Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

North Korea!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Aug 2017, 00:22
  #301 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 5,934
Received 392 Likes on 207 Posts
Darwin is about the safest place to be. Is Kimmy going to whack a Chinese property - they own the port.
megan is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2017, 01:30
  #302 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Darwin, NT, Australia
Posts: 784
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
You can probably say that about most of the country now , megan.
CoodaShooda is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2017, 02:56
  #303 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: A better place.
Posts: 2,319
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
I personally think all this talk of either an ICBM strike or a nuclear exchange is way overblown.
Firing a liquid fueled rocket in peacetime is one thing - on a war footing a lot more difficult - without being hit first.
What guarantee is there that even a conventional warhead on a Hwasong 12 would survive re-entry - seems there was a wide variation of views on just what those Japanese CCTV cameras saw.
They may have developed a miniaturised nuclear warhead, but have they successfully launched it and verified it's stayed intact and functioning before destroying it in flight?
How do we know that even a non-miniature North Korean nuclear weapon would even function as required in a real world setting rather than the controlled underground tests we've seen so far?
What's their quality control like?
I think what's far more likely is a short (maybe a few days to a week) really nasty conventional conflict.
A few dud Scud type shots launched at Tokyo and Guam.
The Northern suburbs of Seoul pounded for a few hours by artillery and other SK cities targeted by SRBMs.
Until they were eliminated en masse by conventional US airstrikes, and US and SK ground forces.
Would the Chinese really intervene at that point or before, or after?
Somehow, despite all the statements, I doubt it.
I don't think they'd use nukes in response to a massive American conventional strike.
And it's then that the real uncertainty starts... almost as difficult as the conflict... is what follows.
tartare is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2017, 03:53
  #304 (permalink)  
ImageGear
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Ahh yes, the allies will agree an end state to this intervention. everyone will stop at the 39th parallel.

Just like the last big brouhaha.. some will, some won't, and another cold war will result. That's if there's anything left.

Imagegear
 
Old 22nd Aug 2017, 05:14
  #305 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Darwin, NT, Australia
Posts: 784
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Remind me again how the embargoes against Japan over its Manchurian visit ended up.
CoodaShooda is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2017, 06:01
  #306 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,077
Received 53 Likes on 33 Posts
I personally think all this talk of either an ICBM strike or a nuclear exchange is way overblown.
The challenges you believe are a barrier are simply technology challenges that will be overcome given time and expertise. At the frenetic pace they seem to be working, I'd say sooner rather than later they'll have the capacity that even you have to acknowledge.
West Coast is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2017, 06:04
  #307 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: A better place.
Posts: 2,319
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Originally Posted by West Coast
The challenges you believe are a barrier are simply technology challenges that will be overcome given time and expertise. At the frenetic pace they seem to be working, I'd say sooner rather than later they'll have the capacity that even you have to acknowledge.
Perhaps.
One thing I have wondered is if they have a limited stock of Ukranian engines, rather than having successfully reverse engineered them and made their own.
tartare is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2017, 05:47
  #308 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Off the map
Posts: 59
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Looks like the Fat Bully has fired a missile over Japan.
There has to be a way to get rid of this fat lunatic discreetly....
DirtyProp is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2017, 06:57
  #309 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,075
Received 66 Likes on 40 Posts
Security Council to meet later on this.
Less Hair is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2017, 06:59
  #310 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: A better place.
Posts: 2,319
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Another sternly worded communique utterly condemning...
tartare is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2017, 14:15
  #311 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,197
Received 393 Likes on 244 Posts
How many UN Communiques can a man take before he breaks down and gives up? Oh, the humanity!

(Oh, wait, the number approaches infinity asymptotically ...)
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2017, 17:24
  #312 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Moscow region
Age: 65
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the missile indeed flew over Hokkaido, then all this sounds disappointing. Kim might feel more and more confident that he could progressively increase the distance in that direction laughing at and sh...ing on Japan from above. I wonder if any real warning (forget about UN blah-blah) would be issued? I.e. drawing a clear red line for him beyond which his missiles would be intercepted.

No teeth (read AeGIS+SM3)? No balls?
A_Van is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2017, 18:28
  #313 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,077
Received 53 Likes on 33 Posts
My bet is a lack of political will to be perceived as escalating the situation, not an issue with the ability to intercept the incoming missile.
West Coast is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2017, 21:38
  #314 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: ESSEX
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If Japan is on the receiving end of North Korea's missiles I doubt the South Koreans will do anything other than laugh
SARF is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2017, 08:09
  #315 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 5,222
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
It's noticeable that he hasn't sent them over South Korea. He probably realises that would be a step too far.
Fareastdriver is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2017, 08:56
  #316 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Southport
Posts: 1,335
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Fareastdriver
It's noticeable that he hasn't sent them over South Korea. He probably realises that would be a step too far.
I guess there's a lot more to hit the other side, bit of a nav error and you hit Indonesia?
andytug is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2017, 09:12
  #317 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Erewhon
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can't help thinking this situation is like The Life of Brian . . .

Fatty Un does something and 'John Cleese' invokes an extraordinary meeting of the Peoples' Liberation Front of Judea (aka the UN).

It's not funny, but it really doesn't cut the mustard when the rest of the world 'condemn' Fatty Un, he really doesn't give a sh*t what everyone else thinks.

It's a no-win situation for the politicians/military with a potentially bad outcome or a worse one. Personally I don't think a peaceful outcome is possible as nobody in NK can actually tell Fatty Un it's going to end in tears without being fed to the dogs.

Where's the Neutron bomb when you need it . . .
Brian W May is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2017, 09:13
  #318 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,075
Received 66 Likes on 40 Posts
Where is China when you need it?
Less Hair is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2017, 09:18
  #319 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Southport
Posts: 1,335
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Less Hair
Where is China when you need it?
Quietly taking over the South China sea using NK as a convenient distraction, by all accounts.
andytug is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2017, 15:23
  #320 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Moscow region
Age: 65
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tartare
Perhaps.
One thing I have wondered is if they have a limited stock of Ukranian engines, rather than having successfully reverse engineered them and made their own.


The rumours circulated for some years that N-Koreans indeed had smuggled smth from Ukraine. Three topics/options were addressed: a) complete technical documentation was stolen that allowed NK to greatly accelerate engineering and production processes, b) some real engines were illegally imported (some even wrote about the routes through middle east), c) NK hired Ukrainian engineers that lost their jobs when the country stopped support to plants in Dnepropetrovsk (now Dnepr).


IMHO option a) is very realistic. Even higher management of the Yuzhmash in Dnepr recently assumed that the leak of documentation likely happened. Two NK spies were caught and now in prison, but how many were not caught, nobody knows. Option b) seems not so likely to me because the entire Ukraine is for a long time under tight control of CIA and the latter would prevent any deal of that kind. Option c) seems very realistic. Controlling people is a much more difficult task than large hardware items. The guys might leave their home country for a vacation in UAE or Turkey and then escape to Far East.
A_Van is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.