Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Aircraft Markings

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Aircraft Markings

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Dec 2016, 17:44
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 113
Received 26 Likes on 6 Posts
Aircraft Markings

A real anorak question for Xmas but one that has perplexed me for a while; can anyone explain why, unlike all the other RAF AT types, RAF Hercules do not have underwing markings(roundels)?
bspatz is offline  
Old 16th Dec 2016, 19:31
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: deepest darkest Wiltshire
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can't see them when you are in the weeds
Tea White Zero is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2016, 09:25
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's not convincing; other types with "all over" camouflage had markings underneath
ShotOne is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2016, 10:25
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: M4 Corridor
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In earlier days the Reg Nos on Hercs were much larger but there were no underside roundels when this paint scheme came in. In Rhodesia and Ethiopia the white crosses made good aiming points though




Dougie M is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2016, 20:44
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: deepest darkest Wiltshire
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm pretty sure as the Herc is a high-wing mono-plane, the painter's ladders won't reach!
Either that or modern twin-pack paint won't stick to the underside; bring back cellulose!
Tea White Zero is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2016, 17:07
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 113
Received 26 Likes on 6 Posts
Tea White Zero I think you will find that the underside of the wings on A400m and C17 are both higher than the Herc so presumably someone has a ladder that will reach! However given that it has been going on for some time it might just be a tradition that has been perpetuated and now makes some sense given its now exclusively tactical role.
bspatz is offline  
Old 19th Dec 2016, 21:47
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: deepest darkest Wiltshire
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bspatz, thanks for your ladder measuring calculations, very useful. I think the issue must be that Airbus and Boeing ladders must be longer than Lockheed's. I reckon its all down to cutbacks!

Does your analysis mean that when the 400 and 17 take on the TacAT role, the long ladders will have to come back out to remove markings? :-)
Tea White Zero is offline  
Old 20th Dec 2016, 19:43
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 113
Received 26 Likes on 6 Posts
Tea White Zero I think this comes back to the point of my original question, if the roundels are removed from the 400 and C17 when they take on a TacAT role we will know what the logic is; otherwise is must be a problem with the length of the ladders at Lockheed and presumably Marshalls!
bspatz is offline  
Old 20th Dec 2016, 19:56
  #9 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 422 Likes on 222 Posts
The roundels just give the enemy something better to aim at.
ShyTorque is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.