Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

North Korea!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Aug 2017, 04:10
  #281 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Land of Oz
Posts: 564
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Lonewolf_50
Stalin, I think, but now I have to go and look that up.
Yep, I think Stalin.
But also sometimes credited to Napoleon.
BBadanov is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2017, 06:13
  #282 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"What condition is their military really in, when reporting problems might cause Kim to frown?"

A country where his Grandfather had someone shot for "leftist-rightest tendencies", where his father had someone shot for "placing a statue of the Good Leader in the shade" and a man who, in a couple of years, has had his half-brother murdered abroad and his uncle shot for unspecified crimes

SMILE!!! and keep on SMILING would be my advice.....................

(fot the avoidance of doubt) Happy Happy Heathrow Harry (notebook in hand of course)
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2017, 06:19
  #283 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,400
Received 1,589 Likes on 726 Posts
Mattis says war could escalate 'very quickly' if N. Korea fires at US

Defense Secretary James Mattis said Monday that the United States will attempt to shoot down any North Korean missile launched at the country or its territories. "We’ll take it out," Mattis told reporters at the Pentagon.

He later said that, should a North Korean missile hit U.S. soil, including the Pacific island of Guam, it would constitute an act of war. “If they shoot at the United State, I’m assuming they hit the United States. If they do that, it’s game on,” Mattis added.

North Korea last week threatened to launch ballistic missiles at waters off the coast of Guam, a U.S. territory that hosts about 6,000 American troops and thousands of civilians. The isolated nation made the statement after President Trump warned North Korean leader Kim Jong Un to stop making threats against the U.S. and allies or it would "be met with fire and fury ... like the world has never seen." North Korea then warned that a plan to attack Guam would be in place by mid-August.

Mattis said the Defense Department would “know within moments” if a North Korean missile has been launched and if it was headed toward Guam. “I think if they fire at the United States it could escalate into war very quickly. Yes, that’s called war, if they shoot at us,” Mattis said.

Mattis also said that should North Korea fire in the direction of Guam but not hit the territory, “that becomes an issue that we take up however the president chooses. War is up to the president, perhaps up to the Congress. The bottom line is we will defend the country from an attack,” he later said. “Yes, that means for a lot of young troops, they’re going to be in a war time situation.”

He added: “You don’t shoot at people in this world. You don’t shoot at people in this world unless you want to bear the consequences.”
ORAC is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2017, 06:33
  #284 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Try watching this without tearing up.
If I really wrote what I'm thinking I would be banned for sure.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ufhKWfPSQOw

I know it's a few years old and if it has been posted before I apologise.
Lantern10 is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2017, 06:42
  #285 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Moscow region
Age: 65
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I take these statements from Mattis in such a way that hopefully there are at least two steps before the hot war starts, not one step. I.e., if fat Un really launches missiles towards Guam explicitly warning in advance that the target area is somewhere in neutral waters, then it is not yet a war (though a violation, ignorance, etc. etc). US would (hopefully) intercept whatever NK launches (I assume there would be some light imitators of real warheads as they are unlikely to reach such a technological level so quick) but not necessarily strike massively the NK territory. IMHO such a successful intercept would put the fat one into sh..t up to his ears, and this would be a good thing. Would it stop him from further development, sure not. More sanctions (even from China), very likely yes. But though a threat for Seoul would not become less, it would be a great relief for Tokyo, Hawaii, Guam and continental US.
A_Van is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2017, 06:44
  #286 (permalink)  

Evertonian
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
Posts: 12,486
Received 101 Likes on 58 Posts
War is up to the president, perhaps up to the Congress.
Umm...I'm not fully versed on American Politics but is there such a blurred line that the Sec Def can say "perhaps"???
Buster Hyman is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2017, 06:52
  #287 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,400
Received 1,589 Likes on 726 Posts
Umm...I'm not fully versed on American Politics but is there such a blurred line that the Sec Def can say "perhaps"???
Buster.....

