Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Does Germany need the Bomb ?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Does Germany need the Bomb ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Apr 2022, 11:39
  #41 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Rhone-Alpes
Posts: 1,178
Received 286 Likes on 160 Posts
Originally Posted by Less Hair
The 2 % GDP defence spending goal was agreed to by Germany and other NATO members before at the Wales and Prague summits as their long term common goal until the year 2024.Two percent is what all new NATO members are asked to contribute. Later on existing members agreed to follow this GDP share goal. However President Trump suddenly asked for 2% immediately, something nobody had promised.

For a lot of years Germany was spending 1.2% - 1.3% and there is no way they would have met this target of 2% by 2024. ?I think I remember Merkel pushing it back.

https://www.macrotrends.net/countrie...defense-budget
Tartiflette Fan is online now  
Old 11th Apr 2022, 11:46
  #42 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Rhone-Alpes
Posts: 1,178
Received 286 Likes on 160 Posts
Originally Posted by Buster15
Don't understand what that is supposed to mean.
The German MoD has spent a considerable sum of money remanufacturing certain parts to maintain their nuclear Tornado capabilities up to 2030.
The bombs are being modified and so the aircraft will have to be modified and "accepted " by the US as a suitable carrier, and in discussion in this forum months ago, they weren't going to do it.
Tartiflette Fan is online now  
Old 11th Apr 2022, 11:47
  #43 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Rhone-Alpes
Posts: 1,178
Received 286 Likes on 160 Posts
Originally Posted by Less Hair
And after that timeframe they will have nuclear capable F-35 to carry NATO's US nukes.
And that decision is about four weeks old.
Tartiflette Fan is online now  
Old 11th Apr 2022, 11:54
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,080
Received 66 Likes on 40 Posts
Otherwise they would have ordered Super Hornets and Growlers to do the same job in the future. They just changed their selection to F-35s. It's not like Germany considered to leave NATO's "Nukleare Teilhabe", carrying and dropping US nukes in times of war like many other NATO members would do as well.
Less Hair is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2022, 12:12
  #45 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Rhone-Alpes
Posts: 1,178
Received 286 Likes on 160 Posts
Originally Posted by Less Hair
Otherwise they would have ordered Super Hornets and Growlers to do the same job in the future. They just changed their selection to F-35s. It's not like Germany considered to leave NATO's "Nukleare Teilhabe", carrying and dropping US nukes in times of war like many other NATO members would do as well.
Unsure what you mean by that. It was debated in the recent election campaign.
Tartiflette Fan is online now  
Old 11th Apr 2022, 12:14
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,080
Received 66 Likes on 40 Posts
Obviously the Greens and SPD support it. CDU and FDP as well.
Who do you mean?
Less Hair is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2022, 14:16
  #47 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Rhone-Alpes
Posts: 1,178
Received 286 Likes on 160 Posts
Originally Posted by Less Hair
Obviously the Greens and SPD support it. CDU and FDP as well.
Who do you mean?
Now the official agreed party line is that but during the campaign there were some MdB -SPD, Greens and Die Linke - who were proposing NATO withdrawal . The following article states that the new coalition angered NATO partners in Dec 2021 when a sentence in the coalition agreement became public which said that they wanted to join " as an observer, not a member , the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons to constructively approach the intention of the treaty "

https://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/...-17661467.html

Last edited by Tartiflette Fan; 11th Apr 2022 at 17:32.
Tartiflette Fan is online now  
Old 11th Apr 2022, 17:59
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 2,166
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by fitliker
Would the bomb protect German women from the invading hordes of Rapists presently making shopping at night a dangerous pastime for women in Germany ?.
It was back in 2015, so not 'presently' or even across Germany either.

Originally Posted by fitliker
...you can read some of the horrific crimes not seen since the Red Army’s denazification in WW2 by using any search engine in seconds .
Are they the Nazis that Stalin became allies with to help start WW2?

Do these account holders get a list of inflammatory things to say or post, or are they allowed to make up their own drivel as long as it aims to make the 'West' look bad?


Just This Once... is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2022, 07:28
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: X marks the spot
Posts: 53
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do these account holders get a list of inflammatory things to say or post, or are they allowed to make up their own drivel as long as it aims to make the 'West' look bad?
Yeah the list of topics are not that long which makes it bit more annoying as each time it's a repetition of the same message but in a different form only... Common ones are of course, rapes, mainstream liberal west leftist media and of course Soros.
Clop_Clop is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2022, 08:26
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Somewhere Sunny
Posts: 1,601
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
The events of the weeks and months ahead in CEE will determine what NATO - as a collective - does and whether the US continues to have a leading role in NATO and whether Putin-songging Trump is re-elected.

"Events, dear boy, events"
Whenurhappy is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2022, 11:27
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere flat
Age: 68
Posts: 5,568
Likes: 0
Received 46 Likes on 31 Posts
Its all been debated before.......

www.youtube.com/watch?v=3j20voPS0gI
Wensleydale is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2022, 17:11
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: England
Posts: 344
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Tartiflette Fan
The bombs are being modified and so the aircraft will have to be modified and "accepted " by the US as a suitable carrier, and in discussion in this forum months ago, they weren't going to do it.
Understood. Thank you for this.
Buster15 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.