Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Iran

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th June 2025 | 03:56
  #2021 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2017
Aviation Qualifications: SLF
Posts: 977
Likes: 705
From: Yakima
At no point is U-235 "glowing." It's unlikely to even be warm. In a cloud chamber a reasonably small chunk will look interesting, but far below the activity of Americium that is used in home ionization detectors for fire alerting.
Yep. U-235 is actually not very radioactive, with a half life of approximately 700 million years. For reference, the shorter the half life the more radioactive emissions. For example, P-238 has a half life of about 88 years and is used in space craft for thermo-electric generators because of its heat of decay. P-239, used in weapons, has a half life of about 24,000 years. Not nice stuff, but atomic bomb pits were handled in open air back in the Los Alamos days; just don't breath the dust.
Winemaker is online now  
Old 19th June 2025 | 04:25
  #2022 (permalink)  
20 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,515
Likes: 151
From: A better place.
Originally Posted by Winemaker
Yep. U-235 is actually not very radioactive, with a half life of approximately 700 million years. For reference, the shorter the half life the more radioactive emissions. For example, P-238 has a half life of about 88 years and is used in space craft for thermo-electric generators because of its heat of decay. P-239, used in weapons, has a half life of about 24,000 years. Not nice stuff, but atomic bomb pits were handled in open air back in the Los Alamos days; just don't breath the dust.
My reference to glowing was deeply sarcastic - a la Homer Simpson...



A pit.



UF6 sublimate at 56 degrees Celsius.

Last edited by tartare; 19th June 2025 at 04:58.
tartare is offline  
Old 19th June 2025 | 05:15
  #2023 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Aviation Qualifications: Military (Retired)
Posts: 2,688
Likes: 1,522
From: Near the coast
Iran

The news says that Trump has approved the attack plans for the Fordo plant but he is just waiting to see if Iran wish to surrender first.

I am left wondering if he is actually waiting to see if Tom Cruise is available to lead the strike package and if all the F-14s have in fact been destroyed. After all many other elements of the news seem to emulate the movie in a classic case of life imitating art.

BV
Bob Viking is offline  
Old 19th June 2025 | 05:32
  #2024 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Aviation Qualifications: SLF
Posts: 2,870
Likes: 508
From: Japan
So is the ancient Chinese paradox to be tested once more? A ‘sword-shield’ situation. 矛盾, = a sword/shield, contradiction in terms, or paradox. The biggest bunker buster in the world, against the deepest bunker.
Mr P will surely be awake and watching.
jolihokistix is offline  
Old 19th June 2025 | 05:41
  #2025 (permalink)  
TWT
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Aviation Qualifications: SLF
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 227
From: troposphere
There's a good chance the MOP's won't go deep enough as the IAEA says the most sensitive areas, which they claim to have
visited, are half a mile underground.

Only one way to find out.
TWT is offline  
Old 19th June 2025 | 05:49
  #2026 (permalink)  
20 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,515
Likes: 151
From: A better place.
Originally Posted by TWT
There's a good chance the MOP's won't go deep enough as the IAEA says the most sensitive areas, which they claim to have
visited, are half a mile underground.

Only one way to find out.
Ship one drops MOP1, and then MOP2 directly on the impact site.
Ship two drops MOP3 on MOP2 impact site and MOP4 on MPO 3 impact site.
tartare is offline  
Old 19th June 2025 | 05:55
  #2027 (permalink)  
TWT
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Aviation Qualifications: SLF
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 227
From: troposphere
Definitely needs Tom Cruise on the job
TWT is offline  
Old 19th June 2025 | 06:58
  #2028 (permalink)  
200 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 289
Likes: 62
From: uk
Originally Posted by tartare
Latest reports seem to indicate a strike plan has been approved, but Trump is waiting to see if the Iranians will still come to the table - ignoring the learned experience that they've been salami slicing the west for the last 10-15 years on the nuclear issue.
Also Israel definitely has a plan to enter Fordo using special forces, and have informed the US - crazy brave.If the Israelis decide to enter Fordow from the ground, using special forces to destroy the centrifuge halls, what might that operation look like?
ChatGPT said:
A ground operation by Israeli special forces to enter and destroy Iran’s Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant (FFEP) would be one of the most daring and logistically complex military operations in modern history. Fordow is built deep inside a mountain, near the city of Qom, and is one of Iran’s most heavily protected nuclear facilities. Here's what such an operation might involve, based on known capabilities and military doctrine:

🔍 Mission Objectives

  • Infiltrate the Fordow site undetected.
  • Access the underground centrifuge halls.
  • Plant demolition charges to destroy or severely disable uranium enrichment capabilities.
  • Exfiltrate the team safely, if possible.

