Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

RAF recruitment

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Jan 2014, 20:29
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: in my combat underpants
Age: 53
Posts: 1,065
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the Officer course is 28 weeks
Nope. IOT is currently 36 weeks. Having seen it at close quarters a year ago, it is a far superior course than any that went before it as well.
Mr C Hinecap is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2014, 20:47
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 4,334
Received 80 Likes on 32 Posts
36 weeks - crikey twice as long as when I went through. It was complete bolleaux then and just bearable, but 36 weeks? Really? You get less for ABH these days!

Thanks for the info, though, mate
Lima Juliet is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2014, 20:54
  #23 (permalink)  

Gentleman Aviator
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Teetering Towers - somewhere in the Shires
Age: 74
Posts: 3,697
Received 50 Likes on 24 Posts
And some of us did it in 15 weeks!
teeteringhead is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2014, 21:09
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: York
Posts: 627
Received 23 Likes on 14 Posts
Up till the introduction of the SA80 RAF Regt did recruit training alongside RAF. It got split because the Regt recieved the weapon 2yrs before the rest of us so needed bespoke training. The Regt resisted returning to joint recruit training once we all had the SA80 although (up to 6yrs ago) the sylabus of training was identicle. A huge waste of money and resources.
dctyke is offline  
Old 9th Jan 2014, 21:18
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,923
Received 2,845 Likes on 1,215 Posts
Yup Regt did their basic with us in my time, you could always get the Pongos to train them after basic.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2014, 10:48
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: God's Country
Posts: 139
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jointery

LJ,

I don't think there is an answer which will be popular. All 3 units have large estates which cost a fortune to run. Halton for example will be further emptied out with the move of SMTW to Worthy Down. The Old Workshops will be almost empty.
There are already at least 10 barrack blocks which are closed up and they are the ones by Maitland. Up at RTS it is very quiet after a few years ago when almost 4000 went through in one year.

My only suggestion is that there should be a Joint officer cadet training establishment. Then once 'basic' is over they then proceed to their professional training units. There is already joint training units at trade level and this will become the norm in the future.
The Nip is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2014, 11:24
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Joint officer training has been mooted for years now. However, I know that Dartmouth is not actually owned by the Navy, but granted to them for use as a training establishment by a local landowner (historic thing...!) hence it cannot be 'sold' by the Navy as they don't technically own it.

Not sure if there is anything similar with Cranwell or Sandhurst, nor whether they'd even be big enough to accommodate all 3 services...?

The difficulty is that none of the services would want to get rid of their iconic establishments and move to someone else's, so perhaps the only answer (if there were to be a joint location) would be to get rid of all 3 and build a bespoke establishment somewhere?
Libertine Winno is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2014, 13:16
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: East Midlands
Age: 84
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In reply to The Wizard - I didn't say I was still in! However I was directly and indirectly employed by the RAF from 1958 to 2004, finishing my time working at a front-line fast jet base so I know what the RAF WAS like and what it was like when I left. I don't try to be amusing, it comes to me naturally.
A2QFI is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2014, 15:29
  #29 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
However, I know that Dartmouth is not actually owned by the Navy, but granted to them for use as a training establishment by a local landowner (historic thing...!) hence it cannot be 'sold' by the Navy as they don't technically own it.
That may not be true. I have read that the Defence Works Act of 1842 was invoked for a compulsory purchase. One source - http://www.bishoparchitecture.com/wp...valCollege.pdf and another - Educating the Royal Navy: 18th and 19th Century Education for Officers - Harry W. Dickinson - Google Books
airborne_artist is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2014, 17:43
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: In the State of Denial
Posts: 1,078
Likes: 0
Received 146 Likes on 28 Posts
My only suggestion is that there should be a Joint officer cadet training establishment.
A seriously bad idea that should never be allowed to happen. Each service has a distinct ethos & requirement so it would not be possible to blend the three services together & if you tried it would potentially lead to amalgamation which has already been proved not to work - disaster all round.

As the largest service the army would expect to take the lead so the course would most likely churn out infantry officers which would not meet the requirements of the RAF or RN. There could be a 'joint' ('Joint' in army-speak = 'army') first term before the 3 services split for more focused training but that would negate much of the potential savings. The graduation parade would look messy with the 3 differing uniforms or would everyone wear the same (army) uniform?

At the start of your career you need to be immersed in the culture & traditions of your own service, a course of 70% army/ 15% RN & 15% RAF (my guesstimate) would not achieve that for the smaller services.
Ken Scott is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2014, 18:14
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: York
Posts: 627
Received 23 Likes on 14 Posts
Ken Scott: The graduation parade would look messy with the 3 differing uniforms or would everyone wear the same (army) uniform?

I always thought the army had a plenty of different (regimental) uniforms which looked, in your definition, 'messy' at graduations?
dctyke is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2014, 18:33
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 4,334
Received 80 Likes on 32 Posts
The Nip

All 3 units have large estates which cost a fortune to run. Halton for example will be further emptied out with the move of SMTW to Worthy Down. The Old Workshops will be almost empty.
There are already at least 10 barrack blocks which are closed up and they are the ones by Maitland. Up at RTS it is very quiet after a few years ago when almost 4000 went through in one year.
As far as I'm aware, the SMTW move has been slipped right as there wasn't the money in the right years in the infra plan - earliest move is 5 years away. Anyway, SMTW is not the be-all/end-all for Old Workshops. There's Specialist Trg Sqn that does all 3 service's HSE/COSH/Environmental trg, JIAG (the new DMOC), the RAF Flight Safety Regional Occurence Investigation Team (that covers the whole of the South), a massive clothing section, the Station Swimming Pool, the Paint Shop and Station Workshops that does stuff for Halton/High Wycombe/Northolt under the Serco Multi-Activity Contract all within Old Workshops.

