Does Germany need the Bomb ?
This is the title of an article* in a major German news magazine - focus. The author asks what would the strategic position of Germany be if Trump were re-elected in 2025 and Le Pen next month ( strangely UK not mentioned at all ) thus making the nuclear umbrella somewhat uncertain, and Putin still in an expansionist mood. I would never have imagined I would read such an article. He adds that, in today's papers there is an open letter signed by 600 German "worthies" saying that it is wrong to spend 100 Mrd on re-equipping the German military ( and upping future spend to 2%).
* https://www.focus.de/politik/deutsch..._80628355.html |
A similar question is now being seriously debated in Japan.
|
If we add to this, the fact that Poland's deputy prime-minister said last week that they would be open to the stationing of nuclear war-heads on Polish soil, then that represents significant movement in a policy that has been "frozen" for a lot of years.
|
Would the bomb protect German women from the invading hordes of Rapists presently making shopping at night a dangerous pastime for women in Germany ?
As Aristotle might say ask the right question if you want the right answer . |
Given Germany's past naughty behaviour, I'd say it may not be a good idea.
|
I would have said at the fall of the wall Ukraine didn’t need them, but now I feel a massive reduction and the retention of say a dozen or so would have prevented the genocide now taking place.
Does Germany need them? If NATO still holds weapons on their territory then probably not. |
Originally Posted by fitliker
(Post 11213025)
Would the bomb protect German women from the invading hordes of Rapists presently making shopping at night a dangerous pastime for women in Germany ?
As Aristotle might say ask the right question if you want the right answer . |
Originally Posted by NutLoose
(Post 11213057)
I would have said at the fall of the wall Ukraine didn’t need them, but now I feel a massive reduction and the retention of say a dozen or so would have prevented the genocide now taking place.
Does Germany need them? If NATO still holds weapons on their territory then probably not. |
The solution could be a European Bomb, rather than a German one. There can be no doubt Europe needs to emancipate and able to defend itself without help.
|
Given Germany's past naughty behaviour, I'd say it may not be a good idea. |
Originally Posted by His dudeness
(Post 11213081)
My best guess is that you won´t be able to get a democratic vote for a 'German bomb' in Germany.
As for Sam Ting Wong's comment, I can't imagine how you devise a system allowing for use with 27 members, many of which would then have to consult their parliaments as well. |
Originally Posted by fitliker
(Post 11213025)
Would the bomb protect German women from the invading hordes of Rapists presently making shopping at night a dangerous pastime for women in Germany ?
|
Nuclear proliferation is not going to make the world a better or even safer place....
|
Originally Posted by Sam Ting Wong
(Post 11213076)
The solution could be a European Bomb, rather than a German one. There can be no doubt Europe needs to emancipate and able to defend itself without help.
Mind you, there would be no first strike... |
Alpine Flyer - Are you saying that Ukraine would still have been invaded if it had kept its nukes ?
|
Originally Posted by Tartiflette Fan
(Post 11213122)
Alpine Flyer - Are you saying that Ukraine would still have been invaded if it had kept its nukes ?
Here is another, if Ukraine had a non nuclear, precision guided weapon, capable of assassinating the Russian head of State with little collateral damage, would they use it? Mjb |
Originally Posted by HOVIS
(Post 11213064)
Have the Russians made it to Germany already?
|
"Alpine Flyer - Are you saying that Ukraine would still have been invaded if it had kept its nukes ?"
As with Libya & Iraq - anyone who has a nuclear weapon won't give it up now and people who almost have one (Iran) will redouble their efforts to get one Who can blame them? |
For Japan and South Korea they might make sense as a counter threat. There is no time to get them when things turn sour. Limiting nukes has only limited the good guys from getting them. The evil guys still armed up.
|
Mind you, there would be no first strike... Anyhuw, the issue at hand developd slowly, and it showcases how bad we all are perceiving slow moving threads. First Ossetia, then the Crimea, now Ukrain and probably Moldova and or the baltics next. Yet Mr.Putin is still seen by some as a peaceful man or that there is a LEGITIMATE Russian claim in any of this. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:19. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.