🚧 Operational Challenges

  1. Location & Fortification
    • Fordow is buried under 80–100 meters of rock.
    • Built to withstand aerial bombardment (deep-earth facility).
    • Surrounded by IRGC (Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps) troops and advanced surveillance.
    • Limited access roads and entrance points, which are likely booby-trapped or guarded.
  2. Distance
    • ~1,000–1,500 km from Israel.
    • Surrounded by hostile territory.
    • Requires covert insertion and extraction, likely without access to nearby friendly bases.
  3. Time on Target
    • High risk of detection; must move fast.
    • May need to neutralize security personnel and surveillance silently.

🪂 Possible Insertion Methods

  1. Airborne Infiltration
    • C-130 or C-17 aircraft flying at low altitude, dropping Sayeret Matkal or Shayetet 13 via HALO (High Altitude, Low Opening) parachute jumps.
    • Helicopter insertion (e.g., CH-53 Yasur or Sikorsky UH-60) if a nearby landing zone can be secured.
  2. Overland Infiltration
    • Through Kurdish territory in northern Iraq (using Mossad or Kurdish contacts).
    • Disguised as Iranian military or civilians, using months of preparation and linguistic/cultural training.
  3. Underground Sabotage
    • Unlikely but theoretically possible: a tunneling operation using robotics or mining equipment pre-positioned through sabotage teams or sympathetic locals.

💣 Attack Tactics

  • Shaped charges to penetrate the centrifuge halls from access corridors.
  • Use of thermobaric or specialized explosive devices to collapse or damage tunnel structures.
  • Possibly include EMP devices to damage electronics and control systems.
  • Plant time-delayed explosives to allow exfiltration before detonation.

🛡️ Deception & Diversion

  • Simultaneous cyberattacks to disable alarms or communications.
  • Decoy drone or missile attacks elsewhere in Iran (e.g., Natanz or Isfahan) to distract IRGC forces.
  • Use of Iranian uniforms, fake documentation, and fake vehicles for deception.

🚁 Extraction Options

  • Exfiltration via helicopter to a ship in the Gulf or a base in northern Iraq.
  • Escape on foot to a safehouse for later pickup by air or land convoy.
  • In some scenarios, the mission could be considered "no-return" – with operators sacrificing themselves or preparing for capture.

🪖 Likely Units Involved

  • Sayeret Matkal – elite reconnaissance and counterterrorism unit.
  • Shayetet 13 – naval commandos, comparable to SEAL Team 6.
  • Mossad operatives – for local logistics, disguises, and intelligence.
  • Cyber Units (Unit 8200) – for surveillance, hacking, jamming.

🧭 Historical Parallels

  • Operation Entebbe (1976) – Israeli commandos flew 4,000 km to rescue hostages.
  • Operation Orchard (2007) – secret airstrike on Syria’s nuclear reactor.
  • Iran’s own assassination ops – e.g., targeted killings of Iranian nuclear scientists by Mossad-linked operatives inside Tehran.

🎯 Strategic Risk

  • If caught or killed, operators could spark full-scale war.
  • Would almost certainly be considered an act of war by Iran.
  • Huge diplomatic fallout even from allies like the US or European nations.
  • Extremely high political and military risk for Netanyahu or any Israeli PM.

💬 Bottom Line

A ground operation into Fordow would be feasible only under extreme conditions and with months or years of planning. It would require local assets, deception, cyber warfare, and elite special forces, and even then would face extraordinary risk. Israel is more likely to attempt sabotage or air-launched deep-penetration strikes using MOPs (Massive Ordnance Penetrators) if available, or covert means, than to risk a commando raid inside the mountain. But in a do-or-die scenario, such a raid can’t be entirely ruled out.
I don’t think they use chat gpt for mission planning . Icons give it away . What about the space laser while we are at it ?
dagenham is offline  
Old 19th June 2025 | 06:59
  #2029 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Aviation Qualifications: Military (Retired)
Posts: 2,688
Likes: 1,522
From: Near the coast
Nuclear Facilities

Israel has attacked the Arak nuclear site.

https://vcdnp.org/wp-content/uploads...facilities.pdf

I think Israel is starting to heavily flirt with the grey areas here. After all, we weren’t happy when Russia did it recently.

As someone who is currently downwind I have to say I’m not a big fan.

