Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Sweden Says Russian Planes that violated Swedish Airspace had nuclear weapons

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Sweden Says Russian Planes that violated Swedish Airspace had nuclear weapons

Old 30th Mar 2022, 16:32
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Outer ring of HEL
Posts: 1,684
Received 342 Likes on 113 Posts
Sweden Says Russian Planes that violated Swedish Airspace had nuclear weapons

Swedish TV4 reports that Russian planes that entered Swedish airspace on 2nd of March were carrying nukes onboard. This was stated by the Swedish AF.
Crazy people.

https://www.tv4.se/artikel/6cNV5sPAa...venskt-luftrum
Beamr is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2022, 16:54
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Rhone-Alpes
Posts: 1,172
Received 273 Likes on 153 Posts
Originally Posted by Beamr
Swedish TV4 reports that Russian planes that entered Swedish airspace on 2nd of March were carrying nukes onboard. This was stated by the Swedish AF.
Crazy people.
How do they claim to know this ?
Tartiflette Fan is online now  
Old 30th Mar 2022, 16:57
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The back of beyond
Posts: 2,131
Received 173 Likes on 89 Posts
From the reports, the Russian pilots made it clear. How they did this isn't explained, but the inference seems to be they tipped their wings to show what they were carrying. Images of the Su-24s show they had a store of some sort under the fuselage.
melmothtw is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2022, 17:04
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: In a Pineapple Under the Sea
Age: 61
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sweden Says Russian Planes that violated Swedish Airspace we carrying nuclear weapons

https://www.tv4.se/artikel/6cNV5sPAa...venskt-luftrum

Translated: https://www-tv4-se.translate.goog/ar..._x_tr_pto=wapp

"Two of the Russian planes that violated Swedish airspace near Gotland on March 2 were equipped with nuclear weapons, TV4 Nyheterna experiences. According to information taken by the channel, the violation was a deliberate act with the aim of intimidating Sweden."



WillFlyForCheese is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2022, 17:34
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: UK
Age: 69
Posts: 1,403
Received 40 Likes on 22 Posts
Originally Posted by Beamr
Swedish TV4 reports that Russian planes that entered Swedish airspace on 2nd of March were carrying nukes onboard. This was stated by the Swedish AF.
Crazy people

https://www.tv4.se/artikel/6cNV5sPAa...venskt-luftrum
Perhaps they were rotating stocks out of Kaliningrad, the escorts being there to ensure no departure from the route rather than defend the formation.
beardy is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2022, 18:04
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Outer ring of HEL
Posts: 1,684
Received 342 Likes on 113 Posts
Originally Posted by Tartiflette Fan
How do they claim to know this ?
There is nowhere to hide anything on a SU24 or 27. They hang out pretty well.

Originally Posted by beardy
Perhaps they were rotating stocks out of Kaliningrad, the escorts being there to ensure no departure from the route rather than defend the formation.
Then they were bloody poor navigators. Children of the magenta line with U/S kit. They were well within Swedish airspace where Finnish and Swedish AF's were having a joint drill.
Beamr is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2022, 18:10
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Rhone-Alpes
Posts: 1,172
Received 273 Likes on 153 Posts
Originally Posted by Beamr
There is nowhere to hide anything on a SU24 or 27. They hang out pretty well.
i have no idea how distinctive bombs are/can be . Is it so obvious ?

Last edited by Senior Pilot; 30th Mar 2022 at 20:41. Reason: Post copied from other thread
Tartiflette Fan is online now  
Old 30th Mar 2022, 18:23
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Outer ring of HEL
Posts: 1,684
Received 342 Likes on 113 Posts
Originally Posted by Tartiflette Fan
i have no idea how distinctive bombs are/can be . Is it so obvious ?

."
I believe the fast jet jocks here can give authentic insight, but the pictures from ID sorties are very detailed.
Beamr is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2022, 18:50
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Dodo Island
Posts: 103
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How can they be so certain about what was actually affixed to those pylons?
Short of some extremely sensitive instruments which seem beyond airborne use in a fighter it is at best an estimate.
Not to endorse any of the recent Russian activities but let's keep it factual.
zambonidriver is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2022, 19:19
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 831
Received 98 Likes on 51 Posts
I would be very surprised if they were real nuclear weapons ( although I have been very surprised by Vlad a lot lately) . Could they have been what we used to call “shapes”, ie inert practice weapons?

Still pretty aggressive though!

