North Korea!
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Moscow region
Age: 65
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
By doing nothing at the moment China may be just raising stakes in future talks with US.
Look at the trajectories: all of them (starting from NK) that end in continental US go over the Chinese territory. So, when the ability of the fat kid to through N-stuff over the Pacific is confirmed, China may invite US to chat in somewhat way like this:
We can buy the latest and greatest S-400 (or 500) from Russia and deploy them along the border. They can easily put down NK ICBMs even at the active (thrust) phase. Would you like us to do so? What would you give us in return (trade, shut up about islands in thee South sea, etc)? Not agree - OK you will have to clean up Alaska or/and Canada from debris at your own (if you are sure GBI can do their job 100%, which of course no one knows).
Look at the trajectories: all of them (starting from NK) that end in continental US go over the Chinese territory. So, when the ability of the fat kid to through N-stuff over the Pacific is confirmed, China may invite US to chat in somewhat way like this:
We can buy the latest and greatest S-400 (or 500) from Russia and deploy them along the border. They can easily put down NK ICBMs even at the active (thrust) phase. Would you like us to do so? What would you give us in return (trade, shut up about islands in thee South sea, etc)? Not agree - OK you will have to clean up Alaska or/and Canada from debris at your own (if you are sure GBI can do their job 100%, which of course no one knows).
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Here
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Aside from a natural desire not to have another superpower's military right on your borders (remember the Cuban Missile Crisis?), I think the main reason China doesn't want a unified Korea is that their big near-term ambition is to replace the US as the dominant Naval power in the region. They're also trying to expand offshore territorial boundaries to lock up mineral and fishing rights, like those artificial island projects in the South China Sea.
A unified Korea might mean an even larger US Navy presence with access to more Korean ports, along with conflicts involving mineral and fishing rights with a unified Korea. So it may be more about what's happening offshore, than worrying about US tanks on the border with China.
A unified Korea might mean an even larger US Navy presence with access to more Korean ports, along with conflicts involving mineral and fishing rights with a unified Korea. So it may be more about what's happening offshore, than worrying about US tanks on the border with China.
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Moscow region
Age: 65
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
dead pan,
Yes, they have to fly over somebody (China, Russia, Japan or SK). But the latest test (flying over Hokkaido) showed that Japanese skies are free. Just one more resolution from UN which they obviously consider a peanut gallery. I would not be surprised that the same very corridor would be later used to "play brackets" with Hawaii (nearly the same launch azimuth).
Yes, they have to fly over somebody (China, Russia, Japan or SK). But the latest test (flying over Hokkaido) showed that Japanese skies are free. Just one more resolution from UN which they obviously consider a peanut gallery. I would not be surprised that the same very corridor would be later used to "play brackets" with Hawaii (nearly the same launch azimuth).
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Norwich
Age: 78
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: the edge of madness
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pine Gap here... he's just squirted off another missile.
"The Security Council utterly condemns and calls for..."
So - bets on how long before Japan nukes up...
"The Security Council utterly condemns and calls for..."
So - bets on how long before Japan nukes up...
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: North Up
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Do these damned sanctions actually do any good?
Or do they simple cause a retrenchment and independent spirit of defiance?
A rather intelligent documentary series a decade ago gave a rather insightful look into the psychology of such matters, in three parts.
Or do they simple cause a retrenchment and independent spirit of defiance?
A rather intelligent documentary series a decade ago gave a rather insightful look into the psychology of such matters, in three parts.
As a bit of “what-aboutery”, here’s an alternative possible hypothesis;
Kim has distanced himself and DPRK from the control of China, this for the Chinese is less that acceptable in their back yard as it reduces their comfort about both the stability of the peninsula and the certainty of a buffer from the "forces of democracy" in South Korea..
Either by accident or design, the west is now pushing China to reign in NK.
This presents China with an opportunity.
While the North Korean’s are looking south and east, China invades from the north and west … toppling the Kim dynasty and replacing it with a more agreeable regime. On the way out, in order to assure future compliance, the PLA establish a base or two including a naval presence on the Korean east coast, along the Sea of Japan, something China currently lacks.
What does China gain? i) A chance to test its military capability, ii) removes a burdensome nuisance on its southern flank, iii) presents itself as helping the rest of the world, iv) believes it has stabilised the DPRK (it could even go as far as taking steps to improve the lot of the average citizen) and v) gains a strategic base or two along the way.
Not quite the Win-Win the West might have hoped for, but still, a problem removed.
JAS
Kim has distanced himself and DPRK from the control of China, this for the Chinese is less that acceptable in their back yard as it reduces their comfort about both the stability of the peninsula and the certainty of a buffer from the "forces of democracy" in South Korea..
Either by accident or design, the west is now pushing China to reign in NK.
This presents China with an opportunity.
While the North Korean’s are looking south and east, China invades from the north and west … toppling the Kim dynasty and replacing it with a more agreeable regime. On the way out, in order to assure future compliance, the PLA establish a base or two including a naval presence on the Korean east coast, along the Sea of Japan, something China currently lacks.
What does China gain? i) A chance to test its military capability, ii) removes a burdensome nuisance on its southern flank, iii) presents itself as helping the rest of the world, iv) believes it has stabilised the DPRK (it could even go as far as taking steps to improve the lot of the average citizen) and v) gains a strategic base or two along the way.
Not quite the Win-Win the West might have hoped for, but still, a problem removed.
JAS
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,809
Received 135 Likes
on
63 Posts
Interesting perspactive, Just a spotter.
Although ... would China want to become an overt aggressor, despite your reasonable outline, when it's World trade is so important?
Although ... would China want to become an overt aggressor, despite your reasonable outline, when it's World trade is so important?
Perhaps George W Bush had the right answer to threats from Pakistan - 'I'll send your whole country back to the Middle Ages.'
For N. Korea - One more step and nuke them!!
For N. Korea - One more step and nuke them!!
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: England
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Forgive my naivety, being a civvie, but why can't we (or the Americans, or even the Russians if they want to) use a covert special forces team to assassinate the North Korean leader? Or use satellites, spies, etc to pinpoint his location and take him out with a well aimed precision strike?
Or am I in the realms of fantasy there? But if I am, why? Surely with our (the 'West') resources and technology, it must be possible to do something like that, especially as he doesn't seem to hide himself in caves or underground like terrorist leaders.
Or am I in the realms of fantasy there? But if I am, why? Surely with our (the 'West') resources and technology, it must be possible to do something like that, especially as he doesn't seem to hide himself in caves or underground like terrorist leaders.
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Penzance, Cornwall UK
Age: 84
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would like to see the US Navy engage and destroy a missile once it had cleared Japanese or South Korean territory - but not reveal their action. The North Koreans can't have radar coverage so far from land so they could think their missile was at fault. The question this raises is - what would they do next? Step up launches or not?