Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Calling redundant WSOps and WSOs!

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Calling redundant WSOps and WSOs!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Jul 2015, 11:24
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@ Biggus, basically what I'm saying is that there will be a very, very small pool of people for which this would work - so fundamentally we agree. Geography is just detail, but yeah your point is solid.

@ Bannock. Dead right. If I was one of them I would be keeping my ear to the ground and possibly whispering "retention bonus" into any ears I though might carry weight. Sadly, I'm well past my sell by date.

@ Avtur, absolutely sir, bollicking accepted, it won't happen again.
The Old Fat One is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2015, 13:54
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,808
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
Perhaps someone in 'manning' at Binnsworth...oops, I mean High Wycombe, had a sudden flash of inspiration after watching Space Cowboys?

Does the P-8 have wipe-clean rear crew seats?
BEagle is online now  
Old 3rd Jul 2015, 14:00
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: cardboard box in't middle of t'road
Posts: 745
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Does the P-8 have wipe-clean rear crew seats?
I do hope so, cos I'm p*ss*ng myself laughing at the predicament that they find themselves in.
Surplus is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2015, 18:52
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Coventry
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what the RAF have done, is absolutely nothing about the nav situation for about the last 5 years and then panicked about the fact they have fu***ed it in spades. They have put plenty of feelers out and even gotten a few bites, the 2 they have got back will replace the 2 they have already lost due to changing the PVR time, apart from the fact they have been out of the cockpit for 5 years of course. Anyhow, as always they fail miserably in making their personnel feel valued. Ho hum.
thelizardking is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2015, 19:23
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I can guess how uplifting it must be on the battle proven Tornado sqn's........." Yes, well done you (so last century) Tonka chaps, keep it up, tally-ho. Never mind, we have a nice new(ish) shiny jet coming along that has secured my retirement...AHEM, I mean our future and, don't you know, it needs one less chap on the flightdeck err,.. cockpit. Whassatt?... It doesn't work yet and costs a fortune?...rubbish! Take this man out and shoot him!"

OAP
Onceapilot is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2015, 19:40
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
There are two things IMHO the RAF has always been very bad at - computer programmes, policy and management - eg Innsworth computer lot would not let us use Sage for non-publics in the 80s (in case someone could get to the code and used it fraudulently - I ask you), and the other is manpower planning - at one time 18 month wait for AFT or OCU, in the 60s shortage of navs - how I ended up on 360! You would not think it was that difficult and similar sized civilian organisations manage, you would thing the RAF could.
Wander00 is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2015, 20:01
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: East Anglia
Age: 74
Posts: 789
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
The lizardking - but what is the quality/value of the two they have so far enticed back?

Not a lot - according to their previous reputations!
1.3VStall is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2015, 21:29
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Coventry
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I couldn't comment on their quality, having never flown with either of them before, but they left the force some 5 years or so ago, and a lot has changed within the jet since then, not beyond the wit of man to catch up though. The point is they haven't really solved anything and seem to be doing square root of cock all about securing the necessary crews till the end. I assume that they believe all the remaining navs will simply stag on 'til the death of the jet and then accept the lack of available cockpits/jobs for them beyond...Still we can't be sure nav won't be getting FRI's ' i'd rather put pilots in the back' not my words, the words of CAS! Im not paraphrasing either, i was there he said it.
thelizardking is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2015, 21:41
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,808
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
There are two things IMHO the RAF has always been very bad at - computer programmes, policy and management....
"Our two weapons are fear and surprise....and ruthless efficiency..."

BEagle is online now  
Old 3rd Jul 2015, 22:42
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: East Anglia
Age: 74
Posts: 789
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
tlk,

That's not the first time I've heard that solution postulated, but of course the RAF isn't short of GR4 back seaters - officially!!!

With a possible new task of bombing Syria, who would now bet on the OSD for the GR4?

If I was a serving two-winged master race officer and they tried to put me in the back seat of a Tornado I'd go sick big time!
1.3VStall is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2015, 19:14
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Worcestershire
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A bloke in the pub told me that ABMers are making a pitch for seats on the P8. The arguement is sound....they are used to controlling 500nm squared of airspace with lots of ac and other things to control. Thus 1 sub or a couple of ships to sort out in a 100nm squared box will be easy. And they are used to US ac.

Sounds like a plan.
Phoney Tony is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2015, 19:34
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 4,334
Received 80 Likes on 32 Posts
Not a problem with ABMers doing this as long as they do a recognised aircrew course to get the required skills - I know, we could call it Nav School and AEELS!

Interestingly thoughts reported of CAS from thelizardking. Why hasn't he used pilots as loadies as well? In fact let's make everyone pilots, eh?

LJ
Lima Juliet is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2015, 19:49
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Absolutely no reason why not Phoney T, they would need to demonstrate the suitable aptitude and learn all the skills required though...

That would require taking the appropriate tests at OASC, passing ITC and Professional Aircrew training, not all aircraft are flying offices

LJ, aren't they already trying that with Drone Drivers, pilots replacing pilots?
Ivan Rogov is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2015, 15:17
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 657
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts
had a sudden flash of inspiration after watching Space Cowboys?
Too late Beags, we're already there! Not sure if you are aware but all sqn ldr aircrew and PAS flt lt's have received extensions of service to age 60. Urgent UOR's are currently being staffed to enable zimmer assisted entry and exits to our front-line fleets. Boscombe Down are also working with the Av Med school to test the effects of explosive decompression on cholostomy bags.

Great film though for those of us of a certain age.
Party Animal is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2015, 11:14
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: In the workshop, Prune-whispering.
Age: 71
Posts: 744
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
TOFO/Avtur - I'm ex 42 as well. If this all goes ahead, will there be a requirement for a new 'entertainments' branch? I think I've still got Samantha's telephone number....
PingDit is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2015, 16:47
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think I've still got Samantha's telephone number....
The Old Fat One is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2015, 17:38
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: morayshire
Posts: 766
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Ah but ah but ah but.....

......ping .....dit doppler low.

The blessed Samantha is well into her pensioner years - think about it. She still could be more than most of us could cope with however!!

The Ancient Mariner
Rossian is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2015, 17:48
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Canada
Posts: 359
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Never too old...(for a flt eng)!
Avtur is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2015, 17:43
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: 4 Civvy Street. Nowhere-near-a-base. The Shires.
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
At ISK, whenever I visited 42(R), the giant coffee table brought back stirring memories, since it had served so well as the stage, and still had Samantha's stilleto marks on it.

I wonder where it ended up.

I also wonder how many on 42(R) (1992-2010) were completely ignorant of it's chequered history.
camelspyyder is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.