Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Missing yacht

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th May 2014, 11:50
  #241 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Perth - Western Australia
Age: 75
Posts: 1,805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Broken cabin windows can also be the result of a hit by a massive wave that breaks over the cabin.
onetrack is offline  
Old 25th May 2014, 12:01
  #242 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: 03 ACE
Age: 73
Posts: 1,015
Received 32 Likes on 22 Posts
To be honest, I have experienced both in the Atlantic in a Jeanneau 42, but never had any damage to windows. Not saying it is not possible.

Without doubt, a rogue wave could quite possibly take out some windows and cause an already weakened keel to detach.

The de-lamination, of the hull is a bit odd.

El G
El Grifo is offline  
Old 25th May 2014, 12:04
  #243 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Wales/now Canada
Age: 82
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maritime search and rescue aircraft can also drop liferafts ,food and water and other supplies as well as home in any surface craft such as ships/yachts which do not have homing equipment. Why else do you think we have such aircraft in the first place.?
RHKAAF is offline  
Old 25th May 2014, 12:28
  #244 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: At home
Posts: 1,232
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
The de-lamination, of the hull is a bit odd.
If the keel was working loose due to fatigue failure of, or pulling through, of the bolts at the fore and aft, when they failed the load would have been transferred to the inner bolts. Assuming the movement had disintegrated the lamination closest to the bolt head & washer, the bolt would pull through this and then come up against the intact outer lamination(s), which then tore away with the bolts.

Having read a few Beneteau owner's websites over the last couple of days, it appears that the keel is purposely not attached to major structure (stiffening ribs), so that in the event of running aground the keel can tear away with the minimum of damage to the boat as a whole. Checking, retightening and replacement of keel bolts on Beneteaus is supposed to be a regular inspection and maintenance task.

Beneteau First 235 - O Beneteau Keel Bolts you scare me

If there were washers under the heads of the bolts which corroded and disintegrated away, this could allow the first few millimetres of movement to start a slide hammer action to fatigue the bolts and break up the hull.
Mechta is offline  
Old 25th May 2014, 13:01
  #245 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Holly Beach, Louisiana
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When I think of Ocean Crossing Sailboats....Benneteu's are not on my list.

Bolt on Keels are far less capable than solid Keels.

Boats like the Benneteu, Hunter, and others of similar construction are called "Clorox Bottles" for good reason.

One can argue however you want.....but if you go to sea and encounter rough water you want a boat that is built to handle those kinds of conditions.

If the Keel parted from the boat it would have capsized almost instantaneously making escape and survival very unlikely.

That is the nature of open water sailing.....bad things sometimes happen even to the most experienced and capable of Sailors.

But...that is why it is such and adventerous endeavor.

Everyone that undertakes such voyages accept those risks.

Yet, it is so tragic when it happens and good folks are lost.
Boudreaux Bob is offline  
Old 25th May 2014, 17:28
  #246 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,780
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Assuming the movement had disintegrated the lamination closest to the bolt head & washer, the bolt would pull through this and then come up against the intact outer lamination(s), which then tore away with the bolts.
Your explanation is plausible, but does not convincingly explain the shape and nature of the hull damage. It is not often that GRP delaminates in large strips like that. Usually it breaks in chunks. If the keel had ripped out a section of the hull and torn out a layer of laminate I would expect to see a visible hole where the keel bolts were. If you look carefully at the antifouling it appears to be abraded, also not consistent with delimitation. There is also some damage to the anti-foul on the port side of the keel, which would not appear to be consistent with delamination And finally what is that dark spot in the middle of the damage? It looks like the hull is holed.

It is shame the USN have not released some more detailed pictures publicly as the resolution on that photo is not really high enough to be absolutely sure. But to me it looks like it has taken a heavy clout rather than just delaminated.
Trim Stab is offline  
Old 25th May 2014, 18:15
  #247 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: where-ever nav's chooses....
Posts: 834
Received 46 Likes on 26 Posts
Whale, shipping container, bloody big wave at the wrong angle - all enough to cause damage like that.

The first and last on that list have damaged pusser's greys (upto and including CVS) I've been in. So far, so lucky with shipping containers.
alfred_the_great is offline  
Old 25th May 2014, 18:19
  #248 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We have Sun fish down here in Aus that seem to be a PITA for Yachties.

You quite often hear of yachts in the Sydney to Hobart hitting them,
big brutes of things.
500N is offline  
Old 25th May 2014, 23:19
  #249 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: 03 ACE
Age: 73
Posts: 1,015
Received 32 Likes on 22 Posts
"Heavy Clout" Sounds not to far away !

