Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Taceval, Maxival and Minival

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Taceval, Maxival and Minival

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Oct 2015, 10:57
  #121 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: SE
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Apologies to the Tornado crews at LBH from 1998-1990. I was initially the Strike Controller, then after I discovered what a boring & "read from the card" job it was became the daylight Attack Controller.

I controlled (?) the tasking of 48 jets during conventional ops, reliant on ATOC Maastricht sending tasking in a timely manner to LBH via secure telecoms. More often than not those telecoms refused to work. That meant that tasking had to be passed by voice over the American supplied "Stu II" secure telephone (Crap -& I hope the current system works, wherever in the world it is now!). The audio qualities of Stu II left a lot to be desired..... I was spending over 10 minutes writing down the each ATO whilst 2 or 3 squadrons were desperately waiting to arm & plan. In the meantime, previous sorties had returned & had idle armourers. This led to numerous Sqn bosses deciding to, quite rightly, order their teams to load LGBs instead of dumb 1000 pounders rather than sit there doing nothing.

The lack of information flow & late ATO's from the ATOC was as palpable as the TOTAL lack of training that I received from either SOPSO or OCOPS. I received not a single visit to any of the 4 squadrons to meet or speak to the auths/Warlords in my 2 years at LBH. The Stn Cdr G McR was a total waste of space on the "Bridge".

Has anything changed 26 years later?

Last edited by SAMXXV; 24th Oct 2015 at 18:04.
SAMXXV is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2015, 11:30
  #122 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,812
Received 137 Likes on 64 Posts
Originally Posted by FantomZorbin
Whilst trotting around a station on Distaff duties, I noted how many scrappy bits of A4 with 'Sandbags' written on them were adorning all the windows. Translating the areas to be covered into numbers of bags required was revealing!
Ah, you too!!

I was doing a staff visit at a certain West Country TWU, when I encountered a similar scenario in their War Book. A couple of sheets of A4 and a smoking calculator later, I was able to suggest to OC Ops that the station's sandbag plan as described would actually take over 2 years to complete, working h-24/365

He was not amused.
MPN11 is online now  
Old 12th Sep 2023, 18:32
  #123 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Baston
Posts: 3,287
Received 718 Likes on 252 Posts
Just had a fascinated re-read: it all seems long long ago, and I fear we are less ready now than in those days of the hooter and the pressure.

However, a side-note not, I think, covered by the above.

Met. Brief.
In RAFG our offices were all fully manned [no women] 24/7 and the call-out was a bit silly and indeed potentially disastrous, all eggs in one basket. Thus it rarely happened, I think SMetOs negotiated that with WingCO Ops.
We kept two parallel sets of documents ready on the old Banda duplicators: one was the usual local and NW Europe forecast and TAF lists, and one was Warsaw Pact pre-defined area and charts etc.
Thus we always knew very early in the tumult that peace had been declared: to brief WP weather to sleepy and startled customers due to fly in a NATO LFA would not have been a good idea.
I claim [boast] that I caused/invented the prep. of a WP set of Docs as routine by every shift [thus 3 times in 24 hours] rather than wait for Armaggedon. Thus Met. was a comparative oasis of calm once we had donned NBC gear. Always ate my snack before donning.

I think we were right to be frightened, and we still should be.
langleybaston is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.