Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Was the Lightning really THAT good ?

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Was the Lightning really THAT good ?

Old 3rd Nov 2015, 17:24
  #241 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Muscat, Oman
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did have to request a fuel priority to cross the runway and taxi back after diverting off a Q scramble and landing on one engine.
Ali Barber is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2015, 21:17
  #242 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK and where I'm sent!
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ORAC
Tankers at RS 2H at Marham, 1H transit to abeam LU, another to north of Saxa. So, 4 hours - minus however early they managed to get airborne (and to be honest they usually managed under 60 mins).

To manage to meet P-time the norm was to scramble Q1 to honour the threat, then Q2 in sequence etc. If you were lucky you could steal a tanker from a TTL as Tansor Mobile, and if activity was forecast preposition tankers at LU.
That seems to be a lot of "maybes" for one of the UK's biggest peacetime ops. I'm interested in your maths there. Assuming the wait for the tanker to pitch up was the three to four hours you mention, how far behind Q1 would Q2 need to be?

I take your point about poaching tankers, but they weren't always there even in those days. Pre-positioning is always an option, but if activity could always be predicted we wouldn't have ended up having to do rush Q generations.

I suppose my question is, what happened when all those extra needs weren't available? Could the Southern Q Lightning base(s) really cover the northern area without all the extra lucky support?
Mach Two is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2015, 21:57
  #243 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: scotland
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
I believe that in the early days just after 5 got the interim 6s ('66) they were scrambled from Binbrook to Bears and wee dragged further north than the 3s from Leuchars usually went - in fact so far that one ended up in Lossie. This was the last time that they went so far. In my time - up to '68 - I don't recall any Tanker support for Q although someone may know differently?
CharlieJuliet is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2015, 23:32
  #244 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Back to the fold in the map
Posts: 382
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
P Time

Penetration time to the UKADR (calculated with a little help from our Northern friends) was generally in the 2 hr 10 mins region so if you got cracking then it was absolutely possible to get the peices in play at the right time and place. As my learned friend ORAC has said, the tanker boys were always eager to get airborne well within their 2 hour limit. Depending on the situation, we could also reduce their RS - but my aging brain tells me that they were limited as to the time they could hold RS 10 (i.e. cockpit). Anyway, bottom line is that we didn't need the moon and stars to align to get the job done.
Canadian Break is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2015, 16:25
  #245 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Yorkshire
Age: 71
Posts: 195
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rhino Power,
Sorry I did not get back. Yes, I believe the slatted tail did make a noticeable difference at lower speeds and certainly in the circuit.
M2N
MACH2NUMBER is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2015, 22:30
  #246 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Near Stalyvegas
Age: 78
Posts: 2,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As an ADO in the "Diversion Cell" at Patrington in 1965-1967, I remember the Binbrook F6s "going North" and returning to Binbrook. I also remember "Bear Week" at Buchan, when we had a succession of Bears transiting Russia-Cuba and Takers were supporting the Leuchars Javelins
chiglet is offline  
Old 22nd Nov 2015, 22:45
  #247 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Leicestershire, England
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MACH2NUMBER
Rhino Power,
Sorry I did not get back. Yes, I believe the slatted tail did make a noticeable difference at lower speeds and certainly in the circuit.
M2N
Thanks, M2N, much appreciated.

-RP
Rhino power is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2016, 01:04
  #248 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 6,048
Received 549 Likes on 256 Posts
Nice pic

megan is online now  
Old 24th Jul 2016, 17:21
  #249 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: 75' from the runway edge and 150' from the threshold
Age: 74
Posts: 249
Received 32 Likes on 14 Posts
There I was, 3 years as a SAC AATC, 1st posting to Wattisham where, sadly, I witnessed the 23rd Canberra fatal practice asymmetric approach, then a course at North Luffenham and a posting to Northern Dairies, my favourite posting of all. ( I met the current Mrs. W there, 44 years ago last month)

One nightshift, I was manning the BBK CCA suite, and my controller, an Ulsterman like myself, was up on the bridge, having made up a four for Bridge.

All fine and well, until a call came from Patrington, requesting a handover for two pairs recovering. I took the details and gave the Patrington controller the usual caveat, "Wait for Controller" and shouted up to the bridge, " Sir, two pairs recovering" back came the reply, "you take them Mike, I'm playing 7 no trumps" No chance I thought, he'll never make 7 no trumps.

I took the first pair, descending them to 50 in the dive circle and then handed them to BBK approach just as Patrington called with the second and last pair of the night. Same again and when BBK called me back to say they had finished for the night, I closed the BBK CCA suite with the allocator.

I somehow feel that this wouldn't happen in this day and age. I mean 7 no trumps?, on the night shift?
ACW342 is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2016, 19:46
  #250 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Surrey
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 1 Post
It is a nice picture, Megan, thank you. We can see our married quarter!
D120A is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2016, 07:49
  #251 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Was that the pic that became an Athena type poster?
Wander00 is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2016, 11:23
  #252 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Boulevard of Broken Dreams
Age: 52
Posts: 197
Received 9 Likes on 2 Posts
I believe that pic was taken from a Harrier, but stand to be corrected.
I've also heard it said that Mike Thompson was piloting the Lightning, but heard others say that isn't correct...
NickB is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2016, 11:51
  #253 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
NickB - that is where I was headed - it was certainly the lovely MT in the Athena poster
Wander00 is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2016, 12:02
  #254 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Boulevard of Broken Dreams
Age: 52
Posts: 197
Received 9 Likes on 2 Posts
Wander00 - for the life of me, I cannot remember what the Athena Lightning poster looked like! Just done an eBay search which didn't help either!

Could you post the image if you have one (unlikely) or could find on t'internet (more likely)?
Thanks
NickB is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2016, 13:59
  #255 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Nick -


This link, 6th row down, w from left - I think its the same pic cropped slightly differently, but it is about 33 years ago!


W
Wander00 is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2016, 15:01
  #256 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Boulevard of Broken Dreams
Age: 52
Posts: 197
Received 9 Likes on 2 Posts
Sorry Wander00 - I'm not seeing the link you refer to!

Could you try again pls?
NickB is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2016, 15:31
  #257 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It would of course help if I had included it - at the time I was being bombarded by gite guests who wanted me to find them a dive school - NOW!


https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=en...HdItBSoQ7AkIQA
Wander00 is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2016, 16:45
  #258 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 18,062
Received 2,123 Likes on 956 Posts
Photo is by Richard Cooke

RICHARD COOKE | Aircraft Photographs
ORAC is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2016, 08:13
  #259 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
That will be the one
Wander00 is offline  
Old 27th Jul 2016, 17:00
  #260 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 350/3 Compton
Age: 76
Posts: 815
Received 467 Likes on 111 Posts
I have nothing but admiration for WIWOLs but remember a Lightning det to VL in the 80s, where we did a 2 SHAR v 2 Lightning bundle west of the Amber way until they ran out of gas, then waited for the next pair and fought them out of gas before doing a quick 1 v 1 and returning for some whacky VSTOL.

Next day I took one of them up in the T4 and demonstrated the low-weight ramp launch to immediate VL. I think he forgot to breath but at least he didn't need to change his flying suit!
Mogwi is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.