El G.
El Grifo is offline  
Old 26th May 2014, 07:38
  #250 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Trimstab, while you seem to know a lot about yacht construction, this doesn't in any way qualify you to make those assertions about the crew .."a more experienced crew would have survived this". Sure, if they'd known the keel was about to fail they could have headed downwind (away from the Azores, with a leak) , crew on deck (for days, in a major storm?) But there's no evidence they had any reason to suspect the keel was the source of their leak, or about to fail. Yes a boat can sometimes be sailed without a keel but to suddenly lose one in a storm is almost certain to result in instant capsize whatever the crew experience.
ShotOne is offline  
Old 26th May 2014, 08:20
  #251 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,780
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But there's no evidence they had any reason to suspect the keel was the source of their leak, or about to fail
My point was that a more experienced crew should have realised that keel failure was a strong possibility once they had eliminated all the usual potential leaks. If you have a leak you first check through-hull valves (outlets from heads, sink, inlets for engine, generator), then check the stern-gland (sail-drive seal on this boat), then inspect every part of the hull itself for damage. If you can't find the leak, then you have to suspect very strongly that the leak is coming through the keel bolts (the keel bolts are at the bottom of the bilges and so underwater thus it is very hard to eliminate them as the source of a leak)

I have been in exactly this scenario myself on a solo delivery last year, and followed the procedure I described in an earlier post.
Trim Stab is offline  
Old 26th May 2014, 12:44
  #252 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Aberdeen
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agreed. If you can't find the leak, then the water is probably coming up, not down. Slow ingress at the keel bolts will be hard to see, but is the likeliest cause once other more visible sources have been ruled out.

Once the leak is present, keel integrity must be presumed to have been lost.

First thing, unload the keel to keep it hanging in there for as long as possible. (reduce sail and select point of sail which minimises lateral load on the keel

Prepare the liferaft for rapid launchsurvival gear on, grab-bag to hand.

Send a no-nonsense MAYDAY - you are in very real and very imminnet danger to life.

Then pray that somebody still has the search assets, and is willing to commit them to looking for you. regardless of whether that was what they were bought for, the 'training value' can usually swing the justification if pressed hard.
FrustratedFormerFlie is offline  
Old 26th May 2014, 13:31
  #253 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm pleased it worked out for you, trim but not all those potential leak sources are checkable at sea. Even if the leak had been traced to the keel, your drill of everyone on deck, sail downwind (where to?) still leaves them in a sinking yacht, thousands of miles from safety, exhausted and hypothermic. Nor was your comment about "liferaft buried in a locker" borne out by the US Coastguard swimmer.
ShotOne is offline  
Old 26th May 2014, 14:43
  #254 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: At home
Posts: 1,232
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
It is not often that GRP delaminates in large strips like that. Usually it breaks in chunks.
If it were chopped strand mat (cheap) construction, I would agree with you. From what I have read, Beneteau appear to use glass cloth construction on their sailing yachts, which would be more likely to peel away in a sheet, as pictured.

See 2:00 for glass cloth on yacht hull. Note though, the First 40.7 does not use balsa core in the hull.

If the keel had ripped out a section of the hull and torn out a layer of laminate I would expect to see a visible hole where the keel bolts were.
Two at the front, one at the back, consistent with gradual break up of the underlying resin from pounding of the bolts. The failure of the middle section appears more sudden, hence the bolts not being able to pull through the glass cloth and taking away a number of layers.

If you look carefully at the antifouling it appears to be abraded, also not consistent with delimitation.
That could be water ingress under the antifouling, causing it to pull away as a layer.

There is also some damage to the anti-foul on the port side of the keel, which would not appear to be consistent with delamination
The bottom layer appears to have sprung out of the way to let the middle glass cloth layers through, then partially sprung back.

And finally what is that dark spot in the middle of the damage? It looks like the hull is holed.
I agree. I suspect that the keel did not let go straight away but swung on the second to aft bolt, allowing the third from forward bolt to penetrate the hull, before the keel finally let go for good.

http://www.first407.org/TipsOgTriks/...ec%20sheet.pdf

Last edited by Mechta; 26th May 2014 at 15:00. Reason: Link to specification
Mechta is offline  
Old 27th May 2014, 21:57
  #255 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: England
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MAIB involvement?

Will the Marine Accident Investigation Branch take the lead here? Nothing about it so far.
Marine Accident Investigation: Current investigations
Hangarshuffle is offline  
Old 27th May 2014, 22:06
  #256 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
HS: One would hope so
Wander00 is offline  
Old 27th May 2014, 22:32
  #257 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
One would hope not: ridiculously expensive and, without the keel, unlikely to come to any clear conclusion that isn't obvious from the photos..

MAIB, Regulation 5
“The sole objective of a safety investigation into an accident under these Regulations shall be the prevention of future accidents through the ascertainment of its causes and circumstances.
my italics
Fox3WheresMyBanana is offline  
Old 27th May 2014, 22:45
  #258 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Looking for the signals square at LHR
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Send a no-nonsense MAYDAY - you are in very real and very imminnet danger to life."

Sound judgment, FrustratedFormerFile but if I may be allowed a moment of pedantry, a MAYDAY transmission is made in respect of perilous conditions applying to the vessel only, not to the crew. Of course, the former usually precedes the latter.
Gipsy Queen is offline  
Old 27th May 2014, 23:11
  #259 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Gipsy Queen. If you're going to be pedantic, at least get it right

The transmission of a distress alert indicates that a mobile unit (ship, aircraft or other vehicle) or person is threatened by grave and imminent danger and requests immediate assistance
http://msi.nga.mil/MSISiteContent/St...17chapter4.pdf

and your qualifications are...? In need of refreshing, at the very least.
Fox3WheresMyBanana is offline  
Old 27th May 2014, 23:36
  #260 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why would it be expensive to salvage it? Supposedly it has a locator on it and it doesn't appear too far from the shipping lanes . Is it that difficult ? It might contain mobile phones etc that might have information on them that tells a little more of the story.
RileyDove is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.