Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

No more ACs, LACs, and SACs....

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

No more ACs, LACs, and SACs....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Jun 2022, 08:29
  #101 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: RAF Kinloss
Posts: 161
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by The Oberon
Drifting but I am confused about what has happened to NCO ranks over the past years.
I should say that I in no way want to denigrate those currently serving or the ranks they hold but I would appreciate an explanation from someone still serving.
I left having completed 22 in 1986. In the aircraft trades it was the norm for someone, providing he had the right numbers and had passed the promotion exams, to reach Chf/Tech at around about 30 - 32 years old. This was based on time promotion which stopped about 2 years before I was due my Chief. As a result I was 2 years late in getting promoted, 34. The idea of a Tech.Cpl in his early to mid 30s. was practically unheard of. He would probably have gone at the 12 year point with no opportunity to sign on beyond that. What has changed?
Times have changed massively. The Air Force no longer has time promotion above Flt Lt and SAC, and it’s all done on merit (medical and dental branches might be a bit different)

There are no promotion exams, just courses to be taken once you’ve come off the board which sits every year. You are pre-boarded into A B and C grades, and then the board themselves look at all the A grades and a percentage of the B’s. They look at your last 3 annual assessments and order everyone depending on what they’re looking for, and then the number that are required are offered promotion. If you’re number 71 and they only need 70, then you’re out of luck unless someone turns it down.

I joined in 2000, and was just outside of the board after 8 years or so for promotion to Cpl. This is the average sort of time you’d expect, so people get it sooner if they do all the outside work, secondary duties, charities etc, and some take longer. I was posted the next year, my assessment went down as I was on a new aircraft and didn’t have the confidence to act like an NCO, so that reset me to needing another 3 good assessments. The RAF signed me on to 15 years due to needing manpower (JT’s were singed on to 22 at one point) and eventually after 14 years I came off the board again. This allowed me to sign on to 22 years (AFPS75 pensionable point) and gave me 7 years or so to make Sgt. This would be needed to sign on to 30 years if I wanted it.

5 years later and I took a place doing my civilian licenses which would send me out to industry for 2 years, and also end any chances of promotion for at least another 3 years after that but I’d get a qualification which would easily earn way more money than the RAF could ever pay me, but came with a 3 year return of service.

The point of all that was to say that when I leave the RAF after 25 years service, I’ll still be a Cpl because the promotion system requires a lot of game playing and box ticking, and there isn’t an option similar to PA Spine/Specialist Aircrew for us. My board just sat as it happens, and a total of 50 people were promoted I think, from a pool of about 700.
RAF_Techie101 is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2022, 11:03
  #102 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: 51.50N 1W (ish)
Posts: 1,141
Received 30 Likes on 13 Posts
In the 60s time promotion worked, and you could be a 25 year old Sergeant (I was) if your annual assessments didn't delay promotion, and you actually read the bits of paper needed to pass the promotion papers. Those around and under me were mostly motivated and competent. There were exceptions
Fitter2 is online now  
Old 13th Jun 2022, 13:13
  #103 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Dead Dog Land
Age: 77
Posts: 531
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by RAF_Techie101
Times have changed massively. The Air Force no longer has time promotion above Flt Lt and SAC, and it’s all done on merit (medical and dental branches might be a bit different)

There are no promotion exams, just courses to be taken once you’ve come off the board which sits every year. You are pre-boarded into A B and C grades, and then the board themselves look at all the A grades and a percentage of the B’s. They look at your last 3 annual assessments and order everyone depending on what they’re looking for, and then the number that are required are offered promotion. If you’re number 71 and they only need 70, then you’re out of luck unless someone turns it down.

I joined in 2000, and was just outside of the board after 8 years or so for promotion to Cpl. This is the average sort of time you’d expect, so people get it sooner if they do all the outside work, secondary duties, charities etc, and some take longer. I was posted the next year, my assessment went down as I was on a new aircraft and didn’t have the confidence to act like an NCO, so that reset me to needing another 3 good assessments. The RAF signed me on to 15 years due to needing manpower (JT’s were singed on to 22 at one point) and eventually after 14 years I came off the board again. This allowed me to sign on to 22 years (AFPS75 pensionable point) and gave me 7 years or so to make Sgt. This would be needed to sign on to 30 years if I wanted it.

