Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

C130J just a strat aircraft?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.
View Poll Results: Is the C130J a Strat only aircraft
Strat only aircraft
7
7.95%
Should be used for both Strat and Tac
40
45.45%
Should be tac only as other aircraft are better for Strat
19
21.59%
Who cares, it\'s just one big computer game with motion!
22
25.00%
Voters: 88. This poll is closed

C130J just a strat aircraft?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st Oct 2002, 21:17
  #101 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: UK
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

Out of curiosity, what precisely, is the J so good at that a C17 (if it were allowed to) couldnt do? The yanks seem fairly certain of its capabilities.
The Brown Bottle is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2002, 17:39
  #102 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BB

Don't believe all the hype about the C-17. A very capable aircraft that is excellent at most things but there are still problems with it in the airdrop role, some of which should be fixed others which may not be. Ther is still a role for the C-130/A-400 type ac, I notice the Americans, despite buying more C-17s, are not planning to retire the C-130??
Banggearo is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2002, 18:28
  #103 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Brown Bottle

I suppose the J is better at filling less of a Hind's gun sight.

Last edited by RoboAlbert; 2nd Nov 2002 at 12:37.
RoboAlbert is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2002, 19:54
  #104 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: roughly near Everleigh DZ
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BB,

Have put Albert into a few strips that would have taken a lot of work with a chainsaw before you could get a C-17 in besides which a Herk can do a bit of strimming itself if needs be!.
DummyRun is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2002, 00:54
  #105 (permalink)  
Bof
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Satisfy my curiosity, providing it's not a Shtum type subject. Do you guys use ATO at all these days? Many moons ago when the 130s were two-tone brown and had perspex domes (that will tell you how many moons) we tried to get the powers that be to buy some bottles from the USAF, but nobody was interested.
Bof is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2002, 01:13
  #106 (permalink)  
Bof
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry to repeat my question guys, but I guess my last post was the last on the last page and the thread slid into obscurity!

I'd have started a new thread but it didn't seem worth it. So, can anyone tell me if you or the powers that be (PTB) have ever condidered using ATO for TAC missions. Does the J have the 'hooks' to take the bottles?

Maybe it's just not a considered requirement, and of course Boscombe would have to have one for a year to play with!
However, it can sure get you off the ground quickly. As I said in my earlier post, we asked for them in prehistoric days but were met by a deafening silence.
Bof is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2002, 16:41
  #107 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: South of the Fens again!
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As I understand it, there aren't the mounting brackets on the J and given that there was certainly no higher level support for using them on the K, I doubt that any mod would be approved barring a major capability gap being identified and needing plugging urgently - similar in scale and urgency to the prompt that resulted in Herc tankers, I imagine.
opso is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2002, 00:24
  #108 (permalink)  
Bof
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks opso. I'll go along with the no requirement envisaged
Bof is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2002, 13:19
  #109 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Nellis of course...
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just heard that the C130J has completed a successful airdrop of 90 troops (Sim 45), Wedge and door bundles. Surely this can't be true, its only a strat aircraft...!! Two pilots will never cope....
RedFlag is offline  
Old 28th Nov 2002, 18:18
  #110 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

Red Flag how can you?

...no good can ever come from spreading this kind of ridiculous fantasy!
RoboAlbert is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2002, 04:14
  #111 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I seem to remember hearing some loadies talking about some sort of C of G issue with dropping above 64?? anyone clarify?

Pass-A-Frozo is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2002, 11:59
  #112 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy

I find the continual C130J vs C130K backstabbing somewhat sad. I have flown K and J aircraft tactically and at the current state of development, each has its own distinct advantages and disadvantages. Most importantly, both models are capable of conducting the tactical mission effectively.

When it comes to provision of military capability, the C130 is a tactical transport aircraft and both J and K models can carry roughly the same mass and size of cargo roughly the same distance in about the same time. As we are in an expeditionary air force and the effective provision of this capability is fairly critical, it would be nice to get a warm feeling that more energy is being expended working towards providing a coherent AT capability using both platforms and using the relative merits of each platform to complement each other.

Unfortunately, I guess that the v senior wheels who allegedly read what is written here get the impression that Lyneham is full of sad, inwards-looking back-stabbers who would rather bitch about each other than contribute towards the Main Effort.

I apologise in advance to those on both sides of the debate who are not small-minded and who are interested in moving forward.
backpocket.com is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2002, 18:55
  #113 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: location location
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
bp.com

Providing coherent AT capability? It's the job.

Working together? Vital.

Not getting the odd prod in when the (very vocal) critics are proved wrong? Impossible!!
propulike is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2002, 05:03
  #114 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Redflag: Are there any online piccy's of the drop?

PAF
Pass-A-Frozo is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2002, 11:14
  #115 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: States sometimes
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RedFlag,

thats excellent news, good to see the J coming online as a tactical aircraft so effectively. I wonder when the last time a sim45 was dropped by a Brit Herc - must have been some 10 years ago?? Was the sim 45 PW with DB dropped in South Africa?
Good Mickey is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2002, 16:18
  #116 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Nellis of course...
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PAF
Not sure about the piccies thing, I'll see what I can get hold of...

GM
South Africa it certainly was....
RedFlag is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2002, 17:06
  #117 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PAF,

there are no C of G issues when dropping more than 64 troops, in fact there are no C of G issues below 64 either (well, none more than usual on a PW mission).
unclebuckhead is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2002, 19:54
  #118 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: somewhere in Wiltshire..once
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

I think that this is a great step forward....
I can stay at home this christmas/new year and let the now highly proven and more capable chaps northside go eastbound in the event of a callout!

Now, how does one obtain oceanic clearance again?........
SCINHead is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2002, 22:20
  #119 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 1,360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just as some common sense was becoming the norm we have white noise breaking through again

Some things I don't miss


all spelling mistakes are "df" alcohol induced

Last edited by Always_broken_in_wilts; 18th Dec 2002 at 11:50.
Always_broken_in_wilts is offline  
Old 20th Dec 2002, 06:54
  #120 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
....hmmm, ABIW, there speaks the most frustrated of frustrated pilots.

Please, please sir, may I sit on your flight deck and push some of your switches and play with your knob..

It's lonely down the back here, I've only got myself to play with......

I don't fly with loadies, engs or AEOs, but I don't bleat on and on and on and on and on and on about them. I like to think that they all get on with the job as professionally as the navs I fly with.

How about a 2003 New Year resolution?!

Interesting stories bouncing around some crew rooms about the Lyneham dodgy video club....allegedly. I have no doubt that all your navigator chums are just breathing a sigh of relief it wasn't one of them!
Chris Kebab is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.