Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Time to role with it?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Time to role with it?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st May 2015, 12:17
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: East East Anglia
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Time to role with it?

Given the increasing spread of illiteracy among all combat arms and the decreasing use of actual rolls of paper to record the participants of an event, is it time to move away from the 'nominal role[sic]' that retards keep writing and into the current, digital age?

Suggestions for alternatives?
bighedsmallface is offline  
Old 1st May 2015, 13:28
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: morayshire
Posts: 766
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Ahem.....

..... blithely referring to others as "retards" isn't going to win you any friends.

Also what exactly is it that you want to see happen? It isn't terribly clear from your message.

Do you want to go to text speak minus capitalisation and punctuation?

Do tell.

The Ancient Mariner
Rossian is offline  
Old 1st May 2015, 13:40
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quite, rossian. The "illiterate retards" mostly manage at least to get the message across, perhaps with imperfect grammar or spelling -but I'm really not sure what bighed wants to happen.
ShotOne is offline  
Old 1st May 2015, 15:56
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: East East Anglia
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As ever, I am guilty of writing before checking that my comments would not offend. I sought to spark a discussion on this long out of date term which seems to (rightly) tax those who don't realise its origins.

It may also just have been the result of seeing it written wrongly for the seventh time this week.
bighedsmallface is offline  
Old 1st May 2015, 16:15
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The back of beyond
Posts: 2,132
Received 173 Likes on 89 Posts
As ever...
I'm not sure that 45 comments in 13 years warrants an 'as ever'.
melmothtw is offline  
Old 2nd May 2015, 08:34
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: East East Anglia
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Methmol - you correctly assume that the only place I have expressed any opinion in that period is on this forum.

Rossian - I seek no new friends, simply enlightenment.
bighedsmallface is offline  
Old 2nd May 2015, 08:49
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,921
Received 2,840 Likes on 1,213 Posts
The Age of Enlightenment (or simply the Enlightenment, or Age of Reason) is an era from the 1650s to the 1780s in which cultural and intellectual forces in Western Europe emphasized reason, analysis, and individualism rather than traditional lines of authority.
Age of Enlightenment - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You're to late for enlightenment
NutLoose is online now  
Old 2nd May 2015, 08:53
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Yorkshire
Age: 55
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If I understand you correctly, you want to eliminate the use of the word 'role' because no-one gets their list of assigned tasks* handed to them on a roll of paper anymore.

If you eliminate every word in English which has an archaic or obsolete origin but which nevertheless remains a perfectly good word there won't be a lot left.

* Oh hang on, that's Latin. Can't use that one either ...
StuartP is offline  
Old 2nd May 2015, 09:03
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SW England
Age: 77
Posts: 3,896
Received 16 Likes on 4 Posts
"Nominal list", or even simpler "list of names" would seem to fit the bill as a suitable alternative.

My bête noire is "ex-pat" instead of expat. I have even seen "ex-patriot", as though the expatriate no longer felt any allegiance to their mother country (even though this is sometimes true!)
Tankertrashnav is offline  
Old 2nd May 2015, 09:18
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,327
Received 622 Likes on 270 Posts
StuartP - I think BHSF's post is about removing the term 'nominal roll' as so many numpties insist instead on writing 'nominal role' because they don't know the difference or because their spoolchicker recognises both words and won't correct them.

Possibly the same people who use pacific when they mean specific
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 2nd May 2015, 11:03
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well that’s six minutes I won't be getting back....evah


glad rag is offline  
Old 3rd May 2015, 07:48
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What exactly is your pacific issue?
Mahogany_Bomber is offline  
Old 3rd May 2015, 15:06
  #13 (permalink)  
Below the Glidepath - not correcting
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,874
Received 60 Likes on 18 Posts
nominal

/ˈnɒmɪnəl/

adjective


1. in name only; theoretical: the nominal leader

I have seen plenty of examples of nominal roles in the military.
Two's in is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.