BV
Bob Viking is offline  
Old 19th June 2025 | 07:06
  #2030 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Aviation Qualifications: SLF
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 1,065
From: Australia
Originally Posted by T28B
In answer to your question, even though I am not the authority on such things that Chat GPT is...
1. Set up an ambush.
2. Position reserves to follow up on the ambush.
3. Parade the bodies of dead enemies through the streets of Tehran.

That's a plan, I am sure others can be dreamed up.
Or, the plan for the erks...
1. Salute officers enthusiastically
2. Send visa application to US, UK, France, Germany, China, anywhere, pleading persecution
3. Adjourn to pub (OK, chaikhaneh) to await results of visa application
4. Learn Yiddish

© not ChatGPT
artee is online now  
Old 19th June 2025 | 07:15
  #2031 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 24,509
Likes: 7,252
From: Peripatetic
UK perspective - squeaky bum time on what to do if Trump asks for UK help and/or use of Diego Garcia.

Tim Shipman article in the Spectator followed by today’s Politico London Playbook.

https://archive.ph/apdVG

Starmer’s war zone: the Prime Minister is in a perilous position

https://www.politico.eu/newsletter/l...om-the-bunker/

No news from the bunker
ORAC is offline  
Old 19th June 2025 | 07:17
  #2032 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Aviation Qualifications: Military
Posts: 65
Likes: 51
From: UK
Originally Posted by Bob Viking
Israel has attacked the Arak nuclear site.

https://vcdnp.org/wp-content/uploads...facilities.pdf

I think Israel is starting to heavily flirt with the grey areas here. After all, we weren’t happy when Russia did it recently.

As someone who is currently downwind I have to say I’m not a big fan.

BV
I guess that’s one of the reasons you get the big bucks for working in that rejoin..
Stuck On The Ground is offline  
Old 19th June 2025 | 08:11
  #2033 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 206
Likes: 31
From: Canada
Originally Posted by Stuck On The Ground
you get the big bucks for working in that rejoin..
Here's a rejoinder to that. Can't anyone write anymore without AI or autocorrect?
Zombywoof is offline  
Old 19th June 2025 | 08:19
  #2034 (permalink)  
20 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,515
Likes: 151
From: A better place.
Originally Posted by dagenham
I don’t think they use chat gpt for mission planning . Icons give it away . What about the space laser while we are at it ?
I did briefly contemplate that I might be inadvertently breaching Israeli Opsec.
Oops - there's a man in black at the door with a Hebrew accent...
tartare is offline  
Old 19th June 2025 | 08:42
  #2035 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Aviation Qualifications: LAME
Posts: 803
Likes: 642
From: Cumbria
Originally Posted by TWT
Definitely needs Tom Cruise on the job
Or 633 Squadron.

(Mozzie; the original stealth bomber).
DuncanDoenitz is offline  
Old 19th June 2025 | 09:06
  #2036 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 24,509
Likes: 7,252
From: Peripatetic
……………

isw:
Israeli strikes have driven Iranian forces to begin firing missiles from central Iran rather than western Iran. Iranian forces will need to use longer-range missiles to reach Israel from the launch sites in central Iran.

Launching ballistic missiles from Esfahan will prevent Iran from being able to use three medium-range ballistic missiles that it has previously used to attack Israel……..


​​​​​​​
ORAC is offline  
Old 19th June 2025 | 09:19
  #2037 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 24,509
Likes: 7,252
From: Peripatetic
IAEA has information the Khondab (former Arak) heavy water research reactor, under construction, was hit. It was not operational and contained no nuclear material, so no radiological effects.

At present, IAEA has no information indicating the Khondab heavy water plant was hit.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/idf-st...r-development/

Reactor: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclea...s_in_Iran#Arak

Heavy water plant: https://www.nti.org/education-center...on-plant-hwpp/

ORAC is offline  
Old 19th June 2025 | 09:41
  #2038 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 79
Likes: 35
From: Canada
Originally Posted by ORAC
IAEA has information the Khondab (former Arak) heavy water research reactor, under construction, was hit.

At present, IAEA has no information indicating the Khondab heavy water plant was hit.
Brilliant!
Smalahove is offline  
Old 19th June 2025 | 09:49
  #2039 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 24,509
Likes: 7,252
From: Peripatetic
Not sure what point you are trying to make - they are two different buildings with different purposes, I provided links describing both - they IAEA confirm the first was attacked, they have no information on the second.
ORAC is offline  
Old 19th June 2025 | 10:38
  #2040 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 4,914
Likes: 608
From: surfing, watching for sharks
Originally Posted by Zombywoof
Here's a rejoinder to that. Can't anyone write anymore without AI or autocorrect?
Agreed, many pawning it or other's work as their own thoughts on the topic.
West Coast is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.