Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Corbin and CDS Squaring-Up

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Corbin and CDS Squaring-Up

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Nov 2015, 14:27
  #141 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wherever it is this month
Posts: 1,789
Received 75 Likes on 34 Posts
NutLoose,

I think you need to clarify your post. Are you suggesting that Kevan Jones or Ken Livingstone is really 'a person you want deciding Military policies'?

Kevan Jones was Veterans' Minister in the MoD during the Brown government and had been on the Defence Select Committee before that. As I recall, he was a knowledgeable and thoughtful individual and did "fit right in" as you suggestively put it. I don't see why having had a past depressive episode should cast any doubt on his ability to fulfil that role. I think it is probably desirable that ministers bring a range of different life experiences into government. In any case, I suspect a great many more servicemen (senior decision-makers included) have suffered mental illnesses than any statistics could reveal, for the very reason that Mr Jones stated in the house - they don't talk about it.

Now, if you are saying that Ken is unfit to be involved in military policy-making, I would tend to agree - not because of his left-wing views, which he is entitled to hold and apply to policy, but because of his long history of association with and support for individuals and movements antithetical to our national interest. Of course that can't stop Corbyn appointing him - but it should stop anyone taking the results of their policy commission seriously. Does anyone think that Ken might have a "lightbulb moment" and suddenly sign up to Trident renewal? No, I didn't think so.
Easy Street is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2015, 19:10
  #142 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Sussex
Age: 82
Posts: 4,761
Received 223 Likes on 70 Posts
The trouble is, for OUR democracy to work properly you need an effective and viable opposition.....
Wise words, glad rag. Some here boasted that they had paid their £3 sub and voted for Corbyn. Well they succeeded and, according to "a senior Conservative Minister", we are about to go to war. At the very time that Her Majesty's Loyal Opposition should be holding the Government to account, they are instead going into self destruct mode. That may make life easy for the Prime Minister, but it bodes ill for this country.

I wonder what the aim of this next adventure is. There isn't one? Who'd have thought?
Chugalug2 is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2015, 19:33
  #143 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,892
Received 2,831 Likes on 1,209 Posts
Yes, Ken Livingstone, Easy.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2015, 19:55
  #144 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'wonder what the aim of this next adventure is. There isn't one? Who'd have thought? '

Preventing POW pilots being burnt alive after social media votes -stopping gay people being thrown from buildings -airliners being blown up - city centres being attacked !

Chugalug - is internet search disabled on your pc or have you decided not to watch television or read papes ?

I guess you think ISIS are 'misunderstood' !
RileyDove is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2015, 20:16
  #145 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Sussex
Age: 82
Posts: 4,761
Received 223 Likes on 70 Posts
Originally Posted by RileyDove
'wonder what the aim of this next adventure is. There isn't one? Who'd have thought? '

Preventing POW pilots being burnt alive after social media votes -stopping gay people being thrown from buildings -airliners being blown up - city centres being attacked !

Chugalug - is internet search disabled on your pc or have you decided not to watch television or read papes ?

I guess you think ISIS are 'misunderstood' !
Riley Dove, my PC is for a change functioning well, thank you. I doubt very very much that the aims you suggest will be achieved by bombing. On the contrary they are likely to be exacerbated. I suggest that your aims, and any other similar ones, can only be achieved by seizing and holding ground where these and other atrocities are being carried out. How are you going to do that if, as we are continually being assured, there are to be no boots on the ground?

The Iraqi Army is just a bad joke, achieving the dubious distinction of being second only to Saudi Arabia as the principle supporter of ISIS (or whatever we are supposed to call those monsters this week). The Syrian Army is too busy tackling its President's real opponents to bother too much with ISIS. The Kurds are the best bet, but supplying them is a no no because they are marginalised by Turkey, a NATO member. So whose boots will you put there, RD? Yours?

