cost and time savings with either of those options, and people may actually want to wear them, rather than the mess in the images on this thread.

If someone thinks that these uniforms will be used as a recruiting tool, I feel they are seriously misguided.
unmanned_droid is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2022, 14:51
  #52 (permalink)  
622
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Hants
Age: 55
Posts: 1,572
Received 18 Likes on 14 Posts
...With all the Gender neutralising going on....is all this kit 'Unisex' .....?

Seems like a lot of potential for mixing tops / bottoms there - it looks a nightmare to me to keep that lot controlled and people 'uniformally' dressed ......WO's will have a field day!
622 is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2022, 15:29
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,914
Received 2,836 Likes on 1,211 Posts
I would imagine they are test samples of the short listed designs to see which looks better in the physical form etc and what changes they need to implement.
Then a shorter list will be forthcoming as they address the issues the previous versions brought up, until a final design is selected and then binned due to financial constraints.
NutLoose is online now  
Old 15th Jun 2022, 17:13
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,809
Received 135 Likes on 63 Posts
Originally Posted by Bob Viking
None of this changes the fact that I think we should just wear MTP day to day with RAF flashes.
BV
And on that point, BV, I totally agree. A fighting Service dressed like RAC Patrolmen (as a Recruiting mate observed) hardly engenders the right mental attitudes. But then I have pontificated on this topic before.
MPN11 is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2022, 17:43
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,914
Received 2,836 Likes on 1,211 Posts
Agreed, plus you can hide easier from the SWO
NutLoose is online now  
Old 15th Jun 2022, 19:13
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Plymouth
Posts: 9
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tax allowance.
Bluntnotsharp is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2022, 19:15
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Baston
Posts: 3,269
Received 659 Likes on 237 Posts
Originally Posted by 622
...With all the Gender neutralising going on....is all this kit 'Unisex' .....?

Seems like a lot of potential for mixing tops / bottoms there - it looks a nightmare to me to keep that lot controlled and people 'uniformally' dressed ......WO's will have a field day!
Problem if unisex [multisex actually]: too loose in the chest for blokes, too tight in the crutch. No Ball Room as it were.
langleybaston is online now  
Old 15th Jun 2022, 19:40
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 831
Received 98 Likes on 51 Posts
What a palava. How about : overalls / flying suits ( plus cold weather additions) , MTP, Number 1s. Simples.
Timelord is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2022, 20:09
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mostly in my own imagination
Posts: 476
Received 301 Likes on 138 Posts
So is "full webbing" no longer part of the uniform?

. . . like it apparently was during the Battle of Britain
Sue Vêtements is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2022, 20:52
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Great Britain
Age: 51
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
Nailed it!


Corporal Clott is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.