War Powers Resolution.
ORAC is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2017, 11:09
  #288 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Maine USA
Age: 82
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Buster Hyman
Umm...I'm not fully versed on American Politics but is there such a blurred line that the Sec Def can say "perhaps"???
Only Congress has constitutional authority to declare war, but the President, acting as Commander-in-Chief, has an inherent power to use military force; for instance when attacked, or briefly.

In practice, this has become a way for Congress to avoid all responsibility for starting a war; they may support the President's decision to use force, or oppose him, but basically they have ceded the decision to him.
PersonFromPorlock is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2017, 21:14
  #289 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Buster Hyman
Umm...I'm not fully versed on American Politics but is there such a blurred line that the Sec Def can say "perhaps"???
There are two issues here:

On the one hand, only Congress can declare war and put the nation on a war footing. But as commander in Chief, the president has the power to commit military forces essentially anywhere, anytime, for any reason. A protracted military engagement requires funding, and since only Congress has the ability to levy taxes and thus controls all the purse strings, that requires Congress to agree with the president in any protracted engagement. This has happened numerous times in our history.

And on the other hand, even if Congress declared war, it's up to the President to prosecute that war. If he decided not to engage the military even in the face of a Congressional declaration of war, he/she could. This has never happened.

But the bottom line: yes, perhaps.
KenV is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2017, 22:45
  #290 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: A better place.
Posts: 2,319
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by Lantern10
Try watching this without tearing up.
If I really wrote what I'm thinking I would be banned for sure.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ufhKWfPSQOw

I know it's a few years old and if it has been posted before I apologise.
Thank you for re-posting that - I hadn't seen it.
Utterly despicable that people could be treated in such a way.

EDIT: Hmmm - perhaps this isn't quite what it seems?
tartare is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2017, 10:27
  #291 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Erewhon
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I hope the Americans have rapidly re-opened the Neutron bomb production line . . .
Brian W May is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2017, 13:35
  #292 (permalink)  

Evertonian
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
Posts: 12,486
Received 101 Likes on 58 Posts
Perhaps it is then....
Buster Hyman is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2017, 06:59
  #293 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: A better place.
Posts: 2,319
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
There you go - looks like poor old `straya is suicidal for cosying up to Uncle Sam.
Guess Darwin is going to have to prepare to get whacked...
tartare is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2017, 07:19
  #294 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Darwin, NT, Australia
Posts: 784
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Guess Darwin is going to have to prepare to get whacked...
Meh! What with being flattened by cyclones in 1897, 1937 and 1974 and Japanese bombs in 1942, we're probably overdue for a good whacking.

May hold off on the household renovations for a bit, though. Kim might create the scenario where I'll be able to get the taxpayer to stump up the repair costs (again).
CoodaShooda is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2017, 07:39
  #295 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,400
Received 1,589 Likes on 726 Posts
One of those places where dropping a bomb could do millions of dollars worth of improvements?
ORAC is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2017, 10:53
  #296 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Darwin, NT, Australia
Posts: 784
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Literally, ORAC.

Cyclone Tracy in '74 flattened the old town and the Aussie taxpayer paid for a modern new city.
CoodaShooda is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2017, 10:58
  #297 (permalink)  

Evertonian
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
Posts: 12,486
Received 101 Likes on 58 Posts
Originally Posted by CoodaShooda
the Aussie taxpayer paid for a modern new city.
Well that was money well spent!....
Buster Hyman is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2017, 12:04
  #298 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think they were worried that the inhabitants might stay south...............
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2017, 20:37
  #299 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Darwin, NT, Australia
Posts: 784
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Darwin is Australia's first line of defence.

Any invader landing here will take one look at the place, realise that there's nothing here worth the effort, turn around and go home (or to NZ).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7pZSsqQVxZA

Last edited by CoodaShooda; 21st Aug 2017 at 22:22.
CoodaShooda is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2017, 22:35
  #300 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: A better place.
Posts: 2,319
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
...where lo we will smite and vanquish them with our T-6 IIs, A-109s and Seasprites...
tartare is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.