Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Buccaneer overhead Cape Town

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Buccaneer overhead Cape Town

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Jan 2016, 12:24
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: crewe
Age: 77
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Buccaneer overhead Cape Town

Just watching the test match, on sky. Sure that was a Buccaneer, doing a pass???
david parry is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2016, 14:30
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: N.Yorks
Age: 83
Posts: 29
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by david parry
Just watching the test match, on sky. Sure that was a Buccaneer, doing a pass???
It was! Airbrakes open, BLC vortices, what a sight! Somebody told Bumble that it was a Hunter? Aircraft reccy is not what it was!!

Last edited by George Richardson; 5th Jan 2016 at 14:53. Reason: Incorrect capital letter.
George Richardson is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2016, 14:38
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: East Midlands
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It was probably my mate from Thunder City. Flew with him in XW986 out of Cape Town in 2008 - almost exactly 25 years since my last operational sortie in a Bucc.

Bloggs
Fg Off Bloggs is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2016, 15:32
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Cape Town, ZA
Age: 62
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Heard a heavy jet overhead (a few km from cricket), but didn't get outside in time to see it...
GordonR_Cape is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2016, 15:33
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: crewe
Age: 77
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Photo here South Africa vs England LIVE cricket score: Day four of the second Test | Daily Mail Online
david parry is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2016, 16:08
  #6 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,470
Received 1,627 Likes on 744 Posts
ORAC is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 5th Jan 2016, 21:03
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Royal Berkshire
Posts: 1,744
Received 79 Likes on 41 Posts
Originally Posted by Fg Off Bloggs
It was probably my mate from Thunder City. Flew with him in XW986 out of Cape Town in 2008 - almost exactly 25 years since my last operational sortie in a Bucc
Some of the Brunty Bucc crew flew in '986 with IP about a year or so ago. I think '986 is maybe the only one of the 3 x Bucc's out there currently still flying?
GeeRam is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2016, 21:22
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Land of Oz
Posts: 565
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
It looks great - what beautiful lines you have, my dear !!
BBadanov is online now  
Old 16th Feb 2023, 15:44
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: the middle of everywhere
Posts: 164
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Admittedly a year old but the latest news that I know of: Hangar 51 company buys Thunder City collection of Ex-Military Jets and aims to use it for Adversary Air Services - The Aviation Geek Club
son of brommers is offline  
Old 16th Feb 2023, 15:48
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: the middle of everywhere
Posts: 164
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Actually, this is news on the Buccs from November '22 Hangar 51 Aviation | Facebook
son of brommers is offline  
Old 16th Feb 2023, 16:57
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,276
Received 338 Likes on 190 Posts
Originally Posted by son of brommers
Good luck with that! This is well worth a read. https://aviation-safety.net/reports/...TNG_ZU-BEX.pdf
212man is offline  
Old 16th Feb 2023, 20:15
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,826
Received 98 Likes on 71 Posts
Originally Posted by GeeRam
Some of the Brunty Bucc crew flew in '986 with IP about a year or so ago. I think '986 is maybe the only one of the 3 x Bucc's out there currently still flying?
'986 was one of the three S2s (along with '987 and '988) delivered to RAE Farnborough in about 1974 and as such, being an MOD(PE) aircraft, must have had very low hours on it when it was 'retired'.
One amusing thing; when it was delivered the navs on Experimental Flying Squadron had to be trained on the up to date nav systems so it did a lot of flying on airways, the problem being that it cruised at 550 kt (T) which meant it overtook everything else in the airway including Tridents and VC10s ('normal' Douglas and Boeing types could only manage about 460-480) at whatever level it was flying which rather annoyed the airways controllers.

Last edited by chevvron; 17th Feb 2023 at 04:48.
chevvron is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2023, 09:13
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: East Riding
Posts: 76
Received 11 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by chevvron
'986 was one of the three S2s (along with '987 and '988) delivered to RAE Farnborough in about 1974 and as such, being an MOD(PE) aircraft, must have had very low hours on it when it was 'retired'.
Good point Chevvron. Medium to high time airframes will have an extensive inspection burden in the wing lower front spar (especially wing rib connection at stn 80 and 110 from vague memory) and the Fin attachment bolts amongst others. But isn't one of their airframes one of the fleet that wasn't a "yellow Peril" (XW986-8)? The SAAF must have been well versed in this (despite embargoes) as they had appropriate inspection holes on their aeroplanes I had a look at in Museums a while ago. However, the availability of spares, general condition of the airframe and systems plus servicing capability will be foremost. The accident report for the Lightning certainly puts a doubt on the latter.
teeonefixer is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2023, 09:19
  #14 (permalink)  
Drain Bamaged
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Earth
Age: 56
Posts: 536
Received 35 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by 212man
Good luck with that! This is well worth a read. https://aviation-safety.net/reports/...TNG_ZU-BEX.pdf
A case study of (A criminal) Normalisation of deviance...
ehwatezedoing is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 17th Feb 2023, 09:42
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,276
Received 338 Likes on 190 Posts
Originally Posted by ehwatezedoing
A case study of (A criminal) Normalisation of deviance...
Absolutely - horrendous!
212man is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2023, 11:27
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,826
Received 98 Likes on 71 Posts
Originally Posted by teeonefixer
Good point Chevvron. Medium to high time airframes will have an extensive inspection burden in the wing lower front spar (especially wing rib connection at stn 80 and 110 from vague memory) and the Fin attachment bolts amongst others. But isn't one of their airframes one of the fleet that wasn't a "yellow Peril" (XW986-8)? The SAAF must have been well versed in this (despite embargoes) as they had appropriate inspection holes on their aeroplanes I had a look at in Museums a while ago. However, the availability of spares, general condition of the airframe and systems plus servicing capability will be foremost. The accident report for the Lightning certainly puts a doubt on the latter.
All 3 were delivered to Farnborough in 'yellow peril' colours by my late great mate Terry Adcock (took me up in Hunter '321 one day; no 'g'suit or mae west!) but only one ('987 I think) stayed at Farnborough and the other two used to inhabit West Freugh and HOSM.
When Ark Royal (?) paid off, we got 2 more Buccs, one being XV344 and the other one was written off by Terry when he was avoiding a German Police helicopter in Germany; pulled 9g and the tailplane came off!
chevvron is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2023, 11:42
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Royal Berkshire
Posts: 1,744
Received 79 Likes on 41 Posts
Originally Posted by teeonefixer
Good point Chevvron. Medium to high time airframes will have an extensive inspection burden in the wing lower front spar (especially wing rib connection at stn 80 and 110 from vague memory) and the Fin attachment bolts amongst others. But isn't one of their airframes one of the fleet that wasn't a "yellow Peril" (XW986-8)? The SAAF must have been well versed in this (despite embargoes) as they had appropriate inspection holes on their aeroplanes I had a look at in Museums a while ago. However, the availability of spares, general condition of the airframe and systems plus servicing capability will be foremost. The accident report for the Lightning certainly puts a doubt on the latter.
Given the SAAF used them, there should still be some old knowledge base floating around, and there was I believe a good stash of ex-SAAF spares out there, this new outfit probably have a chance of flying the Buccs again at least....maybe, if they are professional enough.
I think there is zero chance of the 3 x Lightnings and the Hunter ever flying again though. I've heard the Hunter is now in quite a poor state, which is a shame, as it was an ex-Black Arrows airframe, and had been one of the few remaining airworthy F.6's.
GeeRam is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.