Last edited by Timelord; 30th Mar 2022 at 19:45.
Timelord is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2022, 19:43
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: In a Pineapple Under the Sea
Age: 61
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by zambonidriver
How can they be so certain about what was actually affixed to those pylons?
Short of some extremely sensitive instruments which seem beyond airborne use in a fighter it is at best an estimate.
Not to endorse any of the recent Russian activities but let's keep it factual.
"Sweden - which is neutral and not a NATO member - deployed two JAS 39 Gripen fighter jets that are said to have taken images of the Russian aircraft which confirmed they were equipped with nuclear weapons."

https://news.sky.com/story/ukraine-n...dates-12541713
WillFlyForCheese is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2022, 23:51
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by zambonidriver
How can they be so certain about what was actually affixed to those pylons?
Short of some extremely sensitive instruments which seem beyond airborne use in a fighter it is at best an estimate.
Not to endorse any of the recent Russian activities but let's keep it factual.
I am also skeptical that Sweden would be able to confirm that an Su-24 was carrying a nuclear weapon with optical imagery. Perhaps something was lost in translation. There is a difference between a nuclear-capable delivery vehicle (e.g., gravity bomb, cruise missile) and the associated nuclear warhead. I am not aware of any nuclear weapon where the presence of a nuclear warhead can be confirmed by external inspection. Even retired systems such as the Polaris SLBM or Russian SS-N-6 that had an external reentry vehicle (RV), you still couldn't tell by external inspection if the RV contained a nuclear warhead. The standard method to confirm the presence of a nuclear warhead in arms control regimes is by using radiation detection equipment. Doubt the Gripens got close enough to use that scheme.
BFSGrad is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2022, 00:01
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: UK/OZ
Posts: 1,887
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by BFSGrad
...The standard method to confirm the presence of a nuclear warhead in arms control regimes is by using radiation detection equipment. Doubt the Gripens got close enough to use that scheme.
The USA use a helicopter to check radiation levels around locations where mass gatherings are planned. Perhaps someone can speak to the detection range of portable detection equioment?

Mjb
mickjoebill is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2022, 05:11
  #14 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Outer ring of HEL
Posts: 1,684
Received 342 Likes on 113 Posts
Originally Posted by BFSGrad
I am also skeptical that Sweden would be able to confirm that an Su-24 was carrying a nuclear weapon with optical imagery. .
Every nuclear warhead is clearly distuingishable from a traditional weapon just by the looks of it. And from a dummy trainer as well. And for a good reason, imagine loading a live nuke for target practices instead of a traditional explosives and the consequences. Or instead of a dummy.

take the WE.177 as an example



edit: here's an actual night sortie picture of a russian violating finnish airspace. The swedish incident was in bright daylight...
I havo no doubts that the swedes know what they are talking about.



Last edited by Beamr; 31st Mar 2022 at 05:28.
Beamr is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2022, 05:39
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: A better place.
Posts: 2,319
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Am trying to find online a Russian equivalent of Beamr's WE177 diagram.
They don't appear to be as willing to share as the West!
Presumably there are Russian versions of the coloured stripes - or Cyrillic writing of some kind...
Noting also that things have changed considerably and that B61 training rounds differ in entire colour from live rounds.
All OSINT - but won't post the detail here so as not to irritate people.

Last edited by tartare; 31st Mar 2022 at 07:04.
tartare is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2022, 07:06
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: front seat, facing forwards
Posts: 1,156
Received 12 Likes on 5 Posts
I don't think a paint scheme can confirm anything other than someone has painted something the colour they wanted to.

just another jocky is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2022, 07:06
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,400
Received 361 Likes on 210 Posts
", imagine loading a live nuke for target practices instead of a traditional explosives and the consequences. Or instead of a dummy."

Given the Barnes Wallis theory "You can't make anything fool proof - the fools are so damn clever"

I'm sure it's been done several times over the years somewhere
Asturias56 is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2022, 07:08
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Ferrara
Posts: 8,400
Received 361 Likes on 210 Posts
V Interesting BEAMR but the main obvious difference on the WE177 illustration is the paint job - and that could be changed for all sorts of reasons
Asturias56 is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2022, 07:36
  #19 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,378
Received 1,579 Likes on 717 Posts
Mistakes happen - and as the current war shows, the Russian armed forces are nowhere near as competent as previously supposed…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_U...apons_incident
ORAC is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2022, 07:39
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Dodo Island
Posts: 103
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by just another jocky
I don't think a paint scheme can confirm anything other than someone has painted something the colour they wanted to.
Indeed - especially in current circumstances.

Again they might have spotted what looked like nukes - as of what was actually affixed to the pylons is anyone's guess. But a good headline for sure...
zambonidriver is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.