5 years later and I took a place doing my civilian licenses which would send me out to industry for 2 years, and also end any chances of promotion for at least another 3 years after that but I’d get a qualification which would easily earn way more money than the RAF could ever pay me, but came with a 3 year return of service.

The point of all that was to say that when I leave the RAF after 25 years service, I’ll still be a Cpl because the promotion system requires a lot of game playing and box ticking, and there isn’t an option similar to PA Spine/Specialist Aircrew for us. My board just sat as it happens, and a total of 50 people were promoted I think, from a pool of about 700.

Well all I can say is that I am glad I went when I did. I was a SGT. at 25 and a Chief at 34 and I had been allowed to sign on for a further 7 years beyond my 22 which, in those days, meant that I was in line " for me crown". I had also been asked if I would like to consider a Branch Commission. I decided I'd had enough and PVRd at my 22 point. Within 12 months my salary had doubled, I had complete autonomy and I didn't have to look after and guide SAC Bloggs who had overspent on his credit card for the third time.
The Oberon is online now  
Old 13th Jun 2022, 13:55
  #104 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: RAF Kinloss
Posts: 161
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by The Oberon
Well all I can say is that I am glad I went when I did. I was a SGT. at 25 and a Chief at 34 and I had been allowed to sign on for a further 7 years beyond my 22 which, in those days, meant that I was in line " for me crown". I had also been asked if I would like to consider a Branch Commission. I decided I'd had enough and PVRd at my 22 point. Within 12 months my salary had doubled, I had complete autonomy and I didn't have to look after and guide SAC Bloggs who had overspent on his credit card for the third time.
Its not that unusual either - there were three of us on my license course who are all 40 this year, Cpl, no chance of promotion and approaching our 22. With the new pension not being in the same league as the 75 scheme, it’s hard to see what would keep a lot of people in to be honest.
RAF_Techie101 is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2022, 17:51
  #105 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,809
Received 135 Likes on 63 Posts
Originally Posted by Nil_Drift
I Unfortunately, I observed this approach later at Cranwell on IOT when, after verbal bluff and bluster, people who had struggled for the whole 18 weeks [as it was then] still graduated.
Tne OH was a flt cdr at The Towers in the early 80s. She found it blisteringly difficult to bin seriously unsuitable Officer Cadets… the ‘System’ preferred re-C oursing. However, she justified her nickname of “Snakebite” … swift and deadly. 😎

BTW, she was surprisingly popular with the majority!

Last edited by MPN11; 13th Jun 2022 at 18:20.
MPN11 is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2022, 18:28
  #106 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: South East of Penge
Age: 74
Posts: 1,792
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Reading above, RAF Techie101 remarks about "the RAF no longer having time promotion above Flt.Lt."

Did it ever?
Haraka is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2022, 18:43
  #107 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,809
Received 135 Likes on 63 Posts
Originally Posted by Haraka
Reading above, RAF Techie101 remarks about "the RAF no longer having time promotion above Flt.Lt."

Did it ever?
Didn’t Spec Aircrew have that at one stage? Otherwise, always via Promotion Boards for sqn ldr and beyond.
MPN11 is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2022, 20:03
  #108 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,806
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
Didn’t Spec Aircrew have that at one stage?
I don't think so. It took 3 consecutive Spec Recs before I was grudgingly promoted to Sqn Ldr Spec Aircrew. But when I was, the pay rate system meant that I had several years more seniority in the rank than either Flight Commander. Not that I made a point of it.....

....much!
BEagle is online now  
Old 13th Jun 2022, 21:20
  #109 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: RAF Kinloss
Posts: 161
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Haraka
Reading above, RAF Techie101 remarks about "the RAF no longer having time promotion above Flt.Lt."