How many of these ill advised adventures does it take before the penny finally drops? The real Elephant in the Room is Saudi Arabia. Is that the war we want, or simply the one we will be dragged into? Wars are very easy to get into, especially when urged on by such as yourself. The tricky part is winning them and kidding yourself that what you set out to achieve has been...achieved. As I said before, what is the aim?
Chugalug2 is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2015, 20:41
  #146 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Who said there are no boots on the ground? There are plenty of advisors on the ground.

'The Kurds are the best bet, but supplying them is a no no because they are marginalised by Turkey, a NATO member'

Except for the fact that Canadian forces have been helping them on the ground.


Indeed get on with it ! Maybe you should look into the treatment of the American woman who had her finger nails removed and was tortured and raped in the hands of ISIS if you feel that justification for war is 'thin' .

Wage an air campaign - remove the ability to regroup day and night -make movement impossible and watch them splinter as you degrade their ability to function. When that is achieved -let the ground forces finish them.
RileyDove is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2015, 20:47
  #147 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,200
Received 395 Likes on 245 Posts
Originally Posted by Chugalug2
The Iraqi Army is just a bad joke, achieving the dubious distinction of being second only to Saudi Arabia as the principle supporter of ISIS (or whatever we are supposed to call those monsters this week).
Actually, the current Iraqi army is fighting ISIS, and recently took back Baiji. But I don't consider them a very strong fighting force.
The Syrian Army is too busy tackling its President's real opponents to bother too much with ISIS.
They are limited in effectiveness, to be sure.
The Kurds are the best bet, but supplying them is a no no because they are marginalised by Turkey, a NATO member. So whose boots will you put there, RD? Yours?
Believe it or not, the US support for Kurds continues. Hopefully the UK will join in providing some support to them if they have not already. (I hear that the Israelis were supporting some Kurds a few years ago, but I'm not sure where or for how long or how credible that report was).
The real Elephant in the Room is Saudi Arabia.
Agree.
As I said before, what is the aim?
Fair question, and each head of state seems to have a different answer.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2015, 20:55
  #148 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Sussex
Age: 82
Posts: 4,761
Received 223 Likes on 70 Posts
There are plenty of advisors on the ground.
I wonder if you have any idea of the bells that phrase rings? Vietnam started with advisors and ended with an army of conscripts defeated by little men with bicycles.

...let the ground forces finish them.
What ground forces? Assad has no need to send in ground forces to deal with ISIS that are being bombed "day and night". His priority is defeating the Free Syrian Army and the rest of the Syrian opposition. Putin wants his Mediterranean Bases so that he can assert his power there, and can do so as long as Assad is in power. The Kurds I grant are fierce fighters, but their ambition is for a Kurdish Nation, and once they have seized that territory their interest in rescuing those such as the American woman you instance will be marginal. This is Real Politik, and the UK should only go to war if it cannot be avoided and if it can win. Win what? I ask again, what is the aim?
Chugalug2 is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2015, 21:48
  #149 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is nothing to 'win' its not poker ! Its about stopping people who have no moral compunction and respect no borders . Do you not remember Bin Laden ?

Do you really think Assad cares about the Free Syrian Army ? He has the might of Russia on his side -peace talks will soon mean a departure for Assad for a nice vacation home on the Red Sea and the factions will decide that they want Syria and not ISIS.
RileyDove is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2015, 23:33
  #150 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wherever it is this month
Posts: 1,789
Received 75 Likes on 34 Posts
Riley,

Events in Sangin amply demonstrate that if the aim is to deny safe haven to extremists, the only answers are permanent occupation or strong, competent sovereign government. Our Syrian strategy delivers neither.
Easy Street is offline  
Old 19th Nov 2015, 08:28
  #151 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Sussex
Age: 82
Posts: 4,761
Received 223 Likes on 70 Posts
RD:-
There is nothing to 'win'
Well you know that, and now that you've told me so do I. I just wonder though if the Saudis do, or their proxies, ISIS?

its not poker !
Thank heavens for that, or the guy with the poker face from the East would have taken the dupes, Obama, Cameron, Hollande, and Merkel to the cleaners!

