Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

The One and Only North Korea Thread (merged a few times)

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

The One and Only North Korea Thread (merged a few times)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Mar 2013, 17:59
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: York
Posts: 627
Received 23 Likes on 14 Posts
Don't forget the important stuff:

1. What are the best electronic gadget buys in South Korea.

2. Is the base american and does it have a well stocked PX.
dctyke is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2013, 18:12
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,228
Received 417 Likes on 260 Posts
NK is A threat, most specifically to SK in terms of severity.

The Japanese likely not too comfy these days either.

Level of threat?

Ask Lloyd Bucher.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2013, 18:29
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agaricus bisporus, I think it you taking the piss with post like that! There is a slight difference between a small island in the S. Atlantic with some conscripts a couple of SAMs, AAA and a hand full of fighters and one of the Axis of Evil top five! Just what are you suggesting a few puffer jets would provide, target practice?

Happy easter everyone

Last edited by Ivan Rogov; 30th Mar 2013 at 18:30.
Ivan Rogov is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2013, 18:42
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,780
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Madness, binning the Harrier/carrier. Utter irresponsible madness.
If we still had a Harrier/Carrier, and it had by chance been in a deployable state of readiness when this latest NK buffoonery had started, and our PM had been unwise enough to immediately deploy it, it would by now be about half way across the Med with another ten days or so before it could arrive within strike distance of NK subs (that is to say, way short of strike distance of the Harriers). So we would be sending a clear threat of escalatory intent, with no teeth whatsoever.

Are you sure you're not Sharkey in disguise?

Last edited by Trim Stab; 30th Mar 2013 at 18:46.
Trim Stab is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2013, 18:51
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Home
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
49 Para. The Big Yin vs the big Yawn. This is getting extremely serious.
AHAR is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2013, 19:40
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,780
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is getting extremely serious.
Agreed. Maybe time for UNSCP5 to secretly agree a pre-emptive strike then let the Chinese Ministry of State Security leak the scoop to the NKs via undeclared channels.
Trim Stab is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2013, 19:48
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Wiltshire
Age: 71
Posts: 2,063
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I hear that the BX at Kunsan are running a 50% off deal on Webber's this month, maybe that explains the increase in transcontinental bomber movements!
smujsmith is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2013, 20:28
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: OTA E
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good point, Smuj. However, Korea is still some miles inside the Midland Radar overhead, so I hope the guys are keeping a good lookout.
Bunker Mentality is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2013, 21:08
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: In the workshop, Prune-whispering.
Age: 71
Posts: 744
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The RN's already got them surrounded by SSN's!
A few well placed TLAM's should quieten them down a tad.
PingDit is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2013, 21:26
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Hotel Gypsy
Posts: 2,821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmmmm, about one million troops and another eight million or so in reserve.

I'm not sure that anything the UK can contribute, short of nukes, would make much of a difference.

Last edited by Cows getting bigger; 30th Mar 2013 at 21:27.
Cows getting bigger is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2013, 21:28
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Wiltshire
Age: 71
Posts: 2,063
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'm thinking we could send them all those Tesco "Bronco" burgers, it would make a nice change from Dog stew.
smujsmith is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2013, 21:30
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: east ESSEX
Posts: 4,671
Received 70 Likes on 45 Posts
New CDS trying for points,or Cameron/Clegg `interfering`.....fc%&wits..!
sycamore is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2013, 21:55
  #73 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Lloyd M. Bucher - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

21 Years After Losing the Pueblo, Lloyd Bucher Wins Honors for Its Crew : People.com

The Pueblo was just one of several US ships standing in to danger.

Gulf of Tonkin incident - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Gulf of Tonkin incident (or the USS Maddox incident) is the name given to two separate confrontations, one actual and one false, involving North Vietnam and the United States in the waters of the Gulf of Tonkin. On August 2, 1964, the destroyer USS Maddox, while performing a signals intelligence patrol

USS Liberty incident - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The USS Liberty incident was an attack on a United States Navy technical research ship, USS Liberty, by Israeli Air Force jet fighter aircraft and Israeli Navy motor torpedo boats, on 8 June 1967, during the Six-Day War

Last edited by Pontius Navigator; 30th Mar 2013 at 22:01.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2013, 00:42
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: OTA E
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't want to upset you any more, Sycamore, but 2 Coys of Guards have now been put at readiness, too: Inoperative Link to Imaginary Story on Another Site
Bunker Mentality is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2013, 01:00
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 518 Likes on 216 Posts
So if you send you entire Army to Korea.....you're gonna open up a huge Can of Whip Ass and give them a proper thumping are you?

How long will it take you to get there, set up, establish your logistics tail, and be prepared to fight?

North Korea’s regular army consists of 4 corps in the front area, 8 corps in the rear area, one tank corps, 5 armored corps, 2 artillery corps, and 1 corps for the defense of Pyongyang, a total of over 80 divisions and Brigades. Almost all of these forces are based near the DMZ and require little time to be ready for an offensive. In fact because the North Koreans maintains these forces on a continuous state of alert there will likely be little appreciable warning before a commencement of hostilities.
SASless is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2013, 02:40
  #76 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The RN's already got them surrounded by SSN's!
A few well placed TLAM's should quieten them down a tad.
Wow Really?

You really think giving their bottoms a collective spanking when they have nukes and are basically insane is such a good idea?

I think that's just what they WANT you to do.

After all, whats 2 million less mouths to feed to them?
glad rag is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2013, 02:53
  #77 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"New CDS trying for points,or Cameron/Clegg `interfering`.....fc%&wits..!"

I think he told them 49 Para and 24 SAS with Sharkey in support
could handle it all by themselves.

After the Gurhas missed on on the main game in the Falklands,
might be worth giving them a gig in this one as well
500N is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2013, 08:36
  #78 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the biggest risk is something kicking off due to a perception by the PRNK that the ROK + USA is likely to attack

Although to our eyes the N Korean Govt looks like it's run by a bunch of madmen in fact they are quite clear & logical about maintaining their own (local) domination - they've lasted since 1945 and they are unlikely to suddenly go crazy just for the sake of it and pull the roof in

What is needed is someone they trust (or might trust) to act as a go-between and calm them down - that has to be China. Hopefully now that the "elections" are over in Beijing Mr Xi will realise that having neighbours throwing buckets of instant sunshine around is a bad idea and will have a dreadful impact on his country as well.....
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2013, 08:41
  #79 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It would not surprise me after all these years that the Chinese have excellent ties with some senior NOK officers - if the Young leader decides to invade the South or use N weapons I'm sure these patriotic folk will appeal to Comrade Xi to intervene "to save communism" and replace the current leadership with a People's Committee

China might well go to war with the west one day but it'll be over something that is in THEIR interests - Taiwan for example - not to pull Chubby Cheeks out of the fire

Last edited by Heathrow Harry; 31st Mar 2013 at 08:42.
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2013, 08:49
  #80 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Waiting to return to the Loire.
Age: 54
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unfortunately (And I may be very wrong here) whenever I see PR footage of the NK leader, I cannot help but form the impression that he is a patsy with SEN who has been placed there as a figurehead of sorts to cover the actual military command structure.

Him actually in charge? Really?..
Finnpog is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.