Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

All Hawk T1s will be gone by 31 March 2022

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

All Hawk T1s will be gone by 31 March 2022

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd May 2022, 11:06
  #401 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Jungle
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DuckDodgers
Not overly onerous qualifying it nor supporting it, especially if DIO and SO2 Ranges (or whatever they’re called these days) leaned in, even more so if appropriate ballistic tables and data were available.

Better getter the USMC to agree a policy change to the JCAS MOA.
Hi DD, I think it would likely be an onerous task to get it qualified, I agree, supporting it once the work has been done is not a big burden. Safety trace information for use in the ranges is loose change compared to the other issues of the cost for it; what aircraft are you going to release it from; you have to get it cleared off that aircraft; if you do want to lase the weapon in what LDP will you use. LGTRs have been looked at years and years ago, but the juice was never worth the squeeze.

I’m sure we could get a policy change through to the JFS ESC if attacked at the right level.
Foghorn Leghorn is offline  
Old 23rd May 2022, 15:44
  #402 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The 24th & a Half Century
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Here for several weeks apparently.
DuckDodgers is offline  
Old 24th May 2022, 00:31
  #403 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Nevada, USA
Posts: 1,607
Received 42 Likes on 29 Posts
From the HQ 1 Gp Eng Off responsible for Hawk T1

RAFEngO74to09 is offline  
Old 24th May 2022, 00:51
  #404 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,816
Received 95 Likes on 68 Posts
There's only supposed to be 7 aircraft this season.
chevvron is offline  
Old 24th May 2022, 08:39
  #405 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: East Riding
Posts: 76
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts
There was still supposed to be 9 until very recently, plus an increase in establishment (from 13 to 16+) to cater for TMk.1 conversion/training. However, RAFCAM tasking is news to me, but their aeroplanes (XX162 and XX327 with instrumentation) have been retired to Valley (RTP) and Shawbury (store).
teeonefixer is offline  
Old 24th May 2022, 10:03
  #406 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,816
Received 95 Likes on 68 Posts
Originally Posted by teeonefixer
There was still supposed to be 9 until very recently, plus an increase in establishment (from 13 to 16+) to cater for TMk.1 conversion/training. However, RAFCAM tasking is news to me, but their aeroplanes (XX162 and XX327 with instrumentation) have been retired to Valley (RTP) and Shawbury (store).
I know when RAFCAM moved to Boscombe from Farnborough in about '94 they only had one aircraft but who owns it now I don't know.
chevvron is offline  
Old 24th May 2022, 16:39
  #407 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Teesside
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by chevvron
There's only supposed to be 7 aircraft this season.

The Reds will still be a 9 ship on National Flypast events.

Airshows will see 7 ship displays.
Harold77 is offline  
Old 24th May 2022, 17:14
  #408 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Westnoreastsouth
Posts: 1,826
Received 33 Likes on 29 Posts
Originally Posted by chevvron
I know when RAFCAM moved to Boscombe from Farnborough in about '94 they only had one aircraft but who owns it now I don't know.
As Teeonefixer posted above they had 162 and 327 but both a/c still had the original fuselage (ie pre mod 2010) so were well overdue retirement - esp 162 who's fuselage had never been completely up to full production standard anyway (8th Hawk built).
longer ron is offline  
Old 24th May 2022, 20:06
  #409 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: W. Scotland
Posts: 652
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by teeonefixer
There was still supposed to be 9 until very recently, plus an increase in establishment (from 13 to 16+) to cater for TMk.1 conversion/training. However, RAFCAM tasking is news to me, but their aeroplanes (XX162 and XX327 with instrumentation) have been retired to Valley (RTP) and Shawbury (store).
ISTR an announcement late last year that 22xT1s were to be held at Shawbury to support this tasking. Six months ago, so probably all changed. Still quite a substantial fleet for something that's left service!
dervish is offline  
Old 24th May 2022, 21:58
  #410 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: East Riding
Posts: 76
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by longer ron
As Teeonefixer posted above they had 162 and 327 but both a/c still had the original fuselage (ie pre mod 2010) so were well overdue retirement - esp 162 who's fuselage had never been completely up to full production standard anyway (8th Hawk built).
There was sufficient Fatigue Life left in these 2 airframes to see them to their previous OSD, give or take when their next Major servicing was due. I don't know if DE&S had any serious thoughts of post-Mod 2010 replacements given alternative means of carrying out some of the work (e.g. new Centrifuge).
teeonefixer is offline  
Old 24th May 2022, 22:48
  #411 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Nevada, USA
Posts: 1,607
Received 42 Likes on 29 Posts
RAFEngO74to09 is offline  
Old 25th May 2022, 07:08
  #412 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Westnoreastsouth
Posts: 1,826
Received 33 Likes on 29 Posts
Originally Posted by teeonefixer
There was sufficient Fatigue Life left in these 2 airframes to see them to their previous OSD, give or take when their next Major servicing was due. I don't know if DE&S had any serious thoughts of post-Mod 2010 replacements given alternative means of carrying out some of the work (e.g. new Centrifuge).
Probably came down to ££££ - I don't think they wanted to spend the money on transferring all the RAFCAM specific equipment and instrumentation systems into 2010 fuselages.
There were plenty of 2010 a/c available from storage for a couple of years,indeed I did try on a number of occasions to get my then company management to get hold of a couple to 'major' and then to use as 'Hacks' to save FI on our instrumented fleet - they eventually did get the green light and then shortly afterwards of course the MOD changed their minds and decided to extend the T1 OSD and carry out the major programme (result - no hacks LOL).
As to Fatigue Life I would agree that 327 would probably have been good for another few years but 162 had a pre production standard fuselage structure and I would personally say that the RAF had had their moneys worth out of that particular airframe

cheers LR
longer ron is offline  
Old 25th May 2022, 07:41
  #413 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: East Riding
Posts: 76
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts
Everything comes down to £££££ !!

Interesting that Sqn Ldr Ramsden is showing the RAFAT conversion, but it is in the Gaydon Hangar at Valley, so the work is being done by HIOS (Babcocks/BAE Systems)

Last edited by teeonefixer; 25th May 2022 at 07:44. Reason: update
teeonefixer is offline  
Old 25th May 2022, 08:11
  #414 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,528
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Unless it is just going to be a red, non-RAFAT model?
Background Noise is offline  
Old 25th May 2022, 08:18
  #415 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: East Riding
Posts: 76
Received 10 Likes on 6 Posts
RAFAT have had some non-smoking Reds previously to complete the full establishment (some ex-Display aeroplanes were used as they had all the essential mods). Valley are fully equipped to carry out the Smoke System Mod as they are doing the "routine" conversions, taking the work over from Shawbury.
teeonefixer is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.