Did it ever?
Possibly poor grammar on my part there - it was more a comment on time promotion being applicable below those ranks still, just not above them.
RAF_Techie101 is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2022, 23:34
  #110 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,914
Received 2,836 Likes on 1,211 Posts
Originally Posted by MPN11
Tne OH was a flt cdr at The Towers in the early 80s. She found it blisteringly difficult to bin seriously unsuitable Officer Cadets… the ‘System’ preferred re-C oursing. However, she justified her nickname of “Snakebite” … swift and deadly. 😎

BTW, she was surprisingly popular with the majority!
Judging by one engineering officer we had it does not surprise me, he was eventually kicked downhill from first line to a bay wallah and even there managed to project his sheer incompetence. Clever chap apparently, was doing his MA last I saw of him, but he had the leadership skills of a lemming.
NutLoose is online now  
Old 29th Sep 2022, 07:12
  #111 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 347
Received 64 Likes on 20 Posts
LAC and SAC renamed

It passed me by, but I see that, back in July, the RAF renamed LAC and SAC as Air Specialist Class 2 or 1 respectively. What utter nonsense, and presumably done to rid the world of those horrible terms ‘aircraftman’ and ‘aircraftwoman’ that so offended no one, ever. More Wigston wokery…
snapper41 is online now  
Old 29th Sep 2022, 08:06
  #112 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: lincs
Posts: 89
Received 86 Likes on 30 Posts
None of the ex SACs on my Sqn give a monkey's about it, nothing has changed for the worse. I actually think 'Air Specialist' better describes the function of someone who supports the delivery of Air Power, in all its forms, than 'Aircraftsman'.
cheekychimp is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2022, 08:08
  #113 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Baston
Posts: 3,269
Received 659 Likes on 237 Posts
Originally Posted by snapper41
It passed me by, but I see that, back in July, the RAF renamed LAC and SAC as Air Specialist Class 2 or 1 respectively. What utter nonsense, and presumably done to rid the world of those horrible terms ‘aircraftman’ and ‘aircraftwoman’ that so offended no one, ever. More Wigston wokery…
Re the Regimemt will a Rock be an AS2 (Gunner) or what, please?
langleybaston is online now  
Old 29th Sep 2022, 08:11
  #114 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: lincs
Posts: 89
Received 86 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by langleybaston
Re the Regimemt will a Rock be an AS2 (Gunner) or what, please?
Yes the ranks are AS1 and 2, but we are still Gunners.
cheekychimp is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2022, 08:16
  #115 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Overseas
Posts: 446
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts
Oh the drama, won't someone please think of all the retired dinosaurs getting upset by this...
LateArmLive is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2022, 08:47
  #116 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 347
Received 64 Likes on 20 Posts
Maybe they should have gone for this?


snapper41 is online now  
Old 29th Sep 2022, 09:17
  #117 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 831
Received 98 Likes on 51 Posts
Originally Posted by cheekychimp
Yes the ranks are AS1 and 2, but we are still Gunners.
“Aviators” surely!
Timelord is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2022, 09:26
  #118 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London
Posts: 1,578
Received 18 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by snapper41
It passed me by, but I see that, back in July, the RAF renamed LAC and SAC as Air Specialist Class 2 or 1 respectively. What utter nonsense, and presumably done to rid the world of those horrible terms ‘aircraftman’ and ‘aircraftwoman’ that so offended no one, ever. More Wigston wokery…
Epic anti-woke wokery! Getting upset about something like this!

I'm guessing you're 'ex' so honestly, what is it to you? Let go FFS.
dead_pan is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2022, 10:01
  #119 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: lincs
Posts: 89
Received 86 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by Timelord
“Aviators” surely!
I'll bite. Aviator is for everyone in the RAF, Gunner is still just for the RAF Regiment. Just as before, you would speak of RAF Regiment Gunners not RAF Regiment Airmen, it's still RAF Regiment Gunners not RAF Regiment Aviators. Even though we're all Aviators in the RAF :-)
cheekychimp is offline  
Old 29th Sep 2022, 10:14
  #120 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 350/3 Compton
Age: 76
Posts: 789
Received 378 Likes on 95 Posts
Originally Posted by dead_pan
Epic anti-woke wokery! Getting upset about something like this!

I'm guessing you're 'ex' so honestly, what is it to you? Let go FFS.
Keep it civil.

Mog
Mogwi is online now  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.