As for the Barrack Blocks on Maitland, some are used for Airman's Command Squadron to house the 100s of JNCOs/SNCOs that do JMLC and IMLC. Some are used for the Air Cadets, the Regt Flight uses another for CCS and other trg. Normally, there are only 5-6 empty and they are kept on care and maintenance for things like Op OLYMPICS (Halton took ~4,000 HMForces for trg for the Olympics and then housed ~600 for the games) and the Queen's Diamond Jubilee (drilling and housing the ~500 needed for the Windsor Drum Head Ceremony) - it gives the ability to take ~500 all ranks with ease for Resilience tasks in the South. It has taken over that role from the now defunct RAF Northolt. Many contingency plans use Halton due to its location and ability to accomodate at short notice.

As for the Recruit site, there are now ~2,000 up there over a year compared to your quoted maximum of 4,000. I cannot see how you would easily move Recruit Trg Sqn to anywhere else without a massive build program - I would estimate such a new build to cost ~£500M as you would Barrack Blocks, Classrooms, Trg Areas, Sports Facilities and a Parade Square; plus, I know of knowhere that has surplus of SFA and SLA for all the instructors and staff, so that would need at least 2x SLAM blocks and 3 dozen quarters!

Now if that is cheaper than running on Halton then I'll eat my hat!

Of course, some chiseller staff officer will have hatched a plan to get themselves an MBE/OBE without looking at the true cost of such a move. Have we got half a billion to spare? Nope, but it won't stop us saying that we need more redundancies next SDSR with an urgent infra program requirement...

LJ
Lima Juliet is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2014, 18:57
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Somewhere near the Rhine
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Halton

From what I remember the decision to close Halton has already been screwed up once, when the Technical training school moving to Cosford in the early/ mid 90s. As far as I'm aware the plan was to shut Halton until at almost the last minute it turned out that the original terms of the purchase of the land from the Rothschild's means that MoD has to return the land back to its original condition and then have to sell it back to the family for £1.

It might just be an old wives tale though but someone must know if this is definitely the case.
thefodfather is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2014, 19:01
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 4,334
Received 80 Likes on 32 Posts
Nope, the Estate was bought for £112,000 from the family in 1918 - freehold.

By the way, the cost of moving SMTW to Worthy Down is an eye watering £250-300M. Want to know why Defence is skint and we can't afford anything - decisions like these...

LJ
Lima Juliet is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2014, 19:22
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: God's Country
Posts: 139
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Halton

LJ,

I am fully aware of the make up of the Old Workshops and the quantity of pers therein. You correctly list various tenants located in the Workshops, but have you walked around and seen the amount of empty rooms/corridors?
Correct SMTW are not the be all, but they are still moving in 16. (as of today). The costs are indeed eye watering.

I did not say that you should relocate the basic training, I also did not say that 4000 was a maximum just highlighting the difference in throughput in a given year.

My point was there are 3 training units with large estates to run. With a dwindling number of recruits per annum, is this still viable?

I don't have an answer, I just put forward a suggestion. What would be the cost of refurbishing Halton House to a modern officers mess suitable for today's officers?
The Nip is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2014, 20:08
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 4,334
Received 80 Likes on 32 Posts
I am a "today's officer" and there's nothing wrong with the Mess - so what if you have to buy a dressing gown to go to the loo, you're living in a Rothschild Mansion rather than a soul-less box like Daedalus at Cranwell or that carbuncle they've built at Winterbourne Gunner!

I don't see the issue with the Rock's doing their Recruit Trg at Honington as the main output is FP (now with the Police with the move out of Henlow).

I don't see the issue with Halton continuing to do Recruit Trg when the numbers are as they are and it is so very expensive and not cost effective to move it when there are also other lodger units at Halton (plus being adjacent to the much smaller HQAir).

Whilst there are miniscule amounts of new officers going through Cranwell's IOT, it does so much more. All of RAF EFT (16 and soon 57 Sqn) and 3FTS with 45 Sqn to boot. OASC as well as HQ Air Cadets. I also hear rumours that RAFCAM from Henlow may well be moving there (makes sense). I just don't see the room for Recruit Trg without HUGE uneccessary expense in new infrastructure?

LJ
Lima Juliet is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2014, 20:56
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: England
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Living in the past.

You are living in the past. Be better value to the taxpayers if several of these establishments closed down and the remainder amalgamated. I never cease to be amazed how MOD have hung on so long with it all. The entire RN and RFA surface fleet operation could be ran from one naval base these days, let alone basic training.
HMS Raleigh (RN ratings) was practically dead last time I was there (demob). Massively underused.
But something else is behind all this.
For once a dose of "Thatcherism" should be applied and you should all get on with it..
Hangarshuffle is offline  
Old 10th Jan 2014, 23:00
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: In the State of Denial
Posts: 1,078
Likes: 0
Received 146 Likes on 28 Posts
I always thought the army had a plenty of different (regimental) uniforms which looked, in your definition, 'messy' at graduations?
dctyke: Sandhurst graduates all wear the same uniform for their passing-out parade, only donning the smorgasbord of styles that makes up the modern army afterwards.
Ken Scott is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2014, 09:55
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Whyte House
Age: 95
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...build a bespoke establishment somewhere...
That would make a change. Most of our military establishmants are in the middle of nowhere.
Willard Whyte is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2014, 14:42
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Uranus
Posts: 958
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Willard

The only problem with building near anywhere decent is that everyone then starts to 'beak' about the cost of the housing and how unaffordable it is. Funny how the rest of the population manage to buy a house though - maybe because we in the military fritter our cash at Happy Hours, fast cars/bikes and holidays!!!

The B Word
The B Word is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.