LW50:-
Believe it or not, the US support for Kurds continues. Hopefully the UK will join in providing some support to them if they have not already
I wonder what the price of that support might be? What have the Kurds been promised? Will those promises be kept? If it is to become a nation in their own right, it will be at the cost of Syria, Iraq and Turkey who will surround it and presumably be hostile. The Kurds will be dependant thereafter for continual financial aid and armaments from their sponsors. Remind us of a nearby state?

It seems to me that this adventure will depend on assurances made to Russia and to the Kurds by the West. The former will make the most of that in renewed influence in the Eastern Mediterranean. The latter would be well advised that the solemn and binding undertakings agreed upon are worth any paper whatsoever.
Chugalug2 is offline  
Old 19th Nov 2015, 08:52
  #152 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,892
Received 2,831 Likes on 1,209 Posts
I wonder if you have any idea of the bells that phrase rings? Vietnam started with advisors and ended with an army of conscripts defeated by little men with bicycles.
Ahh, but there was a lot of them, and they did Raleigh to the cause...


I'll get my coat
NutLoose is offline  
Old 19th Nov 2015, 12:43
  #153 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Chugalug2
Wise words, glad rag. Some here boasted that they had paid their £3 sub and voted for Corbyn. Well they succeeded and, according to "a senior Conservative Minister", we are about to go to war. At the very time that Her Majesty's Loyal Opposition should be holding the Government to account, they are instead going into self destruct mode. That may make life easy for the Prime Minister, but it bodes ill for this country.

I wonder what the aim of this next adventure is.
Pseudo Autocracy by the back door.

"whose decisions are subject to neither external legal restraints nor regularized mechanisms of popular control"
glad rag is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2015, 13:11
  #154 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The leader of Her Majesties Parliamentary Opposition.




"Just Do It."
glad rag is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2015, 15:50
  #155 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: sussex
Age: 75
Posts: 192
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
The Kurds: playing the long game

The current chaos in Syria seems to defeat any reasonable prescription, even if its genesis is all too obvious to anyone who isn't viewing it from the preconceived position that most western politicians take. Let's just observe that we don't hear the phrase "Arab Spring" too much these days.

One source of excellent reporting on the region comes from what many might regard as an unlikely source, namely the New York Review of Books whose website makes some of the content available to non-subscribers. The following link is from a recent issue and describes the activities of the Kurdish opposition. The Kurds are in the unenviable position of having their heartland split between Turkey, Syria, Iraq and Iran and have been steadily consolidating their interests over many decades, against fierce opposition, with the ultimate objective being an independent Kurdistan.

It may well be that the Kurds are the only faction likely to come out of the current conflict with any benefit. Of course the Turks (who have contributed hugely to the current devastation of Syria) are scared witless of an increasingly militarily equipped and experienced Kurdish autonomous region. The article's well worth reading by anyone with more than a superficial interest in the conflict.

The Syrian Kurds Are Winning! by Jonathan Steele | The New York Review of Books
skridlov is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2015, 17:53
  #156 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: England
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The whole war countdown is so useful for the Conservatives on so many levels. They have very successfully focused attention onto Corbyn and away from the close scrutiny of the debate. All 4 major UK broadsheets have focused on Labour splits to a greater extent than the real issue.
Its a crying shame for our democracy, and generally shows up the current incredibly shallow level of attention of our nation.
Glads yes he dresses poorly in that photo and obviously lives amongst the ordinary people, is that such a bad thing, really? I'm more interested in what he and many are saying about the state of the debate, our so called free press, the reason for war, and many other uncomfortable topics of the minute.
Hangarshuffle is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2015, 17:58
  #157 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 1,873
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If Corbyn could come up with a coherent and adult argument that would sort of help hold the government to account (the role of HM Loyal Opposition). The Labour Party have saddled themselves with a kind of Pinocchio figure; he wants to be a real politician but he isn't mature enough to not need all his strings pulling.